PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P F Schellhammer

Publications and source records attributed to P F Schellhammer.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Results of radical prostatectomy in men with locally advanced prostate cancer: multi-institutional pooled analysis.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the disease-specific and metastasis-free survival rates in men with locally advanced (clinical stage T3) prostate cancer who were treated surgically. METHODS: A retrospective, multi-institutional pooled analysis of the results of surgical treatment in 345 men with clinical stage T3 disease was performed. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Among 298 evaluable patients, pelvic lymphadenectomy alone was performed in 56 men (19%), while 242 men (81%) underwent node dissection and radical prostatectomy. In total, 122 of 298 patients (41%) had nodal metastases and/or seminal vesicle tumor spread. Pathologically organ-confined disease was noted in 27 men (9%). The actuarial 10-year disease-specific and metastasis-free survival rates for all patients managed surgically were 57 and 32%, respectively. For patients with well, moderately and poorly differentiated tumors, cancer-specific survival rates at 10 years were 73, 67 and 29%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A large number of men with clinical stage T3 prostate cancer have advanced disease and are unlikely to achieve improved long-term survival with surgery alone. Although there may be a role for radical prostatectomy in selected patients with low to intermediate grade tumors, such treatment appears unlikely to result in long-term survival in men with high grade disease. A prospective study is necessary to determine the optimal treatment approach in men with locally advanced prostate cancer.

Adult↗

Are monotherapy options reasonable for T3 prostate cancer?

In 1997, we believe that either surgery, radiation, or hormonal monotherapy are unlikely to be adequate therapy alone for clinical stage T3 prostate cancer and that primary treatment strategies should use combination therapy. Combination therapies have been investigated in an effort to lessen the impact of monotherapy failure, and combination therapy trials have been shown to diminish the incidence of local failure and increase the time to progression. To gauge the role that irradiation or surgical monotherapy may play in clinical stage T3 disease, this article analyzes series that report local and distant disease control.

Adenocarcinoma↗

A controlled trial of bicalutamide versus flutamide, each in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy, in patients with advanced prostate carcinoma. Analysis of time to progression. CASODEX Combination Study Group.

BACKGROUND: A randomized, multicenter trial, double-blind for antiandrogen therapy, compared the antiandrogens bicalutamide and flutamide, each combined with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy (LHRH-A) in 813 patients with Stage D2 prostate carcinoma. An analysis of time to progression (median follow-up, 95 weeks) was performed to augment previous analyses of time to treatment failure and time to death. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to double-blind antiandrogen therapy, receiving either bicalutamide (50 mg once daily) or flutamide (250 mg three times daily), and were assigned 2:1 to LHRH-A with goserelin acetate (3.6 mg every 28 days) or leuprolide acetate (7.5 mg every 28 days). The primary endpoint of the trial was time to treatment failure, defined as an adverse event leading to withdrawal of randomized therapy, objective progression, death, or withdrawal from study therapy for any reason. Secondary endpoints were time to death, quality of life, and subjective response. The current analysis of time to progression included progression data collected prospectively for 561 patients (69%) and retrospectively for 252 patients (31%). RESULTS: Disease progression occurred for 223 of 404 patients (55%) in the bicalutamide plus LHRH-A group and for 235 of 409 patients (58%) in the flutamide plus LHRH-A group. The hazard ratio for time to progression of bicalutamide plus LHRH-A to that of flutamide plus LHRH-A was 0.9 (two-sided 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 1.08; P = 0.26). The upper one-sided 95% CI was 1.05, which met the definition of equivalence (< 1.25). CONCLUSIONS: At a median follow-up time of 95 weeks, bicalutamide plus LHRH-A and flutamide plus LHRH-A had equivalent time to progression.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Effects of the calcium influx inhibitor carboxyamido-triazole on the proliferation and invasiveness of human prostate tumor cell lines.

Aberrant cellular signaling is a central feature of malignant cells and a potential target for anti-cancer therapy. Carboxyamido-triazole (CAI) is a calcium influx inhibitor that alters calcium-sensitive signal transduction pathways and suppresses the proliferative and metastatic potential of malignant cells. We have examined the effects of CAI on several tumor-associated parameters in human prostate cancer cell lines to evaluate the potential of CAI as a signal-transduction therapy agent for advanced-stage prostate cancer. Measuring anchorage-dependent cell growth, continuous application of CAI inhibited the growth of DU-145, PPC-1, PC3 and LNCaP tumor cells with 50% inhibitory concentrations ranging 10-30 microM. Direct cell enumeration assays revealed that the growth-suppressing activity of CAI toward DU-145 cells was reversible, indicating a cytostatic effect of the drug on tumor cells. The drug also inhibited the proliferation of several immortalized human prostatic epithelial cell lines. The proliferation of HaCaT- and RHEK-1-immortalized keratinocyte cell lines was relatively insensitive to CAI. Additionally, invasion by DU-145, PC3 and PPC-1 cells through Matrigel in vitro was reduced approximately 60-70% by 10 microM CAI. Other cellular effects of CAI included an attenuation of the elevation of intracellular free calcium in response to bombesin and carbachol in PC3 cells and a marked dose-dependent inhibition of prostate-specific antigen secretion in LNCaP cell cultures.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Results of radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the results of radical prostatectomy in men with early prostate cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective, nonrandomized, multi-institutional pooled analysis. SETTING: Eight university medical centers in the United States and Europe. PATIENTS: A total of 2758 men with stage Tl and T2 prostatic cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Disease-specific and metastasis-free survival rates. RESULTS: Tumor grade was the most important preoperative factor in determining outcome. Disease-specific survival 10 years following surgery and associated 95% confidence intervals were 94% (range, 87%-98%), 80% (range, 74%-85%), and 77% (range, 65%-86%) for those men with grade 1, 2, and 3 tumors, respectively. Metastasis-free survival at 10 years was 87% (range, 78%-92%), 68% (range, 62%-73%), and 52% (range, 38%-64%) for patients with grade 1, 2, and 3 cancers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Radical prostatectomy leads to high 10-year disease-specific survival rates in men with all tumor grades. However, caution is needed in comparing these results with similar studies of alternative treatment strategies, such as watchful waiting, due to the inherent potential biases in uncontrolled trials. Nevertheless, these results offer the best currently available estimates of 10-year outcome of radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer and may be useful in counseling patients with early malignancy.

Europe↗

Bropirimine immunotherapy of upper urinary tract carcinoma in situ.

OBJECTIVES: Bropirimine has been shown to be effective in treating approximately 50% of patients with carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the bladder in recent clinical trials. Patients with upper tract CIS were treated with bropirimine to determine whether this oral drug might be effective in that setting. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with negative radiographic findings and positive cytologic evidence for upper tract CIS in one or both ureters received bropirimine (3.0 g/day orally) for 3 consecutive days each week for up to 1 year. Ureteral collection of urine or barbotage for cytologic analysis was performed quarterly thereafter. RESULTS: Ten (48%) of 21 evaluable patients had a negative ureteral cytologic analysis after 12 weeks (5 patients) or 24 weeks (5 patients). Of these 10 patients, 8 continue to have negative cytology for a period of 3 to 30 months (median, more than 9 months). In 2 patients, negative cytology reverted to positive at 6 and 9 months, respectively, during therapy. Twelve (50%) of the 24 patients reported no toxicity. Three patients stopped treatment at 2, 3, and 3 weeks due to pruritic rash, nausea and vomiting, and severe bone pain, respectively. Therapy was stopped in 1 additional patient between 4 and 5 months because of transient liver enzyme elevations, yet this patient has had a continuous negative cytologic analysis for more than 9 months. CONCLUSIONS: Orally administered bropirimine may be effective therapy for CIS of the ureter or renal pelvis, with acceptable toxicity in most patients. Further efforts to better define this activity as well as the possible need for maintenance or intermittent long-term therapy are warranted.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

Upregulation of prostate-specific membrane antigen after androgen-deprivation therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the expression of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) before and after androgen-deprivation therapy and to compare PSMA expression with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) expression. METHODS: We studied specimens from 20 patients with prostate cancer undergoing medical or surgical castration or combination androgen-deprivation therapy in whom matched pretreatment and post-treatment tissue specimens were available and 16 patients in whom only a post-treatment specimen was available. The expression of PSMA and PSA in the tissue specimens was determined by immunoperoxidase staining. The extent of staining was calculated by multiplying the percent of antigen-positive tumor cells by the staining intensity to arrive at a stain index for each biomarker. An in vitro study assessed the concentration of PSMA and PSA in extracts of LNCaP cells cultured in the presence or absence of androgen as determined by immunoassays and Western blot analysis. RESULTS: PSMA reactivity was found to be increased in 55% (11 of 20) of post-treatment primary tissues and 100% (4 of 4) of post-treatment metastatic specimens. In contrast, PSA expression was found to be decreased in 70% (14 of 20) of post-treatment primary and 100% (4 of 4) of post-treatment metastatic specimens. Neither type of androgen-deprivation treatment nor tissue sensitivity to androgen deprivation appeared to influence degree of biomarker expression. PSMA was found to be downregulated and PSA upregulated when LNCaP cells were cultured in the presence of testosterone or dihydrotestosterone. CONCLUSIONS: The enhanced expression of PSMA in tissues and LNCaP cells after androgen deprivation suggests that PSMA is upregulated in the majority of prostate carcinomas after androgen treatment. The high expression in metastatic tissues strongly suggests that PSMA may be a clinically useful target for antibody-and genetic-directed therapy of prostate cancer that recurs after androgen deprivation. The mechanism whereby androgens suppress the expression of PSMA, and the association of PSMA with the development of hormone-independent prostate cancers, will require further study.

Androgen Antagonists↗

Free and complexed prostate-specific antigen serum ratios to predict probability of primary prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVES: Ratios of free to total prostate-specific antigen (f/t PSA ratio) improved differentiation of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) from prostate cancer (CaP). Using sera obtained at least 1 month prior to biopsy-confirmed diagnosis and logistic regression adjusted for disease prevalence, probability curves are constructed to predict the presence of CaP. METHODS: The patient population included 122 (44%) BPH sera and 155 (56%) prostate carcinoma sera collected prior to any therapy. The total PSA range = 2.0-20.0 ng/mL; median age = 69 years. External reference standards for both free and total PSA assays were used to standardize the assays and correct the ratio. Probability curves and tables for cancer incidence were formulated for a subset of the total test population (total PSA range = 2.0-10.0 ng/mL; 98 BPH, 118 CaP patients) by using logistic regression and prior cancer prevalence statistics derived from a published patient screening study. RESULTS: Median f/t PSA ratios were 0.18 and 0.12 in the overall sample and 0.19 and 0.12 in the subset for BPH and CaP, respectively (P = 0.0001). The median total PSA concentrations for BPH and CaP were 5.8 and 6.7 ng/mL when total PSA range = 2.0-20.0 ng/mL and were 4.9 and 5.9 ng/mL when total PSA range = 2.0-10.0, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer probability curves were constructed to help guide decisions concerning biopsy and other aspects of prostate cancer disease management. Further validation of this approach in another series of patients is necessary and is planned.

Adult↗

Bicalutamide in the treatment of advanced prostatic carcinoma: a phase II multicenter trial.

OBJECTIVES: The safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of the nonsteroidal antiandrogen bicalutamide were investigated in a Phase II trial in 150 patients with metastatic prostate cancer. METHODS: Patients took bicalutamide, 50 mg daily, in an open-label multicenter North American trial. RESULTS: The objective response rate (modified European Organization on Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] criteria) was 70% (57% partial, 13% stable); 59 (39%) of 150 patients had either a > 90% decrease in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels or a decline to < 4 ng/mL. Extent of disease on the bone scan was a significant predictor of response. Patients with < 6 metastatic lesions were more likely to respond. Breast pain and gynecomastia occurred in 76% and 60% of patients, respectively. Gastrointestinal toxicity was very infrequent (diarrhea, 5%) The mean drug plasma concentration was 8528 (+/- 2928) ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Bicalutamide, 50 mg daily, was well tolerated and has efficacy in metastatic prostate cancer. The percentage of men who had > 90% decline in PSA levels is less than observed with surgical or medical castration and has led to trials using this antiandrogen at higher doses as monotherapy.

Acid Phosphatase↗

Oral bropirimine immunotherapy of carcinoma in situ of the bladder: results of a phase II trial.

OBJECTIVES: Bropirimine is an orally administered immunostimulant that has been shown to have activity against carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the bladder. To further assess this potential activity, bropirimine was administered to 42 patients for bladder CIS in a Phase II trial. METHODS: Patients were treated with bropirimine 3.0 g/day by mouth for 3 consecutive days each week up to 1 year. Cystoscopy with biopsies and bladder wash cytology were performed quarterly. RESULTS: Twenty (61%) of 33 evaluable patients converted malignant biopsies and bladder wash cytology to negative, including 6 (50%) of 12 who failed prior bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) immunotherapy, 14 (67%) of 21 who had not received prior BCG therapy, and 12 (80%) of 15 with primary CIS. Median response duration exceeds 21 months. Four of the 20 responders did have a papillary tumor recurrence at 3 to 15 months, all Stage Ta or T1. Mild toxicity (grade I or II) suggestive to interferon induction or administration occurred in one third of patients. Headache, transient hepatic enzyme elevations, skin rash, and arthralgias each occurred in 5% to 14% of the patients, with nausea or emesis in 21%. Grade 1 tachycardia/palpitations or chest pain each were noted in 5%. CONCLUSIONS: Oral bropirimine can induce remission of bladder CIS with acceptable toxicity at 3.0 g/day. Bropirimine may be a valuable alternative to cystectomy for some failures of BCG therapy and may have the potential to replace BCG as front-line therapy because of its ease of administration.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

A dose-response study of the effect of flutamide on benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of a multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate efficacy, safety, and dose-response profiles of four dosing schemes of flutamide over 24 weeks. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive one of the following five treatment regimens for a period of 24 weeks: placebo capsule, flutamide capsules 125 mg twice daily, 250 mg once daily, 250 mg twice daily, and 250 mg three times daily. Patients were then evaluated at baseline (0 weeks) and at 4, 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks after the start of treatment, and 8 weeks after the end of treatment (32 weeks). Evaluation of efficacy was performed by noting changes in urine flow rate, residual urine volume, symptom score, prostate volume, and prostate-specific antigen level. A total of 372 patients were enrolled into the study at 32 centers (14 centers in the United States and 18 international centers). RESULTS: Baseline peak urinary flow rate and percent change from baseline in maximum flow rate showed a dose-related increase at 4 and 6 weeks; this increase was significant in the 250 mg three times daily group. At later time points, no significant differences between the flutamide and placebo groups were observed, largely because of the decreasing number of evaluable patients. At 4 and 6 weeks, 25% of patients in the 250 mg three times daily group had more than 3 cc/s increase in uroflow compared to about 10% of placebo patients (P < 0.05). All flutamide-treated groups had a significant decrease in prostate volume from baseline to the last treatment visit compared to placebo and this reduction was dose related (in comparison to placebo: P < 0.05 for 125 mg twice daily and P < 0.001 for all other treatment arms). Median decrease for the flutamide-treated groups ranged from 6% to 23% at 12 weeks and from 14% to 29% at 24 weeks. All treatment groups showed a subsequent increase in prostate volume after treatment was stopped. Furthermore, there was a significant reduction in residual urine volume at 24 weeks only in the 250 mg three times daily group. It increased following cessation of therapy. Urinary symptoms at 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks did not show any significant difference between placebo and any flutamide dose group. The most common adverse events were nipple and breast tenderness (42% to 52%), diarrhea (29% to 34%), and gynecomastia (14% to 19%). Each of these adverse events had a significantly higher incidence in all flutamide dose groups compared with placebo, but none appeared to occur in a dose-related fashion. Sixteen percent of patients in the placebo group and 25% to 39% of patients in flutamide groups were discontinued due to diarrhea (12% to 17%) or nipple and breast tenderness (4% to 8%). A total of 1% to 3% of patients in various treatment arms discontinued due to deranged liver enzymes (1% for placebo); and 1% to 4% due to impotence (1% for placebo). CONCLUSIONS: Flutamide reduced the prostate volume in a dose-related fashion and resulted in an increase in peak flow rate at 4 weeks (3% for 250 mg three times daily, P value < 0.05), but the early positive effects did not maintain statistical significance due to an increasing number of dropouts due to adverse events. Effect on postvoid residual volume was observed only at the highest dose and at 24 weeks (median reduction, 23 mL, P < 0.05). Despite volume reduction and early improvement in peak flow rate, there were no significant differences in urinary symptoms among the placebo and flutamide groups. Higher incidences of diarrhea, breast tenderness, and gynecomastia, however, were the main limiting factors in this study and until these problems are overcome, the role of flutamide in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia remains investigational.

Aged↗

Pulmonary metastases from prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Lung metastases are rarely a significant factor in the management of prostate cancer. The usual pattern of spread is via lymphatic pathways, with pulmonary metastases virtually always occurring with osseous metastases. Previous reports suggest that androgen deprivation often fails to produce significant improvement in patients with pulmonary metastases; however, in the authors' experience, it has been successful in achieving objective responses. METHODS: A retrospective review of a large prostate cancer data base was performed to identify patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate and radiographic evidence of pulmonary metastases. A unique case of isolated pulmonary metastases with exsanguinating hemoptysis is described to illustrate the dramatic response to androgen deprivation. RESULTS: Of 1290 patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate, in 47 (3.6%) patients radiologic evidence of pulmonary metastases was observed. Twenty-six (2.0%) patients demonstrated pulmonary metastases at the time of initial detection of metastatic disease. The radiographic appearance of pulmonary metastases was consistent with lymphangitic spread in the majority of patients. Of patients who received no hormonal therapy before the development of pulmonary metastases, 76.5% showed improvement in the appearance of their pulmonary lesions with androgen deprivation. As expected, survival was longer for those patients presenting with hormone-naive disease and pulmonary metastases than for patients with hormone-refractory disease and pulmonary metastases. The difference in survival, however, was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary metastases are not encountered commonly in patients with prostate cancer. Androgen deprivation remains the most effective treatment and, among hormone-naive patients, objective response is common. The prognosis for patients with hormone-naive disease and pulmonary metastases is not necessarily worse than for patients with metastatic disease at other sites.

Diethylstilbestrol↗

Prostate-specific antigen for pretreatment prediction and posttreatment evaluation of outcome after definitive irradiation for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to assess the predictive value of pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and the difference between clinical and PSA disease-free status in patients with long-term follow-up after irradiation for prostatic carcinoma. Comparison of the distribution of prognostic factors between surgical and radiation series was also made. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1975-1989, 652 patients with clinical Stage A2-C prostatic adenocarcinoma were definitively irradiated using external beam therapy. One hundred and fifty patients with banked serum and up to 14 years follow-up have pretreatment PSA levels and 355 patients with up to 17 years follow-up have posttreatment values. Treatment failure was analyzed by tumor stage, grade, and four pretreatment PSA categories. Disease-progression was evaluated by clinical and biochemical (PSA) endpoints. Prognostic factors were compared to two surgical series. RESULTS: A significant difference was seen in clinical and PSA disease-free (PSA < or = 4.0 ng/ml) status based on tumor grade, stage, and pretreatment PSA category. Although the expected clinical outcome has been well-documented previously, results based on posttreatment PSA levels show 5-year disease-free survivals reduced by 10-16% and 10-year survivals lessened by 15-39% depending upon the particular tumor grade and stage. The earlier stage, lower grade tumors showed the largest difference between clinical and biochemical recurrence rates at the longest interval from treatment. Even more notable were the differences in the clinical and PSA disease-free rates based on the pretreatment PSA level. Comparing the irradiated patients to two surgical series showed that the former had a larger percentage of more advanced stage tumors with more unfavorable PSA levels as compared to prostatectomy patients. CONCLUSION: With long-term follow-up, the pretreatment PSA level continues to be a powerful predictor of clinical and biochemical outcome in patients irradiated for apparently localized prostate cancer. Differences between clinical and PSA outcome can be considerable, but oftentimes clinically insignificant. The distribution of prognostic factors between radiation and prostatectomy series seems to favor the latter.

Aged↗

Potential benefit of improved local tumor control in patients with prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In the case of prostate carcinoma, radiation therapy is a locally applied treatment modality in a malignancy known for systemic dissemination. Because significant efforts and resources currently are being consumed to improve local tumor control, failure patterns and potential curative gain deserve appropriate assessment. METHODS: From 1975-1989, 647 patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma were definitively irradiated for biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Failure patterns were examined, and survival advantage based on improvement in either local or distant disease control was calculated. Distant metastatic rate and cause-specific survival analyses were used as parameters by which to compare the outcome for patients in whom local tumor control was achieved with patients who experienced local failure, thereby assessing further the importance of the effectiveness of locally applied therapy. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-two (61%) patients at the time of this writing were clinically disease free. Sixty-two (10%) patients failed locally only, 133 (20%) distantly only, and 60 (9%) developed local and distant recurrent disease. Both local and distant failure rates were higher in patients with more advanced stage lesions at presentation, and distant failure rates significantly increased in patients with less differentiated tumors. Pretreatment prostate-specific antigen was found to be useful in predicting recurrence patterns. Overall, there appeared to be more potential for improvement in survival secondary to reducing distant metastasis. The distant survival advantage (DSA) of reducing distant metastases, compared with the local survival advantage (LSA) of improving local tumor control, was 26 versus 14%. Although DSA was greater than LSA within each stage category, the potential to improve survival was most significant in the Stage C group, where DSA was 35% and LSA 16%. Although LSA varied little according to tumor grade, DSA was dependent on tumor grade and varied from 13% for well differentiated lesions to 38% for poorly differentiated lesions. Distant failure free survival at 10 years was 63% for patients with local control and 45% for those with local failure (P = 0.01). Similarly, 10-year cause-specific survival was 75% in locally controlled patients compared with 48% for those with local recurrence (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although better local tumor control should translate into at least modest survival gain for patients with prostate carcinoma, additional advantage may be seen with improved systemic therapy or perhaps earlier diagnosis to reduce further the distant metastasis rate.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Bicalutamide in the treatment of advanced prostatic carcinoma: a phase II noncomparative multicenter trial evaluating safety, efficacy and long-term endocrine effects of monotherapy.

PURPOSE: The safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of bicalutamide were investigated in 150 patients with stage D2 prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients received 50 mg. bicalutamide daily in an open label multicenter North American trial. RESULTS: The objective response rate (modified European Organization for Research in Cancer Therapy criteria) was 70%. Of 150 patients 59 (39%) met prostate specific antigen criteria for partial response, and 88 (59%) reached treatment failure end points and withdrew. Extent of disease was a significant predictor of response but baseline testosterone was not. Breast pain and gynecomastia developed in 76% and 60% of patients, respectively. Mean drug plasma concentration was 8,528 +/- 2,928 ng/ml. CONCLUSIONS: Bicalutamide (50 mg.) daily was well tolerated and efficacious. However, suboptimal effects on prostate specific antigen have led to additional trials to evaluate monotherapy at higher doses.

Acid Phosphatase↗

Goserelin versus orchiectomy in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer: final results of a randomized trial. Zoladex Prostate Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of goserelin and orchiectomy in patients with stage D2 prostate cancer. METHODS: A randomized, open, multicenter study was conducted in 283 patients. Patients were allocated to goserelin, 3.6 mg every 28 days or to orchiectomy. Study end points were endocrine response, objective response, time to treatment failure, survival, and tolerability. Objective response was based on modified criteria of the National Prostate Cancer Project. RESULTS: Serum testosterone decreased from baseline to castrate levels by week 4 in each group and remained below castrate levels thereafter. Acid phosphatase and alkaline phosphatase concentrations also decreased in each group. The goserelin and orchiectomy groups had similar results for objective response (82% versus 77%) and had similar medial times to treatment failure (52 versus 53 weeks) and survival (119 versus 136 weeks). No significant interactions between treatments and prognostic factors were observed. Adjusting for baseline testosterone concentration had no effect on survival outcome. Race had no influence on outcome or efficacy end points. Common adverse events in both groups were pain, hot flushes, and lower urinary tract symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Goserelin is well tolerated and as effective as orchiectomy in patients with Stage D2 prostate cancer.

Aged↗