PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P G Conaghan

Publications and source records attributed to P G Conaghan.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Clinical effectiveness and dose response of image-guided intra-articular corticosteroid injection for hip osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess symptomatic change after intra-articular corticosteroid (IAST) injection at 2 doses in hip osteoarthritis (OA), and to examine dose response and predictors of response. METHODS: Patients with hip OA (90 women and 30 men and median age 64 yrs) referred for IAST fluoroscopic injection were included in this longitudinal, clinical trial. WOMAC scores, body mass index (BMI), conventional radiographic grade (Kellgren and Lawrence scoring) and ultrasound measures (including capsular thickness and osteophyte assessments) were recorded at baseline. In the first phase of the study, 75 patients were injected with 40 mg methylprednisolone; another 45 patients were injected with 80 mg in the second phase. Change in WOMAC scores from baseline to weeks 6 and 12 were calculated for each dose and then dose comparisons were made. Clinical responders (>15% reduction in baseline pain score) were identified in order to establish predictors of response. RESULTS: For the 40 mg dose, there was a statistically significant improvement in pain (P < 0.001) and stiffness (P < 0.001) but not disability at week 6, and only the improvement in stiffness at week 12 was maintained (P = 0.041). For the 80 mg dose, there was significant improvement in pain (P < 0.001), stiffness (P < 0.001) and disability (P < 0.001) at week 6, which was maintained for all domains at week 12 (P = 0.002; P = 0.001; P < 0.001). When the doses were compared, the 80 mg dose demonstrated a significant improvement compared with the 40 mg group for stiffness at week 12 (P = 0.026) and disability at both weeks 6 and 12 (P = 0.026; P = 0.004). Imaging findings did not relate to severity of symptoms or response to IAST. CONCLUSIONS: In these two hip OA cohorts, both the 40 mg and 80 mg IAST doses had a beneficial effect at week 6, while the 80 mg dose maintained this improvement at week 12. Comparison of the two dose groups provided some evidence of a dose response. Randomized controlled trials of IAST for hip OA are now required.

Adult↗

MRI and non-cartilaginous structures in knee osteoarthritis.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides a sensitive tool for examining all the structures involved in the osteoarthritis (OA) process. While much of the MRI literature previously focussed on cartilage, there is increasing research on whole-organ evaluation and including features such as synovitis, bone marrow edema, and meniscal and ligamentous pathology. The aim of this session at the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT)-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Workshop for Consensus in Osteoarthritis Imaging was to describe the current MRI methods for identifying and quantifying non-cartilaginous structures and review their associations with both OA symptoms and structural progression. Although there is much experience in measuring synovitis (derived from the rheumatoid arthritis literature), only one study has reported an association of MRI-detected synovitis and effusions with OA pain. Bone marrow edema lesions, which may represent areas of trabecular remodelling, have been associated with pain and compartment-specific structural deterioration. MRI studies have confirmed the frequency and importance of meniscal damage in progressive cartilage loss, but not related such damage to symptoms. Osteophytes have been associated with cartilage loss and malalignment to the side of the osteophyte. Ligament damage, including anterior cruciate ligament tears, has been found more commonly than expected in painful OA knees. Improvements in quantitative and semi-quantitative assessments of non-cartilage features will greatly assist understanding of the OA process and its response to therapy.

Bone Marrow↗

Responsiveness, effect size, and smallest detectable difference of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in knee osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the responsiveness, effect size (ES) and smallest detectable difference (SDD) of two Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) measures for osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee: a whole-organ semiquantitative evaluation and cartilage volume. DESIGN: This analysis was performed on a dataset from a randomized, double-blind trial (Roche NI-15713) conducted in 1998 of a novel therapy in subjects with mild-moderate knee OA, with MRI at baseline and 6-month follow-up. The trial measurements included (1) cartilage volume measured using a proprietary software method; and (2) semiquantitative scoring of other parameters important for "whole organ" evaluation of OA knee joint pathology, using the Whole-Organ MRI Score (WORMS). The analysis initially examined the distributional characteristics of WORMS items, such as cartilage morphology. Standardized response mean (SRM), ES, and SDD between baseline and 6-month follow-up were then calculated in the whole group and the placebo group alone. RESULTS: In general, the differences were small and this was reflected in the small ESs and SRMs. There was also a suggestion of a treatment effect with reduction in differences between baseline and follow-up in the treatment group. CONCLUSION: Of the MRI semiquantitative measures, cartilage morphology, synovitis and osteophytes appeared to be responsive to change and the focus of repeat measures should highlight these articular features. In general, the ESs and SRMs were small.

Adult↗

Examining a whole-organ magnetic resonance imaging scoring system for osteoarthritis of the knee using Rasch analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The ability to reliably quantify all the structural abnormalities in osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a long-standing goal of OA research. On December 5 and 6, 2002, Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials and Osteoarthritis Research Society, International held a Workshop for Consensus on Osteoarthritis Imaging in Bethesda, MD, with the aim of providing a state-of-the-art review of imaging outcome measures for OA of the knee. As part of the Workshop, data from previous clinical trials and epidemiological studies of OA were analysed with respect to the metrological properties of the measurement methods used. The following report outlines the results of analyses aimed at evaluating the internal construct validity of a whole-organ, ordinal (semi-quantitative) magnetic resonance imaging score (WORMS) using Rasch analysis. The fit of data to the Rasch model offers a measure of the validity of summing different items into a subscale score and the degree to which this score behaves as a unidimensional, interval level measurement tool. METHODS: The Rasch model was applied in two OA studies. The first was a clinical cohort comprising OA knee subjects entering a clinical trial; study entry criteria included patients with at least moderate pain, radiographic osteophytes and a minimum of 1.5mm tibiofemoral joint-space width. The second cohort was from the Boston Osteoarthritis Knee Study, an observational cohort of subjects with symptomatic knee OA with pain on most days and a definite osteophyte in either the tibiofemoral or patellofemoral joints. Baseline WORMS scores from both studies were used for the Rasch analysis, performed with RUMM 2020 software. RESULTS: There was a substantial proportion of subjects in both study populations with zero scores in several of the subscales of WORMS. Few of the subscales met the requirements of the Rasch measurement model when summated across all sites, and summations of some postulated compartmentally based sites also failed to fit the Rasch model. The existing scoring categories also required rescoring at many sites. CONCLUSION: There remain important issues in constructing outcome measurements that summate different features across multiple anatomical sites. The whole-organ scoring system evaluated here is no exception. Resolving these issues will improve the ability of imaging studies to assess complex pathological structural change.

Adult↗

An integrated analysis of five double-blind, randomized controlled trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of a hyaluronan product for intra-articular injection in osteoarthritis of the knee.

OBJECTIVE: Five double-blind, randomized, saline-controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the United States marketing application for an intra-articular hyaluronan (IA-HA) product for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. We report an integrated analysis of the primary Case Report Form (CRF) data from these trials. METHOD: Trials were similar in design, patient population and outcome measures - all included the Lequèsne Algofunctional Index (LI), a validated composite index of pain and function, evaluating treatment over 3 months. Individual patient data were pooled; a repeated measures analysis of covariance was performed in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analyses utilized both fixed and random effects models. Safety data from the five RCTs were summarized. RESULTS: A total of 1155 patients with radiologically confirmed knee OA were enrolled: 619 received three or five IA-HA injections; 536 received "placebo" saline injections. In the active and control groups, mean ages were 61.8 and 61.4 years; 62.4% and 58.8% were women; baseline total Lequèsne scores 11.03 and 11.30, respectively. Integrated analysis of the pooled data set found a statistically significant reduction (P < 0.001) in total Lequèsne score with hyaluronan (HA) (-2.68) vs placebo (-2.00); estimated difference -0.68 (95% CI: -0.56 to -0.79), effect size 0.20. Additional modeling approaches confirmed robustness of the analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This integrated analysis demonstrates that multiple design factors influence the results of RCTs assessing efficacy of intra-articular (IA) therapies, and that integrated analyses based on primary data differ from meta-analyses using transformed data.

Aged↗

Presence of significant synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis patients with disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-induced clinical remission: evidence from an imaging study may explain structural progression.

OBJECTIVE: More timely and effective therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has contributed to increasing rates of clinical remission. However, progression of structural damage may still occur in patients who have satisfied remission criteria, which suggests that there is ongoing disease activity. This questions the validity of current methods of assessing remission in RA. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that modern joint imaging improves the accuracy of remission measurement in RA. METHODS: We studied 107 RA patients receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy who were judged by their consultant rheumatologist to be in remission and 17 normal control subjects. Patients underwent clinical, laboratory, functional, and quality of life assessments. The Disease Activity Score 28-joint assessment and the American College of Rheumatology remission criteria, together with strict clinical definitions of remission, were applied. Imaging of the hands and wrists using standardized acquisition and scoring techniques with conventional 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography (US) were performed. RESULTS: Irrespective of which clinical criteria were applied to determine remission, the majority of patients continued to have evidence of active inflammation, as shown by findings on the imaging assessments. Even in asymptomatic patients with clinically normal joints, MRI showed that 96% had synovitis and 46% had bone marrow edema, and US showed that 73% had gray-scale synovial hypertrophy and 43% had increased power Doppler signal. Only mild synovial thickening was seen in 3 of the control subjects (18%), but no bone marrow edema. CONCLUSION: Most RA patients who satisfied the remission criteria with normal findings on clinical and laboratory studies had imaging-detected synovitis. This subclinical inflammation may explain the observed discrepancy between disease activity and outcome in RA. Imaging assessment may be necessary for the accurate evaluation of disease status and, in particular, for the definition of true remission.

Adult↗

Hand bone loss in early undifferentiated arthritis: evaluating bone mineral density loss before the development of rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To examine the change in regional bone mineral density (BMD), including the hands, and assess its role as a predictor of outcome in patients presenting with an early undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis; (2) to examine for associations with the changes in hand BMD. METHODS: 74 patients with undifferentiated hand arthritis of less than 12 months' duration were examined at baseline and then at three, six, and 12 months follow up, including BMD measurement of the femoral neck, spine (L2-4), and the whole hands using dual energy absorptiometry (DXA). RESULTS: During the study, 13 patients were diagnosed as having rheumatoid arthritis, 19 as having inflammatory non-rheumatoid joint disorders, and 42 as having non-inflammatory joint disorders. At the femoral neck and lumbar spine no significant bone loss was seen in any of the three subgroups. At the 12 months follow up the mean (95% confidence interval) hand BMD loss in the patients with rheumatoid arthritis was -4.27% (-1.41 to -7.13); in the inflammatory non-rheumatoid group, -0.49% (-1.33 to +0.35); and in the non-inflammatory joint disorder group, -0.87% (-1.51 to -0.23). In a multivariate linear regression model (including age, rheumatoid factor, mean C reactive protein, mean HAQ score, and cumulative glucocorticoid dose), only mean C reactive protein (p<0.001) and rheumatoid factor (p = 0.04) were independently associated with change in hand BMD during follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Hand DXA provides a very sensitive tool for measuring bone loss in early rheumatoid arthritis and may be useful in identifying patients at high risk of developing progressive disease. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of hand bone loss as a prognostic factor and outcome measure in rheumatoid arthritis.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

The validation of simple scoring methods for evaluating compartment-specific synovitis detected by MRI in knee osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Synovitis is common in osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. In order to evaluate its importance, valid and reliable quantification methods are required. The aim of this study was to compare simple, semiquantitative synovitis scores with detailed volume assessments in subjects with knee OA using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the investigative tool. METHODS: Thirty-five subjects with clinically diagnosed OA of the knee were assessed for synovitis using gadolinium-enhanced MRI. The volume measurement of synovitis was assessed at four sites (medial and lateral parapatellar recesses, intercondylar notch and suprapatellar pouch). The semiquantitative scoring of synovitis was scored on a 0-3 scale. Establishment of a correlative relationship was undertaken using Spearman's rho for the individual site-specific measurements. Ordinal regression modelling was undertaken in order to establish the capacity of the synovitis scoring to predict the volume measurement. RESULTS: A total of 140 sites were assessed. There were good correlations between the semiquantitative scores and the volume measurements, ranging from rho = 0.86 (P < 0.00) for the medial parapatellar recess to rho = 0.71 (P < 0.00) for the lateral parapatellar recess. The ordinal regression suggested that, while the synovitis scores predicted between 50 and 70% (R2 = 0.53, P < 0.00 to R2 = 0.71, P < 0.00) of the volume measurements, there was some minor overlap, particularly in the mid-range synovitis scores. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that semiquantitative synovitis scores are valid and will enable feasible evaluation of the synovium in OA cohorts.

Aged↗

Is progressive osteoarthritis an atheromatous vascular disease?

Growing evidence from epidemiological studies suggests that osteoarthritis (OA) is linked to atheromatous vascular disease. This hypothesis article proposes that OA, or at least OA structural progression, may be an atheromatous vascular disease of subchondral bone. Further epidemiological studies, imaging investigations of relevant blood vessels, and trials of the effects of statins on the prevention and treatment of OA are needed to examine this hypothesis.

Atherosclerosis↗

Infliximab in combination with methotrexate in active ankylosing spondylitis: a clinical and imaging study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy and safety of infliximab combined with methotrexate compared with methotrexate alone in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) using MRI and DXA to monitor its impact on bone. METHODS: In this single centre study 42 subjects with active AS were treated with methotrexate and were randomly assigned, in a ratio of 2:1, to receive five infusions of either 5 mg/kg infliximab or placebo over 30 weeks. The primary outcome was improvement in disease activity as shown by the BASDAI at week 30. MRI was used to assess the effect of treatments on sacroiliac and spinal enthesitis/osteitis and DXA to monitor bone mineral density. RESULTS: Both therapeutic agents were well tolerated with no dropouts due to adverse events. A significantly greater improvement in mean BASDAI score was seen in the infliximab arm at week 10 (p = 0.017) than in the placebo arm, but this was not maintained by week 30 (p = 0.195), 8 weeks after the last infusion, at which stage disease flares were reported by some subjects. MRI showed that the mean number of lesions resolving for each subject from week 0 to week 30 was significantly greater in the combination group than in the methotrexate monotherapy group (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab in combination with methotrexate was a safe and efficacious treatment in AS over 6 months and was associated with significant regression in enthesitis/osteitis as determined by MRI. However, disease flares were reported 8 weeks after the last infusion, indicating that addition of methotrexate failed to extend the infliximab dosing interval.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

The relationship between limited MRI section analyses and volumetric assessment of synovitis in knee osteoarthritis.

AIM: To assess whether simple, limited section analysis can replace detailed volumetric assessment of synovitis in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients with clinical and radiographic OA of the knee were assessed for synovitis using gadolinium-enhanced MRI. The volume of enhancing synovium was quantitatively assessed in four anatomical sites (the medial and lateral parapatellar recesses, the intercondylar notch and the suprapatellar pouch) by summing the volumes of synovitis in consecutive sections. Four different combinations of section analysis were evaluated for their ability to predict total synovial volume. RESULTS: A total of 114 intra-articular sites were assessed. Simple linear regression demonstrated that the best predictor of total synovial volume was the analysis containing the inferior, mid and superior sections of each of the intra-articular sites, which predicted between 40-80% (r(2) = 0.396, p < 0.001 for notch; r(2) = 0.818, p < 0.001 for medial parapatellar recess) of the total volume assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that a three-section analysis on axial post-gadolinium sequences provides a simple surrogate measure of synovial volume in OA knees.

Contrast Media↗

Further evidence that a cartilage-pannus junction synovitis predilection is not a specific feature of rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Qualitative differences in synovitis between the cartilage-pannus junction (CPJ) region and the adjoining suprapatellar pouch (SPP) have been reported in rheumatoid arthritis and the spondyloarthropathies. OBJECTIVE: To determine if the distribution of synovitis is the same in osteoarthritis (OA) using sensitive measures of inflammation derived from dynamic, contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DEMRI). METHODS: 20 subjects with established OA of the knee were recruited. Conventional MR images together with the DEMRI measurements were obtained. Areas of synovitis at the CPJ region and at a distant site in the SPP were calculated; differences in CPJ and SPP synovitis were determined using DEMRI parameters: the initial rate of contrast enhancement (IRE) and maximal enhancement (ME). RESULTS: The area of synovitis was significantly greater adjacent to the CPJ than in the SPP. IRE and ME measures were greater at the CPJ than the SPP. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of synovitis at the CPJ is not disease-specific and applies across the spectrum of degenerative disease as well as inflammatory diseases.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗

Debridement of plantar callosities in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare forefoot pain, pressure and function before and after normal and sham callus treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight RA patients were randomly assigned to normal (NCT group) or sham (SCT) scalpel debridement. The sham procedure comprised blunt-edged scalpel paring of the callus which delivered a physical stimulus but left the hyperkeratotic tissue intact, the procedure being partially obscured from the patient. Forefoot pain was assessed using a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS), pressure using a high-resolution foot pressure scanner and function using the spatial-temporal gait parameters measured on an instrumented walkway. Radiographic scores of joint erosion were obtained for metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints with and without overlying callosities. The trial consisted of a randomized sham-controlled phase evaluating the immediate same-day treatment effect and an unblinded 4-week follow-up phase. RESULTS: During the sham-controlled phase, forefoot pain improved in both groups by only 3 points on a VAS and no statistically significant between-group difference was found (P = 0.48). When data were pooled during the unblinded phase, the improvement in forefoot pain reached a peak after 2 days and gradually lessened over the next 28 days. Following debridement, peak pressures at the callus sites decreased in the NCT group and increased in the SCT group, but there was no statistically significant between-group difference (P = 0.16). The area of and duration of contact of the callus site on the ground remained unchanged following treatment in both groups. Following debridement, walking speed was increased, the stride-length was longer and the double-support time shorter in both groups; however, between-group differences did not reach levels of statistical significance. MTP joints with overlying callus were significantly more eroded than those without (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of painful plantar callosities in RA using scalpel debridement lessened forefoot pain but the effect was no greater than sham treatment. Localized pressure or gait function was not significantly improved following treatment.

Adult↗

True infliximab resistance in rheumatoid arthritis: a role for lymphotoxin alpha?

BACKGROUND: The combination of methotrexate and the anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) antibody infliximab is a very effective treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, a proportion of patients are not responsive to this treatment. Inefficacy may represent a TNFalpha independent disease or insufficient drug at the site of action. CASE REPORT: A patient with RA resistant to repeated high dose infliximab infusions and intra-articular infliximab into an inflamed knee is described. No beneficial clinical effect was observed. Pre-injection arthroscopic biopsy of the study knee demonstrated TNFalpha staining but also confirmed the presence of lymphotoxin alpha (LTalpha or TNFbeta) on immunohistochemistry. Subsequent treatment with etanercept (which blocks LTalpha as well as TNFalpha) resulted in clinical remission of disease. CONCLUSION: This case suggests that resistance to TNF blockade may occur when TNFalpha is not the dominant inflammatory cytokine and suggests that LTalpha may have a pathogenic role in RA.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

Validation and reproducibility of ultrasonography in the detection of synovitis in the knee: a comparison with arthroscopy and clinical examination.

OBJECTIVE: Accurate detection of synovitis is important in both the diagnosis and outcome assessment of arthritis. This study was undertaken to assess the validity and reproducibility of ultrasonography (US) as a means of detecting synovitis in the knee, by comparing US findings with findings of arthroscopy and clinical examination. METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients with knee pain due to various arthritides had a clinical examination and US of their knee performed immediately prior to arthroscopy. All 3 assessments were performed by different clinicians who were blinded to the results obtained with the other modalities. US and clinical examination were compared with arthroscopically detected synovitis as the gold standard. Data from a subset of patients were used for calculating the inter- and intrareader reproducibility of US results, using a standard dichotomous (absence/presence of synovitis) as well as a graded (absence/grade of synovitis) scoring system. RESULTS: With the use of arthroscopy as the gold standard, US had a higher sensitivity (98% versus 85%), specificity (88% versus 25%), accuracy (97% versus 77%), positive predictive value (98% versus 88%), and negative predictive value (88% versus 20%) compared with clinical examination. The Cohen kappa values for inter- and intrareader reproducibility of US for distinguishing between presence and absence of synovitis were 0.71 and 0.85, respectively (P < 0.05 for both). The weighted kappa values for distinguishing grade of synovitis were 0.65 for inter- and 0.74 for intrareader reproducibility. The kappa value for intrareader reproducibility of arthroscopy results was 0.88. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography is a valid and reproducible technique for detecting synovitis in the knee, and is more accurate than clinical examination. It may be valuable as a tool in studies investigating pain, diagnosis, and treatment response in knee arthritis.

Adolescent↗

Should oligoarthritis be reclassified? Ultrasound reveals a high prevalence of subclinical disease.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of subclinical synovitis using ultrasound (US) imaging of both painful and asymptomatic joints, in patients with early (<12 months), untreated oligoarthritis (</=5 joints). METHODS: Eighty patients underwent a detailed clinical assessment by two physicians. All painful joints were identified, which were immediately scanned by a sonographer. In the last 40 patients, an additional standard group of joints was scanned to establish the prevalence of synovitis in asymptomatic joints. RESULTS: In 80 patients, 644 painful joints (with and without clinical synovitis) were identified and each underwent a US assessment. Of these joints, 185 had clinical synovitis, of which, US detected synovitis in only 79% (147/185). In the other 38 joints US demonstrated tenosynovitis instead of synovitis in 12 joints and possible, but not definite, synovitis in 11 joints. Fifteen joints were, however, normal on US. In 459 joints that were not clinically synovitic, US detected synovitis in 33% (150/459). In 64% (51/80) of patients, US detected synovitis in more joints than clinical examination and in 36% (29/80) of patients, US detected a polyarthritis (>6 joints). Of the 826 asymptomatic (non-painful) joints scanned, 13% (107/826) had US detected synovitis. CONCLUSION: Sonography detected more synovitis than clinical examination in patients with oligoarthritis. In almost two thirds of patients there was evidence of subclinical disease while one third could be reclassified as polyarticular. These findings suggest that a definition of oligoarthritis based purely on clinical findings may be inappropriate, which may have important implications for disease management.

Adult↗

Musculoskeletal ultrasonography in Europe: results of a rheumatologist-based survey at a EULAR meeting.

OBJECTIVE: To document the practice of musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) by a sample of European rheumatologists attending an annual general meeting of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR). METHODS: English-language questionnaires were distributed to 180 randomly selected participants attending imaging-related sessions at the XIV EULAR meeting in Glasgow, UK, in 1999. The questionnaire was divided into four sections: Demographics, Education and Training, Current Practice, and Equipment. RESULTS: Ninety-two rheumatologists responded, representing 74 centres from 19 European countries. Seventy-eight (85%) of the respondents either already used US in their clinical practice or would like to use it in the future. Thirty-seven (40%) respondents performed US within their own department. Few had received training at undergraduate level and most had learned informally or by attending courses. Scans were considered most useful for large joints and ligaments/tendons. Only 28 (30%) respondents valued US for guided injections. CONCLUSIONS: This study, although containing an element of selection bias, confirms a great interest in musculoskeletal US by rheumatologists across Europe and a demand which is likely to increase. The reported variation in training and practice between countries suggests a need for standardized training guidelines.

Education, Medical, Undergraduate↗