PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P J Cochrane

Publications and source records attributed to P J Cochrane.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Analysis of cathepsin D in human breast cancer: usefulness of the processed 31 kDa active form of the enzyme as a prognostic indicator in node-negative and node-positive patients.

The relative amounts of the precursor (52 kDa) and processed (31,27 kDa) forms of cathepsin D have been analyzed by Western blotting in biopsied breast tissue cytosols from 134 lesions from invasive breast cancer patients, 24 lesions from patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), 227 lesions from benign breast disease patients, and 28 lesions from normal control subjects. The mean relative percentage amount of the 31 kDa form was significantly increased (p < 0.001) in the invasive breast cancer group compared to the other three groups. In addition, the mean relative percentage amount of the 31 kDa form was significantly increased (p < 0.05) in node-positive compared to node-negative breast cancer patients. In the benign breast disease group, patients with proliferative-type disease had a significantly increased (p = 0.02) mean relative percentage amount of the 31 kDa form of cathepsin D compared to patients with nonproliferative-type disease. Invasive breast cancer patients were followed for up to 75 months to determine if the relative percentage amount of the 31 kDa form of cathepsin D was predictive of disease-free and overall survival. Although the amount of the 31 kDa form was not predictive of disease-free survival, patients in the 'high' 31 kDa group (> 18%) were significantly (p < 0.05) more likely to die than patients in the 'low' 31 kDa group (< or = 18%). The 12 patients who died were all node-positive and in the high 31 kDa group. It thus appears that the relative amount of the processed, active 31 kDa form of cathepsin D is a useful prognostic indicator, at least in node-positive breast cancer patients.

Adult↗

Laparoscopic procedures in pregnancy.

As the applications of laparoscopy for general surgical procedures expanded in the 1990s, pregnancy was initially considered a contraindication. Several case reports have suggested the safety of laparoscopy in pregnancy. Previous clinical studies indicate a higher fetal mortality may exist and advised caution. To evaluate the fetal outcome of laparoscopic procedures in pregnant patients at our institution, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records between 1991 and 1997 and identified 21 pregnant patients who underwent either a laparoscopic (n = 12) or open (n = 9) procedure. Appendectomies, cholecystectomies, and diagnostic laparoscopies were performed. Specific variables including age, length of procedure, hospital stay, duration of parenteral analgesic use, gestational age at the time of surgery and delivery, O2 saturation and EtCO2 during surgery, APGAR scores, and birth weights were compared between the two groups. Laparoscopic procedures during pregnancy resulted in shorter hospital stays (34 hours versus 91 hours; P = 0.01), less use of parenteral narcotic analgesics (5 hours versus 29 hours; P = 0.05), and no prolongation of operative times (51 minutes versus 63 minutes; P = 0.20). In addition, laparoscopy was performed at earlier gestational ages (12 weeks versus 29 weeks; P = 0.001). There was one miscarriage 7 days after a laparoscopic cholecystectomy early in the 1st trimester that was not statistically significant. Our experience did not show a higher incidence of fetal loss when comparing laparoscopic to open procedures in pregnant patients.

Adult↗