PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Dreyfuss

Publications and source records attributed to P Dreyfuss.

15 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

The ability of lumbar medial branch blocks to anesthetize the zygapophysial joint. A physiologic challenge.

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, single blinded study. OBJECTIVES: To determine the physiologic effectiveness of lumbar medial branch blocks. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Zygapophysial joint pain can be diagnosed by anesthetization of the joint or its nerve supply (the medial branch divisions of the dorsal rami). The physiologic effectiveness of lumbar medial branch blocks has been assumed but not proven. METHODS: Eighteen asymptomatic individuals were randomly assigned to either L4-L5 or L5-S1 zygapophysial joint injections with contrast medium until capsular distention elicited pain without extracapsular contrast spread. One week later, 15 blinded individuals underwent two randomized saline or 2% lidocaine medial branch injections that correlated to the innervation of the previously injected joint. Medical branch injections were performed such that inadvertent venous uptake was avoided in 14 individuals. Thirty minutes after medial branch injections, these 14 individuals underwent repeat capsular distention of the same zygapophysial joint provoked the prior week in an attempt to elicit another painful response. RESULTS: All five control individuals who received saline medial branch injections felt pain on repeat capsular distention. Nine individuals received 2% lidocaine medial branch blocks; eight felt no pain, and one felt pain on repeat capsular distention. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant effect of 2% lidocaine (versus saline) medial branch injections on anesthetization of the zygapophysial joint when venous uptake was avoided during these injections. When properly performed, lumbar medial branch blocks successfully inhibit pain associated with capsular distention of the lumbar zygapophysial joints at a rate of 89%.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Specificity of lumbar medial branch and L5 dorsal ramus blocks. A computed tomography study.

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVES: To determine the face validity of lumbar medial branch blocks. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lumbar medial branch blocks have been used increasingly to diagnose zygapophysial joint pain. The course and relations of the medial branches of the dorsal rami have been demonstrated in previous anatomic studies. What is not known is whether blocks of the medial branches anesthetize these nerves exclusively or whether they anesthetize other structures that are potential sources of pain. METHODS: In a cadaveric study, the branches of the dorsal rami were exposed. Spinal needles were placed over the nerves, and plain radiographs were taken to demonstrate the precise radiographic locations of the nerves. In the second phase of the study, healthy volunteers underwent injections of radiographic contrast over the nerves, and plain radiographs and computed tomographic images were taken. Injections were performed using different rates of injection and in two positions for each nerve. RESULTS: Radiographic contrast incorporated the medial branches of the dorsal rami in every injection. When injections were performed using the upper position, aberrant flow of contrast medium was demonstrated with extension into the epidural space or intervertebral foramina. When a position lower on the transverse process was selected, aberrant flow was very uncommon. Eight percent of injections were found to be intravenous. CONCLUSIONS: When the appropriate technique is used, medial branch blocks are target specific. To guard against false-negative responses due to intravenous up-take, contrast medium must be used before the injection of local anaesthetic.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

The value of medical history and physical examination in diagnosing sacroiliac joint pain.

STUDY DESIGN: This prospective study evaluated the diagnostic utility of historically accepted sacroiliac joint tests. A multidisciplinary expert panel recommended 12 of the "best" sacroiliac joint tests to be evaluated against a criterion standard of unequivocal gain relief after an intra-articular injection of local anesthetic into the sacroiliac joint. OBJECTIVES: To identify a single sacroiliac joint test or ensemble of test that are sufficiently useful in diagnosing sacroiliac joint disorders to be clinically valuable. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No previous research has been done to evaluate any physical test of sacroiliac joint pain against an accepted criterion standard. METHODS: Historical data was obtained, and the 12 tests were performed by two examiners on 85 patients who subsequently underwent sacroiliac joint blocks. Ninety percent or more relief was considered a positive response, and less then 90% relief was considered a negative response. RESULTS: There were 45 positive and 40 negative responses. No historical feature, none of the 12 sacroiliac joint tests, and no ensemble of these 12 tests demonstrated worthwhile diagnostic value. CONCLUSION: Sacroiliac joint pain is resistant to identification by the historical and physical examination data from tests evaluated in this study.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Dermatomal/segmental somatosensory evoked potential evaluation of L5/S1 unilateral/unilevel radiculopathies.

Dermatomal and segmental somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) have been reported to be of diagnostic utility in unilateral/unilevel L5 and S1 radiculopathies. This investigation employs history, physical examination, imaging studies, and electrodiagnostic medicine evaluations to clearly define unilateral/unilevel L5 or S1 nerve root compromise. Inclusion criteria require all of the preceding diagnostic methods to corroborate a specific nerve root lesion. Regression equation analysis for cortical P1 latencies evaluating age and height based on comparable patient and control reference populations reveals segmental and dermatomal sensitivities for L5 radiculopathies to be 70% and 50%, respectively, at 90% confidence intervals. Similar sensitivities are obtained for 2 standard deviation mean cortical P1 latencies. Side-to-side cortical P1 latency difference data reveal segmental and dermatomal sensitivities for S1 radiculopathies to be 50% and 10%, respectively, at two standard deviations. The clinical utility of both segmental and dermatomal SEPs are questionable in patients with known unilateral/unilevel L5 and S1 nerve root compromise.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

MUJA: manipulation under joint anesthesia/analgesia: a treatment approach for recalcitrant low back pain of synovial joint origin.

OBJECTIVE: These four cases show how application of manipulation under joint anesthesia/analgesia (MUJA) may benefit the patient with low back pain (LBP) of synovial joint origin when prior treatment options fail. We propose that MUJA should be considered as a treatment option for those with recalcitrant synovial joint-mediated LBP. CLINICAL FEATURES: We report four cases of patients with LBP successfully treated by this protocol. These four patients were neurologically normal and suffered from lumbar zygapophyseal joint and/or sacroiliac joint mediated pain diagnosed by fluoroscopically guided, contrast enhanced, intra-articular anesthetic injections. There were various radiographic findings. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOMES: All four individuals were treated with manipulation after facilitatory intra-articular anesthetic/corticosteroid injections into lumbar zygapophyseal and/or sacroiliac joints. Some also required physical therapy interventions to resolve their LBP. CONCLUSIONS: Anecdotal success with MUJA is enticing; MUJA appears to be a viable alternative for those patients in whom traditional treatment options for LBP of synovial joint origin have failed. However, prospective, quality research is required before MUJA can be formally validated or not in the treatment of documented lumbar zygapophyseal joint and/or sacroiliac joint mediated LBP.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Atlanto-occipital and lateral atlanto-axial joint pain patterns.

STUDY DESIGN: Five asymptomatic subjects underwent provocative injections of the lateral atlanto-axial and atlanto-occipital joints. OBJECTIVES: This study isolated and stimulated the lateral atlanto-axial and atlanto-occipital joints via fluoroscopically guided intra-articular injections to determine if they are potential pain generators. If they are pain generators, preliminary pain pattern maps will be constructed. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The cervical zygapophyseal joints (C2-3 to C6-7) are potential pain generators as demonstrated by referred pain induced via isolated intra-articular joint injections in normal subjects. Tentative referral patterns based on direct mechanical stimulation of the lateral atlanto-axial and atlanto-occipital joints have not been reported. METHODS: Five volunteers without histories of upper cervical pain underwent two joint injections each. In all five subjects, the left atlanto-occipital and right lateral atlanto-axial joints were stimulated via injection of contrast medium causing distension of the joint capsule. RESULTS: Referred pain was produced with all ten injections. The lateral atlanto-axial injections resulted in consistent referral patterns, whereas the atlanto-occipital referral patterns varied significantly. A tentative composite diagram of the experimentally induced pain was created for each joint. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the nociceptive ability of these cervical synovial joints. This study may assist the clinician in the differential diagnosis of head and neck pain.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Positive sacroiliac screening tests in asymptomatic adults.

STUDY DESIGN: In a prospective, single-blinded study, the incidence of false-positive screening tests for sacroiliac joint dysfunction was investigated using the standing flexion, seated flexion, and Gillet tests in 101 asymptomatic subjects. OBJECTIVES: This study determined if these commonly used sacroiliac screening tests can be abnormal in an asymptomatic population. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The sacroiliac joint is a potential source of back and leg pain. One condition affecting this joint is termed sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Diagnosis of this is made primarily by physical examination using screening tests as preliminary diagnostic tools. These screening tests evaluate for asymmetry in sacroiliac motion due to a relative, unilateral hypomobility in one the sacroiliac joints. The specificity of these tests, however, has not been thoroughly evaluated in a well-selected asymptomatic population. METHODS: A single-blinded examiner performed the standing flexion, seated flexion, and Gillet tests on all subjects. An asymptomatic and a symptomatic group were studied. RESULTS: Overall, 20% of asymptomatic individuals had positive findings in one or more of these tests. The specific percentage of false positives are reported by test, age, sex, and side. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that asymmetry in sacroiliac motion due to relative hypomobility as determined by these tests can occur in asymptomatic joints. Obviously, one should not rely solely on these tests to diagnose symptomatic sacroiliac dysfunction.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Thoracic zygapophyseal joint pain patterns. A study in normal volunteers.

STUDY DESIGN: Nine asymptomatic volunteers underwent 40 provocative intra-articular injections of the thoracic zygapophyseal joints. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to isolate and stimulate the thoracic zygapophyseal joints via fluoroscopically guided intra-articular injections to determine whether they are potential pain generators. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Experimentally, the cervical and lumbar zygapophyseal joints have been shown to produce pain, and tentative referral patterns have been established. Referral patterns based on stimulation of the thoracic zygapophyseal joints have not been previously reported. METHODS: Four subjects underwent right-sided T3-T4, T5-T6, T7-T8, and T9-T10 joint injections, and four subjects underwent left-sided T4-T5, T6-T7, T8-T9, and T10-T11 joint injections. One subject underwent both the right- and left-sided joint injections. The zygapophyseal joints were injected with contrast medium only, and the quality, intensity, and distribution of evoked pain was recorded. RESULTS: In this asymptomatic population, 72.5% of joints injected produced a sensation/pain that was different from the sensation of needle advancement through the soft tissues. In 27.5% of joints injected, there was no evoked pain despite adequate capsular distension. Evoked referral patterns were consistent in all subjects. Significant overlap occurred in the referral patterns, with most thoracic regions sharing 3-5 different joint referral zones. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary confirmation that the thoracic zygapophyseal joints can cause both local and referred pain. A referral pain diagram has been constructed.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Intercostal somatosensory-evoked potentials. A new technique.

Presently, there are few electrodiagnostic medicine techniques to evaluate lesions affecting the thoracic nerve roots or spinal cord. A new electrophysiologic technique to assess these structures, intercostal somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs), is described. Thirty neurologically normal subjects were used in this investigation to generate intercostal SEPs. Bilateral intercostal SEPs were easily elicited after stimulation of the third intercostal nerves just lateral to the sternum anteriorly. Intercostal SEPs were also easily elicited from the fifth, seventh and ninth intercostal nerves along the anterior axillary line bilaterally. Intercostal SEPs are not only easily and painlessly obtained, but are specific for individual spinal levels. This SEP method will provide the clinician with another neural stimulation procedure to assist in the diagnosis of both central and peripheral thoracic neural compromise.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Segmental v dermatomal somatosensory-evoked potentials. Normal intertrial variation and side-to-side comparison.

Although segmental and dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials have been used in the diagnosis of lumbosacral radiculopathy, the unilateral or bilateral normal intertrial variation of these responses has not been investigated. Furthermore, there exists little consensus on how many sequential trials for a single nerve or dermatome are optimal and how to use the data generated from these trials. Without investigation of these basic parameters, determination of what constitutes a normal somatosensory-evoked potential (SEP) is difficult. In 29 normal subjects, the ipsilateral intertrial variations, arithmetic mean side-to-side differences and maximum potential side-to-side differences with stimulation of the superficial peroneal sensory nerve, sural nerve and L5 and S1 dermatomes with respect to P1 and N1 latencies and peak-to-peak amplitudes were investigated. Considerable ipsilateral intertrial variation was observed and side-to-side comparisons revealed a further increase in this inherent variation regarding the above measured parameters. The maximum potential side-to-side differences were even more remarkable than the mean side-to-side differences. For these results and others presented, a method of evaluating SEP parameters whereby the arithmetic mean of two sequential trials for both latency and amplitude is presented that attempts to minimize the normal, inherent variation. We also suggest an additional parameter with which to evaluate SEPs: the maximum side-to-side latency difference. Only through the use of a consistent methodology can segmental or dermatomal SEPs be utilized in a reliable diagnostic manner.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

The use of transdermal scopolamine to control drooling. A case report.

Drooling is a serious social handicap experienced by some neurologically impaired patients. No one method has been identified to control drooling for all patients, however, anticholinergic drugs recently have been utilized. In the case study described, transdermal scopolamine patches were found to be effective for controlling drooling in a traumatic brain-injured patient for whom more conservative methods failed. From a baseline saliva flow rate, saliva flow decreased an average of 30% with one-patch and 59% with two-patch dosing. No significant side effects were observed with treatment, and the decrease in drooling was maintained for a 4-month period. Although transdermal scopolamine may represent one acceptable facet of long-term treatment, it must be stressed that efficacy is variable across patient populations and that treatment approaches must be individualized.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Atlanto-occipital joint pain. A report of three cases and description of an intraarticular joint block technique.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The atlanto-occipital (AO) joint is a true, innervated synovial joint with the potential to cause pain. METHODS: A detailed description of an AO joint injection technique is provided, as none was found on review of the literature. RESULTS: Using this technique, three illustrative cases provide preliminary evidence that intraarticular injection of the AO joint may have both diagnostic and therapeutic value for the treatment of upper cervical pain and headaches. CONCLUSIONS: Although AO joint injections may prove to be an effective adjunct to more traditional forms of conservative treatment, additional prospective studies are needed to better define the role of intraarticular AO joint injections in the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck pain.

Adult↗