PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Castellanos

Publications and source records attributed to P Castellanos.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Six thousand office diagnostic-operative hysteroscopies.

OBJECTIVE: To compare CO(2) and normal saline as distention media in office diagnostic hysteroscopy. METHODS: The outcome of more than 6000 office hysteroscopies was analyzed. We used carbon dioxide or saline as distension medium. Minor hysteroscopic techniques were performed when indicated. RESULTS: The major indication was abnormal uterine bleeding (45%). Satisfactory hysteroscopy was achieved in 92. 4% with CO(2) and in 98.3% with saline (P<0.05). Local anesthesia was used in 54 patients (1.5%) with CO(2) and in three patients (0. 1%) with saline (P<0.001). Four hundred and two women (16.3%) underwent hysteroscopic procedures under saline hysteroscopy. Endometrial polyps were removed in 281 patients, 75 IUDs were removed, 14 fibroids were extracted, uterine septa were excised in 11 cases and mild and moderate adhesions were transected in 21 patients. CONCLUSION: Saline office diagnostic hysteroscopy offers at least all the advantages of the CO(2) hysteroscopy, and gives the possibility to easily 'find and treat in situ' many of the lesions observed.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗
PubMed1989

A multicentre, randomized, double-blind study comparing nocte famotidine or ranitidine for the treatment of active duodenal ulceration.

The efficacy and safety of famotidine and ranitidine in the treatment of active duodenal ulcer were compared in a multicentre, randomized, double-blind study. The study was carried out in five centres which included a total of 143 patients with endoscopically documented active duodenal ulcer. The patients received either famotidine (one tablet of 40 mg at night) or ranitidine (two tablets of 150 mg at night). Endoscopic examinations were performed at 4 and 6 weeks of active treatment. Daytime and nocturnal pain were also monitored, and the laboratory and clinical profiles evaluated. One hundred and thirty-three patients fulfilled the evaluation criteria (66 patients in the famotidine group and 67 in the ranitidine group). Healing rates at 4 or 6 weeks of treatment showed no significant differences between the famotidine and ranitidine groups. The healing rates were 80% at week 4 and 97% at week 6 in the famotidine group, and 77% at week 4 and 96% at week 6 in the ranitidine group. Similar results were observed in both treatment groups with regard to pain resolution, decrease in antacid intake and safety profile.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind study comparing a daily bedtime administration of famotidine and ranitidine in short-term treatment of active duodenal ulcer.

The efficacy and safety of famotidine and ranitidine in the treatment of active duodenal ulcer were compared in a multicenter, randomized double-blind study. The study was carried out in 5 centers which included a total of 143 patients with endoscopically documented active duodenal ulcer. The patients received either famotidine (1 tablet of 40 mg at night) or ranitidine (2 tablets of 150 mg at night). Endoscopic examinations were performed at 4 and 6 weeks of active treatment. Day and nocturnal pain were also monitored and the laboratory and clinical profiles evaluated. One hundred and thirty-three patients fulfilled the evaluation criteria (66 patients in the famotidine group and 67 in the ranitidine group). Healing rates at weeks 4 or 6 of treatment showed no significant differences between the famotidine and the ranitidine groups. The healing rates were 79% at week 4 and 96% at week 6 in the famotidine group, and 77% at week 4 and 95% at week 6 in the ranitidine group. Similar results were observed in both treatment groups with regard to pain resolution, decrease in antacid intake and safety profile.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind study comparing once-daily bedtime administration of famotidine and ranitidine in the short-term treatment of active duodenal ulcer.

The efficacy and safety of famotidine and ranitidine in the treatment of active duodenal ulcer were compared in a multicenter, randomized double-blind study. The study was carried out at 5 centers and involved a total of 143 patients with endoscopically documented active duodenal ulcer. The patients received either famotidine (1 40 mg tablet at night) or ranitidine 2 150 mg tablets at night). Endoscopic examinations were performed at 4 and 6 weeks of active treatment. Day and nocturnal pain were also monitored, and the laboratory and clinical profiles evaluated. One hundred and thirty-three patients fulfilled the evaluation criteria (66 patients in the famotidine group and 67 in the ranitidine group). Healing rates at weeks 4 or 6 of treatment showed no significant differences between the famotidine group and the ranitidine group. The healing rates were 78% at week 4 and 96% at week 6 in the famotidine group, and 76% at week 4 and 95% at week 6 in the ranitidine group. Similar results were observed in both treatment groups with regard to pain resolution, decrease in antacid intake and safety profile.

Adult↗