PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P M Hoff

Publications and source records attributed to P M Hoff.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

Comparison of the efficacy, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of a uracil/tegafur (UFT) plus oral leucovorin (LV) regimen between Japanese and American patients with advanced colorectal cancer: joint United States and Japan study of UFT/LV.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy, toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of an oral regimen consisting of uracil/tegafur (UFT) and leucovorin (LV) between Japanese patients and patients in the United States with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four Japanese patients and 45 patients in the United States were enrolled in concurrent nonrandomized phase II trials. UFT 300 mg/m2/d and leucovorin 75 mg/d were administered orally for 28 days followed by a 7-day rest period. The total daily dose of each drug was divided into three equal doses. Treatment was repeated every 5 weeks until disease progression. Blood samples for the pharmacokinetic study were obtained after the initial dose on day 1 of the first course. RESULTS: The response rate for the Japanese patients and the patients in the United States was 36.4% (95% CI, 22.4% to 52.2%) and 34.1% (95% CI, 20.5% to 49.9%), respectively. The only major toxicity was diarrhea, and other toxicities were mild in both populations. The incidence of grade 3 or higher diarrhea in the Japanese and Americans was 9% and 22%, respectively. Although the area under the curve and maximum concentration of fluorouracil were found to be slightly higher in the Japanese patients than the patients in the United States, and area under the curve-adjusted body surface area appeared to be comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The efficacy and pharmacokinetic parameters of UFT and LV are comparable in Japanese and American patients; however, a difference in toxicity profile, specifically diarrhea, was noted. This oral regimen of UFT and LV is considered to have similar activity against metastatic colorectal cancer and to have acceptable toxicity in patients in both countries.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2004

Oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: integrated efficacy data and novel analyses from two large, randomised, phase III trials.

This study evaluates the efficacy of capecitabine using data from a large, well-characterised population of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated in two identically designed phase III studies. A total of 1207 patients with previously untreated mCRC were randomised to either oral capecitabine (1250 mg m(-2) twice daily, days 1-14 every 21 days; n=603) or intravenous (i.v.) bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV; Mayo Clinic regimen; n=604). Capecitabine demonstrated a statistically significant superior response rate compared with 5-FU/LV (26 vs 17%; P<0.0002). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that capecitabine consistently resulted in superior response rates (P<0.05), even in patient subgroups with poor prognostic indicators. The median time to response and duration of response were similar and time to progression (TTP) was equivalent in the two arms (hazard ratio (HR) 0.997, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.885-1.123, P=0.95; median 4.6 vs 4.7 months with capecitabine and 5-FU/LV, respectively). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified younger age, liver metastases, multiple metastases and poor Karnofsky Performance Status as independent prognostic indicators for poor TTP. Overall survival was equivalent in the two arms (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84-1.06, P=0.48; median 12.9 vs 12.8 months, respectively). Capecitabine results in superior response rate, equivalent TTP and overall survival, an improved safety profile and improved convenience compared with i.v. 5-FU/LV as first-line treatment for MCRC. For patients in whom fluoropyrimidine monotherapy is indicated, capecitabine should be strongly considered. Following encouraging results from phase I and II trials, randomised trials are evaluating capecitabine in combination with irinotecan, oxaliplatin and radiotherapy. Capecitabine is a suitable replacement for i.v. 5-FU as the backbone of colorectal cancer therapy.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Comparison of oral capecitabine versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment in 605 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase III study.

PURPOSE: To compare the response rate, efficacy parameters, and toxicity profile of oral capecitabine with bolus intravenous (IV) fluorouracil plus leucovorin (5-FU/LV) as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively randomized 605 patients to treatment with oral capecitabine for 14 days every 3 weeks or 5-FU/LV by rapid IV injection daily for 5 days in 4-week cycles. RESULTS: The overall objective tumor response rate among all randomized patients was significantly higher in the capecitabine group (24.8%) than in the 5-FU/LV group (15.5%; P =.005). In the capecitabine and 5-FU/LV groups, median times to disease progression were 4.3 and 4.7 months (log-rank P =.72), median times to treatment failure were 4.1 and 3.1 months (P =.19), and median overall survival times were 12.5 and 13.3 months (P =.974), respectively. Capecitabine, compared with bolus 5-FU/LV treatment, produced a significantly lower incidence (P <.0002) of diarrhea, stomatitis, nausea, and alopecia. Patients treated with capecitabine also displayed lower incidences of grade 3/4 stomatitis and grade 3/4 neutropenia (P <.0001) leading to significantly less neutropenic fever/sepsis. Grade 3 hand-foot syndrome (P <.00001) and grade 3/4 hyperbilirubinemia were the only toxicities more frequently associated with capecitabine than with 5-FU/LV treatment. CONCLUSION: Oral capecitabine was more active than 5-FU/LV in the induction of objective tumor responses. Time to disease progression and survival were at least equivalent for capecitabine compared with the 5-FU/LV arm. Capecitabine also demonstrated clinically meaningful benefits over bolus 5-FU/LV in terms of tolerability.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of exatecan mesylate (DX-8951f): a novel camptothecin analog.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, and recommended phase II dose of Exatecan mesylate (DX-8951f) when administered as a 24-hour continuous infusion every 3 weeks to patients with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients with advanced solid tumors, all previously treated, and with performance status < or = 2, were entered. The starting dose of DX-8951f was 0.15 mg/m(2); the dose was escalated according to the modified continual reassessment method. The drug was administered until disease progression or until unacceptable toxic effects occurred. RESULTS: Seven dose escalations were completed, and a total of 53 courses were delivered (median, two courses; range, one to eight courses) during the study. At doses 1.2 mg/m(2) and lower, toxicities were mostly grade 1, primarily hematologic. In the initial cohort of three patients treated at 2.4 mg/m(2), grade 2 hematologic toxicity was observed. Of the six additional patients entered at 2.4 mg/m(2), three had grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia. At doses higher than 2.4 mg/m(2), DLT granulocytopenia was observed. Nonhematologic toxicities, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fatigue, and alopecia, were mild to moderate. Neither complete nor partial responses were observed, but four patients had stable disease. The PK profile of DX-8951f seemed linear at the doses administered. The plasma clearance, total volume of distribution, and terminal elimination half-life were approximately 3 L/h, 40 L, and 14 hours, respectively. CONCLUSION: The DLT of this DX-8951f schedule was granulocytopenia for minimally pretreated patients, and both granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia for heavily pretreated patients. The MTD for both minimally and heavily pretreated patients was 2.4 mg/m(2). DX-8951f seems to have a linear PK profile on the basis of single-dose administration. The recommended phase II dose with this schedule is 2.4 mg/m(2) for minimally pretreated patients. A lower dose should be used for heavily pretreated patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Phase I bioequivalency study of MitoExtra and mitomycin C in patients with solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: This study compares serum pharmacokinetics, urinary excretion patterns, and relative bioequivalencies of single doses of MitoExtra (ME; SuperGen, San Ramon, CA) and mitomycin C (MMC). METHODS: Thirty-five patients were entered into this open-label, single-institution, crossover study with 2 treatment arms. Each patient received alternating courses of ME and MMC as 15 mg/m(2) single intravenous doses via a short intravenous infusion. Patients were sequentially assigned to receive either ME or MMC as their first treatment course. The courses were given in 6-week intervals and could be repeated up to 4 times in patients with responding disease. Pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed during the first two courses of therapy. RESULTS: The noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis conducted on serum and urine data obtained from patients who received both ME and MMC indicates that the kinetic disposition of these two formulations is similar. This is evident when the mean (+/- standard deviation) values of the various pharmacokinetic parameters are compared. There were no significant differences in any of the kinetic parameters obtained between treatments in all patients examined. The statistical evaluation conducted on the 25 patients that completed both arms of the 2-way pharmacokinetic crossover demonstrates that ME is bioequivalent to MMC. Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were similar between the two treatments. There were three clinically significant infusion-related complications associated with MMC administration and none associated with ME. CONCLUSIONS: The similar pharmacokinetics of MMC and ME suggest complete release of MMC from the hydroxypropyl-Beta-cyclodextrin carrier contained in the ME formulation. Further studies are needed to define the pharmacodynamics, toxicity, and efficacy of this drug-carrier complex.

2-Hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin↗
PubMed2001

Case report: hand-foot syndrome induced by the oral fluoropyrimidine S-1.

Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a relatively common side effect of fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy that has also been associated with the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine. Interestingly, HFS is virtually unknown to result from treatment with UFT, a combination of tegafur and uracil. Tegafur is a prodrug of 5-FU and is a component of S-1, another oral fluoropyrimidine active in a variety of solid tumors. We know of only one previously described case of S-1-induced HFS and the case reported here is the first to provide full documentation of this occurrence. The pathophysiology of chemotherapy-induced HFS remains unknown and very little pathological information is available. Treatment consists of topical emollient therapy, although pyridoxine has occasionally been beneficial. The study of HFS may provide an important insight into the pharmacology of fluoropyrimidines and allow for effective preventive strategies for this side effect of chemotherapy.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2001

Improved overall survival among responders to preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer.

The aim of this study was to determine if the response to preoperative radiation and chemotherapy with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was predictive for survival among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Preoperative chemoradiation (CTX/XRT) that delivered 45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks with continuous infusion 5-FU (300 mg/m2/day) was given to 117 patients. The pretreatment stage distribution, as determined by endorectal ultrasound (u), included uT2N0 in 2%, uT3N0 in 47%, uT3N1 in 49%, and uT4N0 in 2% of cases; endorectal ultrasound was not performed in 13% of cases (15 patients). Approximately 6 weeks after completion of CTX/XRT, surgery was performed. Adjuvant chemotherapy, consisting of 400 to 425 mg/m2 of 5-FU plus 20 mg/m2 leucovorin for 5 days, was administered every 28 days for 4 to 6 cycles after surgical resection. Among the 74 patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, the preoperative stage of disease was 31 with T3N0 and 43 T3N1. Median follow-up was 46 months (range 2 to 89 months). The pathologic tumor stages were Tis-2N0 in 26%, T2N1 in 5%, T3N0 in 21%, T3N1 in 15%, T4N0 in 5%, and T4N1 in 1%; a complete response (CR) to preoperative CTX/XRT was pathologically confirmed in 32 (27%) of patients. Tumor down-staging occurred in 72 (62%) cases. A sphincter-saving procedure (SP) was possible in 59% of patients. The median DFS and overall survival rates for responders were 46 months and 47 months, respectively; for non-responders these outcome measures were 38 months and 41 months, respectively. Log-rank analysis showed that the distant metastatic-free survival rates improved with any response to CTX/XRT (p < 0.00001), CR to CTX/XRT (p < 0.009) and SP (p < 0.012). Likewise, these parameters also significantly influenced DFS rates (CTX/XRT p < 0.00001; CR p < 0.006; and SP p < 0.008). Control of pelvic disease was influenced by clinical size (p < 0.002) and SP (p < 0.016) on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis only clinical size (p < 0.002) continued to be a significant factor for local control. Factors on multivariate analysis that resulted in significant improvements in cancer-specific survival included any response to preoperative CTX/XRT (p < 0.017) and administration of adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.034). Any response to preoperative CTX/XRT improved distant metastatic-free and disease-free survival rates. Multivariate analysis confirmed that a response to preoperative CTX/XRT predicted for improvements in overall survival among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Patients who fail to respond to preoperative 5-FU based chemotherapy given concomitantly with radiation have higher rates of distant metastases with adjuvant 5-FU therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Phase I trial of i.v. administered tirapazamine plus cyclophosphamide.

Our objective was to determine the maximum tolerated doses of tirapazamine and cyclophosphamide given i.v. in combination. Eligible patients had advanced solid tumors refractory to conventional treatment. Tirapazamine (escalated from 80 to 390 mg/m(2)) was given i.v. over 2 h and followed by cyclophosphamide over 1 h. The cyclophosphamide dose was fixed at 1000 mg/m(2) until the tirapazamine dose of 390 mg/m(2) was reached. Once that dose of tirapazamine was reached, the cyclophosphamide dose was escalated to 1250 and 1500 mg/m(2). Twenty-eight patients were enrolled. The dose-limiting toxicity was granulocytopenia. One patient had transient deafness for 2 days. Four other patients had grade 1 ototoxicity. Grade 1 and 2 muscle cramps were observed at all dose levels. Other toxic effects observed included fatigue, nausea, vomiting, headache, diarrhea, drug fever, elevated transaminases and elevated creatine phosphokinase. Three patients had stable disease and the longest time to progression was 5 months. The combination of tirapazamine and cyclophosphamide is feasible, and the dose-limiting toxicity is granulocytopenia. The use of growth factors could possibly allow escalation of tirapazamine doses in future phase II trials. Without growth factor support, the recommended doses of tirapazamine and cyclophosphamide when administered in this schedule are 260 and 1000 mg/m(2), respectively.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

The evolution of fluoropyrimidine therapy: from intravenous to oral.

Chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer is based on i.v. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Numerous attempts have been made to increase the therapeutic benefit of 5-FU through schedule modification and biomodulation, but only modest improvements have been achieved. Capecitabine is an oral fluoropyrimidine that was developed in response to the clinical need for new therapeutic options offering improved efficacy, tolerability, and convenience for patients. Capecitabine was rationally designed to mimic continuous infusion 5-FU. It is rapidly and almost completely absorbed through the gastrointestinal wall and is converted to 5-FU via a three-step enzymatic cascade. 5-FU is generated preferentially in tumor by exploiting the higher activity of thymidine phosphorylase in tumor tissue compared with normal tissue. Results of a randomized, phase II trial led to the selection of a regimen of capecitabine for further clinical development (1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily for 14 days followed by a 7-day rest period). Subsequently, two large, randomized, phase III trials were conducted to compare capecitabine with i.v. bolus 5-FU/leucovorin ([LV]; Mayo Clinic regimen) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. A prospective, integrated analysis of data from the studies showed that capecitabine offers superior activity and an improved safety profile compared with 5-FU/LV. This article summarizes these developments in the treatment of colorectal cancer and assesses the feasibility of replacing i.v. 5-FU-based therapy with oral capecitabine. In addition, retrospective analyses assessing the impact of the dose modification scheme on the efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine are presented, and dose recommendations in special populations are reviewed.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Other fluorinated pyrimidines in the treatment of solid tumors.

Researchers, primarily in Japan, Europe, and the United States, have evaluated several new fluorinated pyrimidines in recent years. Most of these drugs are orally active prodrugs of fluorouracil (5-FU), and some also contain modulators of its pharmacological properties. S-1 is a rationally developed combination of tegafur, a prodrug of 5-FU; CDHP, an inhibitor of 5-FU catabolism; and potassium oxonate, an inhibitor of 5-FU-induced diarrhea. S-1 underwent phase I and II trials in Japan, where it is now approved for use in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Two phase I studies conducted recently in Europe and the United States identified diarrhea as the dose-limiting toxicity of S-1. BOF-A2, which contains a 5-FU prodrug and CNDP, an inhibitor of 5-FU catabolism, demonstrated clinical activity in preliminary studies in Japan. This article summarizes the preclinical and clinical development of S-1 and BOF-A2.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed2000

Phase I study of preoperative oral uracil and tegafur plus leucovorin and radiation therapy in rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Preoperative combined-modality therapy for rectal cancer may allow for sphincter preservation, while decreasing recurrence rates and improving the overall prognosis. Oral chemotherapy with uracil and tegafur (UFT) plus leucovorin (LV) may reduce costs and complications associated with protracted infusions of fluorouracil. Our goal was to evaluate the safety of UFT plus LV combined with preoperative radiation and determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of UFT plus LV in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with tumor-node-metastasis stage II or III rectal cancer received escalating doses of UFT (starting at 250mg/m(2)/d, with 50-mg/m(2)/d increments between consecutive cohorts) and fixed doses of LV (90 mg/d). The UFT and LV combination was given 5 days per week concurrently with a 5-week course of preoperative radiation totaling 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction). Surgery was performed 4 to 6 weeks after radiation and was followed by four 35-day cycles of fixed doses of UFT and LV (28 days of therapy each cycle). RESULTS: Fifteen patients were treated, and 13 received the full preoperative chemotherapy. All planned radiation was delivered successfully. The MTD of UFT with radiation was 350 mg/m(2)/d with 90 mg/d of LV. Diarrhea was the DLT. Sphincter-preserving surgery was performed in 12 of 14 patients. One patient had progressive disease before surgery. Pathologic evaluation of 14 resected specimens showed a complete response in three cases. CONCLUSION: Preoperative chemoradiation with oral UFT plus LV is feasible and well tolerated and should be further investigated.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

Phase I assessment of the pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and safety of emitefur in patients with refractory solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To determine the toxicities, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), maximum-tolerated dose, and pharmacokinetic profile of emitefur (BOF-A2) in patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: This was a phase I dose-escalating trial in which cohorts of patients received BOF-A2 (cohort 1, 300 mg/m(2) orally [PO] tid; cohort 2, 200 mg/m(2) PO tid; cohort 3, 200 mg/m(2) bid; and cohort 4, 250 mg/m(2) bid) for 14 consecutive days followed by 1 week of rest (cycle 1). Pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and tumor response were monitored. RESULTS: Nineteen patients received 110 cycles (three patients in cohort 1, three patients in cohort 2, 10 patients in cohort 3, and three patients in cohort 4). DLT (grade 3 stomatitis, diarrhea, leukopenia) was observed in cohorts 1, 2, and 4. Pharmacokinetics indicated that prolonged systemic expression of fluorouracil (5-FU) is maintained after administration of BOF-A2 at a dose of 200 mg bid for 14 days. The mean steady-state concentration of plasma 5-FU was > or = 24 ng/mL, which was 184-fold greater than the minimum effective cytotoxic concentration in vitro. Lack of variation of 5-FU trough levels within a day at steady-state indicates suppression of circadian variation. One patient in cohort 3 achieved a partial response and five patients maintained stable disease in excess of 6 months. CONCLUSION: BOF-A2 at a dose of 200 mg PO bid for 14 days followed by 7 days of rest is well tolerated. Prolonged exposure to 5-FU above the predicted preclinical minimum effective concentration is maintained, without evidence of circadian variation. Furthermore, evidence of antitumor activity is suggested.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Prospective trial of preoperative concomitant boost radiotherapy with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil for locally advanced rectal cancer.

RATIONALE: To evaluate the response to a concomitant boost given during standard chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Concomitant boost radiotherapy was administered preoperatively to 45 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer in a prospective trial. Treatment consisted of 45 Gy to the pelvis with 18 mV photons at 1.8 Gy/fraction using a 3-field belly board technique with continuous infusion 5FU chemotherapy (300mg/m(2)) 5 days per week. The boost was given during the last week of therapy with a 6-hour inter-fraction interval to the tumor plus a 2-3 cm margin. The boost dose equaled 7.5 Gy/5 fractions (1.5 Gy/fraction); a total dose of 52.5 Gy/5 weeks was given to the primary tumor. Pretreatment tumor stage, determined by endorectal ultrasound and CT scan, included 29 with T3N0 [64%], 11 T3N1, 1 T3Nx, 2 T4N0, 1 T4N3, and 1 with TxN1 disease. Mean distance from the anal verge was 5 cm (range 0-13 cm). Median age was 55 years (range 33-77 years). The population consisted of 34 males and 11 females. Median time of follow-up is 8 months (range 1-24 months). RESULTS: Sphincter preservation (SP) has been accomplished in 33 of 42 (79%) patients resected to date. Three patients did not undergo resection because of the development of metastatic disease in the interim between the completion of chemoradiation (CTX/XRT) and preoperative evaluation. The surgical procedures included proctectomy and coloanal anastomosis (n = 16), low anterior resection (n = 13), transanal resection (n = 4). Tumor down-staging was pathologically confirmed in 36 of the 42 (86%) resected patients, and 13 (31%) achieved a pathologic CR. Among the 28 tumors (67%) located <6 cm from the anal verge, SP was accomplished in 21 cases (75%). Although perioperative morbidity was higher, toxicity rates during CTX/XRT were comparable to that seen with conventional fractionation. Compared to our contemporary experience with conventional CTX/XRT (45Gy; 1.8 Gy per fraction), improvements were seen in SP (79% vs. 59%; p = 0.02), SP for tumors <6 cm from the anal verge (75% vs. 42%; p = 0.003), and down-staging (86% vs. 62%; p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The SP rate with concomitant boost radiation has been highly favorable with rates of response which are higher than those previously reported for chemoradiation without administration of a boost. Further evaluation of this radiotherapeutic strategy appears warranted.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Combined modality treatment of locally advanced breast carcinoma in elderly patients or patients with severe comorbid conditions using tamoxifen as the primary therapy.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the objective response rate and possibility of breast-conserving surgery using neoadjuvant tamoxifen in the multimodality treatment, including surgery and radiotherapy, of elderly or frail patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma. METHODS: Forty-seven patients age > 75 years or age < 75 years with comorbid conditions and locally advanced breast carcinoma were treated with neoadjuvant tamoxifen (20 mg/day) for 3-6 months. This was followed by surgery and radiotherapy when feasible and adjuvant tamoxifen for 5 years or until disease recurrence. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 72 years (range, 48-86 years). Approximately 22% had T3 lesions, 57% had T4 lesions, 22% were Stage II (AJCC Manual for Staging Cancer, 3rd edition), and 78% were Stage III. Eighty percent were estrogen receptor positive. After 6 months of treatment with neoadjuvant tamoxifen, a response rate of 47% was observed, including a complete response rate of 6%. Twenty-nine patients (62%) were rendered free of disease by surgery, including 5 with breast-conserving procedures. After a median follow-up of 40 months, 23 patients (49%) remained disease free. The median survival time had not been reached at the time of last follow-up. No major toxicity was observed, with the exception of one patient who developed a possible tamoxifen-related Stage I endometrial carcinoma. The estimated 2-year and 5-year progression free and overall survival rates were 50% and 41%, and 83% and 59%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study show that neoadjuvant tamoxifen was effective in the treatment of elderly or frail patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma with estrogen receptor positive tumors, and resulted in a reasonable response rate, including complete responses and good overall survival.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2000

Novel oral chemotherapy agents.

The development of anticancer drugs has conventionally focused on intravenous rather than oral regimens. Recently, interest in oral administration of chemotherapy has been stimulated by the discovery of oral fluoropyrimidines, which appear to possess at least an equivalent efficacy and the potential to reduce toxicity compared with intravenous therapies. Using rational drug design, several oral fluoropyrimidines have been developed, including capecitabine, UFT (tegafur and uracil), eniluracil plus oral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and S-1. In addition to the oral fluoropyrimidines, other novel agents available for potential oral administration include irinotecan and temozolomide.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

The tegafur-based dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitory fluoropyrimidines, UFT/leucovorin (ORZEL) and S-1: a review of their clinical development and therapeutic potential.

Protracted intravenous regimens of fluorouracil (5-FU) may be superior and better tolerated than intravenous bolus dosing. An effective oral regimen would allow a protracted course of 5-FU without the need for central venous lines and the associated increase in complications. Approximately 85% of 5-FU is degraded by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD); inhibition of this enzyme pathway can increase the amount of circulating 5-FU. Two oral fluoropyrimidines commonly referred to as DPD inhibitory fluoropyrimidines, or DIFs, UFT plus leucovorin (LV) and S-1 are reviewed herein. These agents represent an approach to more convenient, less toxic 5-FU therapy. In two multicenter, randomized, phase III trials in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, UFT/LV produced equivalent activity compared with intravenous 5-FU/LV but with significantly less major toxicity. The predominant side effect of UFT, diarrhea, is generally self-limited and easily managed. Myelosuppression and hand-foot syndrome were rarely noted in the schedules used in these trials. S-1 has demonstrated promising activity in phase II trials conducted in patients with gastric, colorectal, breast, and head and neck cancers. Ongoing trials are defining the roles of these agents in a variety of malignancies.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗