PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P A Mainland

Publications and source records attributed to P A Mainland.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Absorption of lidocaine during aspiration anesthesia of the airway.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal solution to use when anesthetizing the airway by aspiration of lidocaine. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind clinical study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: 96 adult ASA physical status 1,II, and III patients, scheduled for diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive one of 5 solutions of lidocaine: Group A (n = 16): 1% lidocaine, 0.2 mL. kg(-1); Group B (n = 16): 1.5% 0.2 mL. kg(-1); Group C (n = 32): 2% 0.2 mL. kg(-1); Group D (n = 16): 1% 0.3 mL. kg(-1), and Group E (n = 16): 2% 0.3 mL. kg(-1). Fiberoptic bronchoscopy was performed after the airway was anesthetized with this aspiration technique, using the assigned lidocaine solution. The scope was manipulated in the trachea to test for anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Successful airway anesthesia was determined by tolerance to bronchoscopy without sustained coughing, and also by the number of lidocaine supplements, if any, that were given via the bronchoscope. Arterial plasma concentrations of lidocaine were measured in 33 patients from Groups C, D, and E. All solutions provided equally effective anesthesia of the airway. All patients tolerated endoscopy through the vocal cords, and 94 patients required no supplementary anesthesia, or only one dose of lidocaine, during bronchoscopy to the carina. The highest peak plasma concentrations of lidocaine were 5.02 and 6.28 microg. mL. No patient had signs of toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: This technique produced anesthesia of the airway to the carina, safely, suitable for awake intubation, in 94 of 95 patients. The use of 1% lidocaine, 0.2 to 0.3 mL. kg(-1), so that the volume is 10 to 20 mL, is recommended.

Absorption↗
PubMed1999

Anesthesia of the airway by aspiration of lidocaine.

PURPOSE: Lidocaine instilled onto to the back of the tongue of a supine subject and aspirated has been reported to provide effective topical anesthesia of the airway. The purpose of this study was to observe endoscopically the fate of lidocaine so instilled and document the efficacy of anesthesia for awake fibreoptic intubation. METHODS: In Part I of the study, a fibreoptic bronchoscope was positioned in the pharynx of three volunteers lying supine and the route followed by tinted lidocaine solution instilled onto the back of the protruded tongue during mouth breathing was observed. In Part 2, the airway of 39 patients requiring awake fibreoptic intubation was anesthetized by having them gargle twice with 5 ml lidocaine 2%, followed by instillation of 0.2 ml-kg(-1) or 20 ml lidocaine 1.5% (whichever was less) onto the dorsum of their tongues as described above. The efficacy of anesthesia was scored by the patient reaction (coughing or gagging) to instrumentation in the pharynx, at the glottis, and in the trachea; to passage of the tracheal tube into the trachea; and to the presence of the tube in the trachea. RESULTS: Lidocaine instilled on to the back of the tongue was swallowed initially but ultimately pooled in the pharynx and was aspirated. In all patients the trachea was intubated without requiring supplemental lidocaine, and all but one patient tolerated the tracheal tube in situ. CONCLUSION: A combination of lidocaine gargles and lidocaine instilled on to the back of the tongue and aspirated provides effective anesthesia of the pharynx, larynx, and trachea for awake fibreoptic intubation.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Postoperative analgesic requirement after cesarean section: a comparison of anesthetic induction with ketamine or thiopental.

UNLABELLED: In a randomized, double-blind study, we compared postoperative pain and analgesic requirement in patients who underwent elective cesarean section under general anesthesia induced with thiopental 4 mg/kg (n = 20) or ketamine 1 mg/kg (n = 20). Anesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide and isoflurane. Postoperative analgesia was provided by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) using morphine. Median (range) time to first PCA demand was greater in the ketamine group (28 [3-134] min) compared with the thiopental group (20.5 [3-60] min; P = 0.04). Median (range) morphine consumption over 24 h was less in the ketamine group (24.3 [3-41] mg) compared with the thiopental group (35 [4-67] mg; P = 0.017). Visual analog scale pain scores were similar between groups. No patients had recall of intraoperative events or unpleasant dreams. Two patients in the thiopental group and one patient in the ketamine group had pleasant intraoperative dreams. Apgar scores were similar between groups. Median umbilical venous pH was higher (7.33 vs 7.31; P = 0.04) and attributable to lower median umbilical venous Pco2 (5.72 vs 6.14 kPa; P = 0.02) in the ketamine group compared with the thiopental group. Induction of anesthesia for cesarean section using ketamine is associated with a lower postoperative analgesic requirement compared with thiopental. IMPLICATIONS: Patients who had anesthesia for cesarean section induced with ketamine required less analgesic drugs in the first 24 h compared with patients who received thiopental. Ketamine, unlike thiopental, has analgesic properties that may reduce sensitization of pain pathways and extend into the postoperative period.

Adult↗