Extracorporeal liver perfusion system for successful hepatic support pending liver regeneration or liver transplantation: a pre-clinical controlled trial.
BACKGROUND: There is a well recognized need for a system capable of providing effective support for patients with hepatic failure pending liver regeneration or liver transplantation. Recent attempts of using bioartificial liver containing encapsulated porcine hepatocytes, the deployment of emergency whole liver, or hepatocyte transplantation are complex and not consistently successful. The technique of ex vivo hepatic perfusion developed and used clinically by Abouna in the 1970s, has now been redesigned in a perfusion circuitry that mimics the physiological conditions of a normal liver. Before clinical application of this system, a preclinical trial was carried out in dogs with induced hepatic failure. METHODS: Acute hepatic failure was induced in dogs by an end-to-side porto caval shunt, followed 24 hr later, by a 2-hr occlusion of the hepatic artery. All animals (n=18) were medically supported and were divided into three groups. In the control group (n=6) only medical support was used. In the experimental group (n=12) the animals were connected to the ex vivo liver support apparatus during acute hepatic failure via an AV shunt using a dog liver (n=6) or calf liver (n=6) (after a temporary extracorporeal bovine kidney transplant to remove preformed xeno antibody). Hepatic perfusion was carried out at 37 degrees C through the hepatic artery and portal vein at physiological pressures, and blood flow rate for 6-8 hr. RESULTS: All control animals died of progressive hepatic failure at 14-19 hr after clamping the hepatic artery. The animals treated with ex vivo liver showed remarkable clinical and biochemical improvement. Five animals survived for 36-60 hr. Another seven animals recovered completely and became long-term survivors with biochemical and histological evidence of regeneration of their own liver. Biopsy of the allogeneic ex vivo liver at the end of perfusion showed some interstitial edema. Similar biopsy of the xenogeneic calf liver showed only mild and delayed xenograft rejection, which was most likely due to removal of preformed xeno antibody by temporary transplantation of the calf kidney before liver perfusion. CONCLUSIONS: The observations and results obtained in this trial strongly confirm that extracorporeal perfusion through a whole liver, using the system described, is very successful and cost effective for the treatment of acute, but reversible hepatic failure, as well as serving as a bridge to liver transplantation. The time has come for this form of liver support technology to be reintroduced and widely used.