PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P F Emerson

Publications and source records attributed to P F Emerson.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Timely initiation of dialysis: a urea kinetic approach.

The traditional approach of initiating dialysis when the patient begins to manifest uremic symptoms may result in the development of significant malnutrition with detrimental effects on subsequent morbidity and mortality. The recently issued Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative guidelines suggest that dialysis be initiated when the Kt/V from residual renal function decreases to less than 2.0. We have used the urea kinetic model to show how dialytic dose can be titrated to compensate for declining renal function while maintaining a constant total dose of delivered therapy (Kt/V = 2.0). For hemodialysis (HD), we show that initiating dialysis with once-weekly therapy may be a viable option only for a few months, being replaced by twice-weekly and subsequently with the more typical regimen of thrice-weekly HD. We recommend that the patient be directly initiated with twice-weekly HD to minimize wide swings in the serum concentrations of small-molecular-weight solutes. With continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), a hypothetical average-sized patient with high-average transport can be maintained for approximately 8 months with a single 2.5-L nocturnal exchange and from 8 to 17 months with two nocturnal exchanges of 2.5 L each. The use of nocturnal exchanges allows more normal daytime activities and is less intrusive on patient lifestyle. We have shown that both HD and CAPD regimens can be successfully adjusted to achieve a constant total Kt/V of 2.0 for 5 or more years, although CAPD may provide a smoother transition from no dialysis to a complete 10-L regimen.

Creatinine↗

Effect of low-frequency ultrasound on peritoneal transport in rabbits.

It has recently been suggested that sonophoresis, or the application of ultrasound (US) in the kilohertz range, could enhance peritoneal mass transport. To examine this hypothesis, six nephrectomized rabbits were exposed to ultrasound while under isoflurane anesthesia. An additional five also had bilateral nephrectomies and were used as a control group. Each group underwent four exchanges of 90 minutes duration with 1.5% dextrose while anesthetized. Dialysate samples were taken at 0, 30, 60, and 90 minutes and assayed for urea, creatinine, glucose, and protein. Blood samples were taken pre- and postexchange. In the US group, 20 kHz ultrasound was applied during exchanges 2 and 3 at 47.5 W and 95 W, respectively, using a Virsonic 475 cell disrupter acoustically coupled to the abdomen through a water column and gel-coated PVC membrane. Results were analyzed by calculating the mass transfer area coefficient (MTAC) and 90-minute D/P values for each exchange. No significant differences were observed in the absolute means of either parameter between the control and US groups. However, when exchanges 2 to 4 were normalized with respect to exchange 1, the resulting urea D/P means were less for the US exchanges compared to the control (p < 0.05). This suggests a possible decrease in transport through US application.

Animals↗

Multicenter clinical validation of an on-line monitor of dialysis adequacy.

Quantitation of hemodialysis by measuring changes in blood solute concentration requires careful timing when taking the postdialysis blood sample to avoid errors from postdialysis rebound and from recirculation of blood through the access device. It also requires complex mathematical interpretation to account for solute disequilibrium in the patient. To circumvent these problems, hemodialysis can be quantified and its adequacy assessed by direct measurement of the urea removed in the dialysate. Because total dialysate collection is impractical, an automated method was developed for measuring dialysate urea-nitrogen concentrations at frequent intervals during treatment. A multicenter clinical trial of the dialysate monitoring device, the Biostat 1000 (Baxter Healthcare Corporation, McGaw Park, IL) was conducted to validate the measurements of urea removed, the delivered dialysis dose (Kt/V), and net protein catabolism (PCR). The results were compared with a total dialysate collection in each patient. During 29 dialyses in 29 patients from three centers, the paired analysis of urea removed, as estimated by the dialysate monitor compared with the total dialysate collection, showed no significant difference (14.7 +/- 4.7 g versus 14.8 +/- 5.1 g). Similarly, measurements of Kt/V and PCR showed no significant difference (1.30 +/- 0.18 versus 1.28 +/- 0.19, respectively, for Kt/V and 42.3 +/- 15.7 g/day versus 52.2 +/- 17.4 g/day for PCR). When blood-side measurements during the same dialyses were analyzed with a single-compartment, variable-volume model of urea kinetics, Kt/V was consistently overestimated (1.49 +/- 0.29/dialysis, P < 0.001), most likely because of failure to consider urea disequilibrium. Because urea disequilibrium is difficult to quantitate during each treatment, dialysate measurements have obvious advantages. The dialysate monitor eliminated errors from dialysate bacterial contamination, simplified dialysate measurements, and proved to be a reliable method for quantifying and assuring dialysis adequacy.

Cross-Sectional Studies↗

On-line monitoring of the delivery of the hemodialysis prescription.

The BioStat 1000 is a new device which employs dialysate-based urea kinetics to calculate the dose of dialysis (Kt/V) based on a two-pool model and protein catabolic rate (PCR). Previous methods relying on blood sampling techniques were subject to error and difficult to implement. This paper describes the features of the Biostat and the results of the first clinical validation study with an early prototype. The BioStat was found to compare favorably with the reference method of direct dialysate quantification (mDDQ) which had been modified to obtain a "two-pool" Kt/V. In 31 patients no significant difference was found between mean Kt/V from the mDDQ and the mean Kt/V from the BioStat (1.35 +/- 0.33 versus 1.38 +/- 0.36, respectively). The PCR was also not significantly different (53.4 +/- 18.5 g/day versus 51.8 +/- 16 g/day, respectively). The BioStat was demonstrated to be a convenient method producing reliable results.

Child↗

Pitfalls of in vivo dialyzer clearance measurement.

Dialyzer small-molecule clearance measurements are commonly made to help identify the cause of inadequate dialysis prescriptions, to determine the efficacy of reuse procedures, or to choose between different types of dialyzers. Clearance measurements can be blood-side- or dialysate-side-based. While blood-side clearance measurement is the classical technique, it suffers from several serious flaws that decrease its accuracy. Chief among these are the inability to accurately measure the blood flow rate and the difficulty in accounting for the presence of nonaqueous components in the blood. Using a dialysate-based clearance measurement technique overcomes these problems for most solutes, provided appropriate guidelines are followed. This article reviews the theory behind both blood- and dialysate-side techniques as well as discussing the practical application of that theory to clearance measurement.

Blood Physiological Phenomena↗

Relationship between body size, fill volume, and mass transfer area coefficient in peritoneal dialysis.

A peritoneal dialysate fill volume of 2 L has become the standard of clinical practice, but the relationships between body size, fill volume, and mass transfer area coefficient (KoA) have not been well established. These relationships were studied in 10 stable peritoneal dialysis patients who underwent six peritoneal equilibration studies (2 h each) at fill volumes of 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, and 3 L. The concentration-time profiles for urea, creatinine, and glucose were measured at each fill volume, and residual volumes were calculated from the preceding dwell period. A modified Henderson equation was used to calculate the KoA for the three solutes as a function of fill volume. By normalizing the KoA for each solute to the value at 2 L, the data for all three solutes collapsed onto the same trend line when plotting the normalized KoA versus dialysate volume. Between 0.5- and 2-L fill volumes, the average normalized KoA increases in an almost linear fashion, its value almost doubling over this range. Between 2- and 3-L fill volumes, there is less than a 10% change in the normalized KoA. However, fill volumes for peak urea KoA were found to increase with increasing body surface area (R = 0.76), being around 2.5 L for an average-sized patient and increasing to between 3 and 3.5 L for body surface areas > 2 m2. To maximize solute transport, these relationships between body size, volume, and KoA should be considered when choosing fill volumes for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and automated peritoneal dialysis and when deciding reserve and tidal volumes for tidal peritoneal dialysis.

Body Surface Area↗

Lean body mass estimation by creatinine kinetics.

A new technique for estimating lean body mass (LBM) from creatinine kinetics has been developed. It is based on the principle that creatinine production is proportional to LBM and that, in the steady state, creatinine production is equal to the sum of creatinine excretion (urinary and dialytic) and metabolic degradation. This technique was applied to 17 normal subjects, 26 stable, chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients, and 71 stable, chronic peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. In the HD group, LBM was also determined by bioimpedance in 11 patients and calculated from total body water, measured as the volume of urea distribution of a sterile urea infusion, in 15 patients. In normal subjects and in the PD group, LBM was assessed by creatinine kinetics as well as by bioimpedance, near infrared, and anthropometric techniques. In the HD patients, LBM by creatinine kinetics correlated significantly with LBM from total body water and the bioimpedance technique. There was no statistical difference between the total body water and creatinine kinetics techniques, but the bioimpedance values were systematically higher than those obtained by the kinetic technique. In the PD group and in normal volunteers, LBM values by creatinine kinetics correlated significantly with the other methods but were lower. Forty-seven percent of the HD patients and 66% of the PD patients had significantly lower LBM by creatinine kinetics than expected for their sex and age. Estimation of LBM by creatinine kinetics is proposed as a simple and convenient technique for the routine nutritional assessment of dialysis patients.

Anthropometry↗