PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P A Eigenmann

Publications and source records attributed to P A Eigenmann.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

An internet-based survey on the circumstances of food-induced reactions following the diagnosis of IgE-mediated food allergy.

BACKGROUND: Despite careful avoidance measures, food allergic patients have a significant risk of anaphylactic episodes. Risk situations need to be identified for more efficient preventive measures. METHODS: Responders to an internet-based survey on the awareness of food anaphylaxis were invited to relate the circumstances of their most severe reaction following the diagnosis of IgE-mediated food allergy. Items of the questionnaire included the circumstances of the reaction and the treatment, as well as questions related to reactions occurring at specific categories of sites (i.e. home, schools, or restaurants). RESULTS: Fifty-one of the returned questionnaires (34.1%) corresponded to the study criteria. The median age of the subjects was 7 years (range 0.5-61), with 33/51 (64.7%) being less than 16 years of age. Reactions were reported to peanuts (24/51; 47.1%), milk (12/51; 23.5%), tree nuts (6/51; 11.8%), fish and shellfish (5/51; 9.8%), and others (3/51; 5.8%). Reactions occurred at home (13/51; 25.5%), in restaurants (9/51; 17.6%), at school or daycare or kindergarten (8/51; 15.7%), at a relative or friend's home (7/51; 13.7%), at sites of leisure activities (6/51; 11.8%), at work (3/51; 5.9%), in church or a hospital ward (2/51; 3.9% each), or in a food store (1/51; 2.0%). In severe reactions (37/51; 72.5%) epinephrine was administered in 28/37 (75.7%) of the responders. Finally, while most reactions happened after ingestion of the food (40/51; 78.4%), others were reported after skin contact exclusively (8/51; 16%), or after inhalation (3/51; 5.9%). CONCLUSION: Food induced-anaphylaxis in patients aware of their allergy happens most often at sites considered as safe (i.e. home, schools, workplace, hospitals). Better strategies to avoid accidental reactions include clear labelling of forbidden foods and increased information at all levels. These might dramatically reduce the risk of food-induced anaphylaxis in food allergy sufferers.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Soy anaphylaxis.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

An Internet-based survey of anaphylactic reactions to foods.

BACKGROUND: A favorable outcome of anaphylaxis depends on the rapidity of adequate initial management and epinephrine injection. However, few data on the management of anaphylactic reactions are available. The aim of this study was to investigate the management and awareness of anaphylaxis to foods by mean of an Internet-based survey. METHODS: Visitors to a website with information on food allergy were invited to join the survey. Items in the survey included the management of anaphylactic reactions, investigations done by the diagnosing physician, and information given to the responder in anticipation of a new anaphylactic reaction. RESULTS: Almost all of the 264 responders were from North America, Europe, Australia, or New Zealand (263/264). The most recent reaction was treated by epinephrine injection in 68.7% (180/262) of cases, or by antihistamines in 14.1% (37/262). Epinephrine was the first treatment for the most severe reaction in only 43.9% (101/230), while antihistamines were given first in 43.5% (100/230). One-third (62/210 = 29.5%) of the responders diagnosed by a physician received neither a diagnostic blood test nor a skin test. Responders diagnosed by an allergist were more often investigated (91/105 = 86.7%) than those diagnosed by a pediatrician or an internist (29/44 = 65.9%), a general practitioner (22/45 = 48.9%), or another physician (6/16 = 37.5%) (P < 0.001). Most responders had received instructions on how to deal with a new episode of anaphylaxis (244/263 = 92.8%). Responders instructed by an allergist were most frequently satisfied with the instructions (115/131 = 87.8%). CONCLUSION: A large number of responders did not receive epinephrine for treatment of their most severe, or most recent anaphylactic reaction, and did not undergo allergy tests. The conventional management of anaphylaxis might still be improved.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Oral carrageenan induces antigen-dependent oral tolerance: prevention of anaphylaxis and induction of lymphocyte anergy in a murine model of food allergy.

Immunosuppressive effects of carrageenan, a high-molecular-weight polysaccharide, on antibody and T cell responses have been previously demonstrated. However, its effect on anaphylaxis is unknown. Our objectives were to test carrageenan-mediated oral tolerance induction in young mice subsequently sensitized to a common cow's milk antigen. C3H/HeJ mice were fed or not lambda-carrageenan (0.5 g/L) and/or 0.01 mg/mL beta-lactoglobulin (BLG) for 5 d before oral sensitization with BLG and cholera toxin. Subsequently, the mice were challenged with BLG and symptom scores of anaphylaxis were recorded. Mesenteric lymph node cells, spleen cells, Peyer's patches cells, intraepithelial lymphocytes, and lamina propria lymphocytes were isolated and stimulated in vitro with BLG, IL-2, or left unstimulated. BLG-specific IgG, IgG(1), and IgG(2a) antibodies were measured. Pretreatment with carrageenan and BLG, but not pretreatment with either carrageenan or BLG alone or omission of pretreatment, diminished significantly the number of anaphylactic mice after BLG challenge (6.3 % versus 53 % in mice without pretreatment, p = 0.006). Mesenteric lymph nodes and spleen cells from pretreated mice proliferated less in presence of BLG or IL-2 than cells from sensitized control mice. Antigen-specific antibody production and passive cutaneous anaphylaxis was not suppressed by carrageenan and BLG pretreatment. In conclusion, carrageenan administered to young mice in conjunction with low doses of allergen before sensitization efficiently prevents anaphylaxis.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

Allergenicity of major cow's milk and peanut proteins determined by IgE and IgG immunoblotting.

BACKGROUND: Specific IgG antibodies are frequently observed in food-allergic patients. However, the allergen-fraction specificity of IgG antibodies in relation to IgE antibodies is not well defined. Our aim was to determine the IgE and IgG antibody profile to major cow's milk and peanut-antigen fractions in food-allergic patients and tolerant individuals. METHODS: Sera were collected from 10 patients allergic to cow's milk and 10 patients allergic to peanuts, as well as from 20 control subjects. Cow's milk and peanut proteins were migrated on SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted for IgE, IgG, and IgG4 antibodies. Food-specific IgE concentrations were measured by CAP System FEIA, and IgG and IgG4 concentrations by ELISA. RESULTS: In food-allergic children, similar fraction-specific IgE, IgG, and IgG4 antibody-binding profiles to the major cow's milk or peanut antigens were found. In nonallergics, the presence of fraction-specific IgG antibodies was mostly dependent on regular ingestion of the food. The presence of specific antibody on immunoblots correlated with their quantitative measurement. The mean value for specific IgE in cow's milk-allergic patients was 450 +/- 1,326 IU/ml, and 337 +/- 423 IU/ml in peanut-allergic patients. Specific IgG antibody values in milk-allergic patients were not different (median OD 1.5, range 0.3-2.3) from controls (median OD 1, range 0.2-1.8). However, in peanut-allergic patients, IgG concentrations were significantly higher than in controls (OD 1.2 [0.5-1.3] vs 0.5 [0.3-0.7]; P< 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Similar fraction-specific IgE and IgG antibody profiles in allergic individuals suggest a common switching trigger involving both isotypes. Intrinsic allergenicity might explain identical IgG antibody fraction specificity in nonallergics and in allergics. The presence of IgG antibodies in nonallergics was related to regular ingestion of the food.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Diagnosis of IgE-mediated food allergy among Swiss children with atopic dermatitis.

Diagnosis of food allergy in children with atopic dermatitis (AD) relies on a good knowledge of the prevalence of the disease and of the foods most frequently involved. Our objective was to define these characteristics in a population-of Swiss children with AD. Patients referred to a pediatric allergist or a dermatologist for AD were routinely tested by skin-prick test (SPT) to seven common food allergens (milk, egg, peanut, wheat, soy, fish, and nuts), and to all other foods suspected by history. Patients with positive SPTs were further evaluated for specific serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies (by using the CAP System FEIA ). CAP values were interpreted following previously published predictive values for clinical reactivity. Patients with inconclusive results (between the 95% negative predictive value [NPV] and the 95% positive predictive value [PPV]) were challenged with the suspected food. A total of 74 children with AD were screened for food allergies. Negative SPTs excluded the diagnosis in 30 subjects. Nineteen patients were diagnosed by histories suggestive of recent anaphylactic reactions to foods and/or CAP values above the 95% PPV. Forty-three food challenges (35 open challenges and eight double-blind, placebo-controlled in children with persistent lesions of AD despite aggressive topical skin treatment) were performed in patients with positive SPTs but with inconclusive CAP values. Six patients were diagnosed as positive to 15 foods. Challenges were not performed to high-allergenic foods in young children (under 12 months of age for egg and fish, and under 3 years of age for peanuts and nuts). Altogether, 33.8% (25 of 74) of the AD patients were diagnosed with food allergy. The prevalence of food allergy was 27% (seven of 25) in the group referred to the dermatologist for primary care of AD. The foods most frequently incriminated were egg, milk, and peanuts. The prevalence of food allergy in our population was comparable to that in other westernized countries, suggesting an incidence of food allergy in approximately one-third of children with persistent lesions of AD. Together with milk and eggs, peanuts were most frequently involved in allergic reactions.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

The mucosal adhesion receptor alpha4beta7 integrin is selectively increased in lymphocytes stimulated with beta-lactoglobulin in children allergic to cow's milk.

BACKGROUND: It has been shown in mice that the integrin alpha4beta7 directs the migration of memory T cells into the gut-associated lymphoid tissue. However, little is known about T-cell homing mechanisms in children with food allergies. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the expression of this and other integrins in children with different manifestations of cow's milk allergy (urticaria, atopic dermatitis, and wheezing). METHODS: PBMCs were stimulated with beta-lactoglobulin, 1 of the major allergenic proteins in cow's milk, and tetanus toxoid. Integrin expression was studied by flow cytometric analysis after 1 week of culture. RESULTS: We found significantly higher expression of the alpha4beta7 integrin in cells from patients compared with control subjects with no allergies (P =. 005) when beta-lactoglobulin was used to stimulate the cells. alpha4beta7 integrin was also expressed at significantly higher levels in beta-lactoglobulin-stimulated cells than in tetanus toxoid-stimulated cells (P =.005). The alphaEbeta7 and the alpha4beta1 integrins were not upregulated by allergen stimulation. Most alpha4beta7 integrin-expressing cells were identified as CD4(+) T cells. CONCLUSION: These results show that alpha4beta7 integrin expression after stimulation with beta-lactoglobulin correlates with the presumptive site of cow's milk sensitization (ie, the gut-associated lymphoid tissue but not with the site of symptoms of cow's milk allergy).

CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes↗
PubMed1998

Severe anaphylaxis to a new disinfectant: polyhexanide, a chlorhexidine polymer.

We describe the cases of an 18-year-old female and a 15-year-old male who developed severe anaphylaxis following contact of surgical wounds with the disinfectant Lavasept, containing polyhexanide, a polymerised form of chlorhexidine, during orthopaedic interventions. According to the manufacturer, this product is the only polyhexanide containing medical disinfectant, has recently been commercialised and is only available in Switzerland. One of the patients denied previous contact with this compound but both patients were previously exposed to chlorhexidine. Immediate-type hypersensitivity to polyhexanide was suggested by positive skin prick tests in the two patients and by negative skin tests in control individuals. Skin tests with chlorhexidine in the patients remained negative. We conclude that contact with the new disinfectant Lavasept can trigger anaphylactic reactions, even in the absence of previous history of exposure to this compound. It remains to be established whether this new disinfectant is a frequent anaphylactogen.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed1998

[The problem of hidden food allergens: two cases of anaphylaxis to peanut proteins concealed in a pizza sauce].

Peanut is one of the major food allergens inducing anaphylaxis. It is increasingly consumed and often used as a hidden ingredient, thus making avoidance especially difficult for allergic patients. In Switzerland legislation stipulates that all ingredients of a processed food exceeding 2% of the total mass of the finished food product should be labelled. However, in the case of a mixture of vegetables it can be labelled as "vegetable mix" if it does not exceed 10% of the total weight. Peanut, which is a member of the legume family, can thus form up to 10% of processed foods without being mentioned on the label, thus making avoidance impossible. We report on two patients who presented severe anaphylaxis from peanut hidden in a pizza from a fast food restaurant. We were able to provide evidence for the presence of major peanut antigens in the pizza sauce by immunochemical analysis. These two cases clearly demonstrate the danger of peanut hidden in foods and point up the necessity of a change in legislation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Clinical features of food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical characteristics of food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES), a symptom complex of severe vomiting and diarrhea occurring several hours after the ingestion of particular food proteins in infants. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of a referral population. RESULTS: Sixteen patients had typical FPIES; 11 reacted to milk, 11 to soy, and 7 to both. Mean age at diagnosis was 7 weeks for milk reactivity and 8 weeks for soy reactivity. Two patients also had rice- and pea-induced FPIES. Among 14 patients who were followed up for a median period of 25 months, loss of sensitivity to milk occurred in 6 of 10 patients and loss of sensitivity to soy occurred in 2 of 8. Six additional cases of FPIES were considered atypical: 1 patient had late-onset disease caused by poultry, and in 5 patients IgE antibody to milk or soy developed. During supervised food challenges with milk and soy, the peripheral blood neutrophil count rose over 3500 cells/mm3 in 9 of 10 positive challenges and did not rise above this value in the 7 negative challenges. Emergency treatment was required in 62% of challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Although most patients with FPIES are infants reactive to milk and/or soy, this diagnosis should be considered in older children and for other foods. Food-specific IgE sensitivity may develop in some patients. Standardized food challenges are helpful for diagnosis and follow-up.

Child↗
PubMed1998

Interpreting skin prick tests in the evaluation of food allergy in children.

BACKGROUND: Skin prick tests (SPTs) are utilized routinely in the evaluation of food allergy and several authors have discussed their utility. Efforts to standardize SPT reagents and procedures have been made, but the accuracies of different recording techniques have not been clearly defined. The aim of this study was to compare different SPT recording methods with the outcome of oral food challenge and determine whether they offer any advantage over the criteria proposed by Bock and May (1). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Children suspected of IgE-mediated symptoms to any of five common food allergens (egg, milk, peanut, soy and wheat) were skin tested by the prick technique utilizing commercial extracts. The wheal reactions were recorded by two different methods: first by measuring the largest diameter of the wheal and the diameter orthogonal to it (mean wheal diameter), and second by recording the surface area of the wheal with a hand-held scanner. Wheal sizes above the 95% confidence interval of tolerant individuals were considered positive. The results of double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges were considered the "gold standard" for diagnosis. Cut-off values were compared for positive responses in our study population (mean diameter/surface area of wheal): 4 mm/16 mm2 for egg, 5 mm/29 mm2 for milk, 6 mm/40 mm2 for peanut, 3 mm/9 mm2 for soy, and 3 mm/7 mm2 for wheat. RESULTS: Significant differences in wheal sizes were seen between individuals who were allergic or tolerant to egg (P < 0.001), milk (P < 0.001), wheat (P < 0.005), and peanut (P < 0.05). Reactivity to soy could not be predicted based on SPT results (P = n.s.). The sensitivities and the specificities of the two recording methods were similar. The predictive values were not significantly different from that of the commonly utilized method of grading SPTs (i.e. positive = mean diameter 3 mm or greater than the negative control). CONCLUSIONS: Skin prick tests are a useful procedure for evaluating clinical reactivity to egg, milk, peanut and wheat, but not to soy. While the size of the SPT wheals may be interpreted utilizing mean diameter or surface area cut-offs, the predictive values of these measurement methods were no better than the commonly utilized grading method where a positive skin test was recorded as a mean wheal diameter 3 mm greater than the negative control.

Allergens↗
PubMed1998

Ethanol-induced urticaria: elevated tryptase levels after double-blind, placebo-controlled challenge.

We present a 48-year-old patient who complained for 1 year about urticarial reactions which appeared always when he ingested alcoholic beverages. Skin prick tests with ethanol were negative but positive with 10% acetic acid in the patient. Normal controls tested negative with acetic acid. Skin prick tests to common immediate-type allergens were negative. The patient underwent a double-blind, placebo-controlled challenge test. A few minutes after challenge with ethanol but not with placebo, the patient developed erythema and wheals on the chest and the upper arms. The tryptase serum level rose from undetectable (0.1 U/ml) before challenge to 3.8 U/ml after skin lesions had appeared. This case demonstrates that increased tryptase serum levels can help in the diagnosis of ethanol-induced urticaria.

Alcoholic Beverages↗
PubMed1998

Prevalence of IgE-mediated food allergy among children with atopic dermatitis.

OBJECTIVE: There is a growing body of clinical and laboratory evidence to support the notion that food allergy plays a role in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis (AD). However, the incidence of IgE-mediated food allergy in children with AD is not well established. DESIGN: A prospective study to determine the prevalence of IgE-mediated food hypersensitivity among patients referred to a university-based dermatologist for evaluation of AD. SETTING: University hospital pediatric dermatology clinic. PATIENTS: A total of 63 patients with AD were recruited (35 male; 32 white, 24 African-American, 7 Asian). METHODS: Patients were assigned an AD symptom score (SCORAD) and were screened for food-specific serum IgE antibodies to six foods (milk, egg, wheat, soy, peanut, fish) known to be the most allergenic in children. The levels of food-specific serum IgE were determined by the CAP System fluoroscein-enzyme immunoassay (CAP); patients with a value >/=0.7 kIUa/L were invited for an additional allergy evaluation. Those with CAP values below the cutoff were considered not food allergic. Patients were considered to be allergic if they met one of the following criteria for at least one food: 1) reaction on food challenge; 2) CAP value more than the 95% confidence interval predictive for a reaction; 3) convincing history of an acute significant (hives, respiratory symptoms) reaction after the isolated ingestion of a food to which there was a positive CAP or prick skin test. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients (median age, 2.8 years; median SCORAD, 41.1) were recruited; 22 had negative CAP values (without a significant difference in age or SCORAD score, compared with the 41 with positive specific IgE values). Further allergy evaluation was offered to the 41 remaining patients; 10 were lost to follow-up and 31 were evaluated further. Of these, 19 underwent a total of 50 food challenges (36 double-blind, placebo-controlled, and 14 open), with 11 patients experiencing 18 positive challenges (94% with skin reactions). Additionally, 6 patients had a convincing history with a predictive level of IgE; 5 had a convincing history with positive, indeterminate levels of IgE; and 1 had predictive levels of IgE (to egg and peanut) without a history of an acute reaction. Overall, 23/63 (37%; 95% confidence interval, 25% to 50%) had clinically significant IgE-mediated food hypersensitivity without a significant difference in age or symptom score between those with or without food allergy. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one third of children with refractory, moderate-severe AD have IgE-mediated clinical reactivity to food proteins. The prevalence of food allergy in this population is significantly higher than that in the general population, and an evaluation for food allergy should be considered in these patients.

Adolescent↗