PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

P E Posch

Publications and source records attributed to P E Posch.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

NKG2A complexed with CD94 defines a novel inhibitory natural killer cell receptor.

CD94 is a C-type lectin expressed by natural killer (NK) cells and a subset of T cells. Blocking studies using anti-CD94 mAbs have suggested that it is a receptor for human leukocyte antigen class I molecules. CD94 has recently been shown to be a 26-kD protein covalently associated with an unidentified 43-kD protein(s). This report shows that NKG2A, a 43-kD protein, is covalently associated with CD94 on the surface of NK cells. Cell surface expression of NKG2A is dependent on the association with CD94 as glycosylation patterns characteristic of mature proteins are found only in NKG2A that is associated with CD94. Analysis of NK cell clones showed that NKG2A was expressed in all NK cell clones whose CD16-dependent killing was inhibited by cross-linking CD94. The induction of an inhibitory signal is consistent with the presence of two immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs (V/LXYXXL) on the cytoplasmic domain of NKG2A. Similar motifs are found on Ly49 and killer cell inhibitory receptors, which also transmit negative signals to NK cells.

Antigens, CD

The impact of DR3 microvariation on peptide binding: the combinations of specific DR beta residues critical to binding differ for different peptides.

HLA-DR molecules are a group of highly polymorphic glycoprotein heterodimers that present peptide antigens to T lymphocytes for immune surveillance. To assess the significance of limited polymorphism on the functional differentiation of DR molecules, the binding of several immunogenic peptides to the DR3 microvariants [DR(alpha, beta 1*0302) and DR(alpha, beta 1*0301)] and to mutants of these DR3 molecules was examined. This analysis has shown that each residue (DR beta 26, DR beta 28, DR beta 47, and DR beta 86), which differentiates these two DR3 molecules, contributes to their functional distinction and that the relative contribution of each residue varies for different peptide/DR3 complexes. For example, DR beta 28 and DR beta 86 controlled the mycobacterium tuberculosis 65-kD heat shock protein peptides 3-13 and 4-15 (HSP) binding specificity to DR (alpha, beta 1*0301). [HSP does not bind to DR(alpha, beta 1*0302)], whereas DR beta 26, DR beta 28, and DR beta 86 controlled the influenza hemagglutinin peptide 306-318 (HA) binding specificity to DR(alpha, beta 1*0302). [HA does not bind to DR(alpha, beta 1*0301).] In comparison, DR beta 86 alone controlled the binding level difference of sperm whale myoglobin peptide 132-151 (SWM) and of myelin basic protein peptide 152-170 (MBP) [both bind to DR(alpha, beta 1*0301) at levels five times greater than to DR(alpha, beta 1*0302)] to the DR3 molecules. Although not critical, additional DR beta residues influenced the binding level of individual peptides of each of the DR3 molecules and, again, the combinations of these residues differed for different peptide/DR3 complexes. These data showed that individual DR residues vary in their relative contribution to the interaction between a specific DR molecule and different peptides and that limited polymorphism can create substantial differences in the peptide binding profiles among DR molecules.

Amino Acid Sequence

The relative importance of individual DR binding motif positions as defined by peptide anchor analysis of influenza hemagglutinin peptide 306-318 and human myelin basic protein peptide 152-165 binding to several DR molecules: definition of a common extended DR binding motif.

Definition of peptide binding motifs for DR molecules has proven difficult as the peptides that bind to a DR molecule have shown extensive variability at putative motif positions. Recent studies suggest that specific peptide anchor residues (motif positions) and specific DR residues can differ in importance for peptide binding to a DR molecule. To assess further the relevance of individual peptide anchor residues, the binding of serial alanine-substituted analogs of influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) 306-318 and human myelin basic protein (MBP) 152-165 to a panel of transfected wild-type DR molecules was examined. This analysis included DR molecules from a wide range of allelic families and, unlike most earlier studies, multiple members of single DR allelic families. The data show that different peptide residues serve as critical anchors for binding to different DR molecules. For example, MBP binding to DR(alpha, beta 1*0303) required peptide residues F154 (i), R159 (i + 5) and R162 (i + 8). In contrast, MBP binding to DR(alpha, beta 1*0102) required peptide residues I153 (i) and L156 (i + 3). More importantly, the combination of critical anchor residues in HA and MBP differed for binding to a single DR molecule [e.g. V309 (i) for HA and I153 (i) and L156 (i + 3) for MBP binding to DR(alpha, beta 1*0102)]. Although the location of the binding pocket in each DR molecule compared to the DR (alpha, beta 1 *0101) crystal is expected to be similar and suggests a common extended DR binding motif, the present results suggest that the relative importance of individual peptide anchor residues and of the corresponding DR binding pockets will differ for each DR/peptide complex.

Amino Acid Sequence

Microvariation creates significant functional differences in the DR3 molecules.

Two DR3 molecules differ by four amino acids whose side chains point into the DR antigen-binding groove. To begin to assess the role of microvariation on DR3 function, DRB1*0302 residues were replaced with DRB1*0301 residues at beta-chain positions 26, 47, 86, and 47 plus 86. Murine fibroblast cell lines expressing DR(alpha, beta 1*0301), DR(alpha, beta 1*0302), and the four mutant 0302 molecules were examined for alloproliferative DR(alpha, beta 1*0302)-specific TLC stimulation and peptide binding. Changing position 26 had the most profound effect on T-cell recognition (seven of nine TLCs did not respond). Two TLCs did not respond to the mutant 0302V86 molecule and four TLCs that did respond to this mutant lost responsiveness when positions 47 and 86 were mutated together. These data suggest that each of these variant residues, including position 47, influence T-cell recognition. Surprisingly, none of the mutations had an effect on the absolute binding of HA 307-319 (DR[alpha, beta 1*0302] specific) and HSP 3-13 (DR[alpha, beta 1*0301] specific); however, the mutant 0302 molecules changed at position 86 (glycine to valine) consistently bound HA 307-319 at significantly higher levels than DR(alpha, beta 1*0302). These data for position 86 are in contrast to other DR molecules and indicate that peptide contact residues for a specific DR molecule cannot be predicted based on binding results obtained with other DR molecules. These data suggest that each of these variant groove residues, although not accessible to the TCR, contribute to the significant functional differences between the DR3 microvariants through subtle influences on the DR3-peptide complex.

Amino Acid Sequence