Biomedical subjects

P M Seferovic

Publications and source records attributed to P M Seferovic.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2000

Arrhythmias in acute pericarditis. An endomyocardial biopsy study.

It is still controversial whether the arrhythmias in acute pericarditis are of myocardial or pericardial origin. The aim of the present study was to investigate the occurrence of arrhythmias and conduction disorders in patients with acute pericarditis with no endomyocardial biopsy evidence of myocarditis (group 1: 40 patients, 65% males, mean age 45.6 +/- 15.7 years, mean heart rate [HR] 98.7 +/- 22.2 beats per minute) in comparison to endomyocardial biopsy proven acute myocarditis/perimyocarditis (group 2: 10 patients, 3/10 with perimyocarditis, 70% males, mean age 46.1 +/- 15.8 years, mean heart rate 76.7 +/- 33.1 beats per minute). At the initial assessment all patients underwent comprehensive clinical work-up including echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, and endomyocardial biopsy. In all patients biventricular endomyocardial biopsy was performed using standard femoral approach and Schikumed 7 F or 8 F bioptomes. Tissue samples were stained by H & E, v. Gieson and independently reviewed by two cardiac pathologists. In addition immunohistochemistry and immunocytochemistry were performed, and only patients fulfilling Dallas and World Heart Federation criteria were selected for group 2. Comparative analysis of electrocardiograms and 24-hour Holter recordings at initial presentation revealed in group 1 vs group 2 significantly less frequent paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (5% vs 40%), and ventricular fibrillation (0 vs 20%), in contrast to atrial fibrillation that occurred more often (20% vs 0) (all p < 0.05). Furthermore, in the group 2 one patient died due to VF and two patients underwent ICD implantation. Low voltage (40% vs 30%) and ST/T wave changes (47.5% vs 30%), as well as the incidence of the II degree AV block (5% vs 0) and complete AV block (2.5% vs 10%) were not significantly different between the groups. In conclusion, patients with pericarditis and no endomyocardial biopsy indications of myocarditis had significantly less often life threatening rhythm disorders in contrast to patients with endomyocardial biopsy proven acute myocarditis/perimyocarditis. On the contrary, incidence of transitory atrial fibrillation was higher in acute pericarditis, than in myocarditis.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2000

Flexible percutaneous pericardioscopy: inherent drawbacks and recent advances.

Pericardioscopy enables endoscopic inspection and aimed biopsy of the parietal and visceral pericardium. To elucidate possible technical modifications contributing to the feasibility, diagnostic value and safety of the procedure, pericardioscopy with an Olympus HYF-1T flexible endoscope was performed in 32 patients (53.1% males, mean age 46.2 +/- 13.1 years) with pericardial effusions. In all patients, the initial step of the procedure was subxiphoid fluoroscopically controlled pericardiocentesis and drainage of the pericardial effusion. An Olympus FB-41ST biopsy forceps was applied for endoscopically guided pericardial biopsies. Standard sampling was used in 22/32 patients (3 to 6 samples/patient) and extensive sampling in 10/32 patients (18 to 20 samples/patient). In additional 12 patients pericardial biopsy was performed without pericardioscopy, under fluoroscopic control. Endoscopic visualization was clearly superior when pericardial effusion was partially replaced with 100 to 300 ml of air (29/32 procedures) in comparison to 3/32 procedures in which the pericardial effusion was replaced with warm normal saline (37 degrees C). In patients with hemorrhagic effusion (12/32), we either repeatedly injected and removed 100 to 150 ml volumes of normal saline (37 degrees C), or postponed pericardioscopy for 2 to 3 days of active drainage. The specificity of endoscopic findings is low and not decisive for the diagnosis. However, pericardioscopy is significantly contributing to the diagnostic value of pericardial biopsy, especially regarding establishing the new diagnosis and etiology of the pericardial disease. Sampling efficiency was also significantly higher for procedures using aimed pericardial biopsy with standard and extensive sampling compared to procedures performed under fluoroscopy: 86.2%, 87.3%, and 43.7%, respectively. No major complications directly related to the procedure were encountered. Minor complications included: short-run ventricular tachycardia (6.3%), pain at the sheath entry site (75%) and transient fever (37.5%). In conclusion, pericardioscopy with Olympus HYF-1T, after air instillation, is a technically complex, but safe procedure that enables excellent visualization and extensive pericardial sampling with improved diagnostic value of pericardial biopsies.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

New directions in diagnosis and treatment of pericardial disease. A project of the Taskforce on Pericardial Disease of the World Heart Federation.

New directions in the diagnosis and treatment of pericardial diseases synthesize the achievements of modern imaging with molecular biology and immunology techniques. Comprehensive and systematic implementation of new techniques of pericardiocentesis, pericardial fluid analysis, pericardioscopy, epicardial and pericardial biopsy, as well the application of comprehensive molecular biology and immunology techniques for pericardial fluid and biopsy analyses have opened new windows to the pericardial diseases, permitting early specific diagnosis and creating foundations for etiologic treatment in many cases. In patients with recurrent pericarditis, resistant to conventional treatments, as well as in patients with neoplastic pericarditis an alternative intrapericardial treatment regimen was suggested by the Taskforce on Pericardial Diseases of the World Heart Federation. Intrapericardial application of medication avoids systemic side effects with increased local efficacy. The following protocols are proposed: CIRP (colchicine in recurrent pericarditis)--colchicine vs placebo in chronic/recurring pericarditis without pericardiocentesis; TRIPE (triamcinolone in pericardial effusion)--intrapericardial instillation of triamcinolone + 6 months colchicine vs pericardial puncture without instillation + 6 months colchicine; NEPIN (neoplastic effusion and pericardial instillation)--pericardiocentesis and drainage + intrapericardial instillation of cisplatin or thiotepa.

Chronic Disease↗

PubMed2000

Intrapericardial treatment of autoreactive myocarditis with triamcinolon. Successful administration in patients with minimal pericardial effusion.

A major clinical drawback in the treatment of autoreactive pericarditis is its inherent feature to relapse. Intrapericardial treatment with triamcinolone was reported to be efficient in patients with large, symptomatic autoreactive pericardial effusions, avoiding side effects of systemic treatment as well as compliance problems. Intrapericardial treatment with 300 mg/m2 triamcinolone was for the first time performed in patients with autoreactive myopericarditis and minimal pericardial effusions (75 to 110 ml). After 12 months of follow-up both patients are asymptomatic and there were no further recurrences of pericardial effusion. Pericardiocentesis in these patients was performed with the application of the PerDUCER device, guided by pericardioscopy. This device has a hemispherical cavity at the top of the instrument connected with a vacuum-producing syringe. In this cavity the pericardium is captured by vacuum and tangentially punctured by the introducer needle. Pericardium that can be captured, must be up to 2 mm thin to fit into the hemispherical cavity. Pericardioscopy performed from the anterior mediastinum significantly contributed to the success of the procedures enabling visualization of the portions of the pericardium free of adipose tissue or adhesions, suitable for puncture with the PerDUCER. In conclusion, intrapericardial treatment of symptomatic autoreactive myopericarditis with minimal pericardial effusion was safely and efficiently performed in 2 patients. Pericardiocentesis was enabled by means of the PerDUCER device, facilitated by pericardioscopy.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Initial clinical experience with PerDUCER device: promising new tool in the diagnosis and treatment of pericardial disease.

BACKGROUND: The idea to enter the normal pericardial sac safely was unrealistic until recently. The development of a novel instrument (PerDUCER pericardial access device) for percutaneous access to the pericardium could potentially have a significant impact, not only on patients with pericardial diseases but even more, or primarily, on diagnosis and treatment of myocardial and coronary disease and arrhythmias. HYPOTHESIS: The overall objective of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the percutaneous pericardial access with PerDUCER in patients with pericardial disease, and to analyze our initial experience with this new technique, with particular emphasis on sequential procedural steps. METHODS: The device was studied in five patients with pericardial disease (two men, mean age 50.4 years, range 30-68, four with normal body mass index). The procedure consists of two distinct techniques: (1) access to the mediastinal space, and (2) pericardial capture, puncture, and insertion of the guidewire. Access to the mediastinal space includes the introduction of a blunt cannula, a 0.038 guidewire, a dilator-introducer sheath set, and insertion of the PerDUCER device. Key points of the PerDUCER procedure are as follows: introduction of the blunt cannula without resistance, placement of the dilator-introducer sheath at the upper third of the heart, systolic movements of the PerDUCER device, successful vacuum and capture of pericardium, puncture and introduction of the intrapericardial guidewire. RESULTS: Access to the mediastinal space was accomplished in four of five patients, as were pericardial capture and probably puncture. However, despite numerous successful captures and probably punctures of pericardium, we were not able to confirm introduction of the intrapericardial guidewire into the pericardial cavity in any of our patients (0/5). The procedure was very well tolerated in all patients (5/5). No major complications developed during the procedure, bearing in mind that the intrapericardial placement of the guidewire was not achieved. Minor complications included pain at the dilator-introducer sheath entry site (5/5) and mild transient fever (2/5). CONCLUSIONS: According to the present experience, we believe that, with minor modifications, the PerDUCER device could be successfully implemented for pericardial entry in patients with pericardial disease. Further studies are needed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of this new instrument in patients with a normal pericardium. This could open a most exciting spectrum of possible implementations of the device in the future.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Computed tomography image analyzer: segmentation applying active contour models--"snakes".

Many diagnostic and therapeutic procedures depend on medical images. In order to overcome imperfections of obtained images which are due to acquisition process and to obtain new information from available images, many techniques have been developed. In this study relatively new method of image segmentation, active contour model--"snakes" was applied in analyzing computed tomography (CT) images in patients with acute head trauma. Using this method, lesion to brain (LBR) and ventricle to brain ratio (VBR) were obtained accurately. Quantitative variable LBR, is significantly higher in patients with other pathologic CT findings and who do not survive during hospitalization. Thus, by applying segmentation "snakes" model it is possible to extract maximum information from available CT scans. These variables could be basis for medical decision making in patients with acute head trauma.

Artifacts↗