Biomedical subjects

P H de Mulder

Publications and source records attributed to P H de Mulder.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

Randomized phase III trial of high-dose-intensity methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) chemotherapy and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus classic MVAC in advanced urothelial tract tumors: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Protocol no. 30924.

PURPOSE: This randomized trial evaluated antitumor activity of and survival asociated with high-dose-intensity chemotherapy with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (HD-MVAC) versus MVAC in patients with advanced transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 263 patients with metastatic or advanced TCC who had no prior chemotherapy were randomized to HD-MVAC (2-week cycles) or MVAC (4-week cycles). RESULTS: Using an intent-to-treat analysis, at a median follow-up of 38 months, on the HD-MVAC arm there were 28 complete responses (CRs) (21%) and 55 partial responses (PRs) (41%), for an overall response of 62% (95% confidence interval [CI], 54% to 70%). On the MVAC arm, there were 12 CRs (9%) and 53 PRs (41%), for an overall response of 50% (95% CI, 42% to 59%). The P value for the difference in CR rate was.009; and for the overall response, it was.06. There was no statistically significant difference in survival (P =.122) or time to progression (P =.114). Progression-free survival was significantly better with HD-MVAC (P=.037; hazard ratio.75; 95% CI.58 to.98). The median progression-free survival time was 9.1 months on the HD-MVAC arm versus 8.2 months on the MVAC arm. The 2-year progression-free survival rate was 24.7% for HD-MVAC (95% CI, 17.1% to 32.3%) versus 11.6% for MVAC (95% CI, 5.9% to 17.4%). CONCLUSION: With HD-MVAC, it was possible to deliver twice the doses of cisplatin and doxorubicin in half the time, with fewer dose delays and less toxicity. Although a 50% difference in median overall survival was not detected, a benefit was observed in progression-free survival, CR rates, and overall response rates with HD-MVAC.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Equivalence of three or four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin chemotherapy and of a 3- or 5-day schedule in good-prognosis germ cell cancer: a randomized study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genitourinary Tract Cancer Cooperative Group and the Medical Research Council.

PURPOSE: To test the equivalence of three versus four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) and of the 5-day schedule versus 3 days per cycle in good-prognosis germ cell cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was designed as a 2 x 2 factorial trial. The aim was to rule out a 5% decrease in the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate. The study included the assessment of patient quality of life. A cycle of BEP consisted of etoposide 500 mg/m(2), administered at either 100 mg/m(2) days 1 through 5 or 165 mg/m(2) days 1 through 3, cisplatin 100 mg/m(2), administered at either 20 mg/m(2) days 1 through 5 or 50 mg/m(2) days 1 and 2. Bleomycin 30 mg was administered on days 1, 8, and 15 during cycles 1 through 3. The randomization procedure allowed some investigators to participate only in the comparison of three versus four cycles. RESULTS: From March 1995 until April 1998, 812 patients were randomly assigned to receive three or four cycles: of these, 681 were also randomly assigned to the 5-day or the 3-day schedule. Histology, marker values, and disease extent are well balanced in the treatment arms of the two comparisons. The projected 2-year PFS is 90.4% on three cycles and 89.4% on four cycles. The difference in PFS between three and four cycles is -1.0% (80% confidence limit [CL], -3.8%, +1.8%). Equivalence for three versus four cycles is claimed because both the upper and lower bounds of the 80% CL are less than 5%. In the 5- versus 3-day comparison, the projected 2-year PFS is 88.8% and 89.7%, respectively (difference, -0.9%, (80% CL, -4.1%, +2.2%). Hence, equivalence is claimed in this comparison also. Frequencies of hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were essentially similar. Quality of life was maintained better in patients receiving three cycles; no differences were detected between 3 and 5 days of treatment. CONCLUSION: We conclude that three cycles of BEP, with etoposide at 500 mg/m(2), is sufficient therapy in good-prognosis germ cell cancer and that the administration of the chemotherapy in 3 days has no detrimental effect on the effectiveness of the BEP regimen.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

Management of intermediate-prognosis germ-cell cancer: results of a phase I/II study of Taxol-BEP.

The standard chemotherapy regimen in metastatic germ-cell cancer is bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP). Chemotherapy studies testing cisplatin dosage and the substitution of ifosfamide for bleomycin have not shown this to be superior to BEP. Paclitaxel (Taxol) has demonstrated promising activity as a second-line treatment in patients with relapsing or cisplatin-refractory germ-cell cancer. Hence, the potential of incorporating paclitaxel in first-line chemotherapy should be investigated. We assessed the feasibility of the addition of paclitaxel to BEP (T-BEP) in a phase I/II study in patients with intermediate- or poor-prognosis germ-cell cancer or with carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP). Paclitaxel was investigated at dose levels of 75, 125, 175 and 200 mg/m2 given as a 3 hr infusion on day 1, before the start of BEP. BEP comprised etoposide at a dose of either 120 mg/m2 on days 1, 3 and 5 or 100 mg/m2 on days 1-5. To deliver the highest possible dose of paclitaxel into BEP, all patients received filgrastim (G-CSF). Thirty patients were entered, 14 of whom had intermediate- (n = 7) or poor- (n = 7) prognosis germ-cell cancer. Paclitaxel up to 200 mg/m2 and BEP at 360 mg/m2 was well tolerated. There was minimal neurosensory and no neuromotor toxicity with the use of 4 T-BEP cycles. More pronounced myelotoxicity and diarrhea at the higher dose level of etoposide resulted in a recommended dose level for multicenter phase II/III testing of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and BEP 500 mg/m2. Of the 13 evaluable patients with intermediate- or poor-prognosis germ-cell cancer, all achieved complete response. With a median follow-up of 18 months, none of these patients has relapsed. We conclude that T-BEP is a well-tolerated induction regimen that should be further tested for its therapeutic potential. A randomized phase II/III study of T-BEP vs. BEP has been started as an EORTC trial in patients with intermediate-prognosis disease.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

[Dyspnea in cancer: causes and symptomatic treatment].

Dyspnoea is a frequent symptom in advanced cancer patients. The control of breathing can be impaired by different mental and physical factors that may coincide and change over time. Apart from the treatment of specific pathophysiologic causes, symptomatic management is of utmost importance. Only few controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of symptomatic treatment of dyspnoea in advanced cancer patients are available. There is evidence that systemically administered opioids are effective in alleviating breathlessness in patients with cancer.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗

PubMed1999

Impact of the treating institution on survival of patients with "poor-prognosis" metastatic nonseminoma. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genito-Urinary Tract Cancer Collaborative Group and the Medical Research Council Testicular Cancer Working Party.

BACKGROUND: Because metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell cancer is a rare but treatable cancer, we have explored whether there is an association between the experience of the treating institution with this disease and the long-term clinical outcome of the patients, particularly patients with a poor prognosis. METHODS: We analyzed data on 380 patients treated in one of 49 institutions participating in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/ Medical Research Council randomized trial of four cycles of bleomycin-etoposide-cisplatin followed by two cycles of etoposide-cisplatin versus three cycles of bleomycin-vincristine-cisplatin followed by three cycles of etoposide-ifosfamide-cisplatin-bleomycin, both treatment regimens given with or without filgrastim (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor). Institutions were divided into four groups based on the total number of patients entered in the trial. The groups were compared by use of the Cox proportional hazards model stratified for treatment with filgrastim and for patient prognosis as defined by the International Germ Cell Consensus Classification Group. With the use of this classification, only 65 % of the patients had a poor prognosis. RESULTS: Patients treated in the 26 institutions that entered fewer than five patients into the trial had an overall survival that was statistically significantly worse (two-sided P = .010; hazard ratio = 1.85; 95% confidence interval = 1.16-3.03) than that of patients treated in the 23 institutions that entered five patients or more. Overall survival and failure-free survival were similar among institutions that entered at least five patients. The observed effect may be related to differences in adherence to the chemotherapy protocol and in the frequency and extent of surgery for residual masses, although only the differences in dose intensity achieved statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated in institutions that entered fewer than five patients into the trial appeared to have poorer survival than those treated in institutions that entered a larger number of patients with "poor-prognosis" nonseminoma.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed1999

A multi-center prospective phase II study of high-dose chemotherapy in germ-cell cancer patients relapsing from complete remission.

PURPOSE: To prospectively determine the efficacy of repeated high-dose alkylating chemotherapy to salvage patients with germ-cell tumors who relapsed after adequate first-line chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with germ-cell cancers relapsing from a first, second or third complete remission induced by chemotherapy were offered to participate in a Dutch national prospective trial with broad entry criteria. The salvage treatment began with a conventional dose of ifosfamide (4 g/m2 on day 1) and etoposide (100 mg/m2 on days 1, 2 and 3) followed by daily s.c. administration of G-CSF (10 micrograms/kg) until peripheral blood progenitor cells had been harvested. Immediately after bone marrow recovery, an intermediate dose chemotherapy course of carboplatin (target AUC: 10 mg.ml-1 min on day 1) and etoposide (500 mg/m2 on days 1, 3 and 5) was given with G-CSF daily s.c. After bone marrow recovery, two subsequent courses of high-dose 'CTC' chemotherapy were given, each containing cyclophosphamide (6 g/m2), thiotepa (480 mg/m2) and carboplatin (target AUC: 20 mg.ml-1 min). The high-dose chemotherapy was administered as 30-60-minute infusions, divided over 4 days and the stem-cell transplants were given 48-72 hours after the last chemotherapy infusion. Whenever possible, residual masses were resected at the end of treatment. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were treated between January 1994 and October 1997. The toxicity of the treatment was manageable. Second CTC courses were administered in 25 patients and were associated with hemorrhagic cystitis and veno-occlusive disease in 3 and 4 patients, respectively. One patient who had recently undergone a partial hepatectomy, died of veno-occlusive disease. At the time of analysis, the median follow-up of the surviving patients was 37 months (range 12-56 months). The median progression-free survival for all patients was 44 months, and the median overall survival has not been reached. According to the internationally accepted criteria for predicting the outcome of salvage chemotherapy in germ-cell cancer (Beyer et al. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 2638-45), 30 patients had 'good risk' criteria. Of these, 29 received high-dose chemotherapy. Of this group, the salvage rate at two years was 65% (95% confidence interval: 49.5%-85.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Over half of the germ-cell cancer patients relapsing from a chemotherapy-induced complete remission can be salvaged by a treatment strategy that incorporates high-dose chemotherapy, even when treatment is given in a multi-center setting. These data confirm the international prognostic model proposed by Beyer et al. in a prospectively studied, independent patient group and provide further evidence that high-dose therapy has a role in the salvage setting of patients with germ-cell cancer.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Randomized study of a short course of weekly cisplatin with or without amifostine in advanced head and neck cancer. EORTC Head and Neck Cooperative Group.

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin is one of the most active cytotoxic agents available for the treatment of patients with head and neck cancer. In a previous phase II study with weekly administration of cisplatin, a response rate of 51% was achieved. However, only in a minority of the patients the planned high dose intensity of 80 mg/m2/week could be reached because of toxicity, mainly thrombocytopenia and ototoxicity. Amifostine is a cytoprotective drug that can diminish the toxicity of alkylating agents and platinum compounds. Therefore the effect of amifostine on toxicity and activity of weekly cisplatin was investigated in a randomized study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer were eligible. Patients were randomized to weekly cisplatin 70 mg/m2 for six cycles preceded by amifostine 740 mg/m2, or cisplatin only. Cisplatin was administered in hypertonic saline (3% NaCl) as a one-hour infusion; amifostine was administered as a 15-minute infusion directly before the administration of cisplatin. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were entered in the study. The median number of cisplatin administrations was 6 (range 2-6), equal in both arms. In both treatment arms the median dose intensity of cisplatin achieved was the planned 70 mg/m2/week. In the cisplatin only arm 6 out of 206 cycles were complicated by thrombocytopenia grade 3 or 4 versus 1 of 184 cycles in the amifostine arm (P = 0.035). Hypomagnesaemia grade 2 + 3 was significantly less observed in the amifostine arm (P = 0.04). Neurotoxicity analyzed by serial vibration perception thresholds (VPT) showed a diminished incidence of subclinical neurotoxicity in the amifostine arm (P = 0.03). No protective effect on renal and ototoxicity could be shown. Hypotension was the main side effect of amifostine but only of relevance in one patient. The antitumor activity of cisplatin was preserved as 63% of the evaluable patients in the amifostine arm responded compared to 50% of the evaluable patients in the cisplatin alone arm. CONCLUSION: Our study indicated that in combination with weekly administered cisplatin amifostine reduced the risk of thrombocytopenia, hypomagnesemia as well as subclinical neurotoxicity, but did not result in a higher dose intensity of cisplatin. Addition of amifostine did not compromise the antitumor effect of cisplatin.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

The chemotherapy of head and neck cancer.

Studies of combination therapy [with agents such as cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and methotrexate] have shown some improvements in response rate; however, no obvious survival advantage over monotherapy in the treatment of patients with metastatic or advanced locoregional cancer of the head and neck have been observed. In the neoadjuvant setting, chemotherapy is helpful in preserving the larynx and hypopharynx but has no proven impact (positive or negative) on survival. New treatment options are needed to improve survival in head and neck cancer. Among the new options for chemotherapy in metastatic/recurrent disease is docetaxel. With monotherapy, response rates of 23-42% are seen, and, when used in combination with cisplatin and 5-FU, response rates of 52-100% have been reported in phase I/II trials. A phase III trial of the addition of docetaxel to standard neoadjuvant therapy with cisplatin and 5-FU is now underway.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed1999

Phase I radioimmunotherapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with 131I-labeled chimeric monoclonal antibody G250.

Clinical tumor targeting studies with chimeric monoclonal antibody G250 (cG250) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients indicated the potential use of this antibody for radioimmunotherapy. Here we report on a phase I activity dose escalation study to determine the safety, the maximum tolerable dose (MTD), and the possible therapeutic potential of 131I-labeled cG250 in patients with progressive metastatic RCC. All patients (n = 12) received a diagnostic i.v. infusion of 5 mg of cG250 labeled with 222 MBq of 131I. If accumulation of the antibody in metastatic lesions was observed, patients were hospitalized and a second, therapeutic, i.v. infusion of 5 mg of cG250 labeled with a high dose of 131I was administered (n = 8). Three patients per dose level were entered, starting at 1665 MBq/m2. If no dose-limiting toxicity occurred, the study continued at the next dose level (555 MBq/m2 increase). Most patients experienced mild nausea without vomiting. No other complaints were reported during hospitalization. In two of two patients who received a dose of 2775 MBq/m2, grade IV hematological toxicity was observed, which was defined as dose limiting. Thus, the MTD was set at 2220 MBq/m2. In one patient (2220 MBq/m2), stable disease (lasting 3-6 months) was achieved, whereas another patient (2220 MBq/m2) showed a partial response that is ongoing (>9 months). The minor responses observed in this phase I trial in patients with an advanced stage of RCC are encouraging and warrant further study in a phase II setting at the MTD to determine the efficacy of radioimmunotherapy for metastatic RCC.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

[Immunology in clinical practice. XVII. Immunotherapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Work Group Immunotherapy, Dutch Oncology].

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma has a poor prognosis. The efficacy of immunotherapy with interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) or interleukin 2 (IL-2) or their combination has been investigated extensively. The best schedule and optimum dose and combination is not known. On the basis of three prognostic factors, viz. WHO performance score, time between initial diagnosis and treatment of metastases, and number of metastatic sites, patients can be divided in prognostic groups. Patients classified in the favourable or intermediate prognostic group may survive longer after immunotherapy and therefore are candidates for such therapy. Patients who are classified in the poor prognostic group will not profit from any known systemic therapy.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed1998

Serum alpha-fetoprotein surge after the initiation of chemotherapy for non-seminomatous testicular cancer has an adverse prognostic significance.

It has been recognized that the tumour markers alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) may show a transient elevation after the initiation of chemotherapy in non-seminomatous testicular cancer. We investigated the prognostic importance of these so-called marker surges in a cohort of patients treated with cisplatin combination chemotherapy between 1983 and 1991. A total of 669 patients were studied. Of 352 patients who had an elevated AFP at the start of treatment and for whom we had data at both day 1 and day 8, 101 (29%) had a surge. Of 317 patients for whom we had data for HCG, 80 patients (25%) had a surge. It was found that an AFP surge was a strong adverse prognostic factor for progression [hazard ratio (HR) 2.28, P=0.005]. There was no statistically significant difference in survival (HR 1.65, P=0.13). There was no prognostic significance of a HCG surge, either for progression or for survival. To investigate whether a surge was an independent prognostic factor for progression and survival, multivariate Cox regression models were fitted using the independent prognostic factors for progression and survival and the surge/decline variable. An AFP surge was retained in the final model for progression. A HCG surge was of no prognostic importance for progression or survival. We conclude that an AFP surge has an adverse prognostic significance, independent of pretreatment characteristics.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed1997

Phase II study of weekly high-dose cisplatin for six cycles in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

In a phase I study of weekly administered cisplatin, we observed a major response in 8 of 9 patients with locally far advanced head and neck cancer. Therefore, a phase II study was initiated to explore the activity and tolerance of this weekly cisplatin regimen. 59 patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer were entered into this phase II study. Cisplatin was administered at a dose of 80 mg/m2 weekly for 6 cycles. Cisplatin was administered in hypertonic saline (3% NaCl) as a 3-h infusion with standard pre- and posthydration. 51 patients were evaluable for response and 55 for toxicity. Only 9 patients were able to complete the treatment with the planned dose intensity of 80 mg/m2/week. Complete disappearance of the tumour was observed in 8 patients and a partial response in 22 (response rate 59%; 51% of all eligible patients 95% CI limits 37-63%). Stable disease was observed in 12 patients, and the tumour progressed in 9 patients. 47 patients subsequently received high-dose radiotherapy, 1 radiotherapy and surgery and 4 patients second-line chemotherapy. The median progression-free survival and median overall survival for all patients were 32 weeks and 56 weeks, respectively. Haematological toxicity consisted of anaemia, leucocytopenia (grade 3 + 4 in 17 patients) and thrombocytopenia (grade 3 + 4 in 17 patients). Because of leuco- and/or thrombocytopenia, treatment was delayed in 30 patients while 13 were taken off the study because of delayed bone marrow recovery. Non-haematological toxicities were: ototoxicity grade 1 in 3 patients, grade 2 in 7 and grade 3 in 3 patients; nephrotoxicity grade 1 in 13 patients, grade 2 in 2 and grade 3 in 1 patient. Neurotoxicity grade 1 was observed in only 8 patients. Cisplatin, as a single agent, administered at high-dose intensity, has an antitumour activity comparable with that of combination regimens in locally advanced head and neck cancer. The pattern of toxicity is different: leuco- and thrombocytopenia jeopardize the dose intensity concept; for patients ototoxicity is the more relevant toxicity. Further studies with weekly cisplatin are of interest particularly with newer measures to reduce toxicity.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

EORTC phase II study of daily oral linomide in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with good prognostic factors.

Following a previous EORTC GU-Group study, in which linomide showed some activity in poor prognosis patients, this study was initiated to determine the effect of linomide in more favourable patients. 35 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma with good prognostic factors, i.e. good performance status, prior nephrectomy, no prior systemic therapy, and no liver, bone or brain metastases, were treated with linomide, a quinoline derivative with immunomodulating properties, at a dose of 10 mg daily, after an initial dose escalation during the first 4 weeks of treatment. In 29 evaluable patients, no responses were observed (95% confidence interval 0-10%). Best overall response was no change in 9 patients, for a median duration of 4 months. Linomide in this schedule was poorly tolerated, with 17% (6 patients) of patients being withdrawn and 23% (8 patients) having dose reductions due to adverse events, mostly influenza-like symptoms of myalgia, arthralgia and fatigue. Several cases of pericarditis and neuropathy were observed. In spite of selection of favourable prognosis patients and an optimal daily dosing schedule, linomide was not an effective treatment in renal cell carcinoma. In view of toxicity and lack of efficacy, there is no rationale in further testing the drug in this disease.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed1997

An EORTC phase II study of the efficacy and safety of linomide in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma.

The aim of this study was to determine the objective tumour response rate and duration of response and toxicity of linomide (Roquinimex) treatment in patients with disseminated renal cell carcinoma, pretreated or not pretreated with immunotherapy. From March 1991 to July 1992, 72 patients with metastatic and progressive renal cell cancer were entered of whom 9 (12%) were not evaluable for response. Linomide was given orally, twice weekly, 5 mg during the first week with dose escalation to 10 mg during the second week and 15 mg thereafter. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. No haematological toxicity but slight anaemia was observed. A significant WBC (white blood cell count) increase (P < 0.0001, paired T-test) was found during treatment. The most often reported non-haematological side-effects were: flu-like syndrome (54%, grade III-IV 7%), nausea/vomiting (41% and 3%, respectively) and neurotoxicity (34% and 2%). Most side-effects were of mild or moderate intensity (WHO grade 1 or 2). The objective overall response rate was 4%: 1 CR and 2 PRs. Stable disease was reported for 28 patients (40%). The duration of response was 17, 22 and 30 (CR) months. Median time to progression was 5 months. Linomide at the given dose and schedule is well tolerated, but has limited antitumour activity in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Chemoimmunotherapy with bleomycin, vincristine, lomustine, dacarbazine (BOLD) plus interferon alpha for metastatic melanoma: a multicentre phase II study.

High response rates in patients with metastatic melanoma have been achieved with combination chemoimmunotherapy. A response rate of 62% in 45 patients has been reported for treatment with dacarbazine, bleomycin, vincristine, lomustine (BOLD) plus interferon alpha (IFN-alpha). We conducted a multicentre phase II study to confirm these results. Melanoma patients with distant metastases were treated as outpatients with dacarbazine 200 mg m(-2) on days 1-5, vincristine 1 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 4, bleomycin 15 mg on days 2 and 5 i.v. and lomustine 80 mg orally on day 1, repeated every 4 weeks. IFN-alpha-2b was initiated s.c. on day 8 at 3 MU daily for 6 weeks, and 6 MU t.i.w. thereafter. Forty-three patients entered the study. The median number of metastatic sites was three (range 1-5), and 81% of patients had visceral metastases. Nine patients had brain metastases, and seven patients were systemically pretreated. Among the 41 patients that were evaluable for response, the response rate was 27% (95% CI 14-3%), with one complete and ten partial remissions. The response rate in 25 previously untreated patients without brain metastases was 40% (95% CI 21-61%). Median duration of response was 6 (range 2-14+) months; median overall survival was 5 (1-26) months. The main toxicity was malaise/fatigue. We confirm that BOLD plus IFN-alpha has activity in metastatic melanoma. The lower response rate in our study compared with the previous report is probably related to patient selection, as in the previous study 46% of patients had stage III disease, whereas all our patients had stage IV disease, which is associated with a worse prognosis.

Abdominal Neoplasms↗

PubMed1997

Tumour marker concentration at the start of chemotherapy is a stronger predictor of treatment failure than marker half-life: a study in patients with disseminated non-seminomatous testicular cancer.

We investigated the prognostic value of the serum half-life of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) during induction chemotherapy and the relative prognostic importance of initial marker concentrations and marker half-life. Marker half-lives were calculated using two abnormal values observed between day 8 and day 22 of the first chemotherapy cycle. Moreover, analyses were carried out using day 43 as the second measurement point. Treatment failure at any time was chosen as the end point. The relative prognostic influence of marker half-lives and initial marker concentrations was tested in univariate and multivariate analyses. Half-lives were considered to be prolonged if > 3 days for HCG and > 6 days for AFP. In addition, we separated patients into those with half-lives > 6 days for HCG and those with half-lives > 10 days for AFP to examine whether these long half-lives were associated with a poor prognosis. A group of 669 patients treated with cisplatin combination chemotherapy was studied. Forty-two per cent of the patients had normal HCG and 37% had normal AFP at the start of chemotherapy. At day 22, HCG was still elevated in 138 patients and AFP in 211. At day 43, the numbers of these patients were 35 and 80 respectively. Based on the measurements obtained on day 8 and day 22, a half-life of HCG > 3 days or > 6 days and/or a half-life AFP > 6 days or > 10 days did not accurately predict treatment failure (P=0.413 and P=0.851, respectively; values obtained using tests for trend). However, initial marker concentrations of HCG and/or AFP > 1000 IU l(-1) were highly significant prognosticators for treatment failure (P=0.001 and P < 0.001 respectively), independent of half-life values. Half-lives calculated with the values obtained on day 43 did not contribute to the accuracy of the prediction of treatment failure. We conclude that half-lives of HCG and AFP during induction chemotherapy are inaccurate parameters for the prediction of treatment failure. In contrast, initial serum concentrations of HCG and AFP are highly significant in the prediction of unfavourable treatment outcome.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed1997

Randomized trial of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin compared with bleomycin, etoposide, and carboplatin in good-prognosis metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell cancer: a Multiinstitutional Medical Research Council/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial.

PURPOSE: This prospective randomized multicenter trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of carboplatin plus etoposide and bleomycin (CEB) versus cisplatin plus etoposide and bleomycin (BEP) in first-line chemotherapy of patients with good-risk nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 1989 and May 1993, a total of 598 patients with good-risk nonseminomatous germ cell tumors were randomized to receive four cycles of either BEP or CEB. In each cycle, the etoposide dose was 120 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, and 3, and the bleomycin dose was 30 U on day 2. BEP patients received cisplatin at 20 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 5 or 50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2. For CEB patients, the carboplatin dose was calculated from the glomerular filtration rate to achieve a serum concentration x time of 5 mg/mL x minutes. Chemotherapy was recycled at 21-day intervals to a total of four cycles. RESULTS: Of patients assessable for response, 253 of 268 (94.4%) of those allocated to receive BEP achieved a complete response, compared with 227 of 260 (87.3%) allocated to receive CEB (P = .009). There were 30 treatment failures in the 300 patients allocated to BEP and 79 in the 298 allocated to CEB (log-rank chi 2 = 26.9; P < .001), which led to failure-free rates at 1 year of 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88% to 94%) and 77% (95% CI, 72% to 82%), respectively. There were 10 deaths in patients allocated to BEP and 27 in patients allocated to CEB (log-rank chi 2 = 8.77; P = .003), which led to 3-year survival rates of 97% (95% CI, 95% to 99%) and 90% (95% CI, 86% to 94%), respectively. CONCLUSION: With these drug doses and schedules, combination chemotherapy based on carboplatin was inferior to that based on cisplatin. This BEP regimen that contains moderate doses of etoposide and bleomycin is effective in the treatment of patients with good-prognosis metastatic nonseminoma.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Recombinant human interleukin 6 in metastatic renal cell cancer: a phase II trial.

A phase II trial investigating the anti-tumour effects of recombinant human interleukin 6 (rhIL-6) in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer was carried out. RhIL-6 (150 microgram) was administered as a daily subcutaneous injection for 42 consecutive days on an outpatient basis. Forty-nine patients were studied, 12 with and 37 without previous immunotherapy. Forty patients were evaluable for response. A partial remission was noted in two patients, stable disease in 17 and progressive disease in 21. Toxicity was moderate and reversible and consisted mainly of fever, flu-like symptoms, nausea, weight loss and hepatotoxicity. Anaemia, leucocytosis and thrombocytosis and induction of acute phase protein synthesis were noted in most patients. In 15% of the patients anti-IL-6 antibodies developed, and were neutralising in only one patient. Baseline plasma IL-6 concentrations did not correlate with tumour behaviour before or after rhIL-6 treatment. In conclusion, rhIL-6 can be safely administered on an outpatient basis for prolonged period of time and has moderate, reversible toxicity. Its administration induces IL-6-antibody production in only a minority of patients. Antitmour effects of rhIL-6 in metastatic renal cancer are limited.

Acute-Phase Reaction↗