Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Oscar M Ramirez.
This article provides an overview of the components separation technique. It describes how the technique was first developed and innovations and improvements that have followed through the years.
BACKGROUND: The delicate shape of the tragus and the pretragal depression are fine landmarks on the face that are usually lost during conventional rhytidectomy. A relatively simple technique to preserve the natural pretragal depression after face lift has been implemented in the authors' practice. It provides an almost invisible incisional scar and avoids tragal distortion. METHODS: Incision starts around the sideburn in a curvilinear fashion toward the helix and continues vertically down into the tragal margin and around the earlobe retroauricularly. The pretragal depression is created by separating the facial attachments and deepening the space anterior to the tragal cartilage and external auditory canal. The facial attachment is turned over and sutured over the parotid fascia with several 4-0 polydioxanone sutures. The base of the tragal flap created to fit into the tragus is anchored to the deep tissues in front of the tragus with two sutures of 5-0 polypropylene. The rest of the skin is closed in two layers and the tragal flap is inset without tension. RESULTS: The addition of this component to the operation implemented in more than 300 patients did not significantly elongate the operative time. Complications encountered included partial necrosis of the skin that healed with secondary healing (two patients), pretragal indentation that was released under local anesthesia (two patients), and loss of the pretragal definition (three patients). Preservation of the natural appearance in the tragal and pretragal area was mentioned by the patient as a positive feature. CONCLUSIONS: Re-creation of the natural tragus and pretragal depression without some of the surgical stigmata resultant from the loss of these delicate landmarks during a face lift has improved the aesthetic outcome of the authors' rhytidectomy patients.
Improved esthetic results in the periorbital region can be accomplished with a thorough knowledge of the features of the "beautiful eye." The information provided in this article, culled from the literature and years of clinical experience, should allow the reader to develop an improved esthetic sensibility as applied to the periorbital region. Deviations from the "ideal" can be identified properly and addressed appropriately, leading to improved esthetic outcomes.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Forty-two consecutive patients have had severe eyelid ptosis corrected by intraorbital frontalis flap advancement as a motor unit to substitute for the function of the levator muscle. This technique has avoided the need for the linking structure necessary in the standard frontalis sling approach and has improved the direction of pull to more closely mimic that of a normal levator. This simple technique includes elevation of the innervated frontalis muscle flap and the creation of a pulley near the insertion of the orbital septum at the superior orbital rim, which redirects the lid movement along the surface of the globe rather than lifting it from the globe's surface toward the brow. This type of displacement is produced because the muscle is directed posteriorly by the pulley, so that it conforms to the plane of the levator aponeurosis all the way down to the tarsal plate. In addition, to improve the remaining function of the levator muscle (if any) and to facilitate voluntary positioning of the eyelid, the levator aponeurosis is shortened by plication. Symmetry is created by intervention on the contralateral eyelid to provide symmetrical supratarsal creases.
The effects of tumescent solutions consisting of lidocaine and epinephrine on skin flap survival in rats were studied. Dorsal skin flaps of rats were infiltrated using lidocaine (1%) with epinephrine in concentrations of 1:100,000, 1:200,000, 1:400,000, and 1:800,000 prior to elevating flaps of the different experimental groups. The solutions were applied intradermally or subcutaneously, and the flaps were raised "immediately" or "delayed" after injection in the different groups. Control flaps were infiltrated by lidocaine (1%) only. The survival of the flaps was assessed on the seventh day after the operation. As a result, the flaps showed higher necrosis rates in the groups injected by lidocaine with epinephrine in concentration of 1:100,000 and 1:200,000 than of the other experimental or all control groups (P < 0.01). In conclusion, lidocaine with epinephrine in concentrations of 1:400,000 and 1:800,000 was found safe on skin flap survival for tumescent technique in rats.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Our lift lip technique consists of an excision of the white part of the upper lip directly beneath the nose in the shape of a 'bull's-horn', with advancement of the inferior border of the incision to the area directly beneath the nose. Pre-operative markings on the skin ensure the lip lift is approximately symmetric. Advancement of the inferior edge of skin directly beneath the nasal base lifts the lip, producing more visible vermilion and about 3 mm of tooth show at rest. The position of the final incision is such that it is located within the shadow of the nose. Meticulous technique produces an almost invisible scar. The amount and width of skin excised is individualized depending on the desired aesthetic goals. The procedure is straightforward and is usually performed under local anesthetic. Abdominal fat is frequently injected into both the upper and lower lips to increase the volume and improve the rejuvenation. Lip lifts using this technique provide an immediate, dramatic, and permanent result.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Endoscopic brow lifting has largely replaced coronal brow lifting (Fig. 12). The results are at least equivalent, if not better, with a greatly decreased incidence of scarring, alopecia, and numbness of the scalp. The technique has a steep learning curve. The equipment needed to perform the surgery is expensive,but the authors believe that a well-trained surgeon using the proper instruments can perform this surgery with minimal trauma and few complications. An update with the advanced techniques described herein is recommended to further decrease the rate of complications and undesirable sequelae.
Standard face-lift techniques are excellent for the treatment of the jawline and neck. Treatment of the area between the lower eyelid and the corner of the mouth required the development of techniques in the intermediate lamella of the face. Alternative techniques of subperiosteal dissection by means of lower eyelid incisions were described with good aesthetic results but at the expense of increased morbidity and complications. All these techniques were also two-dimensional manipulations of the soft tissues of the face. The author presents a different approach that he believes is close to the ideal in terms of safety, morbidity, and complications. Although midface rejuvenation may be performed alone, it is more commonly done as a component of total facial rejuvenation. The midface is approached by means of a combination of a temporal slit incision and an upper oral sulcus incision; no eyelid access is used. Fifty percent of the midface dissection is performed under direct visualization, and 50 percent is performed under endoscopic control. Dissection of the temporal area is done under the temporoparietal fascia down to the zygomatic arch. The anterior two-thirds of the zygomatic arch periosteum is elevated along with a few millimeters of the intermediate temporal fascia and the fascia of the masseter muscle. The subperiosteal dissection of the zygoma and maxilla is completed with the medial extension of the dissection just medial to the infraorbital nerve. The orbital fat pads are released by means of intraoral route, and the lateral and middle fat pads are advanced over the orbital rim and fixed to the masseter tendon and the periosteum of the maxillary shelf at the intraoral incision. Three suspension points are typically used on the midface, each one with a different action. All are anchored to the temporal fascia proper. The vascularized Bichat's fat pad is mobilized and fixed with 4-0 polydioxanone sutures. This provides a volumetric cheek augmentation and improvement of the jowl. The inferior malar periosteum and fascia is used for malar imbrication with 4-0 polydioxanone sutures. This provides an anterior projection of the cheek and elevates the corner of the mouth. The suborbicularis oculi fat is used for en bloc vertical suspension of the cheek. This also improves the infraorbital V deformity. This technique has been used in close to 200 patients over the last 5 years. The complications have been minimal: two cases of temporary paresis of the levator of the upper lip, one case of paresis of the orbicularis oris (unilateral), one case of buccinator muscle dysfunction, and two moderate infections that were treated with simple drainage. The degree of facial edema has been minimal compared with the open or the transblepharoplasty approach. Typically, patients can return to work 2 weeks after surgery.The three-dimensional endoscopic midface enhancement provides a technique of midface remodeling that provides the missing dimension (volume) to the rejuvenation of the midface. This can be done with a minimal rate of complications, and the aesthetic results surpass by far the results of other midface techniques previously described by the author.
Reduction mammaplasty has traditionally been done using the Wise pattern of incision. Because of the box-like effect in breast shape, the lack of projection, and the long scars associated with the inverted T incision, two techniques have emerged as alternatives: the vertical reduction of Lassus/Lejour and the "round block" periareolar technique popularized by Benelli. Each of these techniques has its pros and cons. The "owl" incision combines the features of the large periareolar reduction (Benelli's) and the vertical reduction (Lassus/Lejour); the horizontal inframammary scar is either made very short or completely eliminated. Volume reduction is done through a heart-shaped parenchymal resection, leaving the nipple-areolar complex over a supero-central pedicle. Maintenance of the central parenchyma behind the nipple-areolar complex and mobilization of the vertical pillars toward the center of the breast give excellent projection and diminish the lateral fullness. Enlargement of the periareolar skin resection diminishes the length and pleating of the vertical scar; conversely, inclusion of the vertical component to the periareolar technique eliminates the pleating effect of the periareolar incision. The short horizontal excision eliminates any resultant "dog ears" in the new inframammary fold. Thus, the discrepancy in the length of scars is better distributed. There is no skin or parenchymal undermining, so drains are not needed. Excellent results are obtained immediately on the operating table, and large volumes of glandular resection and correction of severe ptosis can be accomplished without compromising vascularity of either the nipple-areolar complex or the skin flaps.Ninety-four patients in a 7-year period were operated upon using this technique. Seventy-two had bilateral reductions up to 1900 gm per breast, 12 had unilateral reduction for symmetry following breast reconstruction, and 10 were patients with severe ptosis. Complications were rare and of a minor nature. No conversion to free grafts was done, even in the larger resections. One case required minor revision under local anesthesia, one case required bilateral re-reduction, and another case required unilateral re-reduction for continued growth of breast tissue. Almost 90 percent of the patients underwent procedures as outpatients. The owl-type incision and the supero-central pedicle flap are elements of a reduction mammaplasty technique that provides excellent projection and shape with minimal visible scars. It takes advantage of the positive features of the periareolar and vertical reduction techniques and minimizes their negative features. The new design of parenchymal resection improves the vascularity of the residual flaps. Additionally, it may better preserve the sensation to the nipple-areolar complex and lactation is not compromised.