PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P A Howard

Publications and source records attributed to P A Howard.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

New recommendations from the 1999 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association acute myocardial infarction guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: To review literature relating to significant changes in drug therapy recommendations in the 1999 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for treating patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). DATA SOURCES: 1999 ACC/AHA AMI guidelines, English-language clinical trials, reviews, and editorials researching the role of drug therapy and primary angioplasty for AMI that were referenced in the guidelines were included. Additional data published in 2000 or unpublished were also included if relevant to interpretation of the guidelines. STUDY SELECTION: The articles selected influence AMI treatment recommendations. DATA SYNTHESIS: Many clinicians and health systems use the ACC/AHA AMI guidelines to develop treatment plans for AMI patients. This review highlights important changes in AMI drug therapy recommendations by reviewing the results of recent clinical trials. Insights into evolving drug therapy strategies that may impact future guideline development are also described. CONCLUSIONS: Several changes in drug therapy recommendations were included in the 1999 AMI ACC/AHA guidelines. There is emphasis on administering fibrin-specific thrombolytics secondary to enhanced efficacy. Selection between fibrin-specific agents is unclear at this time. Low response rates to thrombolytics have been noted in the elderly, women, patients with heart failure, and those showing left bundle-branch block on the electrocardiogram. These patient groups should be targeted for improved utilization programs. The use of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors in non-ST-segment elevation MI was emphasized. Small trials combining reduced doses of thrombolytics with GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors have shown promise by increasing reperfusion rates without increasing bleeding risk, but firm conclusions cannot be made until the results of larger trials are known. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) trials suggest lower mortality rates for primary PCI when compared with thrombolysis alone. However, primary PCI, including coronary angioplasty, is only available at approximately 13% of US hospitals, making thrombolysis the preferred strategy for most patients. Clopidogrel has supplanted ticlopidine as the recommended antiplatelet agent for patients with aspirin allergy or intolerance following reports of a better safety profile. The recommended dose of unfractionated heparin is lower than previously recommended, necessitating a separate nomogram for patients with acute coronary syndromes. Routine use of warfarin, either alone or in combination with aspirin, is not supported by clinical trials; however, warfarin remains a choice for antithrombotic therapy in patients intolerant to aspirin. Beta-adrenergic receptor blockers continue to be recommended, and emphasis is placed on improving rates of early administration (during hospitalization), even in patients with moderate left ventricular dysfunction. New recommendations for drug treatment of post-AMI patients with low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and/or elevated triglycerides are included, with either niacin or gemfibrozil recommended as an option. Supplementary antioxidants are not recommended for either primary or secondary prevention of AMI, with new data demonstrating lack of efficacy vitamin E in primary prevention. Estrogen replacement therapy or hormonal replacement therapy should not be initiated solely for prevention of cardiovascular disease, but can be continued in cardiovascular patients already taking long-term therapy for other reasons. Bupropion has been added as a new treatment option for smoking cessation. As drug therapy continues to evolve in treating AMI, more frequent updates of therapy guidelines will be necessary.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Aggressive diuresis for severe heart failure in the elderly.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy, safety, and economic benefit of continuous IV infusion of furosemide as a treatment modality for elderly patients with class IV heart failure. DESIGN: Prospective trial of consecutively admitted elderly patients > 65 years old with class IV heart failure. SETTING: A single cardiovascular service in a university medical center. PATIENTS: Seventeen male and female patients > 65 years old consecutively admitted to a cardiovascular service. RESULTS: High-dose, continuous IV infusion of furosemide was successful in providing a 9- to 20-L diuresis in an average of 3.5 days without causing clinical complications or aberrations in blood chemistry. The length of stay was 2.3 days shorter than a contemporary group of class III and class IV elderly patients with heart failure managed on other medical services. The Medicare reimbursement for heart failure was $6,047. Patients receiving IV bolus diuretic therapy incurred billing charges of $10,193, or a loss of $4,146 per patient to the hospital. Patients receiving diuretic infusion therapy incurred billing charges of $4,944. This was a difference of $5,249 per patient treated by continuous IV infusion compared to bolus therapy and a profit per Medicare patient of $1,103. Therefore, a $4,146 billing loss was converted to $1,103 profit. CONCLUSION: IV furosemide infusion therapy for class IV heart failure in the elderly is a safe, effective, and economic mode of therapy.

Aged↗

Optimizing beta-blocker use after myocardial infarction.

Although beta-adrenergic blockers can significantly reduce mortality after a myocardial infarction, these agents are prescribed to only a minority of patients. Underutilization of beta blockers may be attributed, in part, to fear of adverse effects, especially in the elderly and in patients with concomitant disorders such as diabetes or heart failure. However, studies have shown that such patients are precisely the ones who derive the greatest benefit from beta blockade. Advancing age or the presence of potentially complicating disease states is usually not a justification for withholding beta-blocker therapy. With use of cardioselective agents and through careful dosing and monitoring, the benefits of beta blockers after myocardial infarction far outweigh the potential risks in most patients.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Ibutilide: an antiarrhythmic agent for the treatment of atrial fibrillation or flutter.

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the clinical pharmacology of the antiarrhythmic drug ibutilide in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (AFl). DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search (January 1983-December 1997) was used to identify pertinent English-language articles on ibutilide. Key search terms included ibutilide, AF, AFl, cardioversion, and sinus rhythm. The MEDLINE search was supplemented by references included in the bibliographies of comprehensive review articles and studies. STUDY SELECTION: Studies and review articles describing the chemistry, pharmacology, and pharmacokinetics of ibutilide were selected. All abstracts and published clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety were reviewed. DATA EXTRACTION: Pertinent information on the pharmacology and mechanism of action of ibutilide was summarized. Data were extracted from the clinical trials describing trial design, patient population, interventions, methods of evaluation, outcomes, and statistical significance. DATA SYNTHESIS: Ibutilide is a Vaughan-Williams class III antiarrhythmic agent approved for intravenous use for the rapid termination of recent-onset AF or AFl. The drug is extensively metabolized by the liver, has a volume of distribution of 11-15 L/kg, is 40% protein bound, and has an elimination half-life of 6 hours (range 2-12). Data from two placebo-controlled trials demonstrated the efficacy of ibutilide for converting AF or AFl of short duration (< or = 90 d) to normal sinus rhythm. A third placebo-controlled trial demonstrated efficacy in patients who developed AF or AFl following cardiac surgery. Comparative trials with procainamide and sotalol have shown at least similar and perhaps superior efficacy with ibutilide. There are no comparative trials with other antiarrhythmic drugs or with direct current cardioversion (DCC). In 586 clinical trial patients receiving ibutilide, the most significant adverse effect was the development of torsade de pointes in 25 patients (4.3%) including 10 cases (1.7%) in which the rhythm was sustained. All cases of torsade de pointes were terminated electrically and none resulted in death or severe morbidity. No prospective cost-effectiveness studies are available; however, results from two decision models suggest that ibutilide may have advantages over other drugs and first-line electrical cardioversion. CONCLUSIONS: Ibutilide appears to be an effective alternative method for rapid conversion of recent-onset AF or AFl. The drug may be particularly useful in patients who have undergone recent cardiac surgery or those who are not ideal candidates for DCC. Although studies suggest that the risk of proarrhythmia and in particular torsade de pointes is relatively low, caution is advised until additional experience is gained in clinical practice.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗

Guidelines for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major independent risk factor for stroke. AF is most commonly associated with nonvalvular cardiovascular disease and is especially frequent among the elderly. The annual risk for stroke in patients with AF is approximately 5% with a wide range depending on the presence of additional risk factors. For patients who cannot successfully be converted and maintained in normal sinus rhythm (NSR), antithrombotic therapy is an effective method for preventing stroke. The 2 drugs which are indicated for stroke prophylaxis in patients with AF are warfarin and aspirin. For primary prevention, warfarin reduces the risk of stroke approximately 68%. Aspirin therapy is less effective, resulting in a 20 to 30% risk reduction. Combination therapy with aspirin and low intensity warfarin adjusted to an International Normalised Ratio (INR) of 1.2 to 1.5 has not been shown to be superior to standard intensity warfarin with a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0. In patients with AF and a prior history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), the absolute risk reduction with warfarin is even greater because of the high risk of stroke in this population. In contrast, aspirin has not been shown to significantly reduce the risk of stroke in patients with AF when used for secondary prevention. When appropriately managed, warfarin is associated with a low risk of major bleeding. In controlled trials of highly selected patients, the annual rate of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) with warfarin was approximately 0.3%. Studies have shown that specialty anticoagulation clinics can achieve similar low rates of major bleeding. However, these results cannot be extrapolated to the general population. Factors which have been identified as predictors of bleeding include advanced age, number of medications and most importantly, the intensity of anticoagulation. INR values above 4.0 have been associated with an increased risk of major bleeding while values below 2.0 have been associated with thrombosis. Slow careful dosage titration, regular laboratory monitoring and patient education can substantially reduce the risk of complications. In patients with AF, antithrombotic therapy has been shown to be cost effective. For high risk patients, warfarin is the most cost-effective therapy, provided the risks for bleeding are minimised. In contrast, aspirin is the most cost-effective agent for low risk patients. Current practice guidelines for stroke prophylaxis recommend warfarin (target INR 2.5: range 2.0 to 3.0) for AF patients at high risk for stroke including those over 75 years of age or younger patients with additional risk factors. Aspirin should be reserved for low risk patients or those unable to take warfarin. Although these recommendations are strongly supported by the clinical trial evidence, studies show that many patients are not receiving appropriate antithrombotic therapy. In particular, warfarin is underutilised in high risk elderly patients. Additional studies are needed to identify barriers that prevent implementation of the clinical trial findings into clinical practice.

Anticoagulants↗

Difficulty in removal of certain intramedullary nails.

Intramedullary nailing is the most common treatment for displaced diaphyseal fractures of the femur and tibia. Gerhard Küntscher introduced the technique of intramedullary nailing to clinical practice in the 1940s, and this method has been the focus of many authors with regard to indications, technique, complications, and outcome. The five cases presented here represent a complication not often reported in recent years: the difficulty in removing an intact intramedullary nail. Inspection of the interlocking nails in four of the cases presented reveals a specific design characteristic: the cross sectional design of the nail prevents the distal, unslotted end of the nail from being extracted from the medullary cavity. This problem is preventable by a change in nail design or the development of absorbable implants.

Adolescent↗

Dalteparin: a low-molecular-weight heparin.

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the chemistry, pharmacology, and pharmacokinetics of dalteparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), and to review the comparative clinical trial data evaluating the efficacy and safety of dalteparin and unfractionated heparin (UH) for the prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search identified pertinent English-language publications on dalteparin and venous thromboembolism. Key search terms were dalteparin, Fragmin, LMWH, and venous thromboembolism. The search was supplemented by review articles, articles obtained from the bibliographies of the review articles, and the dalteparin approval database. STUDY SELECTION: The most pertinent studies describing the pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of dalteparin in humans were selected; all abstracts and clinical evaluating the use of dalteparin for antithrombotic therapy were reviewed. Review articles by authors of international reputation were selected. DATA EXTRACTION: Pertinent information from the review articles on the pharmacology of LMWHs and UH was summarized. Clinical trial data were extracted for study design, patient demographics, therapeutic regimens, methods of evaluation, and outcomes. DATA SYNTHESIS: Dalteparin is an LMWH indicated for patients undergoing abdominal surgery who are considered to be at risk for deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), which may lead to pulmonary embolism (PE). In this population, numerous clinical trials have demonstrated comparable efficacy between dalteparin and fixed-dose UH for DVT prophylaxis. Dalteparin has a predictable dose response and can be administered as a standard single daily subcutaneous dose for all patients. In therapeutic doses, dalteparin does not alter coagulation tests and therefore does not require routine laboratory monitoring, in contrast with adjusted-dose UH. Bleeding risks with dalteparin are comparable with and possibly less than those associated with UH. Preliminary studies suggest that dalteparin may be effective for other indications, including DVT prophylaxis for hip replacement surgery and the treatment of DVT and PE. Comparative cost-effectiveness data are not yet available. CONCLUSIONS: Dalteparin is the second LMWH to receive approval by the Food and Drug Administration. Dalteparin is indicated for prophylaxis against DVT in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Clinical studies have shown that single daily doses of dalteparin provide a safe and effective alternative to fixed-dose UH therapy. Additional studies are needed to determine the cost-effectiveness of dalteparin compared with UH and other LMWHs.

Abdomen↗

Primary stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: implementing the clinical trial findings.

OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical trials evaluating warfarin for primary stroke prophylaxis in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), to discuss the relative benefits and risks of warfarin versus aspirin therapy, and to review the clinical practice guidelines and identify potential barriers to their implementation in clinical practice. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE literature search was performed to identify clinical trials of antithrombotic therapy for NVAF, clinical practice guidelines, studies evaluating physician practices and attitudes, cost-effectiveness studies, and pertinent review articles. Key search terms included atrial fibrillation, stroke, antithrombotic, warfarin, aspirin, and cost-effectiveness. DATA EXTRACTION: Prospective, randomized clinical trials were selected for analysis. Clinical practice guidelines from recognized panels of experts were reviewed. Comprehensive review articles were selected. DATA SYNTHESIS: NVAF is a common arrhythmia that is associated with a substantial risk for stroke. Seven prospective, randomized, clinical trials have conclusively demonstrated the efficacy of warfarin for stroke prevention. The greatest benefits are achieved in older patients and those with comorbidities that increase their risk for stroke. The potential benefits of preventing a devastating stroke, however, must be weighed against the potential for bleeding complications. Warfarin has been shown to be cost-effective in high-risk patients, provided the rate of complications is minimized. Nonetheless, many physicians remain hesitant to implement warfarin therapy in older, high-risk patients. The clinical data on aspirin are less consistent than those observed with warfarin. Aspirin appears to be most effective in younger individuals or those considered to be at low risk for stroke. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NVAF, the personal, social, and economic consequences of stroke are often devastating. Clinical trials have provided definitive proof that the risks of stroke can be significantly reduced through the use of appropriate antithrombotic therapy. Despite this evidence and the recommendations of a number of clinical practice guidelines, variations in care exist that continue to place patients at risk. Additional outcomes research is needed to evaluate the impact of the clinical trial findings and practice guidelines on clinical practice and to develop methods for overcoming barriers to implementation.

Aged↗

Severe musculoskeletal symptoms during continuous infusion of bumetanide.

BACKGROUND: The continuous infusion of the loop diuretic, bumetanide, has been shown to be effective in the treatment of severe refractory edema. Musculoskeletal symptoms have been reported with bumetanide following both oral and intermittent i.v. bolus therapy. It has been suggested that these adverse effects do not occur with continuous infusion. We describe, however, a series of patients with heart failure who developed severe disabling musculoskeletal symptoms during the continuous infusion of humetanide. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the characteristics of bumetanide-induced musculoskeletal symptoms during continuous i.v. infusion in patients with severe heart failure. METHODS: Heart failure patients receiving continuous infusions of bumetanide were monitored for the development of musculoskeletal symptoms. For patients who experienced the adverse reaction, data were collected on demographics, medical diagnoses, concurrent medications, the diuretic regimen, symptoms, time course of the reaction, laboratory findings, alternative therapy, and outcomes. RESULTS: Of 34 patients who received continuous infusions of bumetanide, eight patients experienced a total of 11 episodes of severe musculoskeletal symptoms. All patients had severe congestive heart failure and refractory edema. The reaction was most severe at infusion rates of approximately 2 mg/h and was not associated with any specific laboratory abnormality. The symptoms resolved completely after discontinuing the bumetanide therapy. In two of the patients, the adverse reaction was precipitated again during rechallenge with the bumetanide infusion. Patients who were given an equivalent or higher dose of a continuous furosemide infusion, diuresed without experiencing musculoskeletal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The continuous i.v. infusion of the loop diuretic, bumetanide, may result in severe, disabling musculoskeletal symptoms. The reaction appears to be dose related, without specific risk factors, and is reversible on discontinuation of the infusion. Patients who experience this reaction may be successfully diuresed with equivalent doses of a furosemide infusion.

Adult↗

Amiodarone for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the role of amiodarone for the maintenance of normal sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and review the clinical trial data evaluating the efficacy and safety of amiodarone in patients with AF. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search was used to identify pertinent literature. Additional references were identified from the articles obtained in the search. Key search terms were atrial fibrillation, amiodarone, and sinus rhythm. STUDY SELECTION: All studies available at the time the article was prepared evaluating the efficacy and safety of amiodarone in AF were included. In addition, review articles discussing the role of amiodarone in AF were selected. DATA EXTRACTION: No large, prospective, randomized trials have been performed. Data from 8 nonrandomized and 2 randomized trials are reported. Information derived from review articles is discussed. DATA SYNTHESIS: In patients with AF, maintenance of normal sinus rhythm is desirable to eliminate symptoms, improve functional capacity, and reduce the risk of thromboembolic complications. Class IA agents traditionally have been used; however, concerns about long-term effects on mortality have focused attention on other agents such as amiodarone. A number of nonrandomized, uncontrolled trials have found amiodarone to be effective for maintaining normal sinus rhythm in patients with AF that is refractory to conventional agents. Two randomized, nonblind trials have found amiodarone's efficacy to be equal to or superior to that of class IA drugs. The findings of these trials must be weighed, however, against the significant potential for toxicity and drug interactions associated with amiodarone. Cardiovascular toxicities, including proarrhythmic effects, appear to be relatively rare. In contrast, noncardiovascular effects are common and potentially serious. CONCLUSION: Although the preliminary data using amiodarone in AF are encouraging, many questions remain unanswered. Prospective, randomized trials are needed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of amiodarone in patients with AF. Studies also are needed to determine the optimal dosing regimen. Until these data are available, each patient must be evaluated individually, taking into account the relative benefits and risks of therapy. Amiodarone may be particularly useful in patients with significant risks for proarrhythmia and those whose AF is refractory to traditional therapy.

Amiodarone↗

Effect of vitamin C on plasma lipids.

OBJECTIVE: To review the effects of vitamin C (ascorbic acid) on plasma lipid concentrations, and to address the proposed mechanisms through which vitamin C may potentially alter lipid concentrations. DATA SOURCE: A MEDLINE search was performed to identify pertinent English-language literature including studies, abstracts, and review articles. Key search terms were vitamin C, ascorbic acid, lipoproteins, lipids, and atherosclerosis. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Studies examining the relationships between vitamin C and plasma lipid concentrations including animal, observational, and clinical trials were selected. Because there were no large randomized, controlled clinical trials, data were extracted from all clinical trials, regardless of design. Review articles discussing the effects of vitamin C on plasma lipid concentrations and the atherosclerotic process also were included. Pertinent information, as judged by the authors, was extracted for discussion. DATA SYNTHESIS: Evidence suggests an inverse relationship between vitamin C intake and the development of atherosclerosis, although the effect has not yet been proven in clinical trials. It has been postulated that this effect might be mediated not only through the antioxidant properties of vitamin C, but also through a plasma lipid-modifying effect. Data from animal and observational trials suggest that high vitamin C concentrations may correlate negatively with concentrations of total cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoproteins and positively with high-density lipoproteins. Other studies, however, have not confirmed these findings. Similarly, results from clinical trials have been widely variable and inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the literature suggests an association between vitamin C and plasma lipid concentrations and a potential role in slowing the development of atherosclerosis. Significant variations and inadequacies in trial design, however, prohibit definitive conclusions. On the basis of these preliminary data, it appears that there is justification for additional well-designed trials to further evaluate the relationship between vitamin C and plasma lipid concentrations.

Animals↗

Monitoring warfarin therapy with the international normalized ratio.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of suboptimal warfarin monitoring. CASE SUMMARY: A patient with a history of rheumatic heart disease and a mechanical mitral valve was admitted to the local hospital complaining of left-sided weakness. At the time, she was receiving warfarin 5 mg/d. Upon admission her prothrombin time (PT) was 15 s. An initial computed tomography (CT) scan of the head was negative. On the basis of the initial findings, it was unclear whether the symptoms were caused by a cerebrovascular accident (CVA). The patient was transferred to the University Medical Center for a more thorough evaluation. The diagnosis of CVA was confirmed by a repeat CT scan seven days after the event. On the basis of the information obtained from the local hospital, it was determined that the initial PT of 15 s converted to an International Normalized Ratio (INR) of 1.5, which is below the recommended range for patients with mechanical heart valves. Prior to discharge, the warfarin dosage was increased to obtain an INR in the recommended range of 2.5-3.5. DISCUSSION: This case illustrates the problems that exist with the current system of PT reporting and the potential advantages of using the INR. Variations in the sensitivity of the thromboplastin reagents used to perform the PT may result in misinterpretation of the level of anticoagulation and errors in warfarin dosage adjustments. The potential for suboptimal anticoagulation is greatly increased in patients, such as the one reported here, who are having PTs performed by multiple laboratories. CONCLUSIONS: To maximize efficacy and minimized the risk of bleeding complications, warfarin therapy must be individualized and closely monitored. Standardization of PT monitoring through the use of the INR would significantly reduce the potential for suboptimal anticoagulation associated with the traditional system of reporting.

Cerebrovascular Disorders↗

Treating isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly.

OBJECTIVE: To review the prevalence, pathophysiology, vascular risk, and treatment of isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) in the elderly. DATA SOURCE: A MEDLINE search of the English language literature was performed to identify pertinent literature. Key search terms were hypertension, systolic, and elderly. STUDY SELECTION: All studies available evaluating drug therapy for ISH or hypertension in the elderly as well as review articles discussing the prevalence, pathophysiology, and treatment of ISH were selected. SYNTHESIS: ISH occurs commonly in the elderly and is associated with increased risk for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. Although the mechanism for ISH in the elderly is not completely understood, the primary factor is believed to be a reduction in arterial compliance. Results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program demonstrated that control of ISH using a diuretic alone or in combination with a beta-blocker significantly reduced the incidence of strokes and cardiovascular events. In this trial, drug therapy was found to be safe and generally well tolerated by the elderly. Newer antihypertensive agents such as the calcium-channel blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have also been shown to effectively lower SBP in the elderly, but the effects on long-term morbidity and mortality are not yet known. CONCLUSIONS: ISH is an important risk factor for vascular disease in the elderly. Accurate diagnosis and effective drug treatment can result in significant reductions in the risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. Based on the available trial data, diuretics appear to be the drugs of first choice unless there are contra-indications. If combination drug therapy is required, beta-blockers should be considered although their contribution to vascular risk reduction remains less clear. Additional studies are needed to determine the long-term benefits and risks of alternative antihypertensive agents such as calcium-channel blockers and ACE inhibitors.

Aged↗

Calcium-channel antagonists for prevention of atherosclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: To critically evaluate the current literature regarding the role of calcium-channel antagonists in preventing atherosclerosis. DATA SOURCES: English language clinical studies, abstracts, conference proceedings, and review articles pertaining to calcium-channel antagonists and atherosclerosis. STUDY SELECTION: Relevant animal and human studies examining the role of calcium-channel antagonists in atherosclerosis prevention and treatment. DATA EXTRACTION: Potential mechanisms for the development of atherosclerosis and the use of calcium antagonists for preventing and treating coronary artery disease are discussed. Animal studies are summarized; next, significant data from human clinical studies are presented. DATA SYNTHESIS: Available studies are described and discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Results from animal and clinical trials in humans suggest that calcium antagonists may retard the development and progression of atherosclerosis. However, most clinical trials to date have been conducted in patients with proven atherosclerotic plaques. Further studies examining the role of calcium-channel antagonists in preventing and treating atherosclerosis are needed, but may be difficult to conduct because of the large numbers of patients required, long trial duration, and associated costs.

Animals↗

Child abuse in Alexandra. A clinic-based study and a community programme.

During a 21-month period 140 cases of child abuse were seen at the Alexandra Health Centre and University Clinic. The most common form of abuse was sexual abuse (81.5%), followed by physical abuse (9.3%) and neglect (7.1%). Combined abuse was seen in 2.1% of cases. Age, sex, presentation and perpetrator are discussed and a community programme recommended.

Child↗