PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Boccasanta

Publications and source records attributed to P Boccasanta.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

[Inguinal tension-free hernioplasty performed by day-care surgery in a non-specialized hospital].

BACKGROUND: At present, as a result of the introduction of tension-free techniques, the general opinion is that the treatment of inguinal hernia needs day-care surgery. Nevertheless day-care surgery requires a specific organization of the hospital and of the territorial services, after the discharge of the patient. These facilities are not always available all over the country. The aim of this paper is to present the results of the treatment of inguinal hernia performed by day-care surgery in an unspecialized hospital. METHODS: From April 1999 to April 2000, 28 patients (25 M), median age 54 years (range 25-85), affected by inguinal hernia, underwent ernioplasty operation according to Trabucco technique, by only one skilled surgeon, in an unspecialized hospital. Five patients were affected by inguinal hernia of type I of Nyhus, 9 of type II, 10 of type IIIa and 4 of type IIIb. Twenty-five patients underwent spinal anaesthesia and 3 general anaesthesia due to failure of the previous one or for contraindications due to spine diseases or due to patient's request. All patients remained in the hospital the night after the operation. After discharge, patients were controlled in the outpatient ambulatory every other day for 10 days. After that, patients were required to submit to physical examination only if they were symptomatic. At present, average follow-up is of 18.1+/-6.3 months. RESULTS: The following unspecific complications prevalently due to spinal anaesthesia were observed: 2 (7.1%) acute urinary retentions, 1 (3.6%) headache, 1 (3.6%) acute hypotension, 2 (7.1%) feverets, 1 (3.6%) vomiting, and 1 (3.6%) influenza. The specific complications were: 2 (7.1%) transient neuralgias, 2 (7.1%) ecchimosis and 1 (3.6%) infection of the wound. Average intensity of postoperative pain (VAS) was of 2.8+/-1.2. The average abstention from work was of 12.5 days. Until now, any recurrence has been observed. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of the few cases, our results are similar to those of specialized hospitals organized for day-care surgery. Anyway, in the management of these patients in unspecialized hospitals, according to our opinion one night in the hospital after the operation is required for the easiness of the patient and of the surgeon.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Complications after stapled hemorrhoidectomy: can they be prevented?

Stapled hemorrhoidectomy (SH), a new approach to the treatment of hemorrhoids, removes a circumferential strip of mucosa about four centimeters above the dentate line. A review of 1,107 patients treated with SH from twelve Italian coloproctological centers has revealed a 15% (164/1,107) complication rate. Immediate complications (first week) were: severe pain in 5.0% of all patients, bleeding (4.2%), thrombosis (2.3%), urinary retention (1.5%), anastomotic dehiscence (0.5%), fissure (0.2%), perineal intramural hematoma (0.1%), and submucosal abscess (0.1%). Bleeding was treated surgically in 24%, with Foley insertion 15%; and by epinephrine infiltration in 2%; 53% of patients with bleeding received no treatment and 6% needed transfusion. One patient with anastomotic dehiscence needed pelvic drainage and colostomy formation. The most common complication after 1 week was recurrence of hemorrhoids in 2.3% of patients, severe pain (1.7%), stenosis (0.8%), fissure (0.6%), bleeding (0.5%), skin tag (0.5%), thrombosis (0.4%), papillary hypertrophy (0.3%) fecal urency (0.2%), staples problems (0.2%), gas flatus and fecal incontinence (0.2%), intramural abscess, partial dehiscence, mucosal septum and intussusception (each <0.1%). Recurrent hemorrhoids were treated by ligation in 40% and by Milligan-Morgan procedure in 32%. All hemorrhoidal thromboses were excised. Anal stenoses were treated by dilatation in 55% and by anoplasty in 45%. Fissure was treated by dilatation in 57%. Most complications (65%) occurred after the surgeon had more than 25 case experiences of stapled hemorrhoidectomy. The most common complication in the first 25 cases of the surgeon's experience was bleeding (48%). Even though SH appears to be promising, we feel that a multicenter randomized study with a long-term follow-up comparing SH and banding is necessary before recommending the procedure. Most complications can be avoided by respecting the rectal wall anatomy in the execution of the procedure.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Selection criteria and long-term results of surgery in symptomatic rectocele.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to confirm some selection criteria for the transrectal repair of the anterior rectocele and to compare our surgical results with those reported in the literature. METHODS: From January 1992 to December 1999, 30 females (mean age 52.9 years, range 28-70 yrs) affected by anterior rectocele were prospectively evaluated with a standard questionnaire, clinical examination, proctosigmoidoscopy, colonic transit time, dynamic defecography, anal EMG, anal manometry. Then, they were submitted to transrectal repair of rectocele with anterior plication of the rectal muscular wall. Fourteen (46.6%) of them were also submitted to perineal levatorplasty. Patients were followed postoperatively (mean 25.7 months) with the same standard questionnaire, clinical examination, defecography, and manometry. Results were tested by Fisher's Exact text, Wilcoxon's test, and "t"-test. RESULTS: Rectal dyschezia, incomplete evacuation, digital help in defecating, mean stool frequency, and rectal bleeding significantly improved. After 3 months, 30% of patients had no complaints, 40% had only 1-2 episodes/month complaints, 13.3% had evacuation only using laxatives, and 16.6% were unchanged. Defecography showed a significant reduction of the rectocele in 70% of patients after 3 months. Manometric parameters were not significantly modified. Four (28.6%) out of 14 patients submitted to perineal levatorplasty complained of dyspareunia. CONCLUSIONS: Our surgical results were comparable with those reported in the literature, with more than 80% of successful outcome. Preoperative clinical data and defecography were confirmed to be basic parameters in selecting patients for surgery. Colonic transit time, anal EMG, and anorectal manometry demonstrated to be useful to recognize conditions as slow colonic transit time, peripheral denervation, and reduced voluntary contraction that could lead to a less satisfactory outcome after surgery, and might benefit with a postoperative perineal rehabilitation by biofeedback and anal electrostimulations. The perineal levatorplasty is not suitable in young females, due to the risk of dyspareunia.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Which surgical approach for rectocele? A multicentric report from Italian coloproctologists.

The most effective surgical technique for rectocele has not yet been clearly established. A retrospective multicentric study was carried out to compare the long-term results of 3 endorectal techniques (Block, Sarles and stapled) and the perineal levatorplasty, alone and in association, in a series of patients with symptomatic rectocele. From January 1992 to December 1999, 2212 patients with defecation disorders were referred to 5 Italian coloproctology units. An anterior rectocele was clinically diagnosed in 1045 patients and confirmed with defecography. On the basis of clinical and radiological parameters, 317 patients (312 women; mean age, 52.4+/-20.1 years) were selected for surgery. Group 1 consisted of 141 patients (136 women; mean age, 50.4+/-18.8 years) who were submitted to endorectal operations. Group 2 consisted of 126 women (mean age, 52.5+/-19.7 years) who received perineal levatorplasty. Finally, 50 women (mean age, 54.3+/-21.9 years) in Group 3 received endorectal operations associated with perineal levatorplasty. A total of 269 patients were followed postoperatively (mean period, 24.2+/-3.1 months, 27.5+/-5.4 months and, 22.8+/-2.8 months, respectively) with the same questionnaire and clinical examination. Three months after surgery, a defecography examination and anorectal manometry were performed in 136 and 132 patients, respectively. Operative time, hospital stay and time to return to work were significantly higher in Group 3 (p<0.001). There was one death in Group 3 due to severe sepsis. Main postoperative complications were: in Group 1, hemorrhage (7.8%, all Sarles), dehiscence of the endorectal suture (5.0%, all Block), distal rectal stenosis (2.1%, 1 stapled, 2 block), and rectovaginal fistula (1.4%, all Sarles); in Group 2, delayed healing of the perineal wound (16.4%); in Group 3 delayed healing of the perineal wound (22.0%), hemorrhage (6%, all Sarles), dehiscence (4.0%), stenosis (2.0%). 17.3% of patients of Group 2 and 22.5% of Group 3 complained of dyspareunia. Postoperative defecography showed a complete absence of the rectocele in 44.1% of patients and reduction of size in the others, without significant differences among the three groups. Manometric pattern was not significantly modified by surgery. Significant symptoms recurred in 5.9% of the patients in Group 1, 6.4% in Group 2, and 5.0% in Group 3. Perineal levatorplasty did not significantly improve obstructed defecation, as it did not allow to excise the rectal mucosal prolapse, and was followed by an high incidence of delayed healing of the perineal wound and dyspareunia. Sarles procedure achieved better control of mucosal prolapse but carried a higher complication rate compared to the others. The association of the perineal levatorplasty with an endorectal technique required significantly longer operative time, and led to a longer hospital stay and time to return to work. In conclusion, the investigated techniques showed different patterns of postoperative complications: bleeding after Sarles, dehiscence after Block, dyspareunia after perineoplasty and fatal gangrene after stapled, but non of them showed a clear superiority over the others in term of clinical or functional results 2 years after surgery.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Randomised controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse.

BACKGROUND: This randomized prospective study compared the outcome of circular hemorrhoidectomy according to the Hospital Leopold Bellan (HLB) technique (Paris) with Longo stapled circumferential mucosectomy (LSCM) in two homogeneous groups of patients affected by circular fourth-degree hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse. METHODS: From December 1996 to December 1999, 80 consecutive patients with fourth-degree hemorrhoids and external mucosal prolapse were randomly assigned to two groups. Forty patients (group A: 18 men, 22 women, mean age 50.5 years, range 21 to 82) underwent HLB hemorrhoidectomy, and 40 patients (group B: 15 men, 25 women, mean age 51.0 years, range 29 to 92) underwent LSCM. Before surgery, all patients were selected with a standard questionnaire for symptom evaluation, full proctological examination, flexible rectosigmoidoscopy, dynamic defecography, and anorectal manometry. No significant differences among the two groups were found. All patients were controlled with follow-up questionnaire and with clinical examination at 1, 2, 4, 12, and 54 weeks after the operation. A postoperative manometry was performed 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: The length of the operation was significantly lower in group B (25 +/- 3.1 SD versus 50 +/- 5.3 minutes, P <0.001). Mean hospital stay was 3 +/- 0.4 days in group A and 2 +/- 0.5 days in group B (P <0.01). Mean duration of inability to work was 8 +/- 0.9 days in group B and 15 +/- 1.4 days in group A (P <0.001). Postoperative pain was significantly lower in group B (P <0.001). Mean length of follow-up was 20 +/- 8.0 months in group A and 20 +/- 7.8 months in group B. Late complications were similar in the two groups, with 0%, at present, recurrence rate. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that both operations are safe, easy to perform, and effective in the treatment of advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse. However, the LSCM seems to be preferable owing to the fewer postoperative complications, easier postoperative management, and shorter time to return to work. A longer follow-up is required to confirm the true efficacy of this surgical method.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Simple and complicated acute appendicitis. Indications for a correct diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: In this retrospective investigation the symptoms, signs, and laboratory findings collected in 2 groups of patients with simple and complicated acute appendicitis, respectively, have been observed in order to give some indication for a correct diagnosis and surgical treatment. METHODS: A total of 103 consecutive patients affected by simple and complicated acute appendicitis submitted to surgical operation have been studied. RESULTS: Data collected show statistically significant differences between clinical presentation of simple and complicated acute appendicitis. CONCLUSIONS: The conclusion is draws in that anamnesis and clinical examination of the patients affected by acute appendicitis are the best indications for an exact diagnosis and to select patients who need an immediate operation.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1999

Surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse: results of abdominal and perineal approaches.

This retrospective study reports the results of our 5-year experience in the diagnosis and treatment of rectal prolapse with fecal incontinence by the abdominal (laparotomy or laparoscopy) and perineal approaches. Twenty-five patients (group A; 22 women and 3 men; mean age 57.3 years; range 22-76 years) were operated on by the abdominal approach and ten (group B; 8 women and 2 men; mean age 68.9 years; range 58-84 years) by the perineal approach. All patients were evaluated by clinical examination, proctosigmoidoscopy, pancolonic transit time, dynamic defecography, anorectal manometry, and anal electromyography preparatory to surgery. In patients of group A, we performed an abdominal rectopexy in 19 cases (7 by laparoscopy) and in the remaining 6 cases, a sigmoid resection-rectopexy (3 of which were by laparoscopy). All patients of group B were treated by a perineal operation using Delorme's mucosectomy in 4 cases and Altemeier's rectosigmoidectomy with total perineoplasty in 6 cases. The mean follow-up was 38.8 months in group A and 25.7 months in group B. The postoperative complication rate was 8% (two cases) in group A, whereas no significant complications occurred in group B. Dyschezia and fecal incontinence improved significantly in both groups (P < 0.05 in group A and P < 0.005 in group B), whereas anoperineal pain was not significantly reduced. At 1-year follow-up, the recurrences rates were 8% in group A and 30% in group B. Rectopexy or resection-rectopexy proved to be a safe and effective procedure for external prolapse, without a discernible difference between the laparotomic and laparoscopic techniques. In selected cases, the perineal approach gives good results regarding fecal incontinence without complications, even if in these patients, the likelihood of recurrence is high.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Laparotomic vs. laparoscopic rectopexy in complete rectal prolapse.

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the functional and clinical results of laparotomic and laparoscopic rectopexy in 2 homogeneous groups of patients with complete rectal prolapse and fecal incontinence. METHODS: Between January 1989 and December 1997, twenty-three patients underwent abdominal rectopexy. Thirteen patients (group A, 12 females and 1 male, mean age 57.3, range 22-76 years), and 10 patients (group B, 10 females, mean age 52.3, range 26-70 years) were submitted respectively to either Wells laparotomic or laparoscopic rectopexy by the same surgical team using the same surgical technique and materials. Before the operation a detailed clinical history was collected, and the patients were studied by inspection and digital examination of the anorectum, proctosigmoidoscopy, pancolonic transit time, dynamic defecography, anorectal manometry and anal electromyography. After the operation all patients underwent perineal physiotherapy, external electric stimulation, and perineal biofeedback. Mean follow-up was 37.1 (range 6-90) months in group A and 25.7 (range 6-49) months in group B. Values were compared by chi(2), Mann-Whitney U, and Wilcoxon tests as appropriate. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05. RESULTS: In both groups dyschezia and fecal incontinence improved significantly (p < 0.05) after the operation. The basal pressure of the anal sphincter, squeezing pressure and rectoanal reflex improved without significance, and anal-perineal pain was not significantly reduced. In group B the postoperative hospital stay was lower than in group A, with a reduction in costs. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic Wells rectopexy has the same clinical and functional results as laparotomic rectopexy, but with a shorter postoperative hospital stay and lower costs.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Comparison of laparoscopic rectopexy with open technique in the treatment of complete rectal prolapse: clinical and functional results.

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the functional and clinical results of laparoscopic rectopexy with those of the open technique in two similar groups of patients with complete rectal prolapse and fecal incontinence. Between November 1992 and June 1997, 21 patients underwent abdominal rectopexy. Thirteen patients (group A: 12 women and 1 man, mean age 52.9 years, range 28-70) and 8 patients (group B: 8 women, mean age 58.2 years, range 20-76) were submitted to Well's rectopexy by the open technique and the laparoscopic approach, respectively, without division of the lateral rectal ligaments. Assignment to each group was done randomly. Before the operation, a detailed clinical history was taken, and patients were studied with inspection and digital examination of the anorectum, proctosigmoidoscopy, determination of pancolonic transit time, dynamic defecography, anorectal manometry, and anal electromyography. After the operation, all patients underwent perineal physiotherapy, external electric stimulation, and perineal biofeedback. The mean follow-up time was 29.5 months (range 6-54) in group A and 25.7 months (range 8-45) in group B. Values were compared by chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, and Wilcoxon tests, as appropriate; differences were considered significant at p < 0.05. In both groups, dyschezia and fecal incontinence improved significantly (p < 0.05) after the operation. Basal pressure of anal sphincter, squeezing pressure, and rectoanal reflex improved without significance, whereas anoperineal pain was not significantly reduced. In group B, the postoperative hospital stay was shorter than in group A, with a marked reduction of costs. Laparoscopic Well's rectopexy has the same clinical and functional results as the open technique, with a shorter postoperative hospital stay and lower costs.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

[The surgical correction of anterior rectocele. Our experience].

Rectocele, or namely the protrusion of the anterior wall of the rectum into the vaginal lumen following the collapse of the rectovaginal septum, is the most common anatomic alteration observed in patients suffering from defecation disorders. The surgical treatment of this pathology is still controversial, particularly in the choice of the surgical approach. From 1992 to 1994 10 patients suffering from low type, symptomatic anterior rectocele associated with intrarectal intussusception underwent muscular plastic surgery of the rectocele and anterior mucosectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether surgical muscular plastic of the rectocele using a transanal approach associated with anterior mucosectomy represents in selected symptomatic patients, a rational and elective therapeutic option. In spite of the small number of patients and the short postoperative follow-up, the authors state that, on the basis of the results obtained, the surgical technique used in this clinical series significantly improves symptoms with a lower incidence of complications compared to the transvaginal approach.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

[Subtotal colectomy with ceco-rectal anastomosis (Deloyers) for severe idiopathic constipation: an alternative to total colectomy reducing risks of digestive sequelae].

PURPOSE: Functional results of total colectomy (TC) and ileorectal anastomosis for colonic inertia are often impaired by postoperative obstruction and diarrhea. In order to avoid these postoperative complications, we propose a subtotal colectomy (STC) preserving the ileo-caecal junction. METHODS: Since 1989, 18 consecutive patients (17 F, 1 M; mean age: 54 years) with intractable constipation underwent TC (n = 6) or STC with caecorectal anastomosis (Deloyers Procedure) (n = 12). Mean preoperative bowel frequency was two movements every month. Colonic inertia was defined as diffuse marker delay during transit study without obstructed defecation on manometry or digitalised rectography. Rectocele (n = 10), rectal (n = 5) and genital prolapse (n = 6) were treated in the same operative time. RESULTS: Postoperative course was uneventful after STC but bowel obstruction, requiring laparotomy, occurred in 3 patients (50%) after TC: enterolysis (n = 2), bowel resection (n = 2). Mean postoperative day stool frequency of TC (4.2 +/- 1.2) was higher than STC (1.2 +/- 0.1). Half of patients after TC needed anti-diarrheal treatment and diet, 33% had rectal evacuation difficulties despite liquid stools, 17% had episodic incontinence, 66% had persistent abdominal pain. Compared to TC, the functional results of STC were significantly better: regular normal transit return without diet or treatment in 75% of cases, 25% had rectal emptying difficulties easily treated by mild laxatives, only 17% had persistent abdominal pain. Postoperative obstruction, diarrhea or fecal incontinence never occurred after STC. CONCLUSION: Compared to TC, STC with Deloyers procedure seems to reduce significantly the postoperative incidence of bowel obstruction, diarrhea and abdominal pain. Expected regular transit return after STC needs a careful selection of patients and simultaneous treatment of ano-rectal and pelvic floor abnormalities frequently associated with colonic inertia.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

[Video laparoscopic surgery and rectal prolapse. Our experience in rectopexy].

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy is gaining an important role in the treatment of benign colorectal disorders. The aim of this study is the evaluation of clinical and functional results in 4 patients submitted to a laparoscopy rectopexy according to Wells. METHODS: Four females (22-76, mean 53.7 years) affected from a total rectal prolapse with fecal incontinence underwent this procedure from 1993 through 1995. Six months after surgery, at the end of a rehabilitation program consisting of kinesitherapy, bio-feedback and electrostimulations, all patients have been re-evaluated by means of a clinical exam, anorectal manometry, defecography. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results seem satisfactory and may allow to prefer this approach instead of the traditional open one.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

[Results of the use of topical diosmin (venosmine) in the treatment of acute hemorrhoid pathology].

There is still much discussion about the pharmacological treatment of certain symptoms caused by haemorrhoids and their complications. In 1986 topical treatment with Diosmina ointment was used on 50 patients (33 males, 17 females) with grade 1, 2, 3 or 4 haemorrhoids featuring strangulation and thrombosis. Patients who had previously been given other treatment were excluded from the study. The efficacy of the treatment was assessed by a simple method previously used by others which involves scoring (0-3) the major symptoms of the condition (bleeding, oedema, erythema, pain, itching) according to severity. The drug was most effective on oedema and erythema, producing 75% and 73% improvements as assessed in three consecutive weekly visits. These results confirm the value of Diosmina in the topical treatment of acute haemorrhoids. In particular the treatment is very well tolerated and produces no unwanted side effects if properly used.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed1986

[Treatment of acute symptoms of hemorrhoid disease with high-dose oral O-(beta-hydroxyethyl)-rutosides].

The pharmacological treatment is widely used in the therapy of haemorrhoids. An efficient treatment is particularly useful in case of haemorrhoids of 2nd, 3rd and 4th degree, when phlogosis, oedema and pain are present. Forty patients were treated with either O-(beta-hydroxyethyl)-rutosides (4 g/day orally) or placebo in a double blind randomized comparative trial. The groups of treatment were homogeneous. O-(beta-hydroxyethyl)-rutosides induced a statistically significant reduction of pain and bleeding; placebo did not induce any significant improvement. Tolerability was good and similar for both treatments. It has never been necessary to stop treatment for side effects. The results obtained in this study confirm the usefulness on administering an oral treatment, and not only a local treatment, to patients with acute symptoms of haemorrhoids, both in case of intermittent treatment and in case it is used to prepare quickly the patient for surgery.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1985

Clinical evaluation of triletide versus antacids in the treatment of duodenal ulcer out-patients.

Thirty out-patients with endoscopically assessed, active duodenal ulcer of mild to moderate intensity were randomly assigned to 8-weeks' treatment with either antacids (0.8 g/day each of aluminium hydroxide and magnesium hydroxide), triletide (1.5 g/day) or a combination of the two treatments. Every other week, the intensity of subjective symptoms and of objective signs was scored and recorded, and the endoscopic outcome assessed at the 8th week. Three patients on antacids alone and 1 on triletide alone were withdrawn at the 4th week because of therapeutic failure. Symptoms and signs improved in the three groups significantly faster, to a significantly greater extent, and in more patients with triletide, alone or in combination, than with antacids. Endoscopic evidence of therapeutic response was detected in significantly more patients given triletide, alone or in combination, in comparison with the group who had antacids. A significant influence on promoting ulcer healing could be attributed to triletide (p less than 0.05, multiple linear regression) and not to antacids. Tolerance was complete in all patients. It is concluded that triletide appears to be equally well tolerated as, but significantly more effective than, antacids in relieving symptoms and promoting healing in patients with mild to moderate duodenal ulcer.

Adult↗