Biomedical subjects

Orion A Rust

Publications and source records attributed to Orion A Rust.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Shirodkar versus McDonald cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with short cervical length.

The efficacy of Shirodkar cerclage was compared with that of the McDonald procedure for the prevention of preterm birth (PTB) in women with a short cervix. Secondary analysis using data from all published randomized trials including women with a short cervical length (CL) was performed comparing the use of Shirodkar versus McDonald sutures. Analysis was limited to singletons with short CL on transvaginal ultrasound. The primary outcome measure was PTB < 33 weeks. Statistical analysis was performed using bivariate and multivariable techniques. From 607 women randomly assigned in the study, 277 met our inclusion criteria; 127 received Shirodkar and 150 women received McDonald sutures. The mean ( +/- standard deviation) gestational age at delivery was 35.0 +/- 5.3 versus 36.3 +/- 4.7 for the Shirodkar versus McDonald groups, respectively ( p< 0.02). PTB < 33 weeks was seen in 61 (22%) of 277 women; 26 (20%) of 127 in the Shirodkar and 35 (23%) of 150 in the McDonald groups, respectively (odds ratio [OR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5 to 1.6). On adjusting for confounders using logistic regression modeling, no significant difference in PTB < 33 weeks was found between the two groups (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.2 to 1.3). In women with short cervical length randomly assigned to receiving cerclage, no significant difference in prevention of PTB was observed using Shirodkar or McDonald's procedures.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Short cervix on ultrasound: does indomethacin prevent preterm birth?

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to estimate if indomethacin therapy prevents preterm birth (PTB) in women with a short cervical length (CL) on transvaginal ultrasound (TVU). STUDY DESIGN: Individual-level data from all randomized trials including asymptomatic women with a short CL on TVU were analyzed for use of indomethacin at the time of the short CL. The trials eligible would be ones that randomized women with a short CL <25 mm, identified between 14 and 27 weeks. The eligible trials randomized such women to receive either cerclage or no cerclage. Only women who did NOT receive cerclage were analyzed. Exclusion criteria were major fetal anomaly and cerclage. We compared demographics, risk factors, and outcomes in women who, at the time of the short CL, received indomethacin or not. Primary outcome was PTB <35 weeks. RESULTS: Three of the 4 randomized trials identified had databases which recorded indomethacin use at the time of the short CL. A total of 139 women with a short CL <25 mm identified at 14 to 27 weeks were identified. Of these women, 99 (71.2%) received indomethacin, and 40 (28.8%) did not. Demographics and risk factors, including previous PTB (45.5% vs 62.5%; P = .11), were similar in the 2 groups. The primary outcome of PTB <35 weeks occurred in 29.3% (29/99) of women who received indomethacin, and 42.5% (17/40) of women who did not receive indomethacin (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.44-1.13). PTB <24 weeks occurred in 1.0% (1/99) versus 7.5% (3/40), respectively (RR 0.14; 95% CI 0.02-0.92). Incidence of perinatal death was similar in the 2 groups (6% vs 10%; RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.19-1.95). CONCLUSION: Indomethacin therapy for asymptomatic women who have a short CL <25 mm on TVU at 14 to 27 weeks and do not receive a cerclage did not prevent spontaneous PTB <35 weeks, but did prevent PTB <24 weeks. Further research including larger numbers and a randomized trial design is necessary to further clarify the effectiveness as well as the risks of this therapy.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

PubMed2005

Does the presence of a funnel increase the risk of adverse perinatal outcome in a patient with a short cervix?

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine whether the presence of a dilated internal os (funneling or beaking) alters the outcome of patients with a short cervix documented by transvaginal ultrasound in the second trimester. STUDY DESIGN: Between January 1998 and May 2004, all singleton pregnancies with a short cervix (< or =2.5 cm) and no funnel between 16 and 24 weeks' gestational age were identified by query and review of the Lehigh Valley Perinatal Ultrasound Database. These no funnel patients were compared with patients with a short cervix and funnel matched in accordance with cervical length and risk factors. Multiple variables of perinatal outcome were identified and compared between the Funnel and No Funnel groups. Correlations between cervical measurements and gestational age at birth were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 279 patients with a short cervix identified, 82 were singleton with a T-shaped cervix and no funnel and 82 patients matched with a typical Y-shaped funnel. There was no difference between groups with respect to maternal demographics, previous preterm birth (28.1% No Funnel group vs 36.5% Funnel group, P = .3), prior cervical surgery (24.3% vs 22.0 %, P = .8), gestational age at entry (20.5 +/- 2.1 vs 21.1 +/- 2.4 weeks, P = .1), and cervical length (1.9 +/- 0.4 vs 1.8 +/- 0.5 cm , P = .1). The No Funnel group had significantly less readmissions for preterm labor (43.2% vs 67.1 %, P = .004), chorioamnionitis (2.4% vs 23.2 %, P = .0002), abruption (1.2% vs 13.4 %, P = .007), preterm rupture of membranes (6.1% vs 23.4%, P = .002), and cerclage placement (23.2% vs 43 %, P = .008). The neonates in the no funnel group delivered later (36.2% +/- 4.6 vs 33.8 +/- 5.4 weeks , P = .003), and had less morbidity and mortality (17.1% vs 37.8 %, P = .02) compared with the Funnel group. The width and depth of the funnel did not correlate with perinatal outcome. Cervical length ( R(2) = 0.07, P = .02) and cervical funneling as a categorical variable ( r = 0.3, P = .0002) did correlate with earlier delivery. CONCLUSION: The disruption of the internal os, as documented by funneling, is a significant risk factor for adverse perinatal outcome (ie, preterm labor, chorioamnionitis, abruption, rupture of the membranes, and serious neonatal morbidity and mortality). Cervical funneling is best measured as a categorical variable (present or absent).

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Does cerclage prevent preterm birth?

Cerclage procedures can be classified according to timing, (elective, urgent, emergent), and anatomic approach (transvaginal and transabdominal). The most current clinical data and the evidence-based recommendations for each type of cerclage procedure are listed.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2005

Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography: meta-analysis of trials using individual patient-level data.

OBJECTIVE: Preterm birth is the main cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. A short cervical length on transvaginal ultrasonography predicts preterm birth. Our aim was to estimate by meta-analysis of randomized trials whether cerclage prevents preterm birth in women with a short cervical length. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched with the terms "cerclage," "cervical cerclage," "short cervix," "ultrasound," and "randomized trial." We included randomized trials involving the use of cerclage in women with short cervical length on transvaginal ultrasonography using patient-level data. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Four properly conducted trials were identified. In the total population, preterm birth at less than 35 weeks of gestation occurred in 29.2% (89/305) of the cerclage group, compared with 34.8% (105/302) of the no-cerclage groups (relative risk [RR] 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-1.06). There was no significant heterogeneity in the overall analysis (P = .29). There was a significant reduction in preterm birth at less than 35 weeks in the cerclage group compared with the no-cerclage groups in singleton gestations (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.57-0.96), singleton gestations with prior preterm birth (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40-0.92), and singleton gestations with prior second-trimester loss (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.33-0.99). There was a significant increase in preterm birth at less than 35 weeks in twin gestations (RR 2.15, 95% CI 1.15-4.01). CONCLUSION: Cerclage does not prevent preterm birth in all women with short cervical length on transvaginal ultrasonography. In the subgroup analysis of singleton gestations with short cervical length, especially those with a prior preterm birth, cerclage may reduce preterm birth, and a well-powered trial should be carried out in this group of patients. In contrast, in twins, cerclage was associated with a significantly higher incidence of preterm birth.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Does cerclage location influence perinatal outcome?

OBJECTIVE: The study was undertaken to measure cerclage location within the cervix and to determine whether placement closer to the internal os is related to perinatal outcome. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed data collected during a randomized trial of cervical cerclage versus no cerclage that was conducted at Lehigh Valley Hospital between May 1998 and June 2001 in women with ultrasound findings of short cervix less than 25 mm or funneling between 16 and 24 weeks' gestation. Women who were randomly assigned to the cerclage arm had cervical measurements performed before cerclage, including dilation of the internal os, depth of membrane prolapse into the endocervical canal, cervical length below any funnel (distal length), and total cervical length (including any funnel). Measurements obtained after cerclage placement included the distance from external os to cerclage (A), and a repeat of the same four measurements. The distance from the external os to the cerclage (A) was divided by the total cervical length (B) and a cerclage to cervical length ratio (A/B) was calculated. The relationship between these measurements and gestational age at birth was assessed by linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 150 patients enrolled, 74 received a McDonald cerclage suture. Mean distal cervical length was 1.9+/-0.9 cm before and 2.9+/-1.0 cm after cerclage (P=.001). The mean distance between the cerclage and external os (A) was 1.8+/-0.6 cm; the total cervical length after cerclage (B) was 3.6+/-0.9 cm. The mean cerclage to cervical length ratio (A/B) was 0.5+/-0.1. Linear regression analysis did not demonstrate a correlation between either the cerclage to external os measurement (A) or the cervical length ratio (A/B) and gestational age at birth (R(2)=0.0006 and 0.008, P=.8 and.6, respectively). CONCLUSION: The length of the cervix below the level of cerclage is not related to duration of pregnancy in women treated with cerclage because of ultrasound evidence of cervical effacement.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Risk factors for preterm delivery in patients demonstrating sonographic evidence of premature dilation of the internal os, prolapse of the membranes in the endocervical canal and shortening of the distal cervical segment by second trimester ultrasound.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the outcomes and risk factors associated with the second trimester sonographic findings of premature dilation of the internal cervical os, prolapse of the membranes into the endocervical canal and shortening of the distal segment. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review to identify patients who met the following criteria: (i) gestational age between 16 and 24 weeks; (ii) a vaginal probe ultrasound documenting dilatation of the internal os, prolapsed membranes into the endocervical canal but not extending beyond the external os, and a shortened distal cervix; and (iii) no evidence of increased uterine activity METHODS: Sonographic measurements obtained included: (i) the width of the internal os dilation; (ii) the depth of membranes prolapsed into endocervix (funneling); (iii) the distal cervical length; and (iv) the total cervical length. Patients were stratified into two groups according to gestational age at delivery: the preterm group (< 34 weeks) and the near-term group (> or = 34 weeks). RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients had complete records for analysis and their pregnancies resulted in 47 live births. Eighteen patients were stratified to the near term group and 19 were stratified to the preterm group. There were no stillborn infants and 10 neonatal deaths. Ten patients received cerclage and seven patients delivered at < 34 weeks gestational age. Risk factors found to be significant for preterm delivery included a gestational age at diagnosis of < or = 20 weeks gestation (p = 0.03), dilatation of the internal os > 1.3 cm (p = 0.04), and a composite Benham score > or = 1.0 (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The sonographic findings of premature dilatation of the internal os, prolapse of the membranes into the endocervical canal and shortening of the distal cervix are associated with a high rate of delivery < 34 weeks (51%) and neonatal death (27%).

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Preterm delivery: risks versus benefits of intervention.

The objective of this report is to examine the evidence that supports obstetric intervention to prevent preterm birth and to assess the associated neonatal outcomes. The different causes of preterm birth are identified and reviewed. The evidence to support obstetric intervention is examined, and the current protocols for therapy are listed. An example of institutional data review is outlined and includes common neonatal morbidities with comparison to an international data set. This type of review allows clinicians to establish recommendations for obstetric intervention based on neonatal outcome.

Female↗