PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P J Lopez

Publications and source records attributed to P J Lopez.

11 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

YIDB: the Yeast Intron DataBase.

The Yeast Intron DataBase (YIDB) contains currently available information about all introns encoded in the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Introns are divided according to their mechanism of excision: group I and group II introns, pre-mRNA introns, tRNA introns and the HAC1 intron. Information about the host genome, the type of RNA in which they are inserted and their primary structure are provided together with references. For nuclear pre-mRNA introns, transcription frequencies, as determined by microarray experiments, have also been included. This updated database is accessible at: http://www.embl-heidelberg. de/ExternalInfo/seraphin/yidb.html

Databases, Factual↗
PubMed2000

Uncoupling yeast intron recognition from transcription with recursive splicing.

Pre-mRNA splicing has to be coordinated with other processes occurring in the nucleus including transcription, mRNA 3' end formation and mRNA export. To analyze the relationship between transcription and splicing, we constructed a network of nested introns. Introns were inserted in the 5' splice site and/or branchpoint of a synthetic yeast intron interrupting a reporter gene. The inserted introns mask the recipient intron from the cellular machinery until they are removed by splicing. Production of functional mRNA from these constructs therefore requires recognition of a spliced RNA as a splicing substrate. We show that recurrent splicing occurs in a sequential and ordered fashion in vivo. Thus, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, intron recognition and pre-spliceosome assembly is not tightly coupled to transcription.

Genes, Fungal↗
PubMed1999

The C-terminal half of RNase E, which organizes the Escherichia coli degradosome, participates in mRNA degradation but not rRNA processing in vivo.

RNase E is an essential Escherichia coli endonuclease, which controls both 5S rRNA maturation and bulk mRNA decay. While the C-terminal half of this 1061-residue protein associates with polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) and several other enzymes into a 'degradosome', only the N-terminal half, which carries the catalytic activity, is required for growth. We characterize here a mutation (rne131 ) that yields a metabolically stable polypeptide lacking the last 477 residues of RNAse E. This mutation resembles the N-terminal conditional mutation rne1 in stabilizing mRNAs, both in bulk and individually, but differs from it in leaving rRNA processing and cell growth unaffected. Another mutation (rne105 ) removing the last 469 residues behaves similarly. Thus, the C-terminal half of RNase E is instrumental in degrading mRNAs, but dispensable for processing rRNA. A plausible interpretation is that the former activity requires that RNase E associates with other degradosome proteins; however, PNPase is not essential, as RNase E remains fully active towards mRNAs in rne+pnp mutants. All mRNAs are not stabilized equally by the rne131 mutation: the greater their susceptibility to RNase E, the larger the stabilization. Artificial mRNAs generated by E. coli expression systems based on T7 RNA polymerase can be genuinely unstable, and we show that the mutation can improve the yield of such systems without compromising cell growth.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1998

Translation inhibitors stabilize Escherichia coli mRNAs independently of ribosome protection.

Translation inhibitors such as chloramphenicol in prokaryotes or cycloheximide in eukaryotes stabilize many or most cellular mRNAs. In Escherichia coli, this stabilization is ascribed generally to the shielding of mRNAs by stalled ribosomes. To evaluate this interpretation, we examine here how inhibitors affect the stabilities of two untranslated RNAs, i.e., an engineered lacZ mRNA lacking a ribosome binding site, and a small regulatory RNA, RNAI. Whether they block elongation or initiation, all translation inhibitors tested stabilized these RNAs, indicating that stabilization does not necessarily reflect changes in packing or activity of translating ribosomes. Moreover, both the initial RNase E-dependent cleavage of RNAI and lacZ mRNA and the subsequent attack of RNAI by polynucleotide phosphorylase and poly(A)-polymerase were slowed. Among various possible mechanisms for this stabilization, we discuss in particular a passive model. When translation is blocked, rRNA synthesis is known to increase severalfold and rRNA becomes unstable. Meanwhile, the pools of RNase E and polynucleotide phosphorylase, which, in growing cells, are limited because these RNases autoregulate their own synthesis, cannot expand. The processing/degradation of newly synthesized rRNA would then titrate these RNases, causing bulk mRNA stabilization.

Chloramphenicol↗
PubMed1998

On the mechanism of inhibition of phage T7 RNA polymerase by lac repressor.

We study here the effect on phage T7 RNA polymerase activity of lac repressor bound downstream of the T7 promoter. When repressor binds in vitro at an operator centered at +13 or +15 with respect to transcription start, it does not prevent initiation, though the transcript yield is reduced. However, the processivity of the polymerase is depressed and transcript extension is blocked at positions +4 and +6, respectively. These results indicate that repressor and polymerase do not simply exclude each other from the promoter. Rather, they would come into steric conflict and compete for establishment or retention of interactions with the same segment of DNA, without this leading to the immediate displacement of either polymerase or repressor. The resulting destabilization of the transcription complex would depress both initiation rate and enzyme processivity. In contrast to the above results, little reduction in runoff transcription is observed when operator is centered at +47. The decreased sensitivity of polymerase to repressor bound at +47 versus +13 or +15 is likely to be due to the higher stability of the elongation complex during the transcription of downstream regions in comparison with the first transcribed nucleotides. We also show that under conditions of leaky repression and with operator centered at +13, a mutant T7 RNA polymerase showing normal promoter affinity but a slower elongation rate is more sensitive to repression than the wild-type enzyme, both in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, this higher sensitivity is largely due to a reduced ability of the mutant to overcome the elongation block at position +4. The parallel between the in vitro and in vivo data suggests that in vivo the repressor also does not prevent polymerase from binding to promoter, but interferes with subsequent steps in initiation and transcript extension, in this case presumably largely extension beyond +4.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1997

The low processivity of T7 RNA polymerase over the initially transcribed sequence can limit productive initiation in vivo.

In vitro, after binding to the promoter to form a catalytically active complex, RNA polymerases abortively cycle over the first transcribed nucleotides (initial transcribed sequence or ITS) before leaving the promoter. With the bacteriophage T7 enzyme, the extent of abortive transcription varies with the nature of the ITS and with the elongation speed of the polymerase. Here, we compare in vitro and in vivo the yield of long transcripts from T7 promoters, with two different ITSs, the T7 gene10 and the lactose operon ITSs, and two different T7 RNA polymerases, the wild-type and a 2.7-fold slower mutant (G645A). The use of non-cognate ITS and/or slow polymerase decreases the yield of long transcripts in vitro and in vivo in a parallel fashion, with low polymerase speed and non-cognate ITS acting synergistically. In vitro, this decrease is mirrored by an increase in the average number of abortive cycles the enzyme undergoes before leaving the promoter; specifically, with the G645A mutant, transcript release is favored at any ITS position, whereas with the lac ITS it is particularly frequent at positions five and six following the incorporation of uridine residues. Hence, the more abortive cycles per long transcript synthesis in vitro, the lower the yield of long transcripts in vitro or in vivo. We conclude that the duration of abortive cycling can limit long transcript synthesis in vivo, as in vitro. Under conditions where cycling is minimal (wild-type polymerase, gene10 ITS), T7 promoter drives the synthesis of three long transcripts per second at 37 degrees C in vivo, a figure higher than for any Escherichia coli promoter.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1996

The lacZ mRNA can be stabilised by the T7 late mRNA leader in E coli.

Previous work from this laboratory has shown that T7 RNA polymerase outpaces ribosomes in vivo, generating naked mRNA stretches which may be nuclease-sensitive. In particular, lacZ transcripts synthesised this way are highly unstable and yield little beta-galactosidase. We have argued that most of these transcripts are prematurely inactivated via an RNase E cleavage that occurs ahead of the leading ribosome, whereas a few escape this initial cleavage and are translated normally. Presumably, these rescued transcripts are later inactivated non-nucleolytically and subsequently scavenged by a process partially controlled by RNase E, as for the natural lacZ mRNA. In contrast, despite being synthesised by T7 RNA polymerase, T7 late transcripts are stable. The 5' regions of several of these transcripts, exemplified by the gene 10 mRNA, harbour hairpin structures which may act as barriers against RNase E action. To test whether these structures are indeed 5' stabilisers, we replaced the lacZ leader sequence by the corresponding region from T7 gene10. This replacement yielded a ca 2.9-fold increase in beta-galactosidase yield per transcript. This increase vanished in the presence of the rne-50 mutation which inactivates RNase E, and therefore it reflects a protection of the transcript against RNase E-dependent inactivation. Yet, the leader replacement did not stabilise the transcript chemically. We propose that this replacement inhibits the initial cleavage step but somehow facilitates the subsequent scavenging process.

Bacteriophage T7↗
PubMed1994

The use of a tRNA as a transcriptional reporter: the T7 late promoter is extremely efficient in Escherichia coli but its transcripts are poorly expressed.

In gene expression studies, promoters are often fused to a protein-encoding reporter gene, the expression of which is then taken as an indirect measure of their strength. Here, we advocate the use of a tRNA reporter for the direct quantification of promoter strength. Using this method, we have studied the bacteriophage T7 gene 10 promoter in an E. coli strain that produces saturating amounts of T7 RNA polymerase. At 37 degrees C in aminoacid-glycerol medium, we show that this promoter ranks amongst the strongest known, directing ca 1.1 transcription events per second, 2.2-fold more than the promoters for rRNA operons, or 15-fold more than the induced lac promoter. Surprisingly, compared to the lac promoter, the T7 promoter is far less efficient in driving the expression of protein-encoding genes such as cat, neo or lacZ. Therefore, the polypeptide yield per transcript is lower when the T7 RNA polymerase is used instead of the E. coli RNA polymerase. The former enzyme travels faster than the translating ribosomes, and we suggest that this desynchronization lowers the polypeptide yield per transcript.

Bacteriophage T7↗