Biomedical subjects

P D Schellinger

Publications and source records attributed to P D Schellinger.

43 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed2000

Feasibility and practicality of MR imaging of stroke in the management of hyperacute cerebral ischemia.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neuroimaging techniques such as diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MR imaging have been proposed as tools for advanced diagnosis in hyperacute ischemic stroke. There is, however, substantial doubt regarding the feasibility and practicality of applying MR imaging for the diagnosis of stroke on a routine basis, especially with respect to possible delay for specific treatment such as thrombolysis. In this study, we tested whether MR imaging of stroke is safe, fast, and accurate, and whether the gain in additional information can be used in the daily routine without a loss of time and a risk of suboptimal treatment for the patient with stroke. METHODS: Between September 1997 and August 1999, 64 patients with acute ischemic stroke were recruited for MR imaging (ie, diffusion-weighted imaging, perfusion-weighted imaging, MR angiography, T2-weighted imaging) after a baseline CT was performed. We evaluated practicality and feasibility of MR imaging of stroke by analyzing the intervals between symptom onset, arrival, CT, and MR imaging. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients (mean age, 60.9 years) underwent routine CT and MR imaging within 12 hours after stroke onset (n=25, < or =3 hr; n=26, 3-6 hr; n=13, 6-12 hr). Median times to arrival, start of CT, MR imaging, and between CT and MR imaging were 1.625 hours, 2 hours, 3.875 hours, and 1 hour, respectively. Intervals between symptom onset and MR imaging (P<.005), arrival and MR imaging (P<.002), and CT and MR imaging (P=.0007) differed significantly between the early phase of the study and after November 1998, whereas the intervals between symptom onset and arrival, symptom onset and CT, and arrival and CT did not. Hemorrhage could be excluded in all; a perfusion/diffusion match or mismatch could be shown in 63 of 64 patients. CONCLUSION: Practice and experience with MR imaging in a stroke team significantly reduce the time and effort required to perform this technique and thus make 24-hour availability for MR imaging of stroke practical. Assessment of patients with hyperacute stroke is rapid and comprehensive. Image quality can be substantially improved by head immobilization and by mild sedation, if necessary.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Epstein-Barr virus meningoencephalitis with a lymphoma-like response in an immunocompetent host.

We report the clinical and neuropathological findings in an immunocompetent 19-year-old patient with a fatal acute Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) meningoencephalitis and a lymphoma-like B-lymphocyte response. Our results suggest that an immunotoxic rather than direct viral neuronal invasion mediates brain damage in EBV encephalitis and rule out primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) in our patient. We discuss immunosuppression as a therapeutic option, because present strategies mainly consist of symptomatic therapy due to unclear pathogenesis and nonavailability of effective antiviral agents.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

[Skull and brain injuries in children].

Our contribution reviews the diagnostic algorithm of head injuries in children. According to the Heidelberg consensus on head injury, patients should be divided into three risk groups. In low-risk patients clinical observation is the method of choice and radiological examinations are usually unnecessary. Patients at medium risk should be observed carefully. Sometimes neurosurgical consultation or CT is necessary. High risk patients in most instances need CT and neurosurgical consultation. Skull X-ray is helpful only in selected cases. A simple fracture as demonstrated by skull X-ray has no therapeutic consequence. However, normal findings in skull X-ray do not exclude intracranial injury. CT is the method of choice to detect intracranial hemorrhage, epi- or subdural hematoma and cerebral contusion. If patients present with severe clinical deficits, CT allows characterization of lesions and initiation of specific therapy.

Brain Injuries↗

PubMed1999

Diagnostic accuracy of MRI compared to CCT in patients with brain metastases.

OBJECTIVES: In patients with extracranial neoplasms, the occurrence and number of brain metastases (BM) are critical for further diagnostic approaches and therapeutic strategies and the patient's prognosis. Although widely accepted, there is surprisingly little evidence in the literature that MRI is superior to CCT. Therefore, in patients with solitary BM according to diagnostic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CCT), we investigated, what additional information could be gained by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS/RESULTS: Among 55 patients with solitary BM according to CCT, 17 had multiple BM on MRI (31%) and 38 had solitary BM in both. Based on a presumed binomial distribution of our data, we calculated a rate of at least 19% of patients with solitary BM on CCT, in which MRI would show multiple lesions (p = 0.05). The two main characteristics for BM missed by CCT were the smaller diameter, which averages 2 cm less than in BM identified with both modalities, and a preferential frontotemporal location. CONCLUSION: MRI is indeed superior to CCT in the diagnosis of BM the essential reasons besides detection of smaller lesions being a better soft tissue contrast, significantly stronger enhancement with paramagnetic contrast agents, the lack of bone artifacts, fewer partial volume effects, and direct imaging in three different planes. Therefore, MRI is indispensable in the diagnostic workup of patients with BM for choosing the optimum therapeutic approach, especially with regard to the decision whether to operate or to primarily irradiate the patient's metastases.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

A standardized MRI stroke protocol: comparison with CT in hyperacute intracerebral hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diagnostic imaging in hyperacute ischemic stroke has been revolutionized by the introduction of diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI (DWI and PWI). CT, however, is still needed to exclude intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The purpose of our study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of a standardized, multimodal MRI (mMRI) stroke protocol in the qualitative and quantitative assessment of hyperacute ICH (<6 hours). METHODS: We investigated 9 patients with hyperacute ICH with CT followed immediately by a standardized mMRI stroke protocol (DWI, PWI [T2*-WI], FLAIR, T2-WI, and MRA). The time interval between MRI and symptom onset ranged from 3 hours to 5 hours 45 minutes. We analyzed and compared the size of the hematoma on CT and all mMRI images by semiautomatic volumetry. RESULTS: ICH was unambiguously identified on the basis of all mMRI sequences. With increasing susceptibility effect (T2*-WI), the ICH, appearing as an area of hyperintensity with central signal loss, became qualitatively most evident. Regarding quantitation, T2*-WI overestimated (median and mean difference, 18.9%/17.8%; SD final sigma=24.4%) and DWI correlated best (median and mean difference, 3.97%/-4.36%; SD final sigma=37. 42%) with hematoma size on CT. CONCLUSIONS: Multimodal stroke MRI is as reliable as CT in the assessment of hyperacute ICH. Therefore, additional CT is no longer necessary to rule out ICH in hyperacute stroke. The use of mMRI alone in the diagnostic workup of a hyperacute stroke patient saves time and costs while rendering all the critical information needed to initiate an optimal treatment.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1998

[Emergency and intensive care treatment after stroke. Recommendations of the European Consensus Group].

The concept of critical care in stroke is a controversial issue. The question of whether full-scale critical care management of stroke improves patient outcome is still open and probably depends on the definition adopted for critical care. At a second meeting of the European Ad Hoc Consensus Group, the following recommendations including specific problems for optimal emergency and critical care management of stroke patients were made.

Cerebrovascular Disorders↗

PubMed1997

[Antithrombotic therapy after cerebral ischemia].

Following cerebral ischaemia a recurrent stroke must be avoided in most patients by means of antithrombotic agents. Based on the results reviewed here of new therapy studies, we discuss the presently available antithrombotic treatment options for prophylaxis in ischaemic stroke. TASS (Ticlopidine Aspirin Stroke Study) and CATS (Canadian American Ticlopidine Study) are two multicentre studies investigating the effect of ticlopidine, a new antiplatelet agent of the thienopyridine family, compared to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) respectively placebo, in the secondary prophylaxis of ischaemic stroke. A significant relative risk reduction of ticlopidine against ASA (21%) and against placebo (28.1%) was shown. CAPRIE (Clopidogrel vs. Aspirin in Patients with Risk of Ischemic Events) evaluated clopidogrel and ASA in the secondary prophylaxe of stroke, myocardial infarction and peripheral vascular occlusive disease. Clopidogrel has been shown to be as effective as ticlopidine compared to ASA in the secondary prevention of vascular disease but had the advantage of a far less severe side effect profile as ticlopidine. ESPS 2 (2nd European Stroke Prevention Study) compared dipyridamole and ASA alone and in combination against placebo in stroke prevention. The combination of agents showed a 24.4% relative risk reduction to suffer ischaemic stroke as opposed to placebo. The ranking of heparin and heparinoids in the secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke has not been completely established but seems to diminish according to recently published data from three major trials. The American TOAST study (Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment) failed to prove any advantage of intravenous Orgaran compared to placebo. In IST (International Stroke Trial) and CAST (Chinese Acute Stroke Trial) the benefits of heparin are invalidated by a higher bleeding rate of patients on intravenous heparin therapy. Furthermore, the results of IST have to be judged critically because of significant methodical inadequacies. When applying antithrombotic agents, therapeutic effect and presumed better outcome should be weighed against the risk of associated bleedings. The indication for an antithrombotic treatment should be reevaluated in regular control examinations and the possibility of a less aggressive treatment should be considered.

Aspirin↗