PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P K Pani

Publications and source records attributed to P K Pani.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1993

Genetic control of cellular infection by subgroups A and C RNA tumour viruses in guinea fowl.

An investigation was carried out in guinea fowl to determine their susceptibility to infection by Rous sarcoma viruses of subgroups A and C. A standard dose of each subgroup virus was inoculated into 14-day-old embryos via the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM). On the 10th day after inoculation, 50% of the embryonic chorioallantoic membranes were harvested to assess their infection status (CAM(+) or (-)), while the rest were allowed to hatch. The hatchabilities of the embryos inoculated with subgroups A and C were about 50% and 57%, respectively. The relative sensitivities of guinea fowl to infection by viruses of subgroups A and C were observed to be 0.220 and 0.003, respectively, as compared to chickens (1.00). Mortality due to subgroup A virus-induced liver tumours (LT) was 54% and four phenotypic subclasses, namely CAM(+) LT(+), CAM(+) LT(-), CAM(-) LT(+) and CAM(-) LT(-), were observed in guinea fowl as in chickens. However, a higher incidence (31%) of conversely associated phenotypes, i.e. CAM(+) LT(-) and CAM(-) LT(+), were observed in guinea fowl. Mortality caused by subgroup A virus-induced liver tumours was first observed in inoculated guinea fowl keets during the 3rd week after hatching, and 93% of the mortality occurred within 6 weeks. The peak mortality occurred in the 4th week after hatching. The target organs for transformation were considered to be the liver and spleen because of the equal incidence of tumours in these organs. Males and females were equally likely to die from liver tumours.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Alpharetrovirus↗
PubMed1992

Genetic susceptibility of indigenous chicks to subgroup A Rous sarcoma virus inoculated via the chorioallantoic membrane.

An investigation was made using chicks of two Indian indigenous breeds of fowl, Kadaknath and Aseel, to ascertain genetic resistance to infection by Rous sarcoma virus of subgroup A. A standard inoculation dose of 0.2 ml virus containing 1000 pock forming units ml-1 was injected via the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) into the 11-day-old embryos that were subsequently hatched. The sensitivity of the two indigenous breeds was compared with the highly susceptible exotic White Leghorn (WL) strain maintained in the laboratory. The Kadaknath breed was about three-fold and Assel, about six-fold less sensitive than the WL strain, indicating superiority of the indigenous breeds over the exotic breed of fowl. Most of the CAM-susceptible chicks died of liver tumour (LT) and most of the CAM-resistant chicks survived. However, conversely associated tumour phenotype subclass chicks, i.e. CAM-susceptible LT-negative chicks that survived and CAM-resistant LT-positive chicks that died, occurred consistently in the three breeds of fowl. Nevertheless, the overall survival potential of Kadaknath chicks measured up to 8 weeks post-hatching was greater than that of Aseel chicks. Neither transformation of embryonic tissue prior to hatching nor the visceral metastasis including liver conformed with the degree of CAM-infection as measured by number of pocks on CAMs.

Allantois↗
PubMed1991

Genetics of post-hatching survival potential of Australorp chicks infected as embryos by subgroup A Rous sarcoma virus: further support to 4-allele genetic model.

Embryos (II day-old) of Australorp breed were inoculated via chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) with subgroup A Rous sarcoma virus, and hatched subsequently. The post-hatch survival period in chicks was recorded upto the last chick that died by virus-induced liver tumour, which had a range from 3 to 50 days with an average of 13 +/- 8.7 days. The survival potential of progency tested Australorp parents selected on the basis of negative CAM-infection and those selected on uninoculated embryos, differed significantly (P less than 0.01) while maintaining an inverse relationship between liver tumour mortality and degrees of infection of CAMs. The homozygous susceptibles lacking either ar1 or ar2 or both alleles of the tva (tumour virus a) locus died within 7 days of post-hatching, supporting thereby 4-allele genetic model of tva locus recently proposed for the control of LT- and CAM-infection phenotypes.

Alleles↗
PubMed1990

Induced liver tumour deaths by subgroup A Rous sarcoma virus in chicks inoculated via chorioallantoic membrane, a genetic marker.

A study was made using two strains of light breed (White Leghorn strains, A and B) and four heavy beeds (Rhode Island Red, New Hampshire, Australorp, Columbian) to evaluate the breed difference in survival potential of chicks that were infected as 11-day-old embryos via chorioallantoic membranes (CAMs) with a subgroup A Rous sarcoma virus. Of the 1185 chicks hatched over multiple hatch-replicates, 845 chicks died rapidly of a fibrosarcomatous liver tumour (LT) with a peak mortality about 74% attained by the second week, post-hatch, in the heavy breeds and more than 90% by the second week in the light breed. The breeds did not differ in induced LT mortality when the chicks hatched from eggs that had at least 25 pock counts on CAMs, apparently genetically susceptible, i.e. 25 biologically active virus particles were enough to induce an unpreventable fatal LT. However, low pock-count on CAMs did not act as a pointer for predicting genetic resistance to infection because about 23% of chicks developed from eggs that had no pocks on CAMs, apparently genetically resistant, also died of LT, requiring further studies.

Animals↗
PubMed1977

Genetic control of resistance to subgroup A and subgroup C tumour viruses in Rhode Island Red fowl: evidence for linkage between the tumour virus a (tva) and tumour virus c (tvc) loci.

A study, using the Rhode Island Red (RIR) strain of fowl maintained at Houghton Poultry Research Station, was made to investigate the genetic control of cellular response to infection with viruses of subgroups A and C. Family matings within the RIR strain and test-crosses between the RIR parents and White Leghorn (WL) parents of known ararcrcr genotype were set up to ascertain linkage between the tumour virus a (tva) and tumour virus c (tvc) loci. The results confirmed that in this RIR strain, the two loci, tva and tvc, control the cellular response to viruses of subgroups A and C, respectively, as reported in other breeds of fowl (WL and New Hampshire). As in WL fowl, the two loci are linked. The linkage value of 0-22 in the male sex agreed well with that reported in the WL male sex, indicating that the two loci are located in the same sites in homologous chromosomes in the two breeds. However, in the RIR strain, no sex difference in crossing over between the two linked loci was found, contrary to that reported in WL fowl where the absence of crossing over between the two loci was observed in the heterogametic female sex.

Animals↗
PubMed1976

2-Deoxy-D-glucose uptake by chick embryo cells: a biochemical indicator of genetic susceptibility to RNA tumour viruses.

The enhanced glucose uptake by chick embryo cells as early as 72 h after infection with Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) was confirmed in this study to be an early indicator of cellular transformation. The glucose uptake of C/E BrL cells infected by various doses of BS-RSV of subgroup A showed that the relationship between the log-dose of virus and log-uptake was linear (slope, b1 = 1.30 +/- 0.14) when the ratio of the number of infectious virus particles to the number of cells in the culture was above 1:200. But infection of cultures with a relatively high dose of virus, for instance 10(3.5) focus forming units (f.f.u.) was ineffective for the measurement of cellular transformation using the criterion of glucose uptake, whereas a much lower dose such as 10(1.7) f.f.u. was sufficient to induce foci of transformed cells. We concluded therefore that the statistic of glucose uptake assay (GUA) measured at 72 p.i. is less sensitive than that of the focus count assay (FCA) measured after 10 days as a measure of assessing cellular transformation by RSV. Nevertheless, when the cultures were infected with a higher dose of virus (10(4.3) f.f.u. or more), the GUA could discriminate between the transformed (T) and non-transformed (NT) cultures. This was demonstrated in the two genetic crosses, line 7-2 X WC(F1) and line 7-2 C line. Embryo cultures of these two test-crosses were infected with viruses of subgroups A, B, C and D, and the T and NT phenotypes were ascertained. Also, on the basis of focus counts in the cultures the genetically resistant (R) and susceptible (S) phenotypes in response to various infections were determined. The T and NT phenotypes based on the GUA were compared with the S and R phenotypes, respectively, based on the FCA. It was found that in 47 of the 51 cultures, the phenotypic agreement was perfect, suggesting that glucose uptake by cells of embryo cultures exposed to RSV is a biochemical indicator of genetic susceptibility. The discordant results in 4 cultures are discussed in the light of present knowledge of cellular transformation by RSV.

Animals↗
PubMed1976

Further studies in genetic resistance of fowl to RSV(RAV O): evidence for interaction between independently segregating tumour virus b and tumour virus e genes.

The segregation of resistant and susceptible phenotypes in response to infection by RSV(RAV 2), RSV(RAV 50) and RSV(RAV 0), of avian RNA tumour virus subgroups B, D and E, respectively, was analysed in several test-crosses using chickens from the RPRL line 7-2, HPRS-synthetic line E and the Reaseheath line C. The results were fully consistent with out view reported previously that the genes at the tve and tvb loci segregate independently and recombine under the Mendelian second law of independent assortment. The dominant susceptibility es gene is expressed phenotypically when associated with the dominant susceptibility bs gene, but its expression is suppressed when associated with two doses of the recessive br gene. Genetic causes such as lack of penetration, recessive epistasis, and/or complementary intereaction between the tvb and tve genes have been discussed to account for the modified phenotypic expression of brbreses cells, i.e. resistance to subgroup E virus. Also, as reported previously, it was observed in this study that the tvb genes control the cellular response to subgroup D virus.

Animals↗
PubMed1975

Genetic control of resistance of chick embryo cultures to RSV (RAV 50).

The genetic control of resistance of chick embryo cultures to RSV (RAV 50) was studied in crosses between the highly inbred Reaseheath lines, I, C and W and in the test-cross between WC(F1) and RPRL line 7. Embryo cultures resistant to RSV(RAV2) were also resistant to RSV(RAV 50). Genetic analysis of the segregation results of resistance and susceptibility in the F2, back-crosses, and test-cross populations suggests that the tvb genes pleiotropically control the resistance of the embryo cultures to RSV(RAV 50).

Animals↗
PubMed1975

Genetic susceptibility of chicken times quail hybrid embryos to avian RNA tumour viruses.

An attempt was made to hybridize the chicken (Gallus domesticus) male with Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) female in order to study the genetic susceptibility of hybrid embryos to avian RNA tumour viruses of subgroups, A, B, D and E. In the hybrids the results supported the prevailing concept that susceptibility is dominant over resistance regardless of the dominant trait contributed by either parent. It was also observed that the Ie gene of the chicken was unable to suppress the 'quail-coded' susceptibility to subgroup E virus in the hybrid system, suggesting the lack of penetrance of the Ie gene. Despite the fact that some hybrids were resistant to viruses of subgroups B and D, they were susceptible to subgroup E virus, which was not expected on the basis of the concept that subgroup B-resistant cells cannot be E-susceptible. Also, the hybrids were susceptible to E virus regardless of gs antigen expression and presence of the Ie gene in the genome. This indicates that our earlier suggestion that the Ie gene is another expression of the gs antigen-determining gene is inconsistent.

Alpharetrovirus↗