PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Clevenbergh

Publications and source records attributed to P Clevenbergh.

15 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Ceftazidime- and imipenem-induced endotoxin release during treatment of gram-negative infections.

To determine whether ceftazidime and imipenem, which target two different penicillin-binding proteins, result in different amounts of endotoxin and cytokine release in patients with gram-negative infection, plasma endotoxin, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor alpha were measured during the first 24 h of antibiotic therapy in 27 patients with gram-negative infection who had been randomized to receive either ceftazidime 2 g t.i.d. (n=12) or imipenem/cilastatin 1 g t.i.d. (n=15). The source of infection was the digestive tract (n=13), the urinary tract (n=5), the respiratory tract (n=2), soft tissue (n=2), i.v. line (n=2), or other (n=3). After the first antibiotic injection, a significant increase in the median concentration of plasma interleukin-6 and plasma tumor necrosis factor alpha was noted, without significant differences related to the antibiotic administered. Antibiotic-induced endotoxemia was detectable in nine patients (including 7 with bacteremia). In conclusion, ceftazidime and imipenem had similar effects on endotoxin and cytokine release during the treatment of gram-negative infections.

Bacteremia↗
PubMed2000

Importance of protease inhibitor plasma levels in HIV-infected patients treated with genotypic-guided therapy: pharmacological data from the Viradapt Study.

OBJECTIVE: In a prospective randomized study, the impact of plasma protease inhibitor (PI) trough levels on changes in HIV RNA were assessed in patients treated with genotypic-guided therapy. METHODS: Patients failing combination therapy (HIV-1 RNA > 10,000 copies/ml, and at least 6 months of therapy with nucleoside analogues and 3 months with PI) were randomly assigned into two arms: control group (C) in which the treatment was modified according to the standard of care; genotypic group (G) in which the treatment was modified according to resistance mutation profiles. Serial PI plasma levels were performed in patients throughout the 12 month study. PI levels were determined by high performance liquid chromatography. 'Suboptimal' concentration (SOC) was defined as at least two PI plasma levels below 2 x IC95. Others were defined as 'optimal' concentration (OC). Patients were categorized into four groups: G1 (SOC/control); G2 (OC/control); G3 (SOC/genotype); G4 (OC/genotype). An intent-to-treat analysis was performed with viral load as the primary endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients [mean age 39.7 +/- 8 years, 59 men, 52.7% Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) stage C] were included in the pharmacological substudy. The two groups according to randomization arms were comparable in terms of risk factor, age, sex, previous treatments, baseline CD4 cell count, HIV-1 RNA and mean PI plasma concentrations. Linear regression analysis showed a significant relationship between PI concentration and HIV RNA in the plasma. OC and SOC were found in 67.9% (55/81) and 32.1% (26/81) of patients, respectively. Mean changes in HIV RNA from baseline at month 6 were: -0.23 +/- 0.29 log10 copies/ml (G1); -0.97 +/- 0.28 (G2); -0.68 +/- 0.37 (G3); -1.38 +/- 0.20 (G4). Multivariate analysis showed PI plasma concentrations to be an independent predictor of HIV-RNA evolution (P = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Multiple parameters determine the response to antiretroviral therapy and causes other than the development of drug resistance should be considered in the setting of therapeutic failure. Suboptimal concentrations of PI limit the response to antiretroviral therapy. Therapeutic drug monitoring of the PI plasma concentration may therefore prove useful in optimizing antiretroviral therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Economic evaluation of drug resistance genotyping for the adaptation of treatment in HIV-infected patients in the VIRADAPT study.

BACKGROUND: Costs of antiretroviral therapy for HIV-infected patients have increased at a time when most countries are attempting to contain health care costs. Part of this increase results from HIV drug resistance associated with virologic failure and a subsequent shift to more complex and costly therapies. Genotypic guided treatment is associated with better virologic outcome. However, it is not yet known whether it will be cost effective. METHODS: We present here an economic evaluation based on the results from the VIRADAPT study, a prospective, open-label, randomized trial comparing patients assigned to standard of care (n = 43), versus genotypic guided treatment (n = 64) for 6 months. Total follow-up for the extended trial was 1 year. Costs were computed from the viewpoint of the health care system. Hospitalization data were retrieved from the VIRADAPT study case report forms, costs were estimated from the cost of the corresponding diagnosis-related groups derived from the French national cost data base: these were actual costs and not charges. Data on the volume of tests prescribed, drugs, and clinic visits were retrieved from the VIRADAPT study database. The unit costs of tests and clinic visits were determined using the French national Social Security reimbursement price; costing of drugs used were based upon purchase price by either retail pharmacies or hospitals. Genotyping using TruGene HIV-1 assay was estimated at $500 per test from manufacturer's data (all figures in this paper are expressed in U.S. dollars). RESULTS: Total mean (standard deviation) yearly costs per patients were $20,412 (+/-$10, 129) in the standard of care group and $18,484 (+/-$9,652) in the genotyping group (p =.35). Drug costs represented 55% of total costs. There was a trend toward a decrease in drug costs in the genotyping arm (p =.07), the greatest reduction being in the decreased use of protease inhibitors in the genotyping arm. The additional expense of genotyping appeared to be offset by the savings obtained in drug costs. CONCLUSION: In our study, the cost of drug resistance testing is offset by a reduced use of protease inhibitors and their attendant costs. Although not reaching statistical significance, this trend in the reduction of drug costs and drug use presents a great interest for future trials.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Hepatitis B or hepatitis C virus infection is a risk factor for severe hepatic cytolysis after initiation of a protease inhibitor-containing antiretroviral regimen in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. The APROCO Study Group.

In a cohort of 1,047 human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients started on protease inhibitors (PIs), the incidence of severe hepatic cytolysis (alanine aminotransferase concentration five times or more above the upper limit of the normal level >/= 5N) was 5% patient-years after a mean follow-up of 5 months. Only positivity for hepatitis C virus antibodies (hazard ratio [HR], 7. 95; P < 10(-3)) or hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HR, 6.67; P < 10(-3)) was associated with severe cytolysis. Before starting patients on PIs, assessment of liver enzyme levels and viral coinfections is necessary.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed2000

The relation between baseline HIV drug resistance and response to antiretroviral therapy: re-analysis of retrospective and prospective studies using a standardized data analysis plan.

To assess the relation between resistance to antiretroviral drugs for treatment of HIV-1 infection and virological response to therapy, results from 12 different studies were re-analysed according to a standard data analysis plan. These studies included nine clinical trials and three observational cohorts. The primary end-point in our analyses was virological failure by week 24. Baseline factors that were investigated as predictors of virological failure were plasma HIV-1 RNA, the number and type of new antiretroviral drugs in the regimen, and viral susceptibility to the drugs in the regimen, determined by genotyping or phenotyping methods. These analyses confirmed the importance of both genotypic and phenotypic drug resistance as predictors of virological failure, whether these factors were analysed separately or adjusted for other baseline confounding factors. In most of the re-analysed studies, the odds of virological failure were reduced by about twofold for each additional drug in the regimen to which the patient's virus was sensitive by genotyping methods, and by about two- to threefold for each additional drug that was sensitive by phenotyping.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed2000

Persisting long-term benefit of genotype-guided treatment for HIV-infected patients failing HAART. The Viradapt Study: week 48 follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: We report the 12 months follow-up of the patients who participated in the Viradapt study. METHODS: A total of 108 HIV-infected patients failing antiretroviral (ARV) therapy (HIV RNA > 10,000 copies/ml, therapy > 6 months with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, > 3 months with protease inhibitors (PIs) were randomized into two arms: standard of care in the control arm, and treatment according to the resistance mutations in the protease and reverse transcriptase genes in the study arm. After the first 6 months of the randomized study, open-label, genotype-guided treatment was offered in both arms. A multivariate analysis was performed to assess the predictive factors of treatment success (HIV RNA < 200 copies/ml). RESULTS: The two arms were comparable in terms of risk factors, age, sex, previous treatments, CD4 cell count and log10 HIV-1 RNA at baseline. At week 24, an interim combined analysis showed a statistically significant difference in the drop in viral load at months 3 and 6 (P = 0.015, repeated measures analysis of variance) in favour of the genotype group. Patients in both arms were then offered open-label genotyping. Genotype analysis was performed every 3 months, and treatment changes could accordingly be made. As some of the patients in the control arm had already progressed to months 9 or 12, only 69% (30/43) of these patients received genotype-guided treatment changes. In the genotype arm, the mean drop in HIV RNA of 1.15 log10 copies/ml, obtained at month 6, persisted at months 9 and 12 (1.15 log10 copies/ml +/- 0.17). In the control arm, an additional drop in HIV RNA to 0.98 log10 +/- 0.22 copies/ml was observed by month 12. In control patients receiving open-label genotype, the percentage of patients with HIV-1 RNA levels below detection limit (200 copies/ml) rose from 14% at month 6 to 30.5% at month 12. This percentage in the study arm remained stable at 31.3% and 30% at months 9 and 12, respectively. Genotype-guided therapy, primary protease mutations and PI plasma concentrations were significantly correlated with virological success. CONCLUSION: In this heavily pretreated patient population, genotype-guided therapy resulted in a sustained reduction in HIV RNA of greater than one log10 throughout a 1 year follow-up period. Performance of genotype-guided therapy may have contributed to the additional viral load reduction seen in patients in the control group who received open-label genotyping after the 6 months point. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of primary protease mutations, performance of genotype-guided treatment changes and PI plasma concentrations independently affected virological response.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed1999

Drug-resistance genotyping in HIV-1 therapy: the VIRADAPT randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Growing evidence has linked HIV-1 resistance mutations and drug failure. The use of genotypic-resistance analysis to assist therapeutic decision-making in patients failing therapy has not been investigated. We assessed the virological and immunological impact of genotypic-resistance testing. METHODS: We did a prospective, open, randomised, controlled study of HIV-1-infected patients in whom combination therapy was not successful. We randomly assigned patients standard care (control, n=43) or treatment according to the resistance mutations in protease and reverse-transcriptase genes (genotypic group, n=65). The major endpoint was the change in HIV-1 RNA viral load. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: 108 patients were enrolled. All patients were similar for risk factors, age, sex, previous treatment, CD4-cell count (214/microL [SD14]) and log HIV-1 RNA viral load at baseline (4.7 copies/mL [0.1]). At month 3, the mean change in HIV-1 RNA was -1.04 log (0.14) in the study group compared with -0.46 log (0.17) in the control group (mean difference 0.58 log [95% CI 0.14-1.02], p=0.01). At month 6, changes were -1.15 (0.15) log copies/mL, and -0.67 (0.19) log copies/mL in the genotypic group and the control group, respectively (mean difference 0.48 log [0.01-0.97], p=0.05). Difference in the drop in viral load combined at 3 months and 6 months was significant (p=0.015). At month 3, HIV-1 RNA was lower than detection level (200 copies/mL) in 29% (19/65) of patients in the genotypic group versus 14% (6/43) in the control group (p=0.017). At month 6, the values were 32% (21/65) and 14% (6/43) (p=0.067) for the genotypic group and the control group, respectively. Therapy was generally well tolerated, with ten patients (six in the genotypic group, four in the control group) requiring toxic-effect-related drug modification. INTERPRETATION: We found genotypic-resistance testing to have a significant benefit on the virological response when choosing a therapeutic alternative. Further study of the use of genotypic-resistance testing in assisting clinical decision-making is warranted.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1999

Impact of infectious diseases specialists and microbiological data on the appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy for bacteremia.

Antimicrobial therapy for 428 episodes of bacteremia in an 850-bed university hospital was prospectively evaluated for 1 year to measure the impact of two factors--blood culture results and the therapy chosen by infectious diseases specialists (IDSs)--on quality of treatment and outcome. Initial shock, a simplified acute physiology score of >15, and inappropriateness of the empirical treatment were independently associated with increased mortality. Empirical treatment was appropriate in 63% of the episodes. This proportion reached 78% for the episodes treated by IDSs, compared with 54% for the others (P < .001). After availability of blood culture results, the proportion of appropriate treatments increased to 94%, with 97% for IDS-treated patients and 89% for other patients (P = .008). IDSs more frequently shifted to oral antibiotics and used fewer broad-spectrum drugs. This study underlines the impact of blood culture results and of IDSs on the prescription of appropriate treatment for bacteremia and on the better use of antimicrobial drugs.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1997

Molecular epidemiology of an outbreak of multidrug-resistant Enterobacter aerogenes infections and in vivo emergence of imipenem resistance.

Molecular typing was used to investigate an outbreak of infection caused by multidrug-resistant Enterobacter aerogenes (MREA) susceptible only to gentamicin and imipenem in an intensive care unit (ICU). Over a 9-month period, ciprofloxacin-resistant E. aerogenes isolates were isolated from 34 patients, or 4.1% of ICU admissions, compared with a baseline rate of 0.1% in the previous period (P < 0.001). Infection developed in 15 (44%) patients. In vivo emergence of imipenem resistance (MIC, 32 micrograms/ml) of organisms causing deep-seated infection was observed in two (13%) of these patients following prolonged therapy with imipenem and gentamicin. Arbitrarily primed PCR (AP-PCR) analysis with ERIC1R and ERIC2 primers and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis of XbaI macrorestriction patterns concordantly showed that outbreak-associated MREA isolates were clonally related and distinct from epidemiologically unrelated strains. AP-PCR and PFGE showed discrimination indices of 0.88 and 0.98, respectively. Space-time clustering of cases within units suggests that the epidemic-related MREA isolates were transmitted on the hands of the health care personnel. A case-control study and repeated environmental culture surveys failed to identify a common source or procedure associated with transmission. In spite of the early implementation of isolation measures, the incidence of MREA colonization remained stable until all colonized patients were discharged. This study confirms the usefulness of AP-PCR and PFGE analyses for the epidemiological study of E. aerogenes and underscores the difficulty of controlling the spread of multiresistant clones of this organism in the ICU setting. The emergence of imipenem resistance represents a threat because virtually no therapeutic option is available for such strains.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1994

Semi-automatic external defibrillation.

Malignant arrhythmia, which is responsible for most of the out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, is ventricular fibrillation (VF). The best treatment of VF is a controlled electric shock on the chest administered in a short delay. The emergency medical technicians (EMTs) qualified to carry out this treatment in Belgium and in districts often succeed in arriving on the spot 8 minutes earlier than the people of the Service Mobile d'Urgence et de Réanimation (SMUR). The delegation of defibrillation to ambulance crew members however implies a specific teaching, training and a medical control. The Brussels experience shows that semi-automatic external defibrillation by EMT-Ds (SAED) is feasible when criteria for applying SAED in the pre-hospital phase are applicable.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Prevalence of nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) resistance-associated mutations and polymorphisms in NNRTI-naïve HIV-infected patients.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of treatment containing nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) could be compromised in NNRTI-naïve patients already harboring a virus resistant to NNRTIs. On the contrary, hypersusceptibility to NNRTIs in patients having failed nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-containing regimens has been described and has been associated with improved outcome. METHOD: We assessed the prevalence of NNRTI resistance-associated mutations or polymorphisms in 146 antiretroviral-naïve patients and in 181 HIV-infected patients who were given an NNRTI-based regimen. We phenotypically evaluated the NNRTI susceptibility of 41 strains presenting with amino acid substitutions at positions involved in NNRTI resistance. RESULTS: In the 268 genotypically analyzable samples, the overall prevalence of NNRTI resistance-associated mutations was 2% (6/268 patients). The prevalence of strains with amino acid substitutions at reverse transcriptase (RT) gene positions (A98, K101, K103, V106, V108, V179) involved in NNRTI resistance was 15%. Hypersusceptibility to NNRTI was rare (2%, 1/41) in those samples. RT substitutions at positions involved in NNRTI resistance were not associated with a significantly worse virologic outcome in NNRTI-treated patients. Our understanding of small shifts in IC50 values (higher or lower) toward NNRTI is very limited. The significance of many RT mutations on NNRTI susceptibility is not clear. CONCLUSION: In contrast to resistance mutations, RT substitutions at positions involved in NNRTI resistance are frequent. They are not associated with a worse virologic outcome or with decreased phenotypic susceptibility to NNRTIs. It may be prudent not to rule out the use of NNRTIs in patients with small shifts in IC50 values or poorly understood mutations.

Adult↗