PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ossama W Tawfik

Publications and source records attributed to Ossama W Tawfik.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Proposed prognostic score for breast carcinoma on fine needle aspiration based on nuclear grade, cellular dyscohesion and bare atypical nuclei.

Fine needle aspiration is an established diagnostic tool in breast carcinoma. Although the potential of using the same diagnostic aspirate material to provide additional cytomorphologic prognostic or predictive information has been investigated, no well-recognized, practical grading system has been established. Such system is necessary in guiding treatment, monitoring neoadjuvant chemotherapy effect and predicting outcome. We herein propose a new grading system, combining nuclear grade, cellular dyscohesion, and bare atypical nuclei to arrive at one cytoprognostic score. Cytoprognostic scores were compared with other known prognostic factors. Fine needle aspirations of breast diagnosed as adenocarcinoma from 55 patients were reviewed. The cytoprognostic score combined three features including nuclear grade (score 1-3), cellular dyscohesion (score 1-3), and bare atypical nuclei (score 0, 1). A cytoprognostic score of 3 and below was considered a low score, and a score of 4-7 was considered a high score. The cytoprognostic score was then compared to histologic grade, lymph node status, and expressions of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, Her2-Neu, Ki-67, and p53 in the subsequently excised tumor. A low cytoprognostic score predicted a low to intermediate grade carcinoma and a high score predicted an intermediate to high-grade carcinoma. A high cytoprognostic score also correlated with more positive lymph node metastasis, and poor expression of prognostic markers. In conclusion, cytoprognostic score is performed with ease and shows a great promise as a cost-effective way to predict biological behavior of breast carcinoma and guide clinical management.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Breast cancer chemoprevention phase I evaluation of biomarker modulation by arzoxifene, a third generation selective estrogen receptor modulator.

PURPOSE: Arzoxifene, a new selective estrogen receptor modulator with strong breast antiestrogen activity and absence of uterine agonist activity, was explored as a potential chemoprevention agent. We performed a multi-institutional evaluation of arzoxifene in women with newly diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ or T1/T2 invasive cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In a Phase IA trial, 50 pre- or postmenopausal women were randomized to 10, 20, or 50 mg of arzoxifene daily in the interval between biopsy and re-excision or were enrolled as no-treatment controls. In a Phase IB trial, 76 postmenopausal women were randomized to 20 mg of arzoxifene versus matched placebo. Serum specimens collected at entry and at re-excision were assayed for various hormones and growth factors. Tissue from biopsies (estrogen receptor + and/or progesterone receptor +) and re-excision specimens was evaluated immunohistochemically for proliferation (Ki-67 by MIB-1 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen) and other biomarkers. RESULTS: In both trials, increases in serum sex hormone binding globulin were noted, as were decreases in insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and the IGF-I:IGF binding protein-3 ratio (P < 0.007 versus control/placebo). For 45 evaluable women in Phase IA, decreases in proliferation indices were more prevalent for arzoxifene (particularly 20 mg) than for controls. For 58 evaluable women in Phase IB, a decrease in estrogen receptor expression for arzoxifene was observed compared with no change with placebo (P = 0.0068). However, decreases in proliferation indices for arzoxifene were not statistically different from placebo, perhaps due to a confounding effect of stopping hormone replacement therapy before entry. CONCLUSION: Given the favorable side effect profile and the biomarker modulations reported here, arzoxifene remains a reasonable candidate for additional study as a breast cancer chemoprevention agent.

Anticarcinogenic Agents↗
PubMed2002

Telomerase reverse transcriptase subunit immunoreactivity: a marker for high-grade prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Telomerase, a ribonucleoprotein complex that maintains telomeric DNA, has been detected in 67-93% of prostate carcinomas by telomeric repeat-amplification protocol assay (involving polymerase chain reaction). One study used in situ hybridization in nine patients; however, to date, no immunohistochemical results have been published. METHODS: From two hospitals, the authors compiled data on 62 patients who underwent prostatectomy from January 1996 to May 2001. Representative tissue sections were immunostained with a polyclonal antibody to telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), the catalytic subunit of telomerase. Staining was evaluated by two observers and was correlated with grade, stage, and biochemical failure. There were 28 sections from low-grade to intermediate-grade tumors (Gleason score, 3-6), 14 sections with a Gleason score of 3 + 4 = 7, 9 sections with a Gleason score of 4 + 3 = 7, and 11 sections from high-grade tumors (Gleason score, 8-10). RESULTS: From low-grade to high-grade tumors, the four groups described above disclosed nuclear reactivity in 64%, 100%, 100%, and 100% of sections, respectively. Mean percentages of 5%, 15%, 40%, and 51% of nuclei were reactive in the respective groups (P < 0.0001) with intratumoral heterogeneity. The percent of reactive tumor nuclei was not correlated with pathologic stage (P = 0.32) or margin status (P = 0.35). The basal cell layer in sections of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and benign/atrophic acini was reactive; secretory cells were reactive in 13 of 34 HGPIN foci (38%) in 1-20% of nuclei and were never reactive in benign acini. Lymphocytes and skeletal muscle were reactive. Weak, nonspecific, cytoplasmic staining was noted in benign and tumor acini. CONCLUSIONS: Like cytokeratin 34betaE12, nuclear anti-TERT reactivity is a basal cell marker in nonneoplastic prostatic acini. Anti-TERT reactivity is acquired by secretory cells in tumorigenesis, but consistent reactivity is restricted to high-grade carcinoma (Gleason primary pattern >or=4). This histologic evidence suggests that higher grade tumors have maximally activated telomerase and may be most responsive to antitelomerase therapy.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2002

A comparison of prognostic tumor markers obtained on image-guided breast biopsies and final surgical specimens.

BACKGROUND: This study was initiated to determine whether tumor markers obtained on image-guided breast biopsy specimens provide accurate prognostic information for women with invasive breast cancer. METHODS: Prognostic tumor markers on preoperative image-guided biopsy and final surgical specimens were compared in 44 patients with invasive breast cancer. RESULTS: Progesterone receptor (PR) discordance was 18%. In 87% of PR discordant cases, the image-guided biopsy was positive and the final specimen was negative (P = 0.03). Tumor grade was discordant in 36% of patients Discordance for estrogen receptor (ER) = 2%; MIB-1 = 18%; Her2/neu = 9%; EGFR = 10%; p53 = 9%; and bcl-2 = 0%. The discordance for these markers was random and did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Image-guided core needle biopsies provide reliable information for the majority of prognostic tumor makers. A positive progesterone receptor is significantly more likely to be determined by core biopsy rather than the final surgical specimen. Tumor grade should be based upon the final surgical specimen whenever possible.

Aged↗