PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Chervinsky

Publications and source records attributed to P Chervinsky.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1996

Effects of montelukast (MK-0476), a new potent cysteinyl leukotriene (LTD4) receptor antagonist, in patients with chronic asthma.

BACKGROUND: Cysteinyl leukotrienes mediate signs and symptoms of asthma. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, a new potent and specific cysteinyl leukotriene (LTD4) receptor antagonist, montelukast (MK-0476), was evaluated for tolerability and clinical efficacy in patients with chronic asthma (receiving and not receiving inhaled corticosteroids). METHODS: Twenty-nine nonsmoking patients with asthma (15 treated concomitantly with inhaled corticosteroids) with FEV1 percent predicted values between 50% to 80% received MK-0476, 200 mg, or placebo three times daily for 10 1/3 days (31 doses) in a random, crossover manner, after a 2-week, open, baseline period. Comparisons in FEV1 (mean percent change from baseline after the first and last dose), mean daily daytime asthma and nocturnal awakening scores, and mean daily beta-agonist use were made between treatment periods. RESULTS: Montelukast, compared with placebo, caused improvements in FEV1 (mean percentage point difference of the percentage change from baseline) 3 and 4 hours after dosing on day 1 (hour 3, 9.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53, 18.72; hour four, 10.9%; 95% CI -0.25, 20.20) and day 11 (hour 3, 14.0%; 95% CI 0.76, 31.43; hour 4, 13.4%; 95% CI 1.24, 28.83). Reductions were observed in mean daily beta-agonist use (1.0 puff/day [95% CI -1.61, -0.26]), mean daytime symptom scores, and nocturnal awakenings over the 10 1/3 day treatment period. There were no important differences between the groups receiving and those not receiving inhaled corticosteroids. Montelukast was well tolerated with no serious clinical adverse events reported. CONCLUSIONS: In this study Montelukast, 200 mg, administered three times daily for 10 1/3 days, compared with placebo, was generally well tolerated and resulted in significant improvement in chronic asthma, irrespective of the presence of inhaled corticosteroids.

Acetates↗
PubMed1996

A placebo- and active-controlled randomized trial of prophylactic treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis with mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray.

BACKGROUND: Topical nasal corticosteroids have become a mainstay of treatment for the symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). It is likely that topical corticosteroids, by blocking an initial influx of inflammatory cells in the nasal mucosa induced by aeroallergens, may have a preventive effect on nasal allergy symptoms when administered before the pollen season. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of an 8-week course of mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS), 200 micrograms once daily, in the treatment of SAR compared with beclomethasone dipropionate aqueous nasal spray (BDP), 168 micrograms twice daily, and placebo vehicle, when treatment is initiated before the anticipated onset of the ragweed season. METHODS: Three hundred forty-nine patients with SAR to ragweed pollen from nine centers in the Northeast and Midwest of the United States were randomized to one of the three intranasal study medications (MFNS, 200 micrograms once daily, BDP, 168 micrograms twice daily, or placebo vehicle), starting 4 weeks before the estimated start of the ragweed season. RESULTS: The proportion of "minimal symptom" days (total nasal symptom score < or = 2) was statistically significantly higher in both the MFNS and BDP groups when compared with the placebo vehicle group (p < 0.01). The two active treatment groups were not statistically significantly different from each other. MFNS and BDP displayed a similar safety profile that did not differ from placebo. CONCLUSIONS: This suggests that MFNS, 200 micrograms (once daily), is a useful therapy in the prophylactic treatment of SAR.

Administration, Intranasal↗
PubMed1996

Double-strength beclomethasone dipropionate (84 micrograms/spray) aqueous nasal spray in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: The use of intranasally administered corticosteroid sprays is an established treatment option for seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, 438 patients with moderate to severe symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis were treated for 4 weeks with double-strength beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) aqueous nasal spray (84 micrograms/spray: BDP-ds), once daily; regular-strength BDP (42 micrograms/spray: BDP-rs), twice daily; high-strength BDP (336 micrograms/spray: BDP-hs), once daily; or placebo. BDP-hs was included as a safety comparison group. All treatments were given as two sprays per nostril. RESULTS: Physician-rated nasal symptom scores were significantly improved in all three active treatment groups compared with those of the placebo group within the initial 3 days of treatment. Improvement was maintained throughout the 4-week treatment period. BDP-ds and BDP-rs were equivalent at all time points. The BDP-ds, BDP-rs, and BDP-hs groups had greater numbers of patients with a good or excellent therapeutic response at end point than the placebo group. All treatments were well-tolerated, and no unexpected adverse events were reported. No effects on laboratory evaluations or vital signs were evident for any treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that BDP-ds given once a day and BDP-rs given twice a day in the same total daily dose are comparably safe and effective in the treatment of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Administration, Intranasal↗
PubMed1996

Fluticasone propionate aerosol: efficacy in patients with mild to moderate asthma. Fluticasone Propionate Asthma Study Group.

BACKGROUND: This double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of fluticasone propionate aerosol (25, 50, or 100 mg bid for 12 weeks) administered as primary maintenance therapy to patients whose mild to moderate asthma was inadequately controlled by as-needed use of an inhaled beta-agonist. RESULTS: At all clinic visits, fluticasone propionate compared with placebo was associated with significant (P<.05) improvement in pulmonary function indexed by forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) as well as fewer night awakenings and less use of rescue albuterol. Values for patient-measured morning peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR) were significantly (P<.05) higher and the use of rescue albuterol was significantly (P<.05) lower beginning 3 to 5 days after initiation of therapy in the groups treated with fluticasone propionate, compared with the placebo group. Maximal improvement in FEV1 was achieved during the second week of treatment and maintained throughout the course of therapy. Differences among the three fluticasone propionate dosing groups for these efficacy measures were not statistically significant. The incidence of adverse events was similar across groups. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that fluticasone propionate aerosol is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for asthma and significantly improves pulmonary function within days of initiation of treatment in patients whose asthma is inadequately controlled with as-needed beta-agonists.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Fluticasone propionate reduces oral prednisone use while it improves asthma control and quality of life.

This study examined the ability of fluticasone propionate aerosol to reduce oral prednisone requirements in patients with severe asthma. Ninety-six patients dependent on oral prednisone were treated for 16 wk with placebo or fluticasone propionate aerosol (750 or 1,000 micrograms twice daily). Their dosage of oral prednisone was adjusted weekly according to predetermined criteria. A total of 69% and 88% of patients treated with fluticasone propionate 750 and 1,000 micrograms twice daily, respectively, compared with 3% of placebo-treated patients used no prednisone by the end of the study. In the fluticasone propionate groups, FEV1 and peak expiratory flow rates at the last evaluable visit/date improved and the number of night awakenings and symptomatic albuterol use declined relative to placebo values (p < 0.05). Patient-rated asthma symptoms improved in the groups receiving fluticasone propionate but not in the placebo group (p < 0.005). Fluticasone propionate aerosol was well-tolerated, and it improved some dimensions of health-related quality of life measured using a standard patient survey. Fluticasone propionate aerosol (750 or 1,000 micrograms twice daily) effectively and safely allowed most asthmatics dependent on oral corticosteroids to reduce or eliminate oral prednisone use while improving pulmonary function and quality of life.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1995

Duration of action of a single dose of azelastine in patients with chronic asthma.

The aim of this double-blind, multicenter trial was to determine the duration of bronchodilating activity of a single 4-mg dose of azelastine in chronic asthmatics. Eligible patients had an FEV1 of 40-79% of predicted value with demonstrated reversibility of airway obstruction. A single dose of azelastine 4 mg resulted in rapid onset of bronchodilating activity with a 12-hr duration of action as demonstrated by a clinically and statistically significant mean percent improvement in FEV1, from hours 2-12. As an overall measure of improvement in FEV1, the area under the curve was statistically significantly greater for azelastine than for placebo. Mean improvements in symptom severity in the azelastine group exceeded those for placebo at all observation points. No serious adverse experiences were associated with azelastine.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Safety of salmeterol in the maintenance treatment of asthma.

BACKGROUND: Salmeterol is the first long-acting inhaled beta 2-agonist available in the US for the maintenance treatment of asthma. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety of salmeterol with that of the short-acting beta 2-agonist albuterol. METHODS: Two identically designed, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel studies were conducted comparing salmeterol 42 micrograms twice daily, albuterol 180 micrograms four times daily, and placebo over 12 weeks in 556 patients (12 to 73 years old) with mild-to-moderate chronic asthma. Patients in each treatment group could use albuterol as needed to control acute symptoms. RESULTS: The incidence of potentially drug-related adverse events was similar among the treatment groups (range: 22% to 23%), with headache being the most commonly reported (range: 9% to 10%). No deaths occurred during the studies. Concomitant use of > 4 puffs of supplemental albuterol per day in the salmeterol group produced no increase in the incidence of adverse events either in general or of a cardiovascular nature. There were no statistically significant differences among treatment groups or clinically significant changes from pretreatment values in mean pulse rate, systolic/diastolic blood pressure, or clinical laboratory values after 12 weeks. There were no clinically significant differences among groups in heart rates nor were there differences in the frequency of supraventricular or ventricular ectopic beats during 24-hr Holter monitoring. The frequency of asthma exacerbations was lowest among patients receiving salmeterol (and highest among those who received placebo), and this rate did not increase over the 12 weeks. Asthma exacerbations were treated successfully with nebulized albuterol (2.5 mg), with no evidence of any increased risk of cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: Salmeterol 42 micrograms twice daily is well-tolerated in patients with asthma, having a similar safety profile as that of albuterol 180 micrograms inhaled four times daily or placebo (plus as-needed albuterol). Concomitant use of albuterol, either by MDI or nebulization, did not affect the safety of salmeterol. Extensive cardiovascular monitoring revealed no significant cardiovascular adverse effects or arrhythmogenic effects associated with salmeterol over 12 weeks.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Fluticasone propionate aerosol for the treatment of adults with mild to moderate asthma. The Fluticasone Propionate Asthma Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Recent emphasis on the control of airway inflammation in asthma highlights the need for safe and effective antiinflammatory agents. Fluticasone propionate is one of the most potent antiinflammatory corticosteroids developed to date. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the safety and efficacy of fluticasone propionate aerosol in the treatment of mild to moderate asthma. METHODS: Fluticasone propionate aerosol (25, 100, or 500 micrograms twice daily) or placebo was given for as long as 8 weeks to adults with mild to moderate asthma in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Patients were removed from the study if they showed predefined signs of worsening asthma. RESULTS: Sixty-three percent of placebo-treated patients and 23%, 13%, and 4% of patients treated with fluticasone propionate 25, 100, and 500 micrograms twice daily, respectively, were removed from the study. Mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second, forced vital capacity, and forced expiratory flow at midexpiratory phase at weekly visits throughout the study demonstrated that fluticasone propionate was more efficacious than placebo in maintaining asthma control. Measurements of peak expiratory flow and symptom scores significantly improved and nighttime awakenings and albuterol use to treat symptoms significantly declined in fluticasone propionate-treated groups relative to the placebo-treated group. Differences among fluticasone propionate groups for these variables were not statistically significant. Incidence and severity of adverse events were similar across groups. Fluticasone propionate did not affect morning or stimulated plasma cortisol concentrations, although slight, transient reductions in urinary free cortisol and urinary 17-hydroxy steroids occurred in the group receiving 500 micrograms fluticasone propionate twice daily. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that fluticasone propionate provides safe and effective treatment for mild to moderate asthma.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed1994

Once daily loratadine versus astemizole once daily.

This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of loratadine and astemizole for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. A total of 167 adult patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis was enrolled in a randomized double-blind, parallel group study. Patients were treated once daily for 2 months during a spring allergy season. Both treatment groups showed significant reduction of symptoms (P < .01) from baseline. The physicians' and patients' evaluations of response to treatment were generally higher for loratadine than astemizole but only reached statistical significance (P < .05) at the 1-week evaluation. Astemizole-treated patients showed statistically significantly more weight gain than did loratadine-treated patients. Loratadine and astemizole were comparable in reducing the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Both treatments were well tolerated, although less weight gain was observed in patients treated with loratadine.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1994

Effectiveness of azelastine nasal solution in seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Azelastine is a novel antiallergy medication currently under investigation for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and asthma. Pharmacologic studies in laboratory animals and in vitro model systems indicate that azelastine exerts multiple actions including modulation of airways smooth muscle response, interference with inflammatory processes, and inhibition of allergic reactions. In a previous controlled clinical trial, azelastine nasal solution (ASTELIN N.S.) demonstrated effectiveness in controlling symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). The objective of this 2-week double-blind, parallel-group study was to further assess the effectiveness of azelastine nasal solution in improving allergic rhinitis symptoms. Two hundred forty-seven patients (> or = 12 years) with symptomatic SAR who satisfied a minimum symptoms score during a 1-week, single-blind, baseline evaluation period were randomized to receive azelastine 2 sprays per nostril bid, azelastine 2 sprays per nostril qd, chlorpheniramine 12 mg bid, or placebo using a double-dummy technique to insure blinding. The primary efficacy variables were changes in Major Symptom Complex (nose blows, sneezes, runny nose/sniffles, itch nose, and watery eyes) and Total Symptom Complex (Major plus itchy eyes/ears/throat/palate, cough, and postnasal drip) severity scores. Patients treated with azelastine nasal solution qd and bid had mean percent improvements in the Total and Major Symptom Complex severity scores that were clinically significant (> or = 50% improvement over placebo) after both weeks, at endpoint, and overall. The improvements for the azelastine bid group were statistically significant (P < or = .05) at all evaluation points. Adverse experiences occurred infrequently, and none was considered serious or potentially limiting to the clinical utility of the nasal solution.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Intranasal↗
PubMed1992

A comparison of salmeterol with albuterol in the treatment of mild-to-moderate asthma.

BACKGROUND: An effective, long-acting bronchodilator could benefit patients with asthma who have symptoms not controlled by antiinflammatory drugs. We compared a new long-acting, inhaled beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist, salmeterol, with a short-acting beta 2-agonist, albuterol, in the treatment of mild-to-moderate asthma. METHODS: We randomly assigned 234 patients (150 male and 84 female patients 12 to 73 years old) to one of three treatment groups: one group received 42 micrograms of salmeterol twice daily, one received 180 micrograms of albuterol four times daily, and one received placebo. Treatment was assigned in a double-blind fashion, and all patients could use supplemental inhaled albuterol as needed during the 12-week treatment period. RESULTS: Measurements of the forced expiratory volume in one second, performed hourly for 12 consecutive hours, showed that a single dose of salmeterol produced a greater mean area under the curve than two doses of albuterol taken 6 hours apart (6.3 vs. 4.9 liter.hr, P < 0.05). The difference was significant on day 1 and at week 4 of the study, but not at week 8 or 12. Salmeterol was also more effective than albuterol or placebo (with albuterol taken as needed) in increasing the morning peak expiratory flow rate: salmeterol induced a mean increase of 24 liters per minute over the pretreatment values, as compared with a decrease of 6 liters per minute with albuterol (P < 0.001) and an increase of 1 liter per minute with placebo (P = 0.002). The mean overall symptom score was improved most by salmeterol treatment (P < 0.05), with the number of days with symptoms and of nights with awakenings decreasing by 22 percent and 52 percent, respectively; there were no differences in results between albuterol treatment and placebo administration. We found no evidence of tolerance to the bronchodilating effects of salmeterol, and adverse reactions to all the treatments were infrequent and mild. CONCLUSIONS: For the management of mild-to-moderate asthma, salmeterol given twice daily is superior to albuterol given either four times daily or as needed.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1990

Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of triamcinolone acetonide nasal aerosol in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis.

In a double-blind study involving 205 patients with perennial allergic rhinitis, statistically significantly greater symptomatic improvements were evident following the administration of 200 micrograms/day triamcinolone acetonide aerosol than following placebo. These improvements were evident as early as week 1 and were sustained throughout the 12-week study. They were accompanied by greater reductions in nasal eosinophils. Triamcinolone acetonide aerosol was well tolerated and had no effect on serum cortisol levels.

Administration, Intranasal↗
PubMed1989

SCH 434: a new antihistamine/decongestant for seasonal allergic rhinitis.

In a double-blind, multicenter study, we compared the effects of SCH 434 (Claritin-D; Schering Corp., Kenilworth, N.J.), a new sustained-release, combination antihistamine/decongestant medication, with the effects of its individual components and placebo in 435 patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. SCH 434 contains 5 mg of loratadine, a nonsedating antihistamine, and 120 mg of pseudoephedrine as the decongestant component. Administered twice daily in this study, SCH 434 effected a 50% decrease in total symptom scores at day 4 and was significantly (p less than or equal to 0.03) more effective than the components alone or the placebo. Loratadine or pseudoephedrine alone, with 43% and 33% decline in symptom scores, respectively, also was more effective than placebo (p less than 0.05). As expected, pseudoephedrine alone was more effective than loratadine (p less than 0.01) in relieving nasal stuffiness; SCH 434 was more effective (p less than or equal to 0.01) than placebo and loratadine in relieving nasal stuffiness. All treatments were safe and well tolerated, although insomnia and dry mouth were noted in a significant number of patients who received either SCH 434 or pseudoephedrine. No serious side effects were noted. The incidence of sedation did not differ significantly among the four treatment groups. We conclude that SCH 434 is a safe and effective treatment for symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis. The combination drug (SCH 434) was better than its components for some, but not all, symptoms.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

Procaterol metered-dose inhaler: a multiclinic study evaluating the efficacy and safety in patients with asthma.

Procaterol hydrochloride aerosol, a potent beta 2-adrenergic bronchodilator, was evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study for efficacy and safety in 210 patients with documented mild to moderate reversible airway obstruction. Patients were randomized to receive procaterol in two inhalations (high dose) or one inhalation (low dose), 0.01 mg/inhalation, three times daily, or placebo. Pulmonary function tests were recorded at five and 30 minutes and hourly for eight hours after the first dose and following 1 and 2 weeks of treatment. Both doses of procaterol produced significantly greater improvement in PFTs at one hour and for up to seven hours after dosing compared with placebo (p less than 0.05). Mean percent increases in FEV1 were 35% in the high-dose group and 29% in the low-dose group at week 2. The high-dose group showed no loss of duration of bronchodilation with continued dosing. Improvement in PFTs and peak flow rates was significantly greater in the high-dose than in the low-dose group (p less than 0.05). Tremor was the most frequent side effect. Procaterol had no effect on electrocardiograms, heart rate, blood pressure, or clinical laboratory tests. The high dose of procaterol aerosol was shown to be an effective and well-tolerated bronchodilator with a rapid onset and long duration of action.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1988

Twelve-hour bronchodilation in asthma with a single aerosol dose of the anticholinergic compound glycopyrrolate.

Anticholinergic aerosols provide effective bronchodilation in some patients with obstructive lung disease. Glycopyrrolate is a quaternary ammonium anticholinergic compound that is poorly absorbed from mucus membranes, thus reducing anticholinergic side effects. In 20 adult patients with asthma, we evaluated bronchodilation to a single administration of metered-dose glycopyrrolate aerosol (GA) to ascertain its onset and duration of action along with evaluation of safety. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, crossover trial, bronchodilation was evaluated on five separate occasions to either placebo or a GA dose of 80, 240, 480, or 960 micrograms. Baseline spirometry for each patient on each visit was similar (mean FEV1 +/- SD of 62.2 +/- 13.6% predicted). After aerosol dosing, spirometry was measured at 30 minutes and then at hourly intervals up to 12 hours. Compared to placebo, metered-dose aerosols of 240, 480 and 960 micrograms elicited significantly greater bronchodilation at each test time. Furthermore, significant bronchodilation was noted within 30 minutes of dosing and was sustained for at least 12 hours. Bronchodilation with the 480 and 960 micrograms dose was equal, and both were greater than 240 micrograms. A subset of four asthma patients with baseline FEV1 values less than 50% predicted did not have a bronchodilating response with GA. No notable side effects occurred. Thus, a single aerosol dose of GA provides clinically significant, safe 12-hour bronchodilation in patients with asthma without severe airway obstruction (i.e., FEV1 greater than 50% predicted).

Adult↗