PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P L Soldà

Publications and source records attributed to P L Soldà.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

Autonomic and ventilatory components of heart rate and blood pressure variability in freely behaving rats.

The relative role of parasympathetic, sympathetic, and ventilatory influences in the genesis of blood pressure and R-R interval variability is controversial. In 13 freely behaving WKY rats instrumented with venous and arterial catheters and chest electrodes, mean arterial pressure (MAP, mmHg), R-R interval (ms), and respiratory fluctuations were monitored for 90 min in the control condition and after intravenous atropine (0.75 mg/kg) and/or propranolol (1 mg/kg). Spectral power (pw) in the 0.25- to 0.75-Hz (midfrequency, MF) and the 0.75- to 3.0-Hz (high-frequency, HF, respiratory-synchronous) bands was computed in sequences of 400 heartbeats by use of a combined autoregressive analysis. Atropine reduced but did not abolish HF R-R interval pw (from 1.73 +/- 0.50 to 0.39 +/- 0.27 ms2, P < 0.01) and halved HF MAP pw (from 0.41 +/- 0.30 to 0.21 +/- 0.12 mmHg2, P < 0.05), whereas propranolol did not affect HF pw of the R-R interval or MAP. Propranolol also failed to significantly modify MF R-R interval pw (from 0.48 +/- 0.44 to 0.40 +/- 0.34 ms2, P = NS) or MF MAP pw (from 0.54 +/- 0.39 to 0.42 +/- 0.20 mmHg2, P = NS), whereas atropine virtually abolished MF R-R interval pw (from 0.48 +/- 0.44 to 0.01 +/- 0.01 ms2, P < 0.01) and also significantly reduced MF MAP pw (from 0.54 +/- 0.39 to 0.33 +/- 0.24 mmHg2, P < 0.01). The effects of combined blockade were similar to those of atropine alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗

Continuous monitoring of right ventricular volume changes using a conductance catheter in the rabbit.

To assess the reliability of conductance (G) catheter for evaluating right ventricular (RV) volume changes, a miniature (3.5F) six-electrode catheter was developed and tested in 11 New Zealand rabbit hearts. In five animals the heart was excised; in six it was left in the thorax. RV conductance was recorded while the RV was filled with blood in 0.25-ml steps at different left ventricular (LV) volumes. Linear correlation of measured conductance vs. reference volumes was computed. RV conductance was highly correlated with reference volume [correlation coefficient (r) ranging from 0.991 to 0.999]. Slope of regression lines was not significantly affected by LV volume variations in 1-ml steps or by acute conductance changes of structures surrounding the heart, whereas the intercept was affected only by the 0- to 1-ml LV volume change. In four rabbits, RV conductance changes during a cardiac cycle [stroke volume- (SV) G] were compared in vivo with electromagnetic flow probe-derived estimates of SV (SVem) as stroke volume was varied by graded inferior vena caval occlusion. SV-G correlated well with SVem (r ranging from 0.92 to 0.96). This correlation persisted after the thorax was filled with saline; however, significant differences were found in individual slopes (P < 0.001). These results show that the conductance catheter has a potential to reliably monitor in vivo relative RV volume changes in small-animal hearts.

Anesthesia↗

[The evaluation of the end-ejection pressure-length relation as an index of regional contractility].

Although end-systolic pressure-length relationship (ESPLR) is now widely used as a regional substitute for the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship, there are some reservations about its use as an index of systolic performance. This study aimed at assessing whether by using end-ejection (zero aortic flow) as a definition of end-systole, ESPLR can be used to characterize myocardial performance independent of load, and if the choice of the region where to implant the sonomicrometers is critical. Ten anaesthetized dogs (16 +/- 2 kg) were instrumented with a left ventricular (LV) pressure micromanometer and an aortic flow probe. Sonomicrometers were implanted in the apical (L1) and the mid-ventricular (L2) regions of the anterior LV wall, and in the basal region of the lateral wall (L3). End-systolic pressure-length relationships were obtained during acute preload reduction induced by the inflation of a vena caval balloon. This evaluation was repeated after increasing end-diastolic pressure to 14-18 mmHg (delta PL), after increasing systolic pressure by 15 (delta P-I) and 25 mmHg (delta P-II) with graded descending aorta occlusion, and during dobutamine infusions at 2.5 (Db 2.5) and 5 micrograms/kg/min (Db5). End-systolic pressure-length relationships (r > 0.97; pressure range: 70-100 mmHg) were characterized by their slopes (Ees), the extrapolated intercept at zero pressure (L0) and the values of segment length at a pressure of 75 (L75) and 100 mmHg (L100). In all the myocardial regions studied by sonomicrometry, the increments in preload and afterload did not significantly shift ESPLR.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗

Time course of pressure and flow in ascending aorta during ejection.

To analyze aortic flow and pressure relationships, 10 closed-chest anaesthetised dogs were instrumented with electromagnetic aortic flow probes and micromanometers in the left ventricle and ascending aorta. Left ventricular ejection time was divided into: time to peak flow (T1) (both pressure and flow rising), peak flow to peak pressure time (T2) (pressure rising, flow decreasing), and peak pressure to dicrotic notch time (T3) (pressure and flow both decreasing). These time intervals were expressed as percent of total ejection time. Load-active interventions rose markedly T2 (from 4.2 +/- 5.5 to 19.4 +/- 3.5 after phenylephrine (p less than 0.02); from 4.2 +/- 6.5 to 21.2 +/- 5.3 after dextran (p less than 0.02)). Conversely, dobutamine reduced T2 from 4.4 +/- 5.9 to -2.5 +/- 6.5 (p less than 0.05). Thus, during load-active interventions aortic pressure increases for a longer T2 time although forward flow is decreasing, as a result of higher aortic elastic recoil during ejection. Conversely, beta 1-adrenergic stimulation significantly shortens T2. Dynamic pressure-flow relationship is thus continuously changing during ejection. T2 seems to be inversely related to the efficiency of left ventricular ejection dynamics.

Animals↗

[The variability of the heart rate, arterial pressure and peripheral circulation as the indices of autonomic control in essential hypertension].

In recent years the influence of autonomic nervous system on cardiac rhythm and blood pressure has been increasingly studied by analysis of cardiovascular fluctuations, particularly in diabetic and normal persons under various physiologic conditions, while still few data exist on essential hypertension. To characterize the autonomic cardiovascular control in essential hypertension we studied 22 untreated hypertensives, diagnosed within 1 year (mean age 43 +/- 2 years, mean +/- SEM) and 16 age-matched normotensives. Recordings of RR interval, breathing activity, noninvasive blood pressure (Finapres) and skin arteriolar flow (infrared photoplethysmogram) were obtained while in supine position and after sympathetic activation induced by passive transition to upright posture (tilting table). Autoregressive power spectral analysis was then carried out, and low- (0.03-0.15 Hz, LF) and high-frequency fluctuations (0.15-0.35 Hz, HF) were measured. LF and HF have been considered as markers of sympathetic and parasympathetic activity on the heart, respectively, and as markers of sympathetic and mechanic chest activity on the circulation, respectively. In supine position both cardiac and vascular variability were similar in both hypertensive and normotensive groups. After tilting however the increase in the sympathetic component of cardiac variability was blunted in hypertensives with respect to normotensives (hypertensives LFnu from 43.6 +/- 4.7 nu to 59.4 +/- 5.1 nu, p less than 0.005; normotensives LFnu from 36.9 +/- 3.3 nu to 83.4 +/- 2.6 nu, p less than 0.001), the increase in LFnu being statistically (p less than 0.001) reduced in the hypertensive subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

[Factors influencing left ventricular function in arterial hypertension].

Using digitized M-mode echograms we evaluated the role of preload, afterload, inotropic state and left ventricular (LV) mass on LV systolic and diastolic function in 2 groups of hypertensive patients: Group 1: 25 subjects (18 men, mean age 48 +/- 6 years) with normal LV mass (less than 230 g); Group 2: 25 subjects (20 men, mean age 50 +/- 8 years) with LV hypertrophy (wall hypertrophy with normal LV diameter). As control group, we evaluated 50 normal subjects, matched for age, sex and body surface area with hypertensives. LV mass was significantly (p less than 0.001) higher as respect to normals also in hypertensives with normal LV mass; indexes of LV systolic and diastolic function were similar in normals and in hypertensives with normal LV mass and significantly lower in subjects with LV hypertrophy. The end-systolic wall stress was not significantly different in the 2 groups of hypertensives. We evaluated the relative role of preload (end-diastolic LV diameter), afterload (end-systolic wall stress) inotropic state (systolic arterial pressure/end-systolic LV diameter) and LV mass on LV systolic and diastolic function using multiple regression analysis. As regards LV systolic function, the major determinant was the systolic pressure/end-systolic diameter ratio in normals, the end-systolic stress in hypertensives. As regards LV diastolic function, the major determinant was end-systolic stress in normals and hypertensives with normal LV mass, LV mass in hypertensives with myocardial hypertrophy. Preload seems not to influence LV function in normals and in hypertensives with normal LV diastolic diameter. The major determinant of LV systolic function is the inotropic state in normals and the afterload in hypertensives.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

Fast microcomputer-based multipurpose filtering routine.

In order to perform high-speed digital signal filtering or differentiating at reduced costs, we developed a 68000 assembler routine which runs on a 68000 coprocessor card in an Apple II computer. It achieves a remarkable saving of computational time and may also be used directly with any 68000-based microcomputer.

Microcomputers↗