Hepatitis C infections. From diagnosis to treatment.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Ossama A Shobokshi.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Clinical diagnosis of chronic hepatitis C infections is a difficult task. This is due to the insidious nature of the infection and the subclinical and symptomless presentation in the majority of cases. The laboratory plays a principal role not only in the specific diagnosis of the infection but also in assessing the severity and evolution of the liver disease, selection of patients for therapeutic intervention, monitoring treatment and determining the outcome of treatment. To attain these goals, improvements in sensitivity and specificity of various techniques, including molecular diagnostic assays, have been introduced. Most importantly, patients may be excluded if they have conditions that are contra-indicated for treatment as determined by laboratory parameters. In cases of adverse events the drugs may be reduced or withdrawn based on clinical and laboratory results. The improvement over the last decade of laboratory assays has paralleled the success in the sustained response rates reported for hepatitis C virus treatment. A good laboratory provides the tools for diagnosis and treatment essential for good management. This is a multidisciplinary approach involving all branches of pathology.
The current standard of treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection is the combination therapy of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin for 48 weeks for genotype 1 and 4 and 24 weeks for genotype 2 and 3. Side effects such as influenza-like syndrome, gastrointestinal, neuropsychiatric, dermatological and endocrinological symptoms are not uncommon. Laboratory abnormalities such as hematological and biochemical may be frequent. These side effects are compatible with treatment continuation if symptoms are managed carefully. The adverse effects are dose dependent and often reversible. Premature withdrawal rates can be reduced if side effects are identified early. It is, however, pertinent to target treatment to early responders and avoid side effects in patients who have low predictive response to treatment.
Hepatitis C virus genotype 4 chronic hepatitis predominates in the Eastern Mediterranean region of the world. In the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, as high as 62% of all cases are due to genotype 4. Results of efficacy and safety clinical trials using pegylated-interferon plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C patients have shown great promise, but treatment of early responders should be maintained at 180 mg of pegylated-interferon alfa-2a plus 1000-1200 mg of ribavirin for 48 weeks unlike the 24 weeks recommended for genotypes 2 and 3. Hepatitis C genotype 4 may not be as "difficult to treat" as initially thought.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to determine the seroprevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in blood donors, children, pregnant women, hemodialysis patients and drug addicts in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: Using third generation enzyme immunoassay kits, we have screened Saudi cohorts of all ages and sexes, namely infants, pre-school, school children, young adults and adults (blood donors and antenatals) for antibodies to HCV. We have also reviewed HCV seroprevalence data among high risk groups from 1998 to 2002. RESULTS: An overall 1.1% (6313 out of 557813) seroprevalence rate was determined among Saudi blood donors; 0.1% (5 out of 3854) in Saudi children; and 0.7% (22 out of 3127) among pregnant women. Hemodialysis patients remain at highest risk of infection at 55.7% whereas intravenous drug addicts have 14% exposure rate. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the present public health schemes have been effective in reducing hepatitis C infection in the general community in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia but the infection among high risk groups remain a major problem that needs to be actively addressed.
OBJECTIVE: The object of this study is to determine the molecular epidemiology of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). METHODS: Four hundred and ninety-two histological proven chronic HCV patients prospectively recruited from all regions of KSA, between November 1999 and March 2002, were genotyped and subtyped using amplified products of specific primers from the 5-UTR region in a reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (Roche Diagnostics, Switzerland) followed by a reverse hybridization technique (Innolipa HCV II [Innogenetics, Belgium]). RESULTS: Sixty-two percent of Saudis were found to be genotype 4. Other genotypes were 1 (24.1%); 2 (7.4%); 3 (5.9%); 5 (0.3%); and 10 (0.3%). There were no differences in distribution patterns between sexes and ages. All regions showed similar distribution except the Eastern region where subtype 2a/c seem to have emerged. Diabetic patients and those with a history of blood transfusion had the same pattern as those with community acquired HCV. Among the non-Saudis (mostly Egyptians), genotype 4 predominated (88%). CONCLUSION: We conclude that 86% of Saudi chronic hepatitis C cases are due to genotypes 1 and 4. Since these are considered "difficult to treat" an aggressive approach to management using combination therapy of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin for 48 weeks should be considered for all cases of chronic hepatitis C until genotyping proves otherwise.