PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Kranke

Publications and source records attributed to P Kranke.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8 compared with 0.4 does not further reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting in dolasetron-treated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is one of the most frequent complications after general anaesthesia. Single-dose antiemetic prophylaxis has limited efficacy in high-risk patients. Adding a simple potential antiemetic approach, such as increasing the inspired oxygen fraction, to the antiemetic portfolio would preserve pharmacological interventions for treatment of symptoms in the postoperative period. However, the antiemetic effect of a high inspired oxygen fraction is still discussed controversially. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether an inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8 decreases PONV in patients receiving the 5-HT3-antagonist dolasetron. METHODS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial we studied 377 patients (ASA I-III) undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Induction of anaesthesia was standardized, including thiopental fentanyl and cis-atracurium. For all patients the individual risk for PONV was calculated using the Koivuranta score and all patients received 12.5 mg dolasetron i.v. before surgery. Patients were allocated randomly to one of three groups: Group A (n=125) received 80% oxygen in air, Group B (n=125) 40% oxygen in air and Group C (n=127) 40% oxygen in nitrous oxide. Postoperative nausea, postoperative vomiting (PV), or nausea, vomiting, or both (PONV) was assessed in the early (0-4 h) and overall postoperative period (0-24 h) by an anaesthesiologist unaware of patient allocation. RESULTS: There was a significantly lower incidence of PONV and PV in Groups A (PONV: 11.2%; PV: 3.2%) and B (PONV: 10.4%; PV: 3.2%) compared with Group C (PONV: 26.7%; PV: 13.3%), but there were no significant differences between Groups A and B. CONCLUSIONS: An inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8 does not further decrease PONV or vomiting in dolasetron-treated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The lower incidence of PONV in Groups A and B compared with Group C is most likely caused by the omission of nitrous oxide.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Risk factors for prilocaine-induced methaemoglobinaemia following peripheral regional anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: The local anaesthetic prilocaine has a low systemic toxicity mainly because of a high absorption in the lung and a large volume of distribution and thus is associated with a lower risk of neurological or cardiac side-effects. However, the major disadvantage is the formation of methaemoglobin by its metabolite o-toluidine. This prospective observational study was performed to identify factors that are associated with increased prilocaine-induced methaemoglobinaemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One Hundred and sixty two patients undergoing major knee surgery under general anaesthesia combined with peripheral nerve blocks (femoral nerve block, combined femoral/sciatic nerve block or lumbar plexus block) received a single bolus injection of 300 or 400 mg prilocaine about 30 min before surgery via a catheter. The proper placement was verified using nerve stimulation via a stimulating catheter. Three hours after prilocaine injection, venous blood samples were drawn and methaemoglobin levels were measured by standard photometric technique. Data was subjected to a stepwise multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean methaemoglobin for all patients was 2.7% (range: 0.9-15.4%). A higher dose of prilocaine and younger age were the most important predictive factors for higher methaemoglobin formation. Female sex and to a lesser extent the use of high-concentration/low-volume prilocaine also increased methaemoglobin levels. These four factors of the model explain 36% of the total variance. Other investigated factors, including the patient's height, weight, body mass index, the site of catheter insertion, the anaesthetist's judgement concerning the difficulty of catheter placement, duration of catheter placement or an inadvertent puncture of a venous or arterial vessel, had no significant impact on the concentration of methaemoglobin. CONCLUSION: The use of prilocaine for regional block is safe, since the older patients who might be more susceptible to suffer from clinical symptoms of methaemoglobinaemia usually form less methaemoglobin. However, since prediction of high methaemoglobin levels is difficult, anaesthesiologists performing regional blocks in patients who might be jeopardized by a decreased oxygen transport capacity should avoid high doses of prilocaine.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Anti-emetic prophylaxis with oral tropisetron and/or dexamethasone.

BACKGROUND: The corticosteroid dexamethasone and the serotonine3 -antagonist tropisetron are both effective drugs for the prophylaxis of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) when given intravenously. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the oral use of both drugs as part of a routine oral premedication and to compare their single and combined effectiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, 320 inpatients with a moderate-high risk of PONV (> or = 40% according to two validated risk scores) received an oral premedication 1-2 h pre-operatively with placebo, a fixed dose of tropisetron 5 mg, dexamethasone 8 mg, or a combination of both drugs. A standardized general anaesthesia was performed, including benzodiazepine premedication, propofol, rocuronium, desflurane in air/O2, fentanyl or sufentanil followed by a continuous infusion of remifentanil. Post-operative analgesia and anti-emetic rescue medication were standardized. The main outcome measures were the severity of PONV within the first 24 h (rated by a standardized scoring algorithm). The incidence of PONV was used as the secondary outcome. RESULTS: Data from 310 patients were analyzed. The mean severity score in the placebo-, tropisetron-, dexamethasone- and the combined-groups was 1.37, 0.8, 0.8 and 0.38, respectively. The incidence of PONV of any severity was 59.2%, 37.5%, 40% and 22.8%, respectively. The reduction of the incidence and the severity of PONV were statistically significant with all three interventions. Results from additional analyses suggested that both drugs were equally effective and that there was a simple additive effect of tropisetron and dexamethasone compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: Oral tropisetron and dexamethasone were both equally effective in reducing the severity and incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting. The latter could be reduced by approximately 35% in a population of moderate-high risk for PONV. Both drugs had an additive effect. However, even in the combination group there still remained an unacceptably high incidence of PONV of more than 20%. This highlighted the need for a multimodal anti-emetic approach in high-risk patients and the importance of treatment of PONV.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2005

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for acute ischaemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Most cases of stroke are caused by impairment of blood flow to the brain (ischaemia) which results in a reduction in oxygen available and subsequent cell death. It has been postulated that hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) may reduce the volume of brain that will die by greatly increasing the oxygen available, and it may further improve outcome by reducing brain swelling. Some centres are using HBOT routinely to treat stroke. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of adjunctive HBOT in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched 9 January 2004), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to July 2004), EMBASE (1980 to July 2004), CINAHL (1982 to July 2004), and DORCTHIM (Database of Randomised Controlled Trials in Hyperbaric Medicine) (from inception to 2004). We handsearched journals and conference proceedings, searched reference lists of articles, and contacted researchers in an effort to identify additional published and unpublished studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised controlled trials that compared the effect of adjunctive HBOT with no HBOT (no treatment or sham). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors used standardised forms to extract the data independently. Each trial was assessed for internal validity with differences resolved by discussion. Data were extracted and entered into RevMan 4.2. MAIN RESULTS: Three randomised controlled trials (106 participants) satisfied the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of the trials varied but was generally high. Data could be pooled for a limited number of clinically important outcomes. There were no significant differences in mortality rate at six months in those receiving HBOT compared to the control group (relative risk 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17 to 2.2, P value 0.45). Two of 15 scale measures of disability and functional indicated an improvement following HBOT, both at one year follow up: the mean Trouillas Disability Scale was lower with HBOT (mean difference (MD) 2.2 points reduction with HBOT, 95% CI 0.15 to 4.3, P value 0.04) and the mean Orgogozo Scale was higher (MD 27.9 points, 95% CI 4.0 to 51.8, P value 0.02). These improvements were not reflected in other trials or functional scales. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review has not found evidence to show that HBOT improves clinical outcomes when applied during the acute presentation of ischaemic stroke. While evidence from the three randomised controlled trials is insufficient to provide clear guidelines for practice, clinical benefit does not seem likely. Further research is required to better define the role of HBOT in this condition.

Brain Ischemia↗
PubMed2005

Systematic review of hyperbaric oxygen in the management of chronic wounds.

BACKGROUND: Many therapeutic options exist for chronic wounds. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is one such option. It may be used for diabetic, venous, arterial and pressure ulcers. METHODS: Following a systematic search of the literature, pooled analyses of predetermined clinical outcomes of randomized controlled trials involving the use of HBOT for chronic wounds were performed. Relative risks (RR) and number needed to treat (NNT) with 95 per cent confidence intervals (c.i.) were calculated. RESULTS: Six studies met the inclusion criteria. No appropriate trials were located for arterial and pressure ulcers. Pooled data from five trials on diabetic ulcers (118 patients) suggested a significant reduction in the risk of major amputation with HBOT (RR: 0.31; c.i. 0.13 to 0.71) with a NNT of 4 (c.i. 3 to 11). Sensitivity analyses did not alter the results. Ulcer healing and the rate of minor amputation were not influenced by HBOT. Data from one trial on venous ulcers suggested significant wound size reduction at the end of the treatment, but not at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence that HBOT reduces the risk of major amputation in diabetic patients. For venous, arterial or pressure ulcers there is a lack of data. Further trials may be warranted.

Amputation, Surgical↗
PubMed2005

[A factorial trial of six interventions for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting].

BACKGROUND: Untreated, one third of patients who undergo surgery will have postoperative nausea and vomiting. Although many trials have been conducted, the relative benefits of prophylactic antiemetic interventions given alone or in combination remain unknown. METHODS: In a randomized, controlled trial of factorial design, 5,199 patients at high risk for postoperative nausea and vomiting were randomly assigned to 1 of 64 possible combinations of 6 prophylactic interventions: 1) 4 mg of ondansetron or no ondansetron; 2) 4 mg of dexamethasone or no dexamethasone; 3) 1.25 mg of droperidol or no droperidol; 4) propofol or a volatile anesthetic; 5) nitrogen or nitrous oxide; 6) remifentanil or fentanyl. The primary aim parameter was nausea and vomiting within 24 h after surgery, which was evaluated blindly. RESULTS: Ondansetron, dexamethasone, and droperidol each reduced the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting by about 26%, propofol reduced the risk by 19%, and nitrogen by 12%. The risk reduction with both of these agents (i.e., total intravenous anesthesia) was thus similar to that observed with each of the antiemetics alone. All the interventions acted independently of each other and independently of the patients' baseline risk. Consequently, the relative risks associated with the combined interventions could be estimated by multiplying the relative risks associated with each intervention. However, absolute risk reduction was a critical function of patients' baseline risk. CONCLUSIONS: Because antiemetic interventions are similarly effective and act independently, the safest or least expensive should be used first. Prophylaxis is rarely warranted in low-risk patients, moderate-risk patients may benefit from a single intervention, and multiple interventions should be reserved for high-risk patients.

Analgesics, Opioid↗
PubMed2004

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for chronic wounds.

BACKGROUND: Chronic wounds are common and present a health problem with significant effect on quality of life. The wide range of therapeutic strategies for such wounds reflects the various pathologies that may cause tissue breakdown, including poor blood supply resulting in inadequate oxygenation of the wound bed. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been suggested to improve oxygen supply to wounds and therefore improve their healing. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of adjunctive HBOT for treating chronic ulcers of the lower limb (diabetic foot ulcers, venous and arterial ulcers and pressure ulcers). SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Trial Register (searched 6 February 2003), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2003), Medline (1966 - 2003), EMBASE (1974 - 2003), DORCTHIM (1996 - 2003), and reference lists of articles. Relevant journals were handsearched and researchers in the field were contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised studies comparing the effect on chronic wound healing of therapeutic regimens which include HBOT with those that exclude HBOT (with or without sham therapy). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three reviewers independently evaluated the quality of the relevant trials using the validated Oxford-Scale (Jadad 1996) and extracted the data from the included trials. MAIN RESULTS: Five trials contributed to this review. Diabetic foot ulcer (4 trials, 147 patients): Pooled data of three trials with 118 patients showed a reduction in the risk of major amputation when adjunctive HBOT was used, compared to the alternative therapy (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.71). Sensitivity analysis for the allocation of dropouts did not significantly alter that result. This analysis predicts that we would need to treat 4 individuals with HBOT in order to prevent 1 amputation in the short term (NNT 4, 95% CI 3 to 11). There was no statistically significant difference in minor amputation rate (pooled data of two trials with 48 patients). Healing rates were reported in one trial (Abidia 2003) which showed a significant improvement in the chance of healing 1 year after therapy (RR for failure to heal with sham 2.3, 95%CI 1.1 to 4.7, P=0.03), although no effect was determined immediately post HBOT, nor at 6 months. Further, the beneficial effect after 1 year was sensitive to allocation of dropouts. Venous ulcer: (1 trial, 16 patients): This trial reported data at six weeks (wound size reduction) and 18 weeks (wound size reduction and healing rate) and suggested a significant benefit of HBOT in terms of reduction in ulcer area only at 6 weeks (WMD 33%, 95%CI 19% to 47%, P<0.00001). Arterial and pressure ulcers: No trials that satisfied inclusion criteria were located. REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: In people with foot ulcers due to diabetes, HBOT significantly reduced the risk of major amputation and may improve the chance of healing at 1 year. The application of HBOT to these patients may be justified where HBOT facilities are available, however economic evaluations should be undertaken. In view of the modest number of patients, methodological shortcomings and poor reporting, this result should be interpreted cautiously however, and an appropriately powered trial of high methodological rigour is justified to verify this finding and further define those patients who can be expected to derive most benefit from HBOT. Regarding the effect of HBOT on chronic wounds associated with other pathologies, any benefit from HBOT will need to be examined in further, rigorous randomised trials. The routine management of such wounds with HBOT is not justified by the evidence in this review.

Amputation, Surgical↗
PubMed2004

[Effective literature searching. Focusing the question and using PubMed queries].

Apart from clinical and social expertise, the availability of contemporary knowledge is a key component in organisations within the health system that aim for excellence and competitiveness. Efficient literature searching is within this context a core business of evidence-based medicine. In addition to the need for valid data, the retrieval of information based on published literature has so far constituted a critical hurdle. Based on these requirements, two core issues for success with respect to literature searching are described: First, the generation of a structured question to form the basis of the most promising search terms. Second, a new feature of the web service of the national library of medicine, called "clinical queries", that allows the application of predefined filters to allocate clinically relevant data in terms of published clinical trials and systematic reviews.

Evidence-Based Medicine↗
PubMed2004

[Is ginger a relevant antiemetic for postoperative nausea and vomiting?].

OBJECTIVE: Ginger (Zingiber officinale) has traditionally been used in China for gastrointestinal symptoms, including nausea and vomiting. A recent systematic review on the possible antiemetic effect of ginger for various indications, including PONV, morning sickness, and motion sickness, concluded that ginger was a promising antiemetic herbal remedy, but the clinical data were insufficient to draw firm conclusions. Since that publication, additional data has accumulated and thus an updated meta-analysis was performed. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was performed using different search strategies in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Six randomized controlled trials including 538 patients were identified investigating ginger to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Data on the incidences of PONV, nausea, vomiting, and the need for rescue antiemetics within the first 24 postoperative hours were extracted and the pooled relative risk and the numbers needed to treat (NNT) were calculated using a random effects model. RESULTS: The pooled relative risk to suffer from PONV after pre-treatment with ginger was 0.84 (95 %-confidence interval 0.69 - 1.03). About 11 patients must be treated with ginger for one additional patient remaining free from PONV (NNT: 11; 95 %-CI: 6 - 250). Results for nausea, vomiting, and need for antiemetic rescue treatment are similar. CONCLUSION: Ginger is not a clinically relevant antiemetic in the PONV setting.

Antiemetics↗
PubMed2004

[Cross-validation of simple questioning methods to determine patient satisfaction with anaesthesia care].

INTRODUCTION: Evaluation of patient satisfaction with the perioperative care is an integral part of modern quality management. For this purpose simple questioning techniques are often used in clinical practise or reports of clinical trials. However, little research has been performed to investigate whether these tools and methods are useful and provide valid information. METHODS: Two-hundred patients undergoing elective surgical procedures were interviewed. Five different simple techniques or questions that have been used in the international and in the German literature throughout the last years were applied in random sequence together with the validated German translation of the QoR-9 questionnaire to measure quality of recovery. All analyses were performed descriptively. RESULTS: All investigated techniques could be answered without help by another person in 95 % up to 100 %. All simple dichotomous questions regarding satisfaction were insufficient to discriminate satisfied from less satisfied patients. A rating using grades known from the German school system (1 - 6) and a visual analogue scale (VAS; 0 - 100 mm) obtained ratings lower than the maximum possible values in 10 % and 11 % of the patients respectively. Furthermore, the flexibility that was provided by these tools was not utilized by the patients. The results of the QoR-9 questionnaire as a marker of postoperative recovery showed only a moderate correlation with ratings of patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Until now, there is no method or questioning technique in the German language that can be recommended for a quality assurance program. Thus, further research is needed to develop tools that provide valid information with adequate resolution to allow discrimination of patient satisfaction with perioperative care.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

A comparison of nefopam and clonidine for the prevention of postanaesthetic shivering: a comparative, double-blind and placebo-controlled dose-ranging study.

Postanaesthetic shivering is a frequent complication following general anaesthesia. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of three doses of nefopam with clonidine and placebo in the prevention of postanaesthetic shivering. We studied 371 patients undergoing abdominal or orthopaedic surgery. Patients were allocated to one of five groups: Group A (n = 73) received 0.2 mg x kg(-1) nefopam, Group B (n = 75) 0.1 mg x kg(-1) nefopam, Group C (n = 76) 0.05 mg x kg(-1) nefopam, Group D (n = 73) 1.5 microg x kg(-1) clonidine, and Group E (n = 74) saline 0.9% as placebo. We found a significant reduction in the incidence of shivering in Group A compared to Group C and clonidine as well as to the placebo group. All active treatments reduced the incidence and the severity of shivering compared to placebo. At 5 min postoperatively clonidine-treated patients showed a significant decrease in MAP and a significantly lower Aldrete score compared to all other groups. No haemodynamic or sedative adverse events were observed in the nefopam-treated patients. The results of our study indicate that nefopam (0.2 mg x kg(-1)) is superior to clonidine (1.5 microg x kg(-1)) in the prophylaxis of postanaesthetic shivering and not accompanied by sedative or haemodynamic side-effects.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Comparison of surgical site and patient's history with a simplified risk score for the prediction of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Although site of surgery and previous occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting are often used to decide whether prophylactic anti-emetic drugs are indicated, the value of these predictors is unclear. We compared these two risk factors against a simplified four-factor risk score. We analysed data from 1566 adult inpatients who received balanced anaesthesia without prophylactic anti-emetics. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were used to quantify predictive properties. Nausea and vomiting occurred in 600 (38.3%) patients within 24 h. Sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 47% and 59% for surgical site; 47% and 70% for history of postoperative nausea and vomiting; and 58% and 70% for risk score with three or more factors. The area under the curve for surgical site was 0.53 (95% CI 0.50-0.56); that for patient's history was 0.58 (95% CI 0.56-0.61) while for risk score it was 0.68 (95% CI 0.66-0.71; P < 0.001). Prediction using surgical site or patient's history alone was poor while the simplified risk score provided clinically useful sensitivity and specificity.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

The development and validation of a risk score to predict the probability of postoperative vomiting in pediatric patients.

Risk scores to predict the occurrence of postoperative vomiting (PV) or nausea and vomiting that were developed for adult patients do not fit for children, because several risk factors are difficult to assess or are usually not applicable in pediatric patients (e.g., smoking status). Thus, in the present study, we sought to develop and to validate a simple score to predict PV in children (POVOC-score). Development and validation of the new score was based on data from 4 independent institutions of 1257 children (aged 0-14 yr) undergoing various types of surgery under general anesthesia without antiemetic prophylaxis. Preoperatively, several potential risk factors were recorded. Postoperatively, the occurrence of PV was observed for up to 24 h. The dataset was randomly split into an evaluation set (n = 657) that was analyzed using a forward logistic regression technique and a validation set (n = 600) that was used to confirm the accuracy of prediction by means of the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve. Four independent risk factors for PV were identified in the final analysis: duration of surgery >/=30 min, age >/=3 yr, strabismus surgery, and a positive history of PV in the children or PV/postoperative nausea and vomiting in relatives (mother, father, or siblings). The incidence of PV was 9%, 10%, 30%, 55%, and 70% for 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 risk factors observed. Using these incidences as cut-off values in the validation dataset, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.72 (95% confidence interval: 0.68-0.77). Our data suggest that PV can be predicted with an acceptable accuracy using a four-item simplified risk score.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

[Prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting. Randomised comparison of dolasetron versus dolasetron plus dexamethasone].

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are frequent complications after operations. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of combined dolasetron plus dexamethasone versus dolasetron alone with respect to the incidence and severity of emetic symptoms and patients satisfaction. METHODS: In a prospective, randomised, double-blind study, 150 patients scheduled for hysterectomy or breast surgery were allocated to one of the following two groups: group A received 50 mg dolasetron orally and group B 50 mg dolasetron orally plus 8 mg dexamethasone intravenously. The follow-up was for 24 h after surgery. RESULTS: In group A PONV was significantly more frequent (28%) compared to group B (12.0%). The incidence of vomiting was significantly lower in patients receiving dolasetron plus dexamethasone (0%) in comparison to patients receiving dolasetron (8.0%). Furthermore,patients satisfaction was significantly higher in group B compared to group A. About 6 or 7 patients need to be treated with additional dexamethasone instead of a placebo for one patient to benefit from this intervention (i.e. to stay free from PONV) who otherwise would have suffered from PONV. CONCLUSIONS: Combining oral dolasetron with intravenous dexamethasone further improves the antiemetic efficacy of dolasetron. With a number-needed-to-treat of about 6 the additional benefit might be considered clinically relevant.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

[Cochrane Anaesthesia Review Group and the Cochrane Library. Useful resources for anaesthetists].

The Cochrane Collaboration is an international non-profit organisation that aims to help clinicians in making well-informed decisions about health care issues. This is done through preparing, maintaining and disseminating systematic reviews on the effects of health care interventions. To facilitate this task, review groups have been established. These groups cover specific health care areas and form the organisational basis of the collaboration. They provide methodological and logistic help to the authors of the systematic reviews. The Cochrane Anaesthesia Review Group (CARG) covers anaesthesia, perioperative medicine, intensive care,pre-hospital medicine, resuscitation, and emergency medicine. Protocols and completed Cochrane reviews are published in a structured format in the electronic Cochrane Library. Beside this Cochrane database of systematic reviews, the Cochrane library contains a database with summaries of non-Cochrane systematic reviews (database of abstracts of reviews of effectiveness), and a comprehensive database with controlled clinical trials (Cochrane central register of controlled trials). Thus the Cochrane library is a useful source of information on health care interventions for anaesthetists.

Anesthesiology↗
PubMed2003

Treatment of hiccup during general anaesthesia or sedation: a qualitative systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Acute hiccup is a minor complication that can occur during sedation or general anaesthesia. The disorder can disturb the surgical field, might interfere with lung ventilation or could hamper diagnostic procedures. The objective was to perform a systematic search for interventions aimed at treating hiccup occurring during anaesthesia or sedation. METHODS: A systematic search for reports describing interventions to treat hiccup in conjunction with anaesthesia was carried out (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane-Library, manual screening of reference lists and review articles, up to December 2001). Search terms were 'hiccup', 'singultus' or 'hiccough'. RESULTS: Twenty-six reports involving approximately 581 patients focused on hiccup remedies in the anaesthesia setting. Only one report was substantiated by a randomized controlled trial. This investigated methylphenidate 10 mg intravenously in 51 patients, which did not show a beneficial effect compared with placebo. Hiccup was a self-limiting phenomenon. Case series and case reports focused on various systemically applied drugs in 12 reports, stimulating techniques (e.g. pharyngeal stimulation) in seven, topical applied remedies (e.g. intranasal ice-cold water) in four, and ventilation techniques (e.g. continuous positive pressure ventilation) in two. CONCLUSIONS: A large variety of interventions have been proposed for the treatment of hiccup during anaesthesia and sedation. However, perioperative treatment is still based on empirical findings and no treatment is 'evidence-based'. Thus, no valid recommendations for the treatment of hiccup can be derived. Uncontrolled observations are inadequate to establish treatment efficacy.

Anesthesia, General↗