PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Marroum

Publications and source records attributed to P Marroum.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Comparison of bovine in vivo bioavailability of two sulfamethazine oral boluses exhibiting different in vitro dissolution profiles.

The bolus (or oblet) is a dosage form that can be used for the oral administration of pharmaceutical compounds to ruminating species. Unlike traditional tablets, oral boluses may contain quantities of drug on the order of grams rather than milligrams. Due to its size, it is only recently that USP-like in vitro dissolution methods have been developed for this dosage form. However, whether or not these dissolution tests can predict product in vivo performance has yet to be determined. The importance of this issue is apparent when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Veterinary Medicine is faced with the decision of whether to require additional in vivo bioequivalence study data to support the approval of changes in product chemistry or manufacturing method. The current study was undertaken to determine whether an in vivo/in vitro correlation can be established for bovine sulfamethazine oral boluses and to acquire insight into the magnitude of changes in in vitro product performance that can occur before corresponding changes are seen in in vivo blood level profiles. Based upon the results of this investigation, it is concluded that marked changes in in vitro sulfamethazine bolus performance can be tolerated before resulting in altered in vivo blood level profiles. However, the data also suggest that rumenal absorption may occur for some compounds. Therefore the degree to which variation in product in vitro dissolution profiles can be tolerated may be compound specific.

Administration, Oral↗

Evaluation of "external" predictability of an in vitro-in vivo correlation for an extended-release formulation containing metoprolol tartrate.

The purpose of this study was to examine the external predictability of an in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) for a metoprolol hydrophilic matrix extended-release formulation, with an acceptable internal predictability, in the presence of a range of formulation/manufacturing changes. In addition, this report evaluated the predictability of the IVIVC for another formulation of metoprolol tartrate differing in its release mechanism. Study 1 examined the scale up of a matrix extended-release tablet from a 3-kg small batch (I) to a 50-kg large batch (II). The second study examined the influence of scale and processing changes [3-kg small batch with fluid bed granulation and drying (III); 80-kg large batch with high shear granulation and microwave drying (IV), and a formulation with an alternate release mechanism formulated as a multiparticulate capsule (V)]. In vitro dissolution of all formulations (I-V) was conducted with a USP apparatus I at pH 6.8 and 150 rpm. Subjects received the metoprolol formulations, and serial blood samples were collected over 48 h and analyzed by a validated HPLC assay using fluorescence detection. A previously developed IVIVC was used to predict plasma profiles. Prediction errors (PE) were <10% for C(max) and area under the curve (AUC) of concentration versus time for I, II, and IV. The C(max) for III was slightly underestimated (11.7%); however, the PE of the AUC was <10%. Formulation V displayed a PE for C(max) > 20% and an AUC within 5% of observed values. The low PEs for C(max) and AUC observed for I-IV strongly suggest that the metoprolol IVIVC is externally valid, predictive of alternate processing methods (IV), scale-up (II, III), and allows the in vitro dissolution data to be used as a surrogate for validation studies. However, the lack of predictability for V supports the contention that IVIVCs are formulation specific.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

In vitro metabolic interaction studies: experience of the Food and Drug Administration.

A total of 194 new molecular entities approved by the Food and Drug Administration between 1992 and 1997 were surveyed to determine the role of in vitro metabolic interactions in the conduct of drug-drug interaction studies and to examine the methods used in these studies. Approximately 30% of the submissions were found to have in vitro metabolism-based interaction studies, most of which were inhibitory in nature. Chemical inhibition was the most commonly used approach in studying drug interactions in vitro. In this article, an attempt to assess the quality of the chemical inhibition approach was made. Four areas were found to be often overlooked: (1) incubation time and concentrations of the drug, (2) the difference between inhibition constant (k(i)) and 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values, (3) the substrate-dependent inhibition potential, and (4) the metabolic genotype or phenotype of the liver donor. We discuss the pitfalls in estimating drug interactions when these four areas are overlooked.

Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors↗

Development and internal validation of an in vitro-in vivo correlation for a hydrophilic metoprolol tartrate extended release tablet formulation.

PURPOSE: To develop and validate internally an in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) for a hydrophilic matrix extended release metoprolol tablet. METHODS: In vitro dissolution of the metoprolol tablets was examined using the following methods: Apparatus II, pH 1.2 & 6.8 at 50 rpm and Apparatus I, pH 6.8, at 100 and 150 rpm. Seven healthy subjects received three metoprolol formulations (100 mg): slow, moderate, fast releasing and an oral solution (50 mg). Serial blood samples were collected over 48 hours and analyzed by a validated HPLC assay using fluorescence detection. The f2 metric (similarity factor) was used to analyze the dissolution data. Correlation models were developed using pooled fraction dissolved (FRD) and fraction absorbed (FRA) data from various combinations of the formulations. Predicted metoprolol concentrations were obtained by convolution of the in vivo dissolution rates. Prediction errors were estimated for Cmax and AUC to determine the validity of the correlation. RESULTS: Apparatus I operated at 150 rpm, and pH of 6.8 was found to be the most discriminating dissolution method. There was a significant linear relationship between FRD and FRA when using either two or three of the formulations. An average percent prediction error for Cmax and AUC for all formulations of less than 10% was found for all IVIVC models. CONCLUSIONS: The relatively low prediction errors for Cmax and AUC observed strongly suggest that the metoprolol IVIVC models are valid. The average percent prediction error of less than 10% indicates that the correlation is predictive and allows the associated dissolution data to be used as a surrogate for bioavailability studies.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

High performance liquid chromatographic assays of the illicit designer drug "Ecstasy", a modified amphetamine, with applications to stability, partitioning and plasma protein binding.

Specific, sensitive, reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) assays of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) have been devised with analytical sensitivities as low as 2.7 ng/ml of plasma for MDMA and 1.6 ng/ml for MDA, using spectrophotometric detection at 280 nm. The assays were used to determine some properties of MDMA and MDA. Both drugs were stable in aqueous 1 M HCl, and 1 M NaOH solutions at room temperature. The half-life for MDMA was 6.6 h and for MDA was 7.1 h under the extreme conditions of 90 degrees C and 6 M HCl. MDMA and MDA were highly stable for 28 h in plasma at 25 degrees and 39 degrees C. The concentrations of the drugs were unchanged in frozen plasma after 47 days. The apparent red blood cell-plasma partition coefficient determined from assayed concentrations of the drugs in plasma and erythrocytes was 1.45 for both MDMA and MDA. An equation is presented to correct drug concentration in erythrocytes for the trapped equilibrated plasma/buffer in the packed red blood cells. The fraction of MDMA and MDA bound to dog plasma proteins was determined by several methods and it is 0.34-0.40 for both drugs. The extent of protein binding was independent of the drugs' concentration.

3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine↗