Biomedical subjects

P C Bertrand

Publications and source records attributed to P C Bertrand.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1996

Immediate and long-term results after surgical treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax by VATS.

BACKGROUND: Video-assisted thoracic surgery has recently evolved as a viable alternative to thoracotomy for spontaneous pneumothorax. METHODS: A series of 163 patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax were treated by video-assisted thoracic surgery. Seventy patients were treated for a recurrent episode, 64 patients for a persistent primary spontaneous pneumothorax, 24 patients for a contralateral episode, and 5 patients for a bilateral primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Stapling of bullae with an Endo-GIA stapler (Auto-Suture, Elencourt, France) was performed in 90% of the cases and parietal pleural abrasion was performed in each case. RESULTS: One revisional lateral limited thoracotomy was required for bleeding. Six patients had a prolonged air leak; 2 of them were reoperated on by lateral limited thoracotomy. Two patients have had an incomplete reexpansion of the lung and required a reoperation. The duration of hospitalization was 6.9 +/- 3 days. With a mean follow-up of 24.5 months, three recurrences requiring a reoperation occurred; 3 other patients had a partial recurrence and healed by rest without drainage. The mean time to return to the occupational activity of the patients was 42 +/- 34 days. These results were compared with those of a previous series of 87 patients operated on by lateral limited thoracotomy. CONCLUSIONS: With the development of surgical technique and video equipment, video-assisted thoracic surgery will probably become the treatment of choice of primary spontaneous pneumothorax.

Absenteeism↗

PubMed1995

Durability of the Mitroflow pericardial valve at ten years.

From 1983 to 1992, 366 patients received 407 Mitroflow pericardial valves. Mean age was 62 +/- 14 years. Average follow-up was 72 +/- 28 months. Total follow-up was 1,791 patient-years. Overall survival in all patients was 77.2% +/- 2.2% at 5 years and 56.2% +/- 6.4% at 10 years. Freedom from structural valve deterioration was 95% +/- 1.2% and 36.7% +/- 8.1% at 5 and 10 years for all valves, 96.9% +/- 1.3% and 39.2% +/- 9.8% for aortic valve replacement, and 91.7% +/- 3.2% and 36.4% +/- 10% for mitral valve replacement (p = not significant). The freedom from structural valve deterioration in patients older than 70 years of age was 100% and 93.9% +/- 5.8% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. At 10 years, linearized rate of thromboembolism was 0.73% +/- 0.2% per patient-year and freedom from valve-related mortality for all valves was 88.8% +/- 2.8%. The best indication for the implantation of a Mitroflow valve is mitral or aortic disease in patients more than 70 years of age.

Actuarial Analysis↗

PubMed1995

The Mitroflow pericardial valve: clinical performance to 10 years.

From 1983 to 1992, 366 patients received 407 Mitroflow pericardial bioprostheses at our institution. Mean age was 62 +/- 14 years (range: 15-86 years). There were 229 isolated aortic valve replacements (AVR), 96 isolated mitral valve replacements (MVR), 39 double mitral and aortic valve replacements (DVR) and four tricuspid replacements. Mean follow up was 6 +/- 2.33 years ranging from 1.67 to 10.9 years. Total follow up was 1791 patient-years. Overall survival was 77.2 +/- 2.2% at five and 56.2 +/- 6.4% at 10 years. It was 74 +/- 3% and 56.2 +/- 5.3% after AVR, 78.3 +/- 4.4% and 55.7 +/- 8.8% after MVR, 81 +/- 6.4% and 36.6 +/- 16.5% after DVR at five and 10 years, respectively. Freedom from structural valve deterioration (SVD) was 95 +/- 1.2% and 36.7 +/- 8.1% at five and 10 years for all valves, 96.9 +/- 1.3% and 39.2 +/- 9.8% for AVR, 91.7 +/- 3.2% and 36.4 +/- 10% for MVR. There was no difference in freedom from SVD between AVR and MVR. The freedom from SVD in patients older than 70 years of age was 100% and 93.9 +/- 5.8% at five and 10 years, respectively. Freedom from reoperation was 94.7 +/- 1.37% and 28.36 +/- 7.5% at five and 10 years for all valves, 96.2 +/- 1.5% and 38.6 +/- 9.7% for AVR, 91.7 +/- 3.2% and 36.4 +/- 10% for MVR. The denaturation process did not lead to acute hemodynamic deterioration. Pathologic findings were cuspal tears (one or more) associated with structural tissue changes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Actuarial Analysis↗

PubMed1993

Mitroflow pericardial valve: long-term durability.

Isolated aortic (n = 107), mitral (n = 63), and tricuspid (n = 1) valve replacement and 28 double-valve replacements were performed with a second generation of pericardial valves, the Mitroflow valve, in 199 patients from March 1983 to December 1986. Follow-up (total, 1,058 patient-years) was extended to 106 months and 91.5% complete. Mean age was 58 +/- 13 years. The operative mortality included 22 deaths, non-cardiac-related in 7. The actuarial probability of survival for all patients was 66% +/- 4% at 8.5 years. There were no significant differences between patients with aortic valve replacement, mitral valve replacement, or double-valve replacement. The rate of thromboembolic events, antithromboembolic therapy-related hemorrhage, periprosthetic leak, and endocarditis is extremely minimal. Structural valve dysfunction occurred at a rate of 3.2% +/- 0.5%/patient-year. Actuarial freedom from the event was 94.6% +/- 1.7% at 5 years and 63.7% +/- 6.5% at 8.5 years for all valves. There were no difference in structural valve dysfunction rate between patients having aortic, mitral, or double-valve replacement. Thirty-five patients were reoperated on (3.4 +/- 0.6%/patient-year for all). The rate of all valve-related morbidity and mortality was 5.6% +/- 0.7%/patient-year for all patients, actuarial freedom from the event being 44% +/- 7% at 8.5 years. These data suggest that the excellent hemodynamic characteristics of the valve are balanced by a risk of valve failure that is slightly increased when compared with porcine valves.

Adolescent↗