Comprehensive review of the management of internal mammary lymph node metastases in breast cancer.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to P Borgen.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Gossypol has demonstrated in vitro effects on cell cycle regulation and anti-tumor activity against mammary carcinoma cell lines. This Phase I/II study assesses both the effect of gossypol on cell cycle regulatory proteins in vivo and the clinical effect. Twenty women with refractory metastatic breast cancer received oral gossypol at daily doses between 30 and 50 mg per day. Gossypol plasma levels were measured (n = 8) and the modulation of the retinoblastoma (Rb) gene protein and Cyclin D1 was assessed by serial biopsies (n = 4). Grade I-II toxicities with gossypol treatment included nausea in 30% of patients, fatigue 15%, emesis 15%, altered taste sensation 15% and diarrhea in 10% of patients. Two of the three patients receiving 50 mg/day experienced dose limiting dermatologic toxicity (grade III). One patient had a minor response and two patients had stable disease with > 50% decline in serial assessments of the serum tumor markers. Immunohistochemical analysis of cyclin D1 and Rb expression in serial biopsies of four patients revealed both a concurrent decrease in cyclin D1 expression and an increase in nuclear Rb expression in three patients. The maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of gossypol was 40 mg/day. Gossypol appears to affect the expression of Rb protein and cyclin D1 in breast cancer metastases at doses achievable, yet had negligible antitumor activity against anthracycline and taxane refractory metastatic breast cancer. The cell cycle regulatory effects of gossypol suggest a potential role for gossypol as a modulating agent in conjunction with other cell cycle specific compounds.
BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node status is the strongest prognostic indicator of survival for women with breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of sentinel node metastases in patients with high-risk ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) and DCIS with microinvasion (DCISM). METHODS: From November 1997 to November 1999, all patients who underwent sentinel node biopsy for high-risk DCIS (n = 76) or DCISM (n = 31) were enrolled prospectively in our database. Patients with DCIS were considered high risk and were selected for sentinel lymph node biopsy if there was concern that an invasive component would be identified in the specimen obtained during the definitive surgery. Patients underwent intraoperative mapping that used both blue dye and radionuclide. Excised sentinel nodes were serially sectioned and were examined by hematoxylin and eosin and by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Of 76 patients with high-risk DCIS, 9 (12%) had positive sentinel nodes; 7 of 9 patients were positive for micrometastases only. Of 31 patients with DCISM, 3 (10%) had positive sentinel nodes. 2 of 3 were positive for micrometastases only. Six of nine patients with DCIS and three of three with DCISM and positive sentinel nodes had completion axillary dissection; one patient with DCIS had an additional positive node detected by conventional histological analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study documents a high incidence of lymph node micrometastases as detected by sentinel node biopsy in patients with high-risk DCIS and DCISM. Although the biological significance of breast cancer micrometastases remains unclear at this time, these findings suggest that sentinel node biopsy should be considered in patients with high-risk DCIS and DCISM.
BACKGROUND: Germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. Whether women with breast cancer who have inherited mutations in these genes have a different outcome after breast conservation therapy than women with "sporadic" cancer is unresolved. Consequently, we compared the outcomes after breast conservation therapy in Ashkenazi women with or without germline mutations in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 (hereafter called BRCA). METHODS: We studied 305 women of Ashkenazi Jewish descent undergoing breast-conserving treatment for 329 invasive breast cancers. We reviewed their clinical records, retrieved their archival tissue samples, and tested those samples for the founder mutations BRCA1 185delAG, BRCA1 5382insC, and BRCA2 6174delT. Genetic results were linked to clinical data and outcomes by univariate and multivariate analyses. All Pvalues are two-sided. RESULTS: We detected mutations in BRCA genes in 28 of 305 women. Women with BRCA mutations were more likely to be diagnosed with cancer before the age of 50 years (P<.001) and to have lymph node involvement (P =.04). Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence was more common in women with BRCA mutations, although this did not reach statistical significance (relative risk [RR] = 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.64-5.03). Women with mutations were more likely to develop contralateral breast cancer (RR = 3.50; 95% CI = 1.78-8.74; P =.001). Distant disease-free survival was shorter in women with mutations (66.2% versus 84.3% at 10 years; P =.05), as was breast cancer-specific survival (71.9% versus 87.2% at 10 years; P =.02). Tumor stage and nodal status, but not mutation status, were predictive of distant disease-free and breast cancer-specific survival in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Women with BRCA founder mutations are at increased risk for breast cancer-related events after breast conservation. However, mutation status is not an independent predictor of survival and should not influence decisions regarding adjuvant therapy. The increased contralateral breast cancer risk in women heterozygous for BRCA mutations mandates careful surveillance.
BACKGROUND: It is controversial whether the timing of tumor excision relative to the menstrual cycle influences the survival of patients with breast carcinoma. METHODS: Premenopausal patients (n=614) who had surgery for invasive, nonmetastatic breast carcinoma during the period 1978-1988 participated in an epidemiologic survey, reporting their menstrual cycle length and the date of their last menses. We ascertained deaths from any cause before 1993. RESULTS: Using Cox modeling, we found a nonlinear variation in the relative risk (RR) of death according to the timing of surgery during the menstrual cycle. The curve was best described by a cosine transformation of a 28-day cycle. For patients who had breast carcinoma surgery on the estimated day of ovulation, the risk of death was 0.59 (95% confidence limits [CLI=0.39-0.89, P=0.013) compared with patients who had surgery at the approximate time of menses. We observed this for patients treated in 1978-1981 (RR=0.43, 95% CL=0.23-0.83, P=0.011) and 1982-1983 (0.25, 95% CL=0.10-0.63, P=0.003), but not in 1984-1988 (1.48, 95% CL=0.64-3.4). The difference observed for 1984-1988 was explained by a significant improvement in the mortality rate (P=0.0004) for women whose surgery took place during menses or near to the date predicted for the next menses. No such improvement for women who underwent breast carcinoma surgery around the time of ovulation was observed during the period 1984-1988. These changes were not explained by the performance of lumpectomy or the increasing interval between biopsy and tumor excision. CONCLUSIONS: The shape of the survival curve contradicted the idea that it could be explained by levels of circulating estradiol or progesterone. Because observations that surgery was affected by menstrual timing seem not to have persisted beyond the mid-1980s, this study should not be used to support recommendations that surgeons perform breast carcinoma surgery on any particular day of the menstrual cycle.
PURPOSE: To delineate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of breast cancer that arises in the setting of a germline BRCA mutation and to compare BRCA-associated breast cancers (BABC) with those that arise in women without mutations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the clinical records of 91 Ashkenazi Jewish women ascertained during studies of the genetics of early-onset breast cancer. All women underwent testing for the BRCA1 mutations 185delAG and 5382insC. After the discovery of BRCA2, 79 women were also tested for the BRCA2 mutation 6174delT. RESULTS: Mutations were identified in 30 women (33%). BABC were less likely to present with stage I disease than cases in women without mutations (27% v 46%), more likely to have axillary nodal involvement (54% v46%), and more likely to have extensive axillary involvement (25% v 17%). These differences were not statistically significant. BABC were significantly more likely to be histologic grade III (100% v 59%, P=.04) and to be estrogen receptor-negative (70% v 34%, P=.04). In the entire cohort, there were no significant differences between BABC and non-BRCA-associated cancers in 5-year relapse-free survival (65% v 69%, P=not significant [NS]), 5-year event-free survival (57% v 68%, P=NS), or 5-year overall survival. However, among cases diagnosed within 2 years of study entry, there was a trend toward shorter event-free survival in BRCA heterozygotes, but not relapse-free survival. Women with germline BRCA mutations were significantly more likely to develop contralateral breast cancer at 5 years (31% v 4%, P=.0007). CONCLUSION: BABC present with adverse clinical and histopathologic features when compared with cases not associated with BRCA mutations. However, the prognosis of BABC appears to be similar to that of nonassociated cancer. Further studies of incident cases are necessary to define the independent prognostic significance of germline BRCA mutations.
BACKGROUND: Some authors have suggested that mammographically evident calcifications that would be considered benign in other situations can be due to carcinoma in women who have undergone breast conservation. This study was undertaken to determine if the pattern of calcifications associated with recurrent tumors detected mammographically differs from that observed in carcinomas developing de novo. METHODS: Mammograms of 22 cases of local tumor recurrence were retrospectively reviewed, and calcifications associated with recurrence were characterized according to the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification. RESULTS: Tumors were usually associated with > or = 10 calcifications (77%; 17 of 22 cases). Recurrences commonly contained very suspicious patterns of calcifications with linear forms present in 15 cases (68%) and pleomorphic calcifications present in 17 cases (77%). The distribution of calcifications was usually clustered (73%; 16 of 22 cases) or segmental (18%; 4 of 22 cases). Recurrences were usually obviously malignant (BI-RADS Category 5), and were characterized as such in 77% of cases. The remainder were indeterminate, requiring biopsy (BI-RADS Category 4). Recurrent tumors containing calcifications always contained some suspicious forms. Less worrisome types of calcifications were sometimes observed, including punctate calcifications in 36% and coarse calcifications in 14% of cases, but were always associated with more malignant patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Local tumor recurrences, when associated with mammographically evident calcifications, usually have a pattern highly suspicious for malignancy, although indeterminate forms can be the only calcifications present. Characteristically benign patterns of calcifications are not observed in recurrent tumors unless they are associated with more suspicious calcifications. Therefore, women without more worrisome patterns need not undergo biopsy because of the presence of these nonworrisome calcifications.
Having a family history of cancer is an important predictor of lifetime cancer risk. Individuals with family histories of cancer have been reported to experience symptoms of general distress and to have frequent intrusive thoughts and avoidance regarding cancer. To date, little is known about predictors of such distress. A relation between perception of cancer risk and distress has been suggested, but the possibility that prior cancer-related events may contribute to distress in these women has received little attention. The major aim of the study was to examine the contribution of the past experience of the death of a parent from cancer to distress in women at familiar risk for breast cancer. Women with family histories of breast cancer (Risk Group, N = 46) were assessed on the day of their yearly mammography screening and four to eight weeks after normal result notification in order to confirm the generalizability of their distress. Their levels of intrusive thoughts, avoidance, and perceived lifetime risk for breast cancer were significantly higher than those of women with no family histories of cancer who were not undergoing mammography (Comparison Group, N = 43), and this was true on both assessment days. Among the women in the Risk Group, those whose parent(s) had died of cancer had the highest levels of intrusive thoughts, avoidance, and perceived risk. Results suggested that perceived risk mediated the effect of this event on intrusive thoughts and avoidance regarding breast cancer. The findings are discussed in terms of theories of cognitive responses to traumatic and stressful life events. Implications for future research and interventions are discussed.
Breast cancer presents as two interrelated problems. The first is disease in the breast and axillary lymph nodes and the second is metastatic spread to distant sites. Local diseases can be controlled with less morbidity than in the past because of advances in surgery and radiotherapy. In addition, heightened public awareness and the more widespread use of mammography have increased the detection of smaller cancers that have a better prognosis and are easier to treat. The problem of late relapse leading to death, however, motivates continued intensive study of systemic therapy as treatment for the undetectable micrometastatic disease remaining after surgery. Currently, hormonal therapy and chemotherapy are known to prolong disease-free and overall survival in nearly all groups of patients, although the relative and absolute influences of drug therapies are modest and vary among patient subgroups, and the proper application of these treatments to the hundreds of thousands of patients diagnosed worldwide per year could have a major impact on public health. For the future, clinical trials and laboratory advances indicate that novel dosing and scheduling of chemotherapy agents combined with newer modalities may provide even greater impact against occult disseminated disease.
PURPOSE: Information concerning the differences between older and younger women with breast cancer, treated with standard therapy, is lacking from many prospective series. The purpose of this study is to identify factors that influence treatment decisions and determine if women age 65 and older are treated differently than younger women. The outcomes of older women would then be compared to younger to determine if treatment differences influence outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The records of 558 women with early invasive breast cancer who were treated with breast conserving surgery and radiation therapy were retrospectively reviewed. Four hundred thirty-two women under the age of 65 (range: 24-64) and 126 women age 65 and older (range: 65-85) were assessed for treatment differences including breast reexcision, extent of axillary dissection, extent of breast and nodal irradiation, and the use of chemotherapy or hormonal therapy. Differences in the treatment of the two groups were determined and the end points of local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival were compared. Median follow-up was 5.5 years. RESULTS: The two treatment groups had identical pathologic TNM staging with the exception that 21% of the older age group and 5% of the younger group did not undergo axillary dissection. Women age 65 and older were less likely to have a reexcision, extensive axillary dissection, chemotherapy, or nodal irradiation. They were more likely to receive hormonal therapy. Reexcision in older women was positively influenced by a family history of breast cancer and negatively influenced by a history of previous malignancy. None of the patients who were treated without and axillary dissection suffered a regional recurrence. Although local control was better in older patients, there were no differences in disease-free or overall survival for the two groups. DISCUSSION: The findings of this study reveal that older patients have significant treatment differences as compared to younger patients; however, despite these differences, similar local control and survival were achieved at 5 to 10 years. With the expected survival of older women increasing, the prospective evaluation of treatment options for older women should be considered.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The lifetime risk of breast cancer may approach 80-90% in women who have germline mutations of either of two genes, BRCA1 or BRCA2. A single BRCA1 mutation, 185delAG, has been noted in approximately 20% of Ashkenazi Jewish women with early onset breast cancer and in 0.9% of the Ashkenazi population. We recently detected a 6174delT frameshift mutation in BRCA2 in an hereditary breast cancer kindred of Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry. Here, we investigated the frequency of this mutation in 200 women with early-onset breast cancer. Six of 80 Ashkenazi Jewish women (8%) diagnosed with breast cancer before the age of 42, wer heterozygous for the 6174delT mutation, compared to none of 93 non-Jewish women diagnosed with breast cancer at the same age (P = .005). These cases were ascertained without regard to family history. Two of 27 (7%) additional Jewish families in which the proband was diagnosed with breast cancer at age 42 to 50 and had a family history of breast or ovarian cancer had germline 6174delT mutations. The results of this report suggest that a recurrent mutation of BRCA1 and a recurrent mutation BRCA2 together may account for over a quarter of all early-onset breast cancer in the setting of a personal or family history of ovarian cancer in Ashkenazi Jewish women.
Certain germline mutations in either BRCA1 or BRCA2 confer a lifetime risk of developing breast cancer that may approach 90%. The BRCA1 185delAG mutation was found in 20% and the BRCA2 6174delT mutation in 8% of Ashkenazi Jewish women with early-onset breast cancer. The 185delAG mutation was observed in 0.9% of 858 Ashkenazi Jews unselected for a personal or family history of cancer. Assuming comparable age-specific penetrances, a carrier frequency of 0.3% was estimated for the 6174delT BRCA2 mutation. To test this hypothesis, we performed a population survey of 1,255 Jewish individuals. In two independent groups, a prevalence of approximately 1% (C.I. 0.6-1.5) was observed for the 6174delT mutation. The relative risk of developing breast cancer by age 42 was estimated to be 9.3 (C.I. 2.5-22.5) for 6174delT, compared to 31 (C.I. 11-77) for 185delAG. Analysis of 107 Ashkenazi Jewish women with breast cancer and a family history of breast or ovarian cancer confirmed a four-fold greater prevalence for the BRCA1 185delAG mutation compared to the BRCA2 6174delT mutation. Our findings suggest a difference in cumulative life-time penetrance for the two mutations. Genetic counseling for the one in 50 Ashkenazi Jewish individuals harbouring specific germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 must be tailored to reflect the different risks associated with the two mutations.
BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have examined the prognostic significance of HER2/neu (HER) expression in patients with axillary lymph node negative breast carcinoma. Although some investigations suggest that the presence of the altered expression of HER is prognostically unfavorable, the subject remains controversial. This study explores the interaction of HER with three aspects of axillary lymph node negative breast carcinoma: epidemiologic risk factors, tumor histopathology, and prognosis. METHODS: Immunohistochemical staining for HER was performed on 10% formalin fixed paraffin embedded primary carcinomas from 440 patients with negative axillary lymph nodes with a median follow-up of 119 months. RESULTS: The immunohistochemical expression, or lack thereof, of HER did not prove to be prognostically significant in this group of patients with axillary lymph node negative breast carcinoma. There was also no consistent association with epidemiologic risk factors. The most striking results concerned the relationship of HER to histopathologic features of the carcinomas. Medullary carcinoma differed from other tumor types because it was HER(+) substantially less often (10%) than were other ductal (49%) or lobular (43%) carcinomas. CONCLUSION: The results obtained in this study suggest that the immunohistochemical demonstration of HER is not a reliable prognostic indicator for patients with axillary lymph node negative breast carcinoma. This marker was not associated with major epidemiologic risk factors; however, there was a significant correlation between HER and the phenotypic features of breast carcinoma because medullary carcinoma is rarely HER(+). Although the associations may not be a strong enough basis for refining the classification of breast carcinoma, they could be useful for diagnosing individual patients. The changes in HER that are detectable by the immunohistochemical methods used in this study probably do not occur in the earliest stages of mammary carcinogenesis.
PURPOSE: The present study explores p53 in relation to the following four aspects of node-negative breast carcinoma: epidemiologic risk factors, tumor histopathology, prognosis, and HER2/neu (HER) expression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Immunohistochemical (IH) staining for p53 was performed on formaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded primary invasive carcinomas from 440 node-negative patients with a median follow-up duration of 119 months. RESULTS: The IH expression, or lack thereof, of p53 separately or in combination with HER did not prove to be prognostically significant and there was no consistent association of p53 with epidemiologic risk factors. p53 was expressed in 68% of medullary carcinomas (MEDs), which is a significantly higher frequency (P < .001) than in lobular (9%) and duct (23%) carcinomas. p53 was not found in some types of low-grade carcinomas (tubular and papillary), and was observed in a minority of mucinous carcinomas. p53 was present significantly more often in carcinomas with high-grade or poorly differentiated nuclear grade than in low- or intermediate-grade tumors. There was an inverse statistically significant relationship between estrogen receptor (ER) positivity and p53 expression. Tumors with the p53(+)/HER(-) immunophenotype tended to be MEDs or duct carcinomas with a marked lymphoplasmacytic reaction. Infiltrating lobular carcinomas (IFLCs) were largely p53(-)/HER(-). p53(+)/HER(+) carcinomas had the best prognosis. The poorest outcome was associated with the p53(-)/HER(+) immunophenotype. This trend was statistically significant for recurrence-free and overall survival in patients with T1NOMO infiltrating duct carcinoma (IFDC). CONCLUSION: The IH demonstration of p53 was not a reliable prognostic indicator in the node-negative breast carcinoma patients studied and it was not associated with major epidemiologic risk factors. The combined immunophenotypic expression of p53 and HER was significantly associated with some histologic types of breast carcinoma and with prognosis in T1NOMO breast carcinoma.
The G1 cyclin D1 is amplified in approximately 20% of human breast cancers and is frequently overexpressed as part of an amplicon in these tumors, suggesting a potential role for this gene in the pathogenesis of breast cancer. Although amplification of cyclin D1 occurs in human breast cancer, it is possible that another gene in the amplicon is the relevant oncogene in these cancers. We now report a truncation of the cyclin D1 gene in a human breast cancer cell line, associated with overexpression of a short cyclin D1 mRNA. In a survey of breast cancer cell lines and tumors by Southern blot hybridization, using a 1.2 kb human cyclin D1 cDNA, we observed that genomic DNA derived from the MDA MB-453 cell line contains an extra band in the Bg1II and BamHI digests, suggesting that one allele of gene is altered. Moreover, the altered allele is amplified three-fold relative to the normal allele, and contains a 3' deletion. On Northern analysis, the MDA MB-453 line has a marked increase in 1.1 to 1.3 kb transcripts, which are truncated at the 3' end, in contrast to the normally predominant 4.2 kb transcript. The 1.1-1.3 kb cyclin D1 mRNA has a longer half-life than the 4.2 kb mRNA, indicating that the 3' truncation may contribute an increased stability and therefore an elevated steady-state level of the short mRNA. These alterations in the cyclin D1 gene and mRNA suggest that altered expression of cyclin D1 may be important in the malignant transformation of this cell line, and support the identification of cyclin D1 as a dominant oncogene at 11q13 in human breast cancer.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Cowden's disease (multiple hamartoma syndrome) is characterized by multiple hamartomas of ectodermal, endodermal, and mesodermal origin, a high incidence of malignant tumors of the breast and/or thyroid gland, and an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance. Similar to sporadic breast cancer, chromosomal studies have not elucidated the cause of this syndrome. The authors report the case of a patient with this syndrome and analyze the pattern of amplification or rearrangement of three genes: the HER-2/neu oncogene, the ras oncogene, and the estrogen-inducible gene, pS-2. All three of these genes were present in single copies without translocations. It was noteworthy that three of the most important genes currently studied in relation to breast cancer existed in a unamplified unrearranged state in this patient. Those with clinical manifestations of Cowden's disease may be candidates for prophylactic bilateral total mastectomy, and the authors recommend that these patients undergo this procedure by their third decade of life. An alternative to this approach would entail monthly self examinations, breast examinations by the patient's physician every 3 months, bilateral mammograms every 6 to 12 months, and biopsy of any suspicious lesions. It is crucial, however, that these patients be identified by their mucocutaneous lesions and family history before an underlying malignant lesion develops.