Voglibose has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of hydrochlorothiazide.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to P Kleist.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: Voglibose is a new and potent inhibitor of alpha-glucosidases used for treatment of diabetes mellitus. It increases gastro-intestinal motility and could thus affect absorption of other concurrently administered antidiabetic drugs. The aim of this study was to investigate whether or not voglibose modifies the pharmacokinetics of glibenclamide, a widely used oral antidiabetic, and the glibenclamide-induced decrease in fasting serum glucose. METHODS: Twelve healthy male subjects were included in this double-blind cross-over study and received a single 1.75-mg dose of glibenclamide on the 8th day of continuous administration of either placebo (reference) or voglibose 5 mg t.i.d. (test). Blood samples were taken to determine the pharmacokinetic characteristics of glibenclamide and the test/reference ratios were evaluated according to bioequivalence criteria. Additional blood samples were taken to measure serum glucose on the same day. RESULTS: The concentration-time course of glibenclamide under concomitant voglibose administration was similar to that under placebo. The equivalence ratio (test/reference) for the pharmacokinetic characteristics AUCnorm was 1.03 (geometric mean; 0.95-1.11, 90% confidence interval) and Cmax.norm 1.01 (0.94-1.08). The parameters were within the accepted range of 0.8-1.25 (AUC) or 0.7-1.43 (Cmax), thus fulfilling equivalence criteria and indicating no effect of voglibose on glibenclamide kinetics. The glibenclamide-induced decrease in fasting serum glucose concentration was similarly independent of placebo or voglibose co-administration. CONCLUSIONS: Voglibose did not interact with glibenclamide on a pharmacokinetic level. Concomitant treatment was well tolerated and has been proven to be safe for further clinical use.
OBJECTIVE: Voglibose is a new and potent inhibitor of alpha-glucosidases and is used for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Since voglibose increases gastrointestinal motility and could thus affect absorption of concomitantly administered drugs, it was investigated whether or not voglibose modifies the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of warfarin, an oral anticoagulant frequently used in cardiovascular disorders likely to arise in diabetic patients. METHODS: Twelve healthy male subjects were given individually adjusted doses of warfarin to reduce prothrombin time (Quick's method) to a value of about 30-40% of the normal range within the first 8 days. Then, the individuals maintenance dose, given in the morning, was maintained until day 15. On study days 11-15, voglibose was co-administered per os in a dose of 5 mg t.i.d. The prothrombin time was determined on days 10 and 11 (reference) and on days 15 and 16 (test), and the steady-state pharmacokinetic characteristics of the warfarin enantiomers were determined on days 10 (reference) and 15 (test). The ratios test/reference were evaluated according to bioequivalence criteria. RESULTS: The equivalence ratio (test reference) for the pharmacodynamic parameter prothrombin time was 0.97 and for the pharmacokinetic characteristics AUC0-24 h.t.ss: S-(-)-warfarin, 1.05; R-(+)-warfarin, 1.01; and Cmax.ss: S-(-)-warfarin, 1.08; R-(+)-warfarin, 1.04. All parameters were within the predetermined accepted range of 0.7-1.43 (pharmacodynamics) or 0.8-1.25 (pharmacokinetics), thus fulfilling equivalence criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Voglibose modified neither the pharmacodynamics nor the pharmacokinetics of warfarin under steady-state conditions. Concomitant treatment was well tolerated and has been proven to be safe for further clinical use.
The alpha-glucosidase inhibitor voglibose (AO-128) was designed to prevent rapid postprandial blood glucose rises in non-insulin-dependent diabetics. We analyzed its effect on the entero-insular axis in 72 healthy volunteers in a double-blind study design before, after the 1st dose, and on the 7th day of a 7-day treatment protocol (3 daily loads). Six parallel groups of 12 volunteers received voglibose (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, or 5.0 mg) or placebo (two groups). Blood was drawn at regular intervals up to 180 min after a standardized breakfast to analyze the levels of glucose, insulin, C peptide, gastric inhibitory polypeptide, and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1). As expected, after ingestion of voglibose, slight to moderate gastro-intestinal discomfort but no severe side-effects were reported. In a dose-dependent manner, voglibose significantly reduced postprandial increases of blood glucose, insulin, and C peptide. At the lower loads (0.5 and 1 mg voglibose three times daily), these effects were more pronounced after 7 days. The postprandial increase of gastric inhibitory polypeptide was already reduced after the first load of 2 and 5 mg voglibose. In comparison to the placebo group, this inhibition became also significant for the lower loads after 7 days. Interestingly, GLP-1, originating from the lower intestines, was increasingly released under voglibose treatment. The first administration of 1 mg voglibose enhanced GLP-1 secretion > 80% above controls. Treatment with 1 mg voglibose three times daily over 7 days revealed a maximal mobilizing effect on endogenous GLP-1 (> 90% above controls) which was not further increased by 2- or 5-mg loads. We conclude that voglibose treatment effectively inhibits intestinal disaccharidases and thereby mobilizes the endogenous pool of insulinotropic GLP-1.
Lansoprazole is a potent proton pump inhibitor and blocks gastric acid secretion. The potency of many antibiotics in eradicating Helicobacter pylori may be considerably enhanced by increasing the intragastric pH due to a twice-daily coadministration of proton pump inhibitors. This double-blind crossover study was designed to compare the effect on intragastric pH of four dose regimens of lansoprazole (30 mg o.a.d., 30 mg b.i.d., 45 mg b.i.d., 60 mg b.i.d.) after 5 days of treatment and to investigate whether an increment of lansoprazole dose level leads to a more pronounced effect. Omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. was administered as a reference drug. The study was carried out in 20 healthy male subjects. Intragastric pH was recorded by a nasogastric probe over 24 h. All dose regimens of lansoprazole were well tolerated and no unexpected drug-related adverse events were observed. The lowest lansoprazole dose level, 30 mg o.a.d. already increased intragastric pH considerably. This effect was even enhanced by increase of the lansoprazole dose as assessed by mean pH as well as percentage of time spent above different pH values. The increase in effect with lansoprazole dose increment from 30 mg b.i.d. to 60 mg b.i.d. was only very small. The time spent at pH values above or equal to 3 after b.i.d. administration was slightly higher with all lansoprazole dose levels compared to omeprazole. The time spent at intragastric pH values above or equal to 5 after b.i.d. oral administration of 30 mg, 45 mg and 60 mg lansoprazole was comparable to that observed after b.i.d. oral administration of 20 mg omeprazole, so that it may be recommended to use lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d. as a treatment equivalent to omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. for eradication of Helicobacter pylori in combination with antibiotics.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Controversial studies concerning the fact that simultaneous i.v. administration of heparin and glyceroltrinitrate (GTN) might reduce the anticoagulatory effect of heparin have been published. In a controlled and comparative study we therefore investigated the influence of the nitrates GTN or isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) in comparison to placebo on the anticoagulatory effect of a constant heparin infusion in patients with CAD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 22 stable and mobile inpatients (two female, 20 male; aged 47 to 80; documented CAD in 20 patients, one patient with atrial fibrillation, one patient with suspected CAD), kept on a therapeutic heparin infusion for several days (prolongation of the partial thromboplastin time [PTT] by 1.5 to two-fold), were included. Study course: Day 1: Discontinuation of nitrate medication, optimization of heparin therapy and fixation of the heparin dose (mean dose 33,800 E/24 h in the GTN group and 32,700 E/24 h in the ISDN group). Day 2: Intravenous simultaneous administration of 0.9% NaCl solution as placebo (3 ml/h) with heparin over 24 hours. Day 3: Substitution of NaCl solution by randomised single-blind intravenous administration of GTN (n = 10; 0.1%, solved in NaCl; dose 2.8 +/- 0.5 mg/h) or ISDN (n = 12; 0.1%, solved in NaCl, dose: 4.8 +/- 0.8 mg/h) for 24 hours. Day 4: Discontinuation of nitrates. RESULT: As compared to placebo, the intravenous simultaneous administration of GTN or ISDN and heparin over 24 hours had no influence on the anticoagulatory effect of heparin when the areas under the curve of PTT values on days 2 and 3 were compared (PTT measurements at 8, 10 a.m., 1, 3, 6, 11 p.m.; Mann-Whitney test). After GTN or ISDN had been discontinued, no change in PTT values was seen during the following five hours. CONCLUSION: There is no indication of a pharmacodynamic relevant interaction between heparin and low-dose intravenous nitrate therapy in patients with CAD.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: The role of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition in patients with coronary artery disease without concomitant disease such as heart failure or hypertension has not been elucidated. In this double-blind, cross-over, randomized trial of the ACE inhibitor captopril, its antianginal and anti-ischemic effects were studied during monotherapy and in the presence of an organic nitrate. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients (34 men, three women) with stable coronary artery disease and exercise-induced ST-segment depression were enrolled. After a washout phase without medication they received placebo, isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) 20 mg twice daily, captopril 12.5 mg twice daily, and the combination of both for 1 week each, after which exercise tolerance, blood pressure and heart rate (supine, standing and 24 h profile), and peripheral arterial vasodilatation (finger pulse plethysmography) were assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients completed all phases of the study. Exercise-induced anginal symptoms occurred in 17 patients, and asymptomatic ischemia was seen in the other 16 men. In comparison with ISDN, the anti-ischemic effects of captopril were minimal, despite a similar reduction in blood pressure. Compared with baseline, 1 week of placebo reduced the sum of ST-segment depression, the main efficacy parameter, by 10% (NS), captopril by 19% (NS), ISDN by 37% (P < 0.001) and the combination of captopril and ISDN by 42% (P < 0.001; NS versus ISDN). No patient remained completely free of exercise-induced angina during treatment with captopril; however, three patients after ISDN and seven patients after the combination did (P < 0.05). Blood pressure at rest decreased at peak effect by 9-10% systolic (P < 0.001) with monotherapy and by up to 7% diastolic (P < 0.001), and during combined therapy with captopril and ISDN by 18% systolic (P < 0.001) and 12% diastolic (P < 0.001). Significantly enhanced circulatory effects of captopril plus ISDN versus ISDN were found for blood pressure (P < 0.001) and peripheral arterial vasodilation (P < 0.01). The reflex tachycardia induced by ISDN in the upright position (5 beats/min) was not blocked by captopril during combined therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The antianginal and anti-ischemic effects of captopril alone were marginal, despite significant circulatory effects after short-term administration. Although captopril in combination with ISDN resulted in a significant further blood-pressure-lowering effect and increased peripheral arterial vasodilatation, the magnitude of potentiation of the anti-ischemic nitrate effects was, in contrast, small. Only exercise-induced angina was further improved by the use of the combination. No paradoxical worsening of ischemia or angina was seen after captopril. Thus, although captopril has no place as first-line therapy for ischemia, its use in combination with ISDN could be advantageous for long-term prognosis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.