PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Møller

Publications and source records attributed to P Møller.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Acoustic neuroma--treatment modalities. Surgery, gamma-knife or observation?

We present our results of 211 patients with acoustic neuroma over a period of 10 years, 1988-97. We operated on 100 and 111 had Gamma-knife (GK) treatment (69 were available to follow-up). The results are excellent for surgery on small and intracanalicular tumours. In tumours of the same size, surgery and GK treatment give comparable, but somewhat different, results. In the GK group of 54 primary treated patients, 3 patients had to be operated on and another 4 developed hydrocephalus. A group of 35 acoustic tumours was observed for more than 3 years. Nineteen did grow (54%). Hearing was unchanged in 23%. We performed surgery in 11 patients and gave 2 patients GK treatment because of tumour growth of > 2 mm in diameter a year. We conclude that either treatment is effective for small and medium-sized acoustic neuromas. Hearing preservation was best in the GK-treated group (80%), compared to only 12.5% in the group operated via the suboccipital route. Larger tumours and most medium-sized tumours should be operated, as should smaller tumours with persistent symptoms of vertigo and pain. Medical contraindications to surgery or reluctance to undergo surgery make GK treatment a good alternative. Treatment of residual tumours with the GK could also be a solution to a difficult problem.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Endoscopic placement of self-expanding metal stents for treatment of colorectal obstruction with long-term follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Relief of colorectal obstruction by means of self-expandable metal mesh stents (SEMS) has been suggested for palliation and acute decompression followed by optimization of the patients' general condition prior to definitive surgery. METHODOLOGY: Twelve patients with high operative risk and/or metastatic disease were selected for stenting with a dedicated colorectal partly covered SEMS (Choo Colo-Rectal Stent, Solco Intermed Co., Seoul, Korea). RESULTS: Stent deployment was successful in nine, two of whom had total obstruction. In one a guidewire perforation was treated conservatively. In two patients (one benign stricture, and one rectal cancer) the stents migrated within three weeks. One re-obstructed. In the remaining six patients colonic decompression was achieved, and the stents have been patent until death after median 116 days (33-292 days). CONCLUSION: These results are promising, but data from several centres should be compiled prospectively in a standardized fashion in order to allow for assessment of the method's safety and success rates before randomised trials can be initiated.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

The comet assay as a rapid test in biomonitoring occupational exposure to DNA-damaging agents and effect of confounding factors.

Within the last decade, the comet assay has been used with increasing popularity to investigate the level of DNA damage in terms of strand breaks and alkaline labile sites in biomonitoring studies. The assay is easily performed on WBCs and has been included in a wide range of biomonitoring studies of occupational exposures encompassing styrene, vinyl chloride, 1,3-butadiene, pesticides, hair dyes, antineoplastic agents, organic solvents, sewage and waste materials, wood dust, and ionizing radiation. Eleven of the occupational studies were positive, whereas seven were negative. Notably, the negative studies appeared to have less power than the positive studies. Also, there were poor dose-response relationships in many of the biomonitoring studies. Many factors have been reported to produce effects by the comet assay, e.g., age, air pollution exposure, diet, exercise, gender, infection, residential radon exposure, smoking, and season. Until now, the use of the comet assay has been hampered by the uncertainty of the influence of confounding factors. We argue that none of the confounding factors are unequivocally positive in the majority of the studies. We recommend that age, gender, and smoking status be used as criteria for the selection of populations and that data on exercise, diet, and recent infections be registered before blood sampling. Samples from exposed and unexposed populations should be collected at the same time to avoid seasonal variation. In general, the comet assay is considered a suitable and fast test for DNA-damaging potential in biomonitoring studies.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

[Hereditary breast cancer in Norway].

Women at risk for inherited breast cancer have been evaluated in two collaborating Norwegian cancer genetics centres and offered follow-up in the out-patient clinics of all major Norwegian hospitals for the last 11 years. The families were identified on the basis of clinical criteria. The breast cancer genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 were identified in 1994-95. Even though several hundred different mutations in these genes have been described, a significant proportion of Norwegian families with breast cancer appears to have a few frequent mutations. This most probably is a result of the changes in the population structure of Norway as the population went through a genetic bottleneck during the Black Death, which was followed by rapid population expansion. Mutation analysis has now been put in use to identify Norwegian breast cancer families. Such analysis should be offered to all Norwegian patients with breast or ovarian cancers regardless of age of onset or positive family history. For the time being, analysis should be restricted to the detection of the demonstrated frequent mutations in BRCA1.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

[Hereditary colorectal cancer].

About 13% of all colorectal cancer may be dominantly inherited. This amounts to about 300 new cases a year in Norway. Colorectal cancer can be cured by early diagnosis and treatment. Coloscopy with polypectomy may prevent infiltrating cancer. Affected families should be offered genetic evaluation, and family members subjected to regular colonoscopy. The genetic bases of five colorectal cancer syndromes, accounting for most cases of hereditary early onset colorectal cancer, have now been determined. These are familial adenomatous polyposis, colon-endometrial cancer (hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer), Cowden's syndrome, Peutz-Jegher's syndrome and juvenile polyposis. These account for at most 3% of all colorectal cancers. In this group, predictive genetic testing may be employed in families with known mutation. Demonstration of mutation carriers by predictive testing must be based on health service available to the persons at risk. With regard to prophylactic measures, experimental and epidemiological data suggest a preventive effect of aspirin and resistant starch. Empirical information on the effect of intervention is insufficient; multicentre studies are needed.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed1999

Three per cent of Norwegian ovarian cancers are caused by BRCA1 1675delA or 1135insA.

Our aim was to determine the prevalence of two Norwegian BRCA1 founder mutations in ovarian cancer patients, to identify carriers and their families for medical follow-up, and to study histopathological factors. Of a cohort of 727 ovarian cancer patients, 615 gave informed consent to testing. 2.9% (18/615) of the tested patients were found to be carriers of BRCA1 1675delA (n = 13) or 1135insA (n = 5). The total frequency of the mutations was 4.7% (8/171) in patients below 50 years of age, and zero (0/144) in patients above 70 years of age. In patients below 70 years of age, the frequency of 1675delA and 1135insA mutations was 2.8% and 1.0%, respectively. Out of 13 patients with 1675delA mutation, 4 had breast cancer. 14/16 (87.5%) families fulfilled clinical criteria for familial breast-ovarian cancer. Median age of onset of ovarian and breast cancer was 51 years and 37 years, respectively. Mutation carriers tended to have tumours with unfavourable prognostic factors. This is, to our knowledge, the highest reported frequency of founder mutations in a national ovarian cancer cohort (less than in the Ashkenazis). It seems justified to offer such testing to ovarian cancer patients below 70 years of age in Norway, identify their risk of breast cancer and offer medical follow-up to the families.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Penetrances of BRCA1 1675delA and 1135insA with respect to breast cancer and ovarian cancer.

For genetic counseling and predictive testing in families with inherited breast-ovarian cancer, penetrances and expressions of the underlying mutations should be known. We have previously reported two BRCA1 founder mutations in the Norwegian population. Index cases for the present study were found two different ways: through a series of consecutive ovarian cancers (n=16) and through our family cancer clinic (n=14). Altogether, 20 of the patients had BRCA1 1675delA, and 10 had 1135insA. Their relatives were described with respect to absence/presence of breast and/or ovarian cancer. Of 133 living female relatives, 83 (62%) were tested for the presence of a mutation. No difference, in penetrance and expression, between the two mutations were found, whereas differences according to method of ascertainment were seen. The overall findings were that disease started to occur at age 30 years and that by age 50 years 48% of the mutation-carrying women had experienced breast and/or ovarian cancer. More ovarian cancers than breast cancers were recorded. Both penetrance and expression (breast cancer vs. ovarian cancer) were different from those in reports of the Ashkenazi founder mutations. Whether the reported differences reflect true differences and/or methodological problems is discussed. An observed excess of mutation carriers could not be accounted for by methodological problems; possible explanations were a "true" low penetrance or preferential segregation.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Risk estimation as a decision-making tool for genetic analysis of the breast cancer susceptibility genes. EC Demonstration Project on Familial Breast Cancer.

For genetic counselling of a woman on familial breast cancer, an accurate evaluation of the probability that she carries a germ-line mutation is needed to assist in making decisions about genetic-testing. We used data from eight collaborating centres comprising 618 families (346 breast cancer only, 239 breast or ovarian cancer) recruited as research families or counselled for familial breast cancer, representing a broad range of family structures. Screening was performed in affected women from 618 families for germ-line mutations in BRCA1 and in 176 families for BRCA2 mutations, using different methods including SSCP, CSGE, DGGE, FAMA and PTT analysis followed by direct sequencing. Germ-line BRCA1 mutations were detected in 132 families and BRCA2 mutations in 16 families. The probability of being a carrier of a dominant breast cancer gene was calculated for the screened individual under the established genetic model for breast cancer susceptibility, first, with parameters for age-specific penetrances for breast cancer only [7] and, second, with age-specific penetrances for ovarian cancer in addition [20]. Our results indicate that the estimated probability of carrying a dominant breast cancer gene gives a direct measure of the likelihood of detecting mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. For breast/ovarian cancer families, the genetic model according to Narod et al. [20] is preferable for calculating the proband's genetic risk, and gives detection rates that indicate a 50% sensitivity of the gene test. Due to the incomplete BRCA2 screening of the families, we cannot yet draw any conclusions with respect to the breast cancer only families.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

BRCA1 1675delA and 1135insA account for one third of Norwegian familial breast-ovarian cancer and are associated with later disease onset than less frequent mutations.

A total of 845 women from breast-ovarian cancer kindreds were enrolled in a clinical follow-up program for early disease diagnosis; 35 women were prospectively identified with cancer. In order to estimate the role of genetic factors for cancer predisposition in this well-defined set of patients, considered as representative for familial breast-ovarian cancer in the Norwegian population, the BRCA1 gene was investigated for germline mutations. The entire coding region of BRCA1 was analysed using a protein truncation test, direct sequencing and a screen for known large genomic deletions and insertions. Twenty one (60%) of the 35 patients were identified as carriers of 11 distinct BRCA1 mutations. Two previously described founder mutations, 1675delA and 1135insA, were found to account for more than half (11/21) of all BRCA1 cases and for almost one third (11/35) of all breast and ovarian cancers. Supported by a previous population-based analysis of these founder mutations in ovarian cancer, our findings suggest that a significant proportion of women at risk for developing inherited breast and ovarian cancer can be identified. This is particularly obvious in certain geographic regions where these founder mutations are prevalent. Women carrying the two founder mutations had a significantly older age of disease onset as compared to women with other BRCA1 mutations. This observation indicates that BRCA mutation penetrance estimates from populations with strong founder effects may be biased. One reason why some deleterious mutations are allowed to prevail in a population may be coupled to penetrance and the fact that they seldom induce disease in women in child-bearing ages. Eleven out of 12 (92%) breast cancers in BRCA1 mutation carriers were estrogen receptor negative, versus 4 out of 9 (44%) in mutation negative patients (p = 0.03). Histopathological characteristics of the prospectively detected cancers indicated an unfavourable prognosis in mutation carriers.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Ethical, social and economic issues in familial breast cancer: a compilation of views from the E.C. Biomed II Demonstration Project.

Demand for clinical services for familial breast cancer is continuing to rise across Europe. Service provision is far from uniform and, in most centres, its evolution has been determined by local conditions, specifically by local research interests, rather than by central planning. However, in a number of countries there is evidence of progress towards co-ordinated development and audit of clinics providing risk assessment, counselling, screening and, in some cases, prophylactic intervention. Much important information should emerge from continued observation and comparative assessment of these developments. In most countries for which relevant data are available, there is a distinct bias towards higher social class among those who avail themselves of clinic facilities (in line with findings from many other health-promotion initiatives). This should be addressed when considering future organisation of clinical services. Molecular genetic studies designed to identify the underlying mutations responsible for familial breast cancer are not generally regarded as part of the clinical service and are funded through research grants (if at all). Economic considerations suggest that there is a case for keeping this policy under review. Familial cancers throw into sharp relief certain ethical and legal issues that have received much recent attention from government advisory bodies, patients' representatives, professional commentators and the popular media. Two are of particular importance; first, the right to gain access to medical records of relatives, in order to provide accurate risk assessment for a given family member, versus the right to privacy in respect of personal medical information and, second, the obligation (or otherwise) to inform family members of their risk status if they have not actively sought that knowledge. The legal position seems to vary from country to country and, in many cases, is unclear. In view of pressures to establish uniform approaches to medical confidentiality across the EC, it is important to evaluate the experience of participants in this Demonstration Programme and to apply the principle of "non-malfeasance" in formulating regulations that should govern future practice in this field. Data on economic aspects of familial breast cancer are remarkably sparse and outdated. As evidence accrues on the influence of screening and intervention programmes on morbidity and mortality, there is a strong case for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of different models of service provision.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1999

Uptake of genetic testing and pre-test levels of mental distress in Norwegian families with known BRCA1 mutations.

232 family members from 27 Norwegian families with BRCA1 mutations were offered genetic testing. 180/232 (78%) chose to be tested, 14/232 (6%) have not yet decided and 38/232 (16%) declined. All 232 persons were invited to fill in the following questionnaires when offered testing: Impact of Event Scale (IES), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) and Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS). 207/232 (89%) responded to the questionnaires. Of those declining to be tested 23/38 (61%) answered the questionnaires compared to 170/180 (94%) of those wanting the test (p < 0.0001). A higher proportion of females with a history of cancer than females without such a history had abnormal scores on the IES-intrusion and GHQ questionnaires (p < 0.001). Healthy females who were deciding on predictive testing had the same or lower prevalence of mental distress compared to the general population, between 4.3% and 18.0% as measured by the different questionnaires. Males did not differ from healthy females on any of the measures. According to their HADS scores, women without a history of cancer deciding on predictive testing for breast-ovarian cancer had lower or equal levels of mental distress compared to the general population. The high uptake of genetic testing combined with the lower than normal prevalence of mental distress indicates that the activity may continue as practised, awaiting longitudinal data concerning the levels of mental distress after genetic testing.

Anxiety↗
PubMed1999

Utilisation of prophylactic mastectomy in 10 European centres.

Increasingly women at high risk of breast cancer are opting for prophylactic surgery to reduce their risks. Data from 10 European centres that offer a risk counselling and screening service to women at risk show different approaches to the option of preventive surgery, although most centres adhere to a protocol including at least two risk counselling sessions and a psychological assessment. Thus far the combined centres have data on 174 women who have undergone prophylactic mastectomy with in excess of 400 women years of follow up. Operations were carried out on women with lifetime risks of 25-80%, with an average annual expected incidence rate of 1% per women. No breast cancers have occurred in this cohort. Long term follow up on an extended group of women will be necessary to truly address the risk of subsequent breast cancer and the psychological sequelae.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Costs and benefits of diagnosing familial breast cancer.

Based on results from our surveillance program for women at risk for inherited breast cancer, we have calculated cost per year earned. Norwegian National Insurance Service reimbursement fees were used in the calculations. The calculated costs are based on empirical figures for expanding already established medical genetic departments and diagnostic outpatient clinics to undertake the work described. Cost per year earned was estimated at Euro 753 using our current practice of identifying the high-risk women through a traditional cancer family clinic. A strategy of identifying the high-risk families through genetic testing of all incident breast and ovarian cancers for founder mutations in BRCA1, will increase the cost to Euro 832. Costs related more to genetic counseling and clinical follow-up than to laboratory procedures. This potential economic limiting factor coincides with a shortage of personnel trained in genetic counseling. The number of relatives counseled to identify one healthy female mutation carrier (i.e. the uptake of genetic testing) is more important to cost-effectiveness than family size. Costs will vary depending upon the penetrance of the mutations detected and the prevalence of founder mutations in the population examined. Prevalences of BRCA1 founder mutations in some high incidence areas of Norway may be sufficiently high to consider population screening. Unlike mutation screening of cancer genes, founder mutation analysis will not identify DNA variants of uncertain clinical significance. Identification of high-risk families through founder mutation analysis of BRCA1 ensures that families with maximum risks are given first access to the limited resources of the high-risk clinics. This may be the greatest contribution to increased cost effectiveness of such a strategy. The assumptions underlying the calculations are discussed. The conclusion is that inherited breast cancer may be managed effectively for the cost of Euro 750-1,600 per year earned.

Biopsy↗
PubMed1999

Efficacy of early diagnosis and treatment in women with a family history of breast cancer. European Familial Breast Cancer Collaborative Group.

BACKGROUND: Surveillance programmes for women at increased genetic risk of breast cancer are being established worldwide but little is known of their efficacy in early detection of cancers and hence reduction in mortality. METHODS: Data were contributed from seven centres participating in the EU Demonstration Programme on Clinical Services for Familial Breast Cancer. All breast tumours (n = 161) detected prospectively, from the time of enrolment of women in a screening programme, were recorded. Analysis took account of age at diagnosis, whether tumours were screen-detected or not, their pathological stage and outcome by Kaplan-Meier survival plots. RESULTS: Mean age at diagnosis was 48.6 years. Overall, 75% of tumours were detected in the course of planned examinations. For women under age 50 at diagnosis, this figure was 68%. Eighteen percent were mammographically negative, (23% in patients under age 50). At first ("prevalence") round and at follow-up screening, 16% and 22% of tumours respectively were carcinoma in situ (CIS) while 27% and 22% respectively had evidence of nodal or distant spread (CaN+). Comparison of screen-detected and other tumours showed that the latter were more frequently mammogram-negative and CaN+. Overall five-year survival was 89% and five-year event-free survival 86%. Five-year event-free survival was 100% for CIS, 88% for invasive cancer without nodal or distant spread and 67% for CaN+. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of cancers arising in women at increased genetic risk of breast cancer can be detected by planned screening, even in those under age 50. Surveillance should include regular expert clinical examination and teaching of "breast awareness" as well as mammography. Attention to the logistics of screening programmes may improve still further the proportion of tumours that are screen-detected. The trend towards earlier pathological stage in tumours detected during follow-up rounds and the preliminary findings on survival analysis suggest that this approach will prove to be of long-term benefit for breast cancer families.

Adult↗