PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P D Grimm

Publications and source records attributed to P D Grimm.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

10-year biochemical (prostate-specific antigen) control of prostate cancer with (125)I brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To report 10-year biochemical (prostate-specific antigen [PSA]) outcomes for patients treated with 125I brachytherapy as monotherapy for early-stage prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred and twenty-five consecutively treated patients, with clinical Stage T1-T2b prostate cancer were treated with 125I brachytherapy as monotherapy, and followed with PSA determinations. Kaplan-Meier estimates of PSA progression-free survival (PFS), on the basis of a two consecutive elevations of PSA, were calculated. Aggregate PSA response by time interval was assessed. Comparisons were made to an earlier-treated cohort. RESULTS: The overall PSA PFS rate achieved at 10 years was 87% for low-risk patients (PSA < 10, Gleason Sum 2-6, T1-T2b). Of 59 patients (47%) followed beyond 7 years, 51 (86%) had serum PSAs less than 0.5 ng/mL; 48 (81%) had serum PSAs less than 0.2 ng/mL. Failures were local, 3.0%; distant, 3.0%. No patients have died of prostate carcinoma. The proportion of patients with a PSA < or =0.2 ng/mL continued to increase until at least 7-8 years posttherapy. A plot of PSA PFS against the proportion of patients achieving serum PSA of less than 0.2 ng/mL suggests a convergence of these two endpoints at 10 years. Patients treated in the era of this study (1988-1990) experienced a statistically improved PFS compared with an earlier era (1986-1987). This difference appears independent of patient selection, suggesting that the maturation of the technique resulted in improved biochemical control. CONCLUSION: With modern technique, monotherapy with 125I achieves a high rate (87%) of biochemical and clinical control in patients with low-risk disease at 10 years. The decline of PSA following brachytherapy with low-dose-rate isotopes can be protracted. Absolute PSA and PFS curves merge, and are comparable at 10 years.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Palladium-103 brachytherapy for prostate carcinoma.

PURPOSE: A report of biochemical outcomes for patients treated with palladium-103 (Pd-103) brachytherapy over a fixed time interval. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two hundred thirty patients with clinical stage T1-T2 prostate cancer were treated with Pd-103 brachytherapy and followed with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) determinations. Kaplan-Meier estimates of biochemical failure on the basis of two consecutive elevations of PSA were utilized. Multivariate risk groups were constructed. Aggregate PSA response by time interval was assessed. RESULTS: The overall biochemical control rate achieved at 9 years was 83.5%. Failures were local 3.0%; distant 6.1%; PSA progression only 4.3%. Significant risk factors contributing to failure were serum PSA greater than 10 ng/ml and Gleason sum of 7 or greater. Five-year biochemical control for those exhibiting neither risk factor was 94%; one risk factor, 82%; both risk factors, 65%. When all 1354 PSA determinations obtained for this cohort were considered, the patients with a proportion of PSAs < or = 0.5 ng/ml continued to increase until at least 48 months post-therapy. These data conformed to a median PSA half-life of 96.2 days. CONCLUSIONS: Prostate brachytherapy with Pd-103 achieves a high rate of biochemical and clinical control in patients with clinically organ-confined disease. PSA response following brachytherapy with low-dose-rate isotopes is protracted.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

The role of external beam radiotherapy with I-125/Pd-103 brachytherapy for prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To compare the biochemical outcomes of patients treated with Pd-103/I-125 brachytherapy alone vs. brachytherapy combined with external beam radiotherapy for early stage prostate carcinoma. METHODS: Brachytherapy monotherapy was used in 403 patients. Brachytherapy was combined with 45 Gy of external beam radiotherapy in 231 patients. Median follow-up was 58 months. To compare the biochemical outcomes of these two treatment approaches, patients were stratified into three relative risk groups: low risk, T(1)-T(2), Gleason 2-6/10, PSA< or =10.0; intermediate risk, T(3), Gleason 7-10/10, PSA>10.0 (one factor); high risk, T(3), Gleason 7-10/10, PSA>10.0 (two factors). RESULTS: The actuarial biochemical progression-free rate (bNED) for the entire 634 patients was 85% at 10 years. The bNED outcomes by risk group for monotherapy vs. combined therapy respectively were: low risk, 94 vs. 87%; intermediate risk, 84 vs. 85%; high risk, 54 vs. 62%. These differences did not reach statistical significance for any risk group. Rectal morbidity was slightly greater in the combined treatment patients. CONCLUSION: Although the addition of external beam irradiation to brachytherapy is conceptually appealing for patients with higher risk prostate carcinoma, we were unable to demonstrate a benefit. Whether this is because of patient selection biases within the risk groupings, an artefact of retrospective review, or because external radiotherapy does not offer additional benefit is uncertain.

Brachytherapy↗
PubMed2000

Transient elevation of serum prostate-specific antigen following (125)I/(103)Pd brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Based on suggestions by anecdotal evidence to date, an attempt is made to estimate the occurrence of non-disease-related prostate-specific antigen (PSA) spiking in the serum PSA profiles of a series of men treated by (125)I/(103)Pd brachytherapy with or without external beam irradiation. Five hundred ninety-one patients treated between January 1988 and December 1993 were eligible for study. Patients whose clinical status was described as equivocal (declining PSA > 1.0 ng/mL or rising PSA without documented disease [9.6% of the cohort]) were not considered. Evidence of PSA increases that were followed by decline were identified. Treatment and disease-specific parameters were examined for influence of the occurrence of spiking. In patients judged biochemical successes at last follow-up (serum PSA < or = 1.0 ng/mL), 35.8% exhibited a temporary increase of 0.2 ng/mL or more. Seventy-five percent of these patients exhibited a temporary increase between 0.3 and 3.4 ng/mL. The average time of the temporary increases was 24.8 months after implant. Spiking was not associated with a higher risk of clinical failure in this data set. Conventional risk factors for recurrent disease were not associated with benign PSA spiking. Low-magnitude serum PSA spiking may occur in up to one third of patients following permanent, low-dose rate brachytherapy of the prostate. Most of these observations occur up to 3 years after implant and do not appear to be related to disease recurrence. Caution should be taken before initiating further therapy pursuant to the observation of PSA spiking of less than 2 to 3 ng/mL shortly following brachytherapy. Frequent serum PSA sampling following prostate brachytherapy with early follow-up may overestimate biochemical failure rates.

Brachytherapy↗
PubMed2000

Short-course androgen ablation combined with external-beam radiation therapy and low-dose-rate permanent brachytherapy in early-stage prostate cancer: a matched subset analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In order to evaluate the effect of short-term androgen blockade on biochemical control rates for high-risk patients receiving a combination regimen of external-beam radiation therapy and low-dose-rate permanent seed implant brachytherapy, a retrospective matched subset analysis was performed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Inclusion in the high-risk cohort required at least two of the following poor prognostic factors: serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentration > or = 10.0 ng/mL, Gleason score > or = 7, or clinical stage T(2c) or T(3a) disease. Twenty-one patients who underwent androgen ablation between June 1991 and December 1995 in addition to combined-modality radiation therapy qualified as high risk, as did 77 patients who underwent combined-radiation therapy only. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of follow-up (mean 44.6 v 47.8 months, respectively), pretreatment PSA, clinical stage, biopsy Gleason score, or the presence of all three poor prognostic factors. RESULTS: The overall rates of freedom from biochemical failure at 5 years were 77% in the hormonally treated group and 58% in the nonhormonally treated group. The difference was not statistically significant by log rank test (P = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Longer follow-up with larger patient numbers is needed to define the role of adjuvant androgen ablation combined with radiation therapy.

Androgen Antagonists↗
PubMed1998

Reduction of radioactive seed embolization to the lung following prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: Ultrasound-guided interstitial implantation of radioactive seeds is a common treatment for early stage prostate cancer. One of the risks associated with this therapy is seed embolization to the lung. This paper reports on the incidence and possible adverse effects of seed migration. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two hundred ninety consecutive patients were treated with permanent radioactive seed brachytherapy for prostate cancer between January 1 and December 31, 1995. One hundred fifty-four patients were treated with iodine-125 (I-125), and 136 patients were treated with palladium-103 (Pd-103). All but one patient had a routine post implant chest radiograph (CXR), leaving 289 evaluable patients. RESULTS: Twenty radioactive seed pulmonary emboli were identified in 17 patients; 3 patients had two emboli each. The radioactive seed pulmonary embolism rate for the entire group of patients was 5.9%. Acute pulmonary symptoms were not reported by any patient in this series. One hundred forty-six study patients were implanted with free seeds alone (136 Pd-103 and 11 I-125), and 143 were implanted with linked seed embedded in a vicryl suture for the peripheral portions of their implants. The radioactive seed embolization rate by patient was 11% (16/146) versus 0.7% (1/143) for free seed implants and implants utilizing linked seeds, respectively. The difference was statistically significant, p = 0.0002. No patient had detectable morbidity as a consequence of seed emboli. CONCLUSION: The use of linked seeds embedded in vicryl sutures for the peripheral portion of permanent radioactive seed prostate implants significantly reduced the incidence of pulmonary seed embolization in patients treated with the Seattle technique.

Brachytherapy↗
PubMed1998

Centralized multiinstitutional postimplant analysis for interstitial prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility and utility of performing centralized postimplant analysis for transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy (TIPPB) by conducting a pilot study that compares the results obtained from 125I implants conducted at five different institutions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis was performed on 10 postimplant CT scans from each of five institutions. This analysis included the total implanted activity of 125I, ultrasound, and CT volumes of the prostate, target-volume ratios, dose homogeneity quantifiers, prostate dose coverage indices, and rectal doses. As a result of the uncertainty associated with the delineation of the prostatic boundaries on a CT scan, the contours were redrawn by a single, study center physician, and a repeat DVH analysis was performed. This provided the basis for comparison between institutions in terms of implant technique and quality. RESULTS: By comparing total activity to preimplant ultrasound volume we clearly demonstrated that differences exist in implant technique among these five institutions. The difficulty associated with determining glandular boundaries on CT scans was apparent, based upon the variability in prostate volumes drawn by the various investigators compared to those drawn by the study center physician. This made no difference, of course, in the TVR or homogeneity quantifiers that are independent of target location. Furthermore, this variability made surprisingly little difference in terms of dose coverage of the prostate gland. Rectal doses varied between institutions according to the various implant techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Centralized, outcome-based evaluation of transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy is viable and appropriate. Such an approach could be reasonably used in the conduct of multiinstitutional trials used to study the efficacy of the procedure.

Brachytherapy↗
PubMed1998

A survey of physics and dosimetry practice of permanent prostate brachytherapy in the United States.

PURPOSE: To obtain data with regard to current physics and dosimetry practice in transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy (TIPPB) in the U.S. by conducting a survey of institutions performing this procedure with the greatest frequency. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Seventy brachytherapists with the greatest volume of TIPPB cases in 1995 in the U.S. were surveyed. The four-page comprehensive questionnaire included questions on both clinical and physics and dosimetry practice. Individuals not responding initially were sent additional mailings and telephoned. Physics and dosimetry practice summary statistics are reported. Clinical practice data is reported separately. RESULTS: Thirty-five (50%) surveys were returned. Participants included 29 (83%) from the private sector and 6 (17%) from academic programs. Among responding clinicians, 125I (89%) is used with greater frequency than 103Pd (83%). Many use both (71%). Most brachytherapists perform preplans (86%), predominately employing ultrasound imaging (85%). Commercial treatment planning systems are used more frequently (75%) than in-house systems (25%). Preplans take 2.5 h (avg.) to perform and are most commonly performed by a physicist (69%). A wide range of apparent activities (mCi) is used for both 125I (0.16-1.00, avg. 0.41) and 103Pd (0.50-1.90, avg. 1.32). Of those assaying sources (71%), the range in number assayed (1 to all) and maximum accepted difference from vendor stated activity (2-20%) varies greatly. Most respondents feel that the manufacturers criteria for source activity are sufficiently stringent (88%); however, some report that vendors do not always meet their criteria (44%). Most postimplant dosimetry imaging occurs on day 1 (41%) and consists of conventional x-rays (83%), CT (63%), or both (46%). Postimplant dosimetry is usually performed by a physicist (72%), taking 2 h (avg.) to complete. Calculational formalisms and parameters vary substantially. At the time of the survey, few institutions have adopted AAPM TG-43 recommendations (21%). Only half (50%) of those not using TG-43 indicated an intent to do so in the future. Calculated doses at 1 cm from a single 1 mCi apparent activity source permanently implanted varied significantly. For 125I, doses calculated ranged from 13.08-40.00 Gy and for 103Pd, from 3.10 to 8.70 Gy. CONCLUSION: While several areas of current physics and dosimetry practice are consistent among institutions, treatment planning and dose calculation techniques vary considerably. These data demonstrate a relative lack of consensus with regard to these practices. Furthermore, the wide variety of calculational techniques and benchmark data lead to calculated doses which vary by clinically significant amounts. It is apparent that the lack of standardization with regard to treatment planning and dose calculation practice in TIPPB must be addressed prior to performing any meaningful comparison of clinical results between institutions.

Brachytherapy↗
PubMed1998

A survey of current clinical practice of permanent prostate brachytherapy in the United States.

PURPOSE: To help establish standards of care for transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy (TIPPB) by obtaining data regarding current clinical practice among the most experienced TIPPB brachytherapists in the United States. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The 70 brachytherapists who performed the greatest number of TIPPB cases in 1995 in the U.S. were surveyed. Each received a comprehensive four page questionnaire that included sections on training and experience, patient and isotope selection criteria, manpower, technique, and follow-up. Thirty-five (50%) surveys were ultimately returned after three mailings and follow-up phone calls. The cumulative experience of the 35 respondents represented approximately 45% of the total TIPPB volume in the U.S. for 1995. Respondents included 29 from the private sector and six from academic programs. RESULTS: The median physician experience with TIPPB was reported as 4.9 years. Each performed an average of 73 TIPPB procedures in 1995 (range 40-300). This represented an increase in volume for most (74%) of the respondents. Sixty-three percent of the respondents attended a formal training course, 54% had TIPPB-specific residency training, and 31% had been proctored (16 had received two or more types of training experience). The most commonly reported selection criteria for implant alone was on Gleason score < or = 7, PSA < 15, < or = Stage T2a, and gland size < or = 60 cc, although no clear consensus was found. Fifty-four percent considered a history of TURP to be a relative contraindication, while 34% considered TURP to have no impact on patient selection. Eighty-six percent of respondents combine brachytherapy with external beam radiation in an average of 32% of their patients. Boosts were given with both 125I prescribed to 120 Gy (75%) or 103Pd to 90 Gy (50%). Sixty percent reported using a Mick applicator, 46% prefer using preloaded needles, and (11%) use both techniques. Real-time imaging was usually performed with ultrasound (94%); most included fluoroscopy (60%). Definitions of PSA control varied widely. CONCLUSIONS: TIPPB clinical practice in the U.S. demonstrates similarities in technique, but differences in patient selection and definitions of biochemical control. It is, therefore, incumbent on those beginning TIPPB programs to carefully review the specific practice details of those institutions with a broad experience.

Brachytherapy↗
PubMed1998

Pubic arch detection in transrectal ultrasound guided prostate cancer therapy.

New biopsy techniques, increased life expectancy, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening have contributed to an increase in the reported incidence of prostate cancer. Among several treatment options available to the patients, transperineal prostate brachytherapy has emerged as a medically successful, cost-effective outpatient procedure for treating localized prostate cancer. Transperineal prostate brachytherapy employs transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) as the primary imaging modality to accurately preplan and subsequently execute the placement of radioactive seeds into the prostate. Under TRUS guidance, a needle (preloaded with radioactive seeds) is inserted through a template guide, through the perineum and into a predetermined prostate target. The pubic arch, formed by the central union of pelvic bones, is a potential barrier to the passage of these needles in the prostate. A critical aspect, therefore, in the planning and execution of the brachytherapy procedure is the accurate assessment of pubic arch interference (PAI) in relation to the prostate. Traditionally, the evaluation of PAI has involved computed tomography correlate scanning or crude subjective evaluations. In this paper, we describe a new method of assessing PAI by detecting the pubic arch via image processing on the TRUS images. The PAI detection (PAID) algorithm first uses a technique known as sticks to selectively enhance the contrast of linear features in ultrasound images. Next, the enhanced image is thresholded via percentile thresholding. Finally, we fit a parabola (a model for the pubic arch) recursively to the thresholded image. Our evaluation result from 15 cases indicates that the algorithm can successfully detect the pubic arch with 90% accuracy. Based on this study, we believe that detecting the pubic arch and assessing PAI can be done practically and more accurately in the clinical setting using TRUS rather than the current available methods.

Brachytherapy↗
PubMed1997

Interstitial iodine-125 radiation without adjuvant therapy in the treatment of clinically localized prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of iodine-125 interstitial radiation in the treatment of prostate carcinoma classified as T1 or T2. METHODS: One hundred twenty-six consecutive patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate (T1, 23%; T2, 77%) were treated with iodine-125 radionuclides between January 1, 1988, and December 31, 1990. Four patients died of intercurrent illness within 1 year postimplant, leaving 122 men in the study. The prescribed minimum radiation dose was 160 gray. Median follow-up was 69.3 months. Prebiopsy prostate specific antigen (PSA) values (median, 5.0 ng/mL) were available for all patients. Posttherapy evaluation included clinical, biochemical (PSA), and pathologic (repeat needle biopsy) studies. No patient was surgically staged, and none received androgen deprivation therapy. Morbidity was graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grading scale. Statistical appraisal was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method. PSA failure was defined in two ways: (1) PSA progression, i.e., 2 consecutive increases from a nadir value; and (2) failure to attain an arbitrary serum PSA value of 1.0 or 0.5 ng/mL at last follow-up. RESULTS: The overall 7-year survival was 77%; there were no deaths from prostate carcinoma in this cohort. The 7-year actuarial PSA progression free outcome was 89%, and the PSA < or = 1.0 ng/mL outcome was 87%. When PSA < or = 0.5 ng/mL was selected as an outcome end point, and PSA values in this series of radiation-treated patients were compared with PSA values proposed to indicate disease free survival after radical prostatectomy (PSA < or = 0.3-< or = 0.6 ng/mL), the 7-year actuarial disease free survival was 79%. Morbidity was minimal except in patients who had preimplant or postimplant transurethral prostate resection. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient-based iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy for prostate carcinoma classified as T1 or T2 resulted in biochemical outcomes comparable to end points resulting from radical prostatectomy and external beam radiation.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1997

Posttreatment biopsy results following interstitial brachytherapy in early-stage prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess pathologic control rates for prostatic carcinoma as determined by postimplant prostate biopsy in a large series of consecutive patients who have received permanent interstitial brachytherapy using a contemporary transrectal ultrasound-directed, transperineal, computer generated, volume technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Four hundred and two patients received permanent 125I or 103Pd interstitial brachytherapy as primary treatment for early stage prostatic carcinoma at the Northwest Tumor Institute between January 1988 and January 1994. Of these, 201 have consented to biopsy 12 or more months postimplant with a median follow-up of 40 months (range: 12-83 months). None had received hormonal manipulation. A total of 361 biopsies was performed on 201 patients with a range of one to six annual biopsies per patient (91 received multiple, serial biopsies). Of the 161 patients more than 12 months postimplant who have not been biopsied, most have been unwilling or unable to submit to biopsy. Only six patients with biochemical progression have not been biopsied. There was no difference in the presenting characteristics or implant parameters between those patients biopsied and those that were not. One hundred and forty-three received 125I (71%) prescribed to a MPD of 160 Gy with a median activity of 35.5 mCi, and 58 (29%) received 103Pd prescribed to a MPD of 115 Gy with a median activity of 123 mCi. Multiple biopsies were performed under transrectal ultrasound guidance, and all specimens were classified as either negative, indeterminate, or positive. RESULTS: At the time of last biopsy, 161 (80%) have achieved negative pathology, 34 (17%) remain indeterminate, and 6 (3%) have been positive. Only 2 of the 186 patients with a PSA < 4.0 ng/ml at the time of biopsy were positive. Among those 33 indeterminate patients with a subsequent biopsy, 28 have converted to negative, 2 to positive, and 3 remain unchanged to date. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate at least an 80% pathologically confirmed local control rate following permanent interstitial brachytherapy for early stage prostate cancer. A higher local control rate is expected with further follow-up as the majority of indeterminate biopsies convert to negative over time. The indeterminate category of postirradiation biopsy described here includes specimens that have probably been interpreted as positive in other series, but correlate clinically and biochemically with negative biopsies. These results support the use of modern interstitial brachytherapy techniques for selected patients with early stage adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Biopsy↗
PubMed1996

Should brachytherapy be considered a therapeutic option in localized prostate cancer?

Contemporary prostate brachytherapy incorporates advances in computer analysis, imaging technology, and delivery apparatus, allowing exacting and reproducible results compared with historical approaches. The advances permit brachytherapy to be performed on a cost-effective, outpatient basis with low morbidity in the appropriately selected patient. Although unsettled questions remain regarding dosimetric issues, long-term outcomes, and morbidity, the weight of evidence to date appears to support the use of brachytherapy in selected patients. Brachytherapy may be considered a therapeutic option: as monotherapy for early-stage disease and also a boost following moderate doses of external beam irradiation for locally advanced disease.

Brachytherapy↗
PubMed1996

Does brachytherapy have a role in the treatment of prostate cancer?

The goal of radiation therapy is to deliver a high dose to the tumor while preserving normal surrounding tissue. For early-stage prostate cancer, the ultimate conformal irradiation is to place radioactive sources directly into the gland either as permanent or temporary seeds. Permanent seed implantation is capable of delivering two times the radiobiologically equivalent dose of external beam irradiation to the prostate and tumor. In the past, the results of prostate brachytherapy were likely poor owing to the technical difficulty in accurately placing the radioactive seeds uniformly throughout the prostate. The use of low-dose-rate I-125 to treat high-grade cancers probably also contributed to the poorer results as compared with external beam irradiation. Over the last 10 years, however, technologic advances in transrectal ultrasonography, computer dosimetry, and template-based transperineal techniques have dramatically improved the accuracy and consistency of the brachytherapist to place radioactive sources directly into the prostate gland. Transperineal ultrasound or CT directed seed implantation has replaced the older retropubic method. Brachytherapists are now able to accurately map out the gland prior to the implant and carefully evaluate preoperatively seed placement. The availability of such radioactive sources as iodine-125, palladium-103, and iridium-192 has also given the brachytherapist isotopes that can be more carefully matched to the biology and stage of the tumor. More sensitive definitions of failure have prompted radiation oncologists and urologists to carefully evaluate the efficacy of external beam irradiation and surgery. Accurate comparison of the efficacy of brachytherapy to surgery and to external beam radiation requires a randomized study. Comparisons of retrospective studies are fraught with the problems of the heterogeneous nature of early-stage prostate cancer. Imbalances in stage, grade, initial PSA extraprostatic disease, and nodal status of patient groups make comparisons difficult. Most of the long-term data for permanent seed implantation are the result of work at a single institution. These results will need to be repeated at other institutions treating patients in a similar manner. Because techniques vary from institution to institution, permanent implant results will need to be carefully evaluated for technique as well as stratified for pretreatment variables. Pretreatment PSA and grade appear to be more sensitive variables than stage in predicting failure after radiation. As more patients are diagnosed with very early and nonpalpable disease, future studies will need to stratify patients based on these pretreatment factors. Patients with early-stage disease but identified as high risk for extraprostatic disease will require more intensive regimens. The treatment outcomes based on biopsy results are inconclusive. A lack of consensus on the definition of a truly positive biopsy remains forthcoming. The value of a positive prostate biopsy as an outcome predictor for clinical failure is still unclear. The use of prostate nuclear cell antigen staining may help clarify the issue. Comparison of treatment outcome based on absolute PSA is also difficult. The Seattle series suggest that brachytherapy by permanent seed implantation is as efficacious as external beam irradiation for early-stage disease in patients with a low PSA (< 10 ng/mL). As the PSA value rises above 10 ng/mL, the probability of failure after external beam rises substantially. Results from the Seattle series suggest an advantage to seed implant alone or the judicious application of seed implant boost to external beam radiation for these patients with more advanced cancer. The most sensitive measurement of therapeutic outcome is progression-free survival. Few studies to date have evaluated progression-free survival.

Biopsy↗
PubMed1995

Prostate specific antigen based disease control following ultrasound guided 125iodine implantation for stage T1/T2 prostatic carcinoma.

PURPOSE: We report the prostate specific antigen (PSA) based recurrence-free survival rate after 125iodine (125I) implantation for early stage prostatic carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 197 patients with clinical stage T1 and T2 prostatic carcinoma underwent outpatient 125I seed implantation. Followup was 1 to 7 years (median 3). Pretreatment serum PSA levels were elevated (greater than 4.0 ng./ml.) in 138 patients (70%). There were 105 well differentiated (Gleason score 2 to 4), 87 moderately differentiated (Gleason score 5 to 6) and 5 indeterminate tumors. The prescribed minimum prostatic dose was 160 Gy. The total dosage of 125I implanted ranged from 15 to 62 mCi. (median 37). Staging lymph node dissection and seminal vesicle biopsies were not routinely performed. RESULTS: Among 138 patients with an elevated PSA level before implantation and no prior hormonal treatment, the PSA value returned to normal in 98% and decreased to less than 1.0 ng./ml. in 82% within 24 months of treatment. In 97% of those 138 patients the PSA level decreased to less than 1.0 ng./ml. at 48 months after implantation. Of 8 patients with an increasing PSA value 5 also had clinically evident failure. The actuarial rate of chemical (increasing PSA) or clinical failure at 5 years following implantation was 7%, with 15 patients still at risk at 5 years. There was a trend for higher failure rates among patients with higher pretreatment PSA levels (p = 0.57), Gleason scores 5 and 6 versus 2 to 4 (p = 0.51) or higher stage of disease (p = 0.17). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high rate of clinical and chemical freedom from progression following 125I implantation for select patients with early stage prostatic carcinoma.

Aged↗
PubMed1991

Transperineal ultrasound-guided implantation of the prostate: morbidity and complications.

Two hundred and seventy four patients with early carcinoma of the prostate were treated by ultrasound-guided transperineal I-125 implantation. One hundred and ninety six received implant alone, and 78 were treated with combined external beam and I-125 implantation. Operative, early and late complications were reviewed with a median follow-up time of 40 months (minimum 13, maximum 64 months). Operative complications were negligible. Early morbidity (less than 12 months post implant) was noted in 10-15% of patients and consisted of self-limited irritative uropathy or obstruction. Late complications (more than 12 months post implant) were noted in 13%. Seven percent of patients had some combination of permanent sequelae of treatment: 14 patients had some degree of incontinence, 17 had irritative uropathy symptoms, and 7 had proctitis, 5 of whom resolved spontaneously. Most complications were mild to moderate with a notable absence of severe problems. Urinary morbidity was strongly related to prior or post-implant transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) (24% with TURP, 3% without). Transperineal implantation in our experience is associated with an acceptable acute and chronic complication rate.

Brachytherapy↗