PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Coudray

Publications and source records attributed to P Coudray.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Effects of bepridil and diltiazem on ventricular repolarization in angina pectoris.

To examine the time-course and potential predictors of prolongation of ventricular repolarization with the calcium antagonist bepridil, the effects of bepridil (300 to 500 mg/day; n = 45) and diltiazem (180 to 300 mg/day; n = 42) on QT and QTc interval duration were analyzed in a randomized double-blind study in patients with angina pectoris. Electrocardiograms were recorded before and 14, 28, 70 and 112 days after treatment was begun. After 14 days, bepridil prolonged QT interval by 26 +/- 35 ms (range, -60 to 120 ms) and QTc (Bazett's formula) by 17 +/- 33 ms (range, -73 to 107 ms) compared to baseline (both p less than 0.05). QT or QTc did not significantly increase thereafter. However, among the 30 patients who had less than 40 ms QTc prolongation at day 14 compared with baseline, 13 (43%) exceeded this limit on at least 1 of the following visits. Diltiazem did not significantly alter QT or QTc intervals. The absolute change in QTc interval from baseline observed after 14 days of bepridil therapy was inversely proportional to the baseline QTc interval (r = -0.68; n = 42; p less than 0.001). The degree of bepridil-induced QTc prolongation on day 14 correlated with pretreatment RR interval (r = 0.36; n = 42; p less than 0.02). In conclusion, chronic administration of bepridil but not of diltiazem prolongs ventricular repolarization in patients with angina pectoris. The overall effects of bepridil therapy on QT and QTc intervals can be assessed by an electrocardiogram recorded after 14 days of treatment but subsequent measurements may be required in individual patients. A short baseline QTc interval and a slow initial heart rate may be potentially useful predictors of a greater QTc prolongation with bepridil.

Angina Pectoris↗

[Comparative study of the mid-term electrocardiographic and clinical tolerability of bepridil versus diltiazem in patients with coronary disease].

A randomized, double-blind, multicentric study has been carried out to compare the electrocardiographic tolerance and the clinical benefit of bepridil (B) (300 to 500 mg/day) and of diltiazem (D) (180 to 300 mg/day). 227 patients with stable coronary disease, aged 70 years or less (mean = 59.4 +/- 7.2 years) have received treatment (116 B vs 111 D) during 16 weeks. The standard ECGs at each visit (D 0-inclusion-, D 14, D 28, D 70, D 112) show that, in group D, 9 first degree auriculo-ventricular blocks (ABV), occur during the study while no ABV occur in group B. A significant prolongation of the QTc (+5%) is observed as from D 14 in group B patients compared to those in group D. This difference persists during all the study. The study of Holters of 24 hours, carried out on D 0, D 70 and D 112, shows the good tolerance of B in this type of population. The number of patients presenting attacks of angina, the frequency of these attacks and the amount of TNT consumed are not different for the two groups under treatment, whatever the period studied. The frequency of extracardiac and cardiovascular undesirable effects is not different for the two groups. The number of patients who left the trial is not different for the two groups. The biological tolerance remained within normal limits in both groups. The analysis of the individual data has never shown any pro-arrhythmic effect, attributable to B or D, in the patients with no initial arrhythmia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗