Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to P J Kenny.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
RATIONALE: Smokers frequently report that they obtain anxiety-reducing (anxiolytic) effects from smoking, and this may be one factor which contributes to nicotine dependence. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the role of the dorsal raphé nucleus (DRN) in mediating the acute anxiolytic effect of nicotine, the development of tolerance to this effect and the anxiogenic response observed on withdrawal from chronic nicotine. METHODS: The social interaction test of anxiety was used to investigate the effects of a range of doses of (-)-nicotine (2.5-4000 ng) following DRN infusion, and whether co-administration of the specific 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY 100635 could antagonise the anxiolytic action of nicotine. We then examined the effects of intra-DRN nicotine (2.5-7 ng) following six daily injections of subcutaneous (s.c.) (-)-nicotine (0.1 mg/kg). Finally, we examined whether s.c. or intra-DRN (-)-nicotine could antagonise the anxiogenic response seen 72 h after the termination of 7 days of nicotine treatment. RESULTS: Acute nicotine administration into the DRN produced dose-related effects: low doses (2.5-10 ng) induced an anxiolytic effect, intermediate doses were behaviourally silent (100-1000 ng), and an anxiogenic effect was seen following administration of a high dose (4 micrograms). The anxiolytic effect of (-)-nicotine (5 ng) was reversed by co-administration of a behaviourally inactive dose of WAY 100635 (200 ng). Following 6 days of treatment with s.c. 0.1 mg/kg per day (-)-nicotine, tolerance developed to its anxiolytic action in the DRN. Rats withdrawn for 72 h following this chronic treatment showed an anxiogenic response which was reversed by (-)-nicotine injected s.c. (0.1 mg/kg) or into the DRN (5 ng). CONCLUSIONS: The present findings therefore suggest that the DRN plays an important role in mediating the acute effects of nicotine on anxiety, as measured in the social interaction test, and that the anxiolytic effect is mediated by activation of somatodendritic 5-HT1A autoreceptors. The DRN is also concerned with mediating the development of tolerance to nicotine's anxiolytic effects and because there is an anxiogenic response 72 h after withdrawal from chronic nicotine, this suggests that an oppositional, compensatory mechanism is mediating the tolerance.
The aversive aspects of withdrawal from chronic nicotine exposure are thought to be an important motivational factor contributing to the maintenance of the tobacco habit in human smokers. Much emphasis has been placed on delineating the underlying neurobiological mechanisms mediating different components of the nicotine withdrawal syndrome. Recent studies have shown that both central and peripheral populations of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are involved in mediating somatic signs of nicotine withdrawal as measured by the rodent nicotine abstinence scale. However, only central populations of nAChRs are involved in mediating affective aspects of nicotine withdrawal, as measured by elevations in brain-stimulation reward thresholds and conditioned place aversion. Nicotine interacts with several neurotransmitter systems, including acetylcholine, dopamine, opioid peptides, serotonin, and glutamate systems. Evidence so far suggests that these neurotransmitters play a role in nicotine dependence and withdrawal processes. The available evidence also suggests that different underlying neurochemical deficits mediate somatic and affective components of nicotine withdrawal. The aim of the present review is to discuss preclinical findings concerning the neuroanatomical and neurochemical substrates involved in these different aspects of nicotine withdrawal.
The 5-HT(1A) receptor has previously been shown to be important in mediating the behavioural effects of nicotine. It is possible that nicotine administration might regulate the levels of 5-HT receptors in limbic and cortical regions, and such regulations may underlie adaptive responses to nicotine in the central nervous system. The effects of acute and chronic systemic (--)-nicotine administration on 5-HT(1A) receptor gene expression were measured by in situ hybridization, in the rat cerebral cortex, dorsal hippocampus and lateral septum. In the cortex, acute nicotine (0.5 mg/kg i.p.) significantly increased the expression of 5-HT(1A) receptor mRNA 2 h and 24 h after injection. Similarly, acute nicotine significantly increased 5-HT(1A) receptor mRNA in the dentate gyrus (DG), CA3 and CA1 regions of the dorsal hippocampus 2 h and 24 h after injection. Acute nicotine was without effect in the lateral septum. Chronic nicotine (0.5 mg/kg i.p; twice daily for 7 days) significantly decreased 5-HT(1A) receptor mRNA in the cortex 2 h after the final injection, but was without effect at 24 h or 72 h. Chronic nicotine caused no changes in 5-HT(1A) mRNA in the lateral septum or dorsal hippocampus. These data demonstrate that nicotine regulates 5-HT(1A) receptor gene expression in the cortex and hippocampus. The rapid regulation of expression of 5-HT(1A) receptor mRNA leads to the hypothesis that nicotine-induced 5-HT release may alter the postsynaptic sensitivity to 5-HT.
Acute nicotine administration (0.5 mg/kg i.p.) significantly decreased BDNF mRNA levels in dentate gyrus, CA3 and CA1 subfields of the rat hippocampus 2 h and 24 h after administration. However, with 7 days nicotine treatment, tolerance developed to the inhibitory effect of nicotine on BDNF mRNA expression and there was a significant increase in BDNF expression 2 h after the final injection in the CA1 region. These data suggests that changes in expression of hippocampal BDNF may be involved in the behavioural effects of nicotine observed after acute and chronic treatment.
The effects of nicotine administration into the dorsal hippocampus and lateral septum provide further evidence that different neurochemical and neuroanatomical substrates control behaviour in different animal tests. Thus, in the social interaction test (a model of generalised anxiety disorder), bilateral administration of nicotine (1-4 microg) into both regions has anxiogenic effects in test conditions that generate moderate anxiety. The anxiogenic effects are mediated by a nicotine-evoked increase in 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) release and are reversed by co-administration of the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist, N-(2-(6-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl)ethyl)-N-(2-pyridyl)-cyclohex -ane carboxamide trichloride (WAY 100,635). On trial 1 in the elevated plus-maze (which models the escape components of panic disorder), nicotine is without effect when administered to the dorsal hippocampus, but has anxiogenic effects after lateral septal administration. On trial 2 in the elevated plus-maze (a model of specific phobia), nicotine (1 microg) has anxiolytic effects when administered to the dorsal hippocampus, but is ineffective (4 and 8 microg) in the lateral septum.
After direct administration into the dorsal hippocampus nicotine decreased the time spent in social interaction, without changing locomotor activity, indicating an anxiogenic effect. The possibility that post-synaptic M1 muscarinic receptors mediated this effect was examined by determining whether dorsal hippocampal administration of a specific M1 receptor agonist (McN-A-343) had anxiogenic effects, and whether the anxiogenic effect of nicotine could be reversed by co-administration of the M1 receptor antagonist, pirenzepine. McN-A-343 (0.3, 1.6, 3.2, 15.8 nmol) was without effect on social interaction, and pirenzepine (0.7 and 2.4 nmol) injection into the dorsal hippocampus failed to reverse the decrease in social interaction caused by nicotine (6.3 nmol) injection into this area. However, the decrease in social interaction after nicotine (50 nmol) was completely reversed by the specific 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY 100635 (0.4 nmol) after co-administration of both drugs into the dorsal hippocampus. Thus, the anxiogenic effect of nicotine in this brain region seems to be mediated by 5-HT1A, but not M1, receptors. In contrast to the effect of nicotine in naive animals, those retested after a second injection of 50 nmol did not show a significant anxiogenic effect. The theoretical implications of this are discussed and from a practical point of view this suggests caution in the retesting of animals after central injections.
A review of the literature suggests that the dorsal hippocampal serotonergic system, and, in particular, the postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptor, mediates an anxiogenic response, whereas endogenous dorsal hippocampal cholinergic tone mediates an anxiolytic response. Accordingly, it has been shown that direct dorsal hippocampal administration of the 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist, 8-OH-DPAT, the nicotinic receptor antagonist, mecamylamine, and the M(1) muscarinic receptor antagonist, pirenzepine, all have anxiogenic effects in rats tested in the social interaction test. It is therefore surprising that nicotine also has an anxiogenic effect in this test following dorsal hippocampal administration. However, the anxiogenic effects of mecamylamine and nicotine in the dorsal hippocampus are blocked by coadministration of the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist, WAY 100635, suggesting that both of these compounds act by enhancing hippocampal serotonergic transmission, thereby stimulating postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors. This conclusion is supported by the observation that both nicotine and mecamylamine stimulate basal [3H]-5-HT release from dorsal hippocampal slices. A possible mechanism by which nicotinic receptor ligands modulate hippocampal 5-HT release is discussed, and it is proposed that the dorsal hippocampal serotonergic and cholinergic systems are tightly coupled and function antagonistically in the modulation of anxiety, as measured in the social interaction test. These systems are relatively unimportant in controlling behaviour on trial 1 in the plus-maze. On trial 2 in the elevated plus-maze, a model of specific phobia, the endogenous cholinergic system, nicotine, and the M(1) receptor agonist, McN-A-343, all mediate an anxiolytic effect, whereas stimulation of 5-HT(1A) receptors mediates an anxiogenic effect. It is proposed that the hippocampus may predominantly control the avoidance components of phobic anxiety, with other regions, such as the dorsomedial hypothalamus, controlling the escape components.
1. Different animal tests model different anxiety disorders. Thus, the social interaction test is a model of generalised anxiety disorder, plus-maze Trial 1 models elements of panic disorder and Trial 2 in the elevated plus-maze is a model of specific phobia. 2. Studies of the neuroanatomical and neurochemical pathways controlling behaviour in these different tests provides information on the neurobiological mechanisms modulating anxiety disorders. 3. In the social interaction test, nicotine and 8-OH-DPAT had anxiogenic effects when injected into the dorsal hippocampus or the lateral septum. 4. These ligands were without effect on Trial 1 in the plus-maze when injected into the dorsal hippocampus, but had anxiogenic effects when injected into the lateral septum. 5. On Trial 2 in the elevated plus-maze, nicotine had an anxiolytic effect, but 8-OH-DPAT had an anixiogenic effect when injected into the dorsal hippocampus.
The purpose of the present study was to determine the role of the 5-HT1A receptors in the lateral septum in the mediation of the anxiogenic effects of nicotine in the social interaction and elevated plus maze tests of anxiety in the rat. Bilateral infusion of (-)-nicotine (4 and 8 microg) and of the 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT (200 and 500 ng) into the lateral septum decreased the time spent in social interaction, indicating anxiogenic effects. The anxiogenic effect of 8-OH-DPAT (500 ng) was completely reversed by coadministration of a behaviourally inactive dose of the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY 100635 (200 ng). The anxiogenic effect of the lower dose of (-)-nicotine (4 microg) was completely reversed by WAY 100635 (200 ng), but the reversal was only partial following administration of 8 microg nicotine. In a second test of anxiety, the elevated plus maze, lateral septal administration of 8-OH-DPAT (500 ng) and nicotine (4 microg) induced anxiogenic effects. In this test, the anxiogenic effect of nicotine (4 microg) was completely reversed by coadministration of WAY 100635 (200 ng). The effects of 8-OH-DPAT demonstrate that stimulation of 5-HT1A receptors in the lateral septum has anxiogenic effects in two animal tests and that the anxiogenic effects of nicotine are mediated at least in part by these 5-HT1A receptors.
The effects of nicotine on 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) release from serotonergic nerve endings in rat dorsal hippocampal slices were studied. Nicotine (50-500 microM:) caused a concentration-dependent increase in 5-HT release. This effect was antagonised by mecamylamine (0.5 microM:), indicating an action at nicotinic receptors. Nicotine-evoked 5-HT release was not affected by tetrodotoxin (3 microM:), cadmium chloride (0.1 mM:), or the absence of Ca(2+) or Na(+) in the superfusion medium. Unexpectedly, higher concentrations of mecamylamine alone (1-50 microM:) increased 5-HT release. This suggested the presence of inhibitory input to 5-HT neurones and that these inhibitory neurones possess tonically active nicotinic receptors. The effect of mecamylamine (50 microM:) on 5-HT release was reduced by the muscarinic M(1) receptor agonist, McN-A-343 (100 microM:), but pirenzepine (0.005-1 microM:), which blocks M(1) receptors, alone increased 5-HT release. Hippocampal serotonergic neurones are known to possess both excitatory nicotinic receptors and inhibitory M(1) receptors. Although there may be several explanations for our results, one possible explanation is that nicotine stimulates 5-HT release by activating nicotinic heteroreceptors on 5-HT terminals. Mecamylamine (0.5 microM:) antagonises this effect, but higher concentrations increase 5-HT release indirectly by blocking the action of endogenous acetylcholine on nicotinic receptors situated on cholinergic neurones that provide muscarinic inhibitory input to 5-HT neurones.
RATIONALE: The elevated plus-maze provides a test situation in which distinctive states of anxiety are elicited on trials 1 and 2 and the dorsal hippocampus has previously been shown to mediate the anxiogenic effects of (-)-nicotine in the social interaction test. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of a wide dose range of (-)-nicotine on trial 1 and 2 in the plus-maze after systemic administration and whether the dorsal hippocampus is a site mediating the anxiogenic effect of nicotine. METHODS: (-)-Nicotine (0.001, 0.005, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5 and 1 mg/kg) was injected IP 30 min before testing for 5 min in the plus-maze. Rats receiving dorsal hippocampal infusions received bilateral infusions of 0.5 microl of artificial CSF or (-)-nicotine (0.1, 1, 4 or 8 microg). The needle was left in place for 50 s after injection and testing took place 3 min later. Rats tested on trial 1 were naive to the plus-maze, those tested on trial 2 had received a previous 5-min undrugged exposure to the maze 48 h earlier. RESULTS: Low doses of (-)-nicotine (0.001, 0.005, 0.01, 0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg, IP) were without effect on either trial, but higher doses (0.5 and 1 mg/kg, IP) had anxiogenic effects on both trials, as shown by decreases in percentage time spent and percentage entries onto the open arms. Infusion of (-)-nicotine (0.1, 1, 4 and 8 microg) bilaterally into the dorsal hippocampus was without effect on trial 1, but 1 microg had an anxiolytic effect on trial 2, shown by an increased percentage time spent on the open arms. CONCLUSIONS: The results on both trials in the plus-maze after systemic administration of nicotine add to previous reports from the social interaction test that high doses of nicotine have anxiogenic effects. However, the effects of nicotine in the dorsal hippocampus are different in all three anxiety tests (anxiogenic in social interaction, ineffective on trial 1, anxiolytic on trial 2) showing that nicotinic cholinergic control in this brain region may vary depending on the state and/or type of anxiety generated by the test. The brain region(s) underlying the anxiogenic effects of IP nicotine on both trials in the plus-maze remain to be identified.
The present study investigated the role of nicotinic receptors in the lateral septum in the modulation of anxiety. The effects of direct injections of nicotine into the lateral septum were first investigated in two tests of anxiety, social interaction and elevated plus-maze tests. Intra-septal injection of nicotine (1 and 4 microgram) induced consistent anxiogenic effects in both tests. The reversal of nicotinic effects with mecamylamine was then studied in the social interaction test. Intra-septal injection of mecamylamine at a low dose (15 ng) induced an anxiolytic effect, suggesting the presence of intrinsic cholinergic tone increasing anxiety. At higher doses (30-50 ng), mecamylamine was without effect in the social interaction test, but blocked the anxiogenic effects of nicotine (4 microgram). These findings provide further evidence for the role of the lateral septum in the modulation of anxiety and suggest that cholinergic projections to this brain area facilitate anxiety through nicotinic receptors.
In conditions generating moderate levels of anxiety in the social interaction test (low light, unfamiliar arena or high light, familiar arena), parenteral administration of nicotine had bimodal actions, low doses (0.01 and 0.1 mg/kg i.p.) had anxiolytic effects and high doses (0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg i.p.) had anxiogenic effects. In test conditions where anxiety was lowest (low light, familiar arena) and highest (high light, unfamiliar arena), nicotine was without effect after intraperitoneal or hippocampal administration. Thus, nicotine plays a modulatory role in which the activity of other neurotransmitters is crucial to its expression. After bilateral administration to the dorsal hippocampus, nicotine (0.1-8.0 microg) had anxiogenic effects in conditions of moderate anxiety; mecamylamine (30 ng) was silent in these conditions, indicating no intrinsic tone. Our results show that the dorsal hippocampus is one area that can mediate anxiogenic effects in the social interaction test, but the brain region mediating anxiolytic effects remains to be identified.
We report an association between an extraforaminal disc herniation at the L5-S1 level causing an L5 radiculopathy and a reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD) in the affected foot. This is only the second reported case of a disc herniation at this level causing an RSD syndrome. We opted to treat both problems through a retroperitoneal approach involving a discectomy and a surgical sympathectomy. There was immediate and lasting relief from all symptoms, which has been maintained at 18 months' follow-up. The possible mechanisms for this condition are discussed as well as the various treatment options.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Scientific data are reviewed to evaluate the risks of radioiodine uptake and to compare those risks with the benefits and risks of low milligram doses of stable potassium iodide (KI). The limit of 25 rad to the thyroid due to radioiodine uptake is adopted as the "break-even" point above which 130-mg KI doses should be administered. The biological and radiological kinetics of radioiodine for protracted uptakes were derived from the Medical Internal Radiation Dose Committee (MIRD) model (MIRD75). Resulting calculations yielded estimates of dose commitment rates to the thyroid as a function of thyroidal uptake. The extrapolated value of the 1-hr inhalation curve for 131I with 30% uptake compares well with the established MPCa value and intercepts the origin. The calculated KI-blocking efficiency as a function of time after radioiodine uptake agrees well with previously reported experimental data. The prevention or "blocking" of 25 rad to the thyroid was the criterion used to define critical values of radioiodine in the thyroid. Critical values are functions of isotope, the duration of uptake and the elapsed time between inhalation and assay of thyroid content. The presence of radioiodine in the thyroid in amounts greater than the critical value indicates that more than 25 rad to the thyroid can be averted, and KI should be administered in the absence of contraindications. Critical average concentrations are implicitly defined by the method of calculation used in the derivation. Critical average concentrations are presented as criteria for KI administration when assays of the radioiodine content of the thyroid are unavailable. Illustrative applications of critical values and critical average concentrations are presented in the Appendix.
No method has been reported for measuring CBF, repeatedly and noninvasively, in the rat brain. A new method is described, which is noninvasive to the brain, skull, or cervical large vessels. Two pairs of coincidence detectors were positioned, one over the rat brain and the other at the loop of a catheter inserted into the femoral artery. The coincidence head curve and arterial curve were recorded after intravenous injection of 1-[11C]butanol in 15 rats. CBF was calculated by one-compartment curve fitting ( CBFo ) from 1-min data and with the recirculation corrected height/area method from 3-min data ( CBFh X 3 min) and 5-min data ( CBFh X 5 min). CBFo agreed well with CBFh X 5 min, although a slight overestimation was observed in CBFh X 3 min. The normal CBFo in the normocapnic group (n = 6, paCO2 36.7 +/- 2.3 mm Hg) was 1.76 +/- 0.49 ml/g min (mean +/- SD). A good correlation was observed between CBFo (y) and PaCO2 (x), and the regression line was y = 0. 0629x -0.715 (r = 0.88, p less than 0.0001). We concluded that this method gives the stable blood flow values noninvasively and with a minimum loss of blood (less than 0.28 ml per measurement). Applications of this method include activation studies, studies on the effect of drugs and treatments, and water and oxygen extraction fraction studies using different tracers in the same rat.