PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Jaskowski

Publications and source records attributed to P Jaskowski.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Responses to cued signals in Parkinson's disease. Distinguishing between disorders of cognition and of activation.

Impairment of movement execution in Parkinson's disease could be due to disorders of cognition and/or of activation. These two factors are hard to separate by measuring response times only. Therefore, in this study response force and event-related EEG potentials were measured continuously during tasks in which subjects had to respond to cued signals. Fifteen patients with Parkinson's disease and 15 healthy subjects were studied during two tasks: (i) the 'clock task', in which the signal's identity was fully precued but its presentation time was uncertain and (ii) the 'validity task' in which the cue did not always predict the response validly. Thus, the clock task required more sustained attention, and the validity task sometimes required fast switching. The patients generally responded slower than control subjects. In the clock task, the response times of both groups changed to the same extent with presentation time, whereas in the validity task the patients were additionally slower than the control group with invalidly cued signals. The patients generally had a weaker response force and a lower rate of force production. In the clock task, both force measures changed with presentation time in the control group only, whereas in the validity task, the two measures increased in both groups to the same extent with invalidly cued signals. The contingent negative variation amplitudes in the patients' event-related EEG potentials were reduced, reflecting reduced activation of movement preparation, whereas lateralization of the motor cortices (i.e. the lateralized readiness potential) did not differ significantly between groups, reflecting unimpaired response selection. Force and contingent negative variation were generally reduced in the patients showing that their general slowing is at least partially due to impaired activation. Task-specific problems added to the general activation deficit; the lack of modulation of response force by presentation time revealed pronounced deficits of activation in the monotonous clock task. The specific delay of responses with invalidly cued signals, unparalleled by activation measures, might suggest a problem of cognition. The task-specific deficits may reflect a basic dilemma for patients with Parkinson's disease: cognitive problems may arise in complex tasks but disorders of activation may become pronounced in more simple, monotonous tasks.

Adult↗

Salsolinol, catecholamine metabolites, and visual hallucinations in L-dopa treated patients with Parkinson's disease.

We could quantify the tetrahydroisoquinoline derivative salsolinol in urine of patients with Parkinson's disease and normal control subjects by means of high performance liquid chromatography and electrochemical detection. Urine levels of salsolinol were positively related to the homovanillic acid/3-O-methyl-dopa ratio in the cerebrospinal fluid that reflects dopamine metabolism. In the patient group with visual hallucinations, mean salsolinol level was significantly increased to almost the 3-fold of those found in patients without hallucinations. Since the daily L-dopa doses of both patient groups were nearly identical this result is not due to different L-dopa medications. Additionally, either high values of the main serotonin metabolite, 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid (HIAA) or the L-dopa/3-O-methyl-dopa ratio were found in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with hallucinations. The enhanced salsolinol levels in patients with visual hallucinations seem to be due to an overloaded dopaminergic pathway with an imbalance between dopaminergic and serotonergic systems. Thus, salsolinol appears as a predictor for hallucinosis in Parkinson's disease.

Aged↗

Preparation for action: an ERP study about two tasks provoking variability in response speed.

This study focused on the covariation of response speed and event-related potentials during response preparation and on whether these variations can be brought under experimental control. Two S1-S2 choice response tasks with temporal uncertainty were conducted. In Experiment 1, S1 was 100% informative. Fast subjects showed larger P3s with S1 than slow subjects. The terminal CNV (tCNV) increased intraindividually with response speed. In Experiment 2, 50% of S1s were uninformative and the visual display was designed to attract more attention. Effects of information were found on P3 amplitude, on the topography of tCNV, and on the temporal distribution of response times. Interindividual differences disappeared in Experiment 2. The results suggest that group differences in Experiment 1 were due to different strategies of allocating visual attention. Interindividual variations of strategy showed a pattern of effects different from intraindividual variations of efficiency.

Adult↗

Suspense and surprise: on the relationship between expectancies and P3.

Few theories of the P3 component have emphasized the distinction between its parietal and frontocentral parts. This study used a new paradigm for testing the predictions that the parietal P3 is evoked by awaited stimuli (suspense) and the frontal P3 by unexpected stimuli (surprise). Subjects had to make simple responses whenever a yellow ring appeared. This signal appeared on the screen within a clock, most frequently when the pointer was at 12 o'clock (every 6 s) but sometimes also at other times. The suspense process should therefore have its minimum shortly after 12 o'clock and then steadily increase until 12 o'clock, and the parietal P3 should accordingly be smallest with stimuli shortly after 12 o'clock, then gradually increase and be largest with 12 o'clock stimuli. Further, the stimuli presented at times other than 12 o'clock should evoke large frontal P3s because they were unexpected. The results confirmed parts of these predictions. A frontocentral and a parietocentral component could indeed be discerned. The frontal P3 was largest with non-12 o'clock stimuli, whereas the parietal P3 was large with all stimuli. The parietal result was not predicted, but these results taken together pose more problems for the usual view, which assumes that the parietal P3 is evoked by unexpected stimuli, than for our assumption that the parietal P3 reflects suspense, and the frontocentral P3 reflects surprise. Generalizing to other paradigms, we assume that different topographies of P3 in different paradigms or in different groups of subjects might be due to different mixtures of these two components.

Adult↗

A clock paradigm to study the relationship between expectancy and response force.

It has recently been demonstrated that the force used by subjects to press a response key depends on stimulation conditions such as stimulus intensity, fore-period, etc. We performed an experiment in which response force and reaction time were measured as a function of expectancy. In contrast to the paradigms used so far, we manipulated expectancy without using warning stimuli by applying a so-called "clock-paradigm." It enabled us to avoid the possible arousing effect of the warning stimulus. Both reaction time and response force depended on expectancy. The results suggest that response force was not affected by arousal or activation but was affected by preparatory state at the moment of making a response.

Acoustic Stimulation↗