PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P García-Ortega

Publications and source records attributed to P García-Ortega.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Drug neosensitization during anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome.

Anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome (AHS) is a rare, severe drug hypersensitivity reaction included in the drug-related rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome (DRESS), in which a transient state of immune suppression and reactivation of latent virus infections have been observed. We describe 5 patients who developed neosensitization to different drugs taken during a previous episode of anticonvulsant-related DRESS, in whom skin prick, intradermal and/or patch tests were performed to confirm the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity. In 1 patient, transient hypogammaglobulinemia was observed during the AHS. Four of the 5 patients developed a delayed skin eruption or a delayed systemic hypersensitivity reaction after intake of a drug that they had also taken during a previous anticonvulsant DRESS which had occurred months or years earlier; in the fifth, a possible reaction was prevented thanks to the allergy workup. The diagnosis of drug allergy was demonstrated by positive delayed reaction to intradermal test with amoxicillin in 2 cases, positive patch tests to paracetamol and amitriptyline in 2 cases, and by clinical evidence of ceftriaxone erythroderma in one. The possibility of neosensitization to drugs administered during anticonvulsant-related DRESS should be considered. A transient state of immunosuppression induced during the anticonvulsant-related DRESS may trigger latent virus reactivation and massive nonspecific immune system response, which may lead to breakdown of tolerance to other drugs present at that time in the organism.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Allergic eosinophilic gastroenteritis in a child with Crohn's disease.

A case of a child with Crohn's disease who developed an eosinophilic gastroenteritis is reported. Although symptoms of eosinophilic gastroenteritis at age 8 could mimic those of Crohn's disease, laboratory, radiographic and histologically studies are clearly different. Peripheral blood eosinophilia (7,476 cells per mm3), high serum IgE level (1,050 kU/l) and normal C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate are common in eosinophilic gastroenteritis and uncommon in Crohn's disease. Eosinophilic gastroenteritis was due to bovine serum albumin (BSA) hypersensitivity, confirmed with skin tests, serum levels to specific IgE and a SDS-PAGE IgE-immunoblotting. A strict meat-free diet was started, with progressive relief of symptoms and decrease of eosinophil count twelve months later; the patient became fully symptom-free and eosinophil count was normal.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Allergy to Diplotaxis erucoides pollen: occupational sensitization and cross-reactivity with other common pollens.

BACKGROUND: Diplotaxis erucoides is a common weed of the Brassicaceae family widespread in southern and central Europe. METHODS: A total of 410 consecutive patients referred for allergy study of rhinoconjunctivitis and/or asthma were skin tested with D. erucoides pollen, 14 proving positive. A purified D. erucoides pollen extract was prepared to perform quantitative skin tests, provocation tests, immunoblotting, and EIA inhibition in the 14 sensitized patients. RESULTS: Three patients, directly involved in viniculture, had rhinoconjunctivitis related to D. erucoides pollen. No D. erucoides-related symptoms were observed in most patients, who were also sensitized to Artemisia pollen. RAST was positive in 12/14 patients and nasal provocation tests in 9/12. The molecular masses of the most prevalent IgE-binding proteins ranged from 26 to 27.5 and from 31 to 34 kDa. D. erucoides pollen inhibited the IgE-binding of other sensitizing pollens in the three viniculture workers, whereas both Artemisia and D. erucoides pollen produced similar heterologous inhibition in the pooled serum of the remaining, nonclinically affected, D. erucoides-sensitized patients. CONCLUSION: D. erucoides pollen may be an important prevalent aeroallergen, particularly in rural areas. It may act as an occupational allergen in vineyard workers, in whom it seems to be the primary sensitizing agent, playing a secondary cross-reactive role in other sensitized patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Usefulness of patch tests for diagnosing selective allergy to captopril.

Captopril, enalapril, and lisinopril are angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors widely prescribed for hypertension and heart failure. Cutaneous side effects of captopril include angio-edema, anaphylactoid reactions, maculopapular eruptions, pitiryasis rosea-like rash, toxic erythema, and exfoliative dermatitis. Some of the immunological captopril-induced cutaneous adverse reactions have been diagnosed in recent years by patch tests. A case of a cutaneous immune adverse reaction to captopril with tolerance to enalapril and lisinopril demonstrated both by patch tests and double-blind challenge tests is reported for the first time. A 71-year-old nonatopic woman suffered a generalized pruriginous maculopapular rash. Two months earlier, she had started oral treatment with captopril 50 mg t.i.d and glibenclamide 5 mg daily. After the rash appeared, she stopped both drugs and the reaction cleared. A skin biopsy from one of the lesions showed perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate of the upper dermis. Skin prick tests with captopril and glibenclamide and patch tests with enalapril, lisinopril, and glibenclamide at 1% and 10% pet., and with mercaptobenzothiazole (a sulfhydryl group-containing chemical at 1% pet were negative. Only patch tests with captopril at 1% and 10% concentrations were positive at 48 h. Oral double-blind challenge tests with glibenclamide, enalapril, lisinopril, and placebo showed good tolerance. The patient was advised to avoid only captopril. Because captopril is the only ACE inhibitor containing a sulfhydryl group and has occasionally been implicated in complex immunological diseases, this chemical group has been considered the culprit of allergic reactions to captopril. The lack of cross-reactivity between captopril, enalapril, and benazepril has been demonstrated in a few patients by patch tests. In our patient, patch tests identified captopril as the drug responsible for a probably immune adverse reaction not due to the sulfhydryl group. Patch tests are useful and safe in the diagnostic work-up of allergic drug reactions and in studies of cross-sensitivity among ACE inhibitors.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Asthma, mite sensitization, and sleeping in bunks.

BACKGROUND: Mattresses and bedding are the main reservoirs of house dust mites. OBJECTIVE: Subjects sleeping in the bottom bunk may be exposed to house dust particles detached from bedding of the top bunk. Our aim was to ascertain whether this exposure could influence the development of mite sensitization and/or allergic symptoms in these individuals. METHODS: Symptoms of allergic respiratory disease were recorded and mite skin tests performed in 94 consecutive bunk-sleeping subjects (47 pairs of siblings) from an outpatient allergy clinic. Levels of Der p I, Der f I, and Der II were determined by enzyme-immunoassay in 16 randomly selected bedding dust samples (8 pairs of bunks). RESULTS: Mite sensitization rate and prevalence of allergic respiratory disease were similar for the top-bed and bottom-bed groups, whereas prevalence of asthma was significantly higher in the latter. Mite sensitization was significantly associated with family atopy background, whereas other factors such as house pets, indoor smoke exposure or types of mattress or bunks were not. Der p I levels higher than 2 microg/g dust were found in 12 of the 16 mattresses and the median of the 8-bed-bottom group was over 10 microg/g. CONCLUSIONS: Sleeping in bunks constitutes a greater risk of developing asthma for subjects sleeping in the bottom bed. Bunk sleeping should be discouraged in families with an atopic background and sensitized subjects should use the top bed.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Usefulness of UniCAP-Tryptase fluoroimmunoassay in the diagnosis of anaphylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Serum tryptase level measured by RIA is the main in vitro tool to confirm the diagnosis of anaphylaxis. METHODS: Serum tryptase levels were determined by UniCAP-Tryptase fluoroimmunoassay (Pharmacia & Upjohn, Uppsala, Sweden), in 30 consecutive patients who presented at the emergency room with a clinical allergic reaction of less than 6-h duration to assess the value of this method in the diagnosis of anaphylaxis. Anaphylaxis was established by clinical criteria and by immunoallergic study. Baseline tryptase levels were determined 1 month later in 21 patients. The receiver operating curve (ROC) was used to establish the best cutoff point of tryptase levels to confirm the diagnosis of anaphylaxis. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were diagnosed with anaphylaxis. In this group, tryptase levels were higher than in the nonanaphylaxis group, composed mostly of patients with urticaria or angioedema (P<0.001). ROC established the best cutoff of tryptase levels at 8.23 ng/ml with a 94.12% sensitivity and 92.31% specificity, whereas the 13.5 ng/ml cutoff recommended by the manufacturers showed 35.29% sensitivity and 92.31% specificity. The reaction-tryptase/baseline-tryptase ratio was 2.85 in the anaphylaxis group and 1.29 in the nonanaphylaxis group. CONCLUSIONS: Serum tryptase levels of >8.23 ng/ml by UniCAP-Tryptase fluoroimmunoassay identify anaphylaxis in patients with symptoms of less than 6-h duration. The usefulness of this determination is higher if baseline tryptase levels are available.

Adolescent↗