PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P E Langford

Publications and source records attributed to P E Langford.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Obligation conditionals in a nonstandard conditional selection task: general versus specific reasoning strategies as a false dichotomy.

The paper reports a study comparing performance on obligation and causal conditionals in the explicit standard order conditional selection task. Analysis indicated that both general and specific reasoning strategies are used when a request is given to disprove obligation conditionals, contradicting the prevalent view that only one of the two kinds of strategy is used and confirming the 1993 suggestions of Evans and later ones by Evans and Over. The incidence of general reasoning strategies in this situation is reduced, compared to that for other kinds of conditional in a disproof task probably because a specific reasoning strategy is available that is easier to use.

Adolescent↗

A neglected window on hypothesis testing in adolescence: explicit standard order conditional selection tasks.

The paper reported four experiments on explicit standard order conditional selection tasks, which permit more direct inference of subjects' strategies than do other conditional selection tasks. The experiments allowed plausible rational support-seeking strategies to be reduced from nine to three, disproof strategies from six to three. The main strategy in early adolescence was either (1) models-based deduction, as suggested by Johnson-Laird and Byrne in 1991 or (2) rules-based deduction, as suggested by Rips in 1994, with a factual attitude to hypothesis and offered information. In late adolescence a substantial minority adopt a hypothetical attitude to both these things, which may be applied with either of these strategies or with (3) the nondeductive strategy suggested by Langford and Hunting in 1994. This general picture of developmental possibilities can be extended to Inhelder's and Piaget's problems requiring information search to test conditional and biconditional hypotheses, in particular their chemicals, pendulum, and rods problems. This extension is obtained by assuming that adolescents acquire a range of strategies for problems requiring more or less focussed information search, conditional selection tasks requiring the former, Piagetian formal operations tasks tending towards the latter. Current evidence does not indicate whether strategies (1) or (2) are dominant in younger adolescents or whether strategies (1) or (2) or (3) are dominant in older adolescents. Thus, the Piagetian argument that formal operations thinking passes from factual rules-based deduction to hypothetical rules-based deduction is only one of several styles of theory that can readily accommodate current evidence in this area.

Adolescent↗

Evaluation of conditional and biconditional hypotheses in information-use tasks during adolescence.

This article describes three studies of the evaluation of conditional and biconditional hypotheses by adolescents and young adults in the age range 11-29 years. Patterns of responding were in accordance with the predictions of the two-stage model of such tasks proposed by Langford (1992). Conditionals and biconditionals gave rise to similar response patterns, suggesting that they are interpreted in similar ways. Conditionals and biconditionals involving changes in variables were more difficult than those involving individual events. The mention of a second possible antecedent to the consequent had little influence on the tendency to convert conditionals to biconditionals. This contradicts the notion that discourse presuppositions are the major source of such conversion. The most plausible alternative explanation is the Piagetian view that individuals seek to avoid the complications of dealing with three factors.

Adolescent↗

Evaluation strategies for some nonstandard conditionals during adolescence.

380 adolescents and young adults between the ages of 11 and 29 years participated in three experiments in which they were asked to evaluate both universally quantified nonstandard and standard conditionals using items of information bearing upon them. Subjects found it much easier to avoid a biconditional interpretation with the nonstandard than with the standard conditionals, which throws doubt on the explanation of desire for symmetry of biconditional conversion. It was argued, from data of other studies, that a modified version of the Piagetian view that biconditional conversion occurs as a result of a desire to avoid the complications of dealing with three factors explains most cases of such conversion in adolescence. Results also confirmed that it is more profitable to analyse performance on tasks of this kind using a two-stage model of interpretation and information use previously developed to explain performance with standard universally quantified conditionals than to view such tasks as providing truth-table values. Such an analysis was extended to the nonstandard conditionals studied in the present paper. The origins of the dramatic differences in information-use strategies adopted by adolescents for standard and nonstandard conditionals remain unclear.

Adolescent↗