Simultaneous temporomandibular joint and mandibular reconstruction in an immunocompromised patient with rheumatoid arthritis: a case report with 7-year follow-up.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to P Mehra.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: This report evaluates treatment outcomes associated with the use of Gore-Tex (GT; W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ) vein graft tubing as a conduit for repair of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) and lingual nerve (LN) continuity defects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six patients (5 female and 1 male) with painful dysesthesia secondary to injuries of the IAN (n = 3) or LN (n = 3) underwent surgical exploration and resection of pathologic tissue. Reconstruction of the resultant continuity defects was performed using 3-mm diameter GT tubing sutured to the epineurium of the proximal and distal nerve trunks. Nerve reconstruction was performed an average of 20 months after injury (range, 4 to 48 months). Patients were tested before and after surgery with the following tests: subjective pain level using an analogue scale, sharp stimulus, touch, cold sensation, directional sense, and 2-point discrimination. RESULTS: Four patients reported no change in subjective pain level, and 2 patients had minimal decrease in pain. Two patients reported some sensation to sharp stimulus, and 1 patient was hypersensitive. Three patients responded to touch, and 3 had no response. Four patients had no response to cold sensation, and 2 had a delayed response. Only 1 patient could detect brushstroke direction. Three patients had no response to 2-point discrimination, and 3 responded at greater than 20 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Use of GT tubing in this group of patients produced poor clinical outcomes and is not recommended for nerve reconstruction of IAN and LN continuity defects.
PURPOSE: This study compared the number of unfavorable fractures after sagittal split osteotomies (SSOs) of the mandible when third molars were present or absent. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The treatment records of 262 patients (500 SSOs) were retrospectively evaluated. Group 1 consisted of 250 SSOs and concomitant removal of impacted mandibular third molars and group 2 consisted of 250 SSOs with absence of third molars. A modified SSO technique with inferior border cuts was used on all patients, and the third molars, when present, were removed after separation of the proximal and distal segments. Rigid fixation was applied using bicortical bone screws. Bone plates with monocortical screws were additionally used to secure the free bony segments of the proximal segment in cases with unfavorable fracture. RESULTS: There were 11 (2.2%) unfavorable fractures in 500 SSO procedures. The incidence of unfavorable splits was 3.2% in group 1 and 1.2 % in group 2. In group 1, all fractures occurred in teenagers, with 7 of 8 fractures extending through the extraction socket in the distal segment. Six of the 8 fractures were associated with completely impacted third molars, and 2 involved partially impacted teeth. All 3 fractures in group 2 occurred in the proximal segment. No significant difference was seen in the amount of relapse in patients with unfavorable or favorable splits. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of unfavorable splits is uncommon when using a modification of the SSO that includes an inferior border osteotomy. Although more unfavorable fractures occurred in teenage patients with third molars, this had no impact on the stability of the final result.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This study evaluated our treatment outcomes in 105 patients (188 discs) using the Mitek mini anchor for temporomandibular joint (TMJ) articular disc repositioning surgery, with 88 patients having simultaneous orthognathic surgery. Criteria for inclusion into the study were: (1) Presurgical TMJ disc displacement with salvageable disc; (2) No prior TMJ surgery; (3) TMJ disc repositioning with the Mitek mini anchor; (4) Absence of connective tissue/autoimmune disease; (5) Absence of postsurgical trauma; and (6) Minimum of 12 months postsurgery follow up. Presurgery (T1), immediately postsurgery (T2), and longest follow up (LFU) clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed. The mean age of the patients was 32.6 years (range 14-57 years), and mean follow-up time was 46.2 months (range 14-84 months). Radiographic evaluation at LFU demonstrated no significant condylar resorption or positional changes of the anchors. At LFU, there was a statistically significant reduction in: TMJ pain, facial pain, headaches, TMJ noises and disability, and improvement in jaw function and diet. Maximum incisal opening improved slightly and lateral excursive movements decreased slightly. The Mitek mini anchor provides a predictable method for stabilizing the TMJ articular disc to the condyle and a high success rate in decreasing TMJ dysfunction and pain in patients with no previous TMJ surgery.
The growing patient can present to the clinician with significant dentofacial deformities that require surgical correction. In some cases, certain functional, esthetic, and psychosocial factors may necessitate early surgical intervention. Although there is extensive literature on the effects and stability of orthognathic surgical correction of maxillary deformities in adults, the same is not true for the pediatric and adolescent growing patient. Not much is known about the predictability of orthognathic surgical procedures performed during growth or the effects such procedures have on subsequent facial growth. There is always the possibility that secondary corrective procedures may be required after the initial corrective surgery. This article presents recommendations based on available research and personal clinical experience in surgical correction of maxillary deformities in growing patients. The common maxillary dentofacial deformities, age considerations, and surgical alternatives and sequencing are presented. The treatment of mandibular deformities is addressed in Part 1 of this article.
Management of the growing patient with mandibular dentofacial deformities presents a unique and challenging problem for orthodontists and surgeons. The surgical procedures required for correction of the deformity may affect postsurgical growth and dentofacial development. Further, facial growth may continue postoperatively and negate the benefits of surgery performed, resulting in treatment outcomes that are less than ideal. From individual patient characteristics, the type of deformity, and the indications for early surgical intervention, it is possible to effectively treat many cases during growth. A thorough understanding of facial growth patterns is essential, and each case needs to be evaluated individually. Surgery is often undertaken with the expectation that additional treatment, including more surgery, may be required after the completion of growth. The material presented here is based on the available research and the senior author'ss clinical experience of more than 25 years in the correction of mandibular deformities in the growing patient. Advantages and disadvantages of specific surgical techniques for correction of common mandibular deformities and pertinent age and surgical considerations are discussed. The material should be viewed as a general outline that provides broad guidelines for management of these patients. The management of maxillary deformities will be discussed in Part 2 of this article.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of double-jaw surgery with counterclockwise rotation of the maxillomandibular complex on the pharyngeal airway space and velopharyngeal anatomy in patients with high occlusal plane facial morphology. Fifty patients (22 men, 28 women) with high occlusal plane facial morphology underwent double-jaw surgery with counterclockwise rotation of the maxillomandibular complex. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1, 30 patients (8 men, 22 women) who underwent maxillary and mandibular advancement and group 2, 20 patients (14 men, 6 women) who underwent maxillary advancement and mandibular setback. Presurgery and postsurgery lateral cephalometric radiographs were analyzed to correlate changes in pharyngeal airway space dimensions and velopharyngeal anatomy with maxillary and mandibular positional changes. The calibration showed a more than 0.94 correlation for both intra- and interoperator error. The average follow-up time was 29.6 months in group 1 and 22.2 months in group 2. Mean maxillary surgical change at point A was 4.15 mm in group 1 and 2.5 mm in group 2. Mean mandibular surgical change at the genial tubercles was 7.5 mm in group 1 and -4.95 mm in group 2. After surgery, group 1 patients had an increase in pharyngeal airway space of 47% at the soft palate and 76% at the base of the tongue relative to the amount of mandibular advancement. Group 2 patients had a decrease in pharyngeal airway space of 47% at the soft palate and 65% at the base of the tongue relative to the amount of mandibular setback. Double-jaw surgery with counterclockwise rotation of the maxillomandibular complex significantly affects the pharyngeal airway space and velopharyngeal anatomy in patients with high occlusal plane facial morphology, with both mandibular advancement and setback.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to present a new technique for limiting mandibular translation in patients with chronic mandibular dislocation. TECHNIQUE DESIGN: This relatively simple procedure uses 2 Mitek mini bone anchors with osseointegration potential. One anchor is placed in the lateral pole of the condyle, and the other is placed in the posterior root of the zygomatic arch. Heavy suture material is threaded through the eyelet of each anchor and tightened to function as a restraining ligament. RESULTS: This technique has been used on 5 patients with a follow-up of 2 to 4 years, with no failures. CONCLUSIONS: This technique provides an effective method for the prevention of condylar dislocation while permitting some controlled translation.
This study was undertaken to evaluate the stability of maxillary advancement using bone plates for skeletal stabilization and porous block hydroxyapatite (PBHA) as a bone graft substitute for interpositional grafting in cleft and non-cleft patients. The records of 74 patients (41 females, 33 males) who underwent Le Fort I maxillary advancement using rigid fixation and PBHA interpositional grafting were evaluated retrospectively. All patients also underwent simultaneous sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomies. Patients were divided into 2 groups for study purposes: group 1 consisted of 17 cleft palate patients and group 2 consisted of 57 non-cleft patients. Each group was further subdivided into 2 subgroups based on the concurrent vertical positioning of the maxillary incisors: groups 1a and 2a, where the maxilla underwent 3 mm or more of inferior repositioning, and groups 1b and 2b, where the maxilla underwent minimal vertical change (< or = 1 mm). Presurgery, immediate postsurgery, and longest follow-up lateral cephalometric tracings were superimposed and analyzed to calculate surgical change and long-term stability of results by assessing horizontal and vertical changes at point A, incisor superius, and the mesial cusp tip of maxillary first molar. The average follow-up time in group 1 was 37.9 months (range 12 to 136) and in group 2 was 28.77 months (range 17 to 88). Average maxillary advancement at point A was: group 1a, 5.4 mm; group 1b, 5.25 mm; group 2a, 5.48 mm; group 2b, 5.46 mm. Average relapse at point A was: group 1a, -0.75 mm; group 1b, -1 mm; group 2a, -0.47 mm; group 2b, -0.48 mm. Average horizontal and/or vertical relapse at the central incisors and first molars was 1 mm or less in group 1 and less than 0.5 mm in group 2. Although there was a slightly greater relapse in group 1, no statistically significant difference was observed between the groups. Maxillary advancement with Le Fort 1 osteotomies using rigid fixation and interpositional PBHA grafting during bimaxillary surgery is a stable procedure with good predictability in cleft and non-cleft patients, regardless of the direction of vertical maxillary movement.
PURPOSE: This study analyzes the use of a standard nomogram that can help reduce the level of anticoagulation preoperatively to effectively manage perioperative heparin therapy in chronically anticoagulated oral surgery patients who are at high risk for thromboembolism. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with significant cardiovascular disease, ranging in age from 56 to 79 years and requiring oral surgery, were randomly divided into 2 groups. All patients were on chronic warfarin therapy, and perioperative heparinization was recommended by their cardiologist. Group A (n = 10) had their anticoagulation therapy managed with the use of a standard nomogram. The heparin therapy for group B (n = 10) was managed without the use of the nomogram. The records of all patients were analyzed for therapeutic efficacy of heparinization, number of laboratory tests required, duration of hospitalization, and complications related to heparinization. RESULTS: Patients in group A did significantly better in all parameters when compared with group B patients. There were no complications in group A, whereas there was a 20% incidence of complications related to anticoagulation therapy in group B. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a standard nomogram to manage anticoagulation therapy in the oral surgery patient requiring heparinization is strongly recommended. This provides optimal therapeutic benefit, decreases the incidence of complications, and makes the hospitalization less costly and more comfortable for the patient.
BACKGROUND: Sodium hypochlorite, or NaOCl, is one of the most commonly used irrigating solutions in endodontic practice. Its clinically proven antibacterial, solvent and lubricating properties make it a very appealing choice as an intracanal medicament. CASE DESCRIPTION: The authors present a case of facial hematoma formation after an inadvertent injection of NaOCl into the periapical tissues. The NaOCl solution caused extensive tissue destruction. Management of the condition required the hospitalization, intravenous antibiotic therapy and multiple intraoral surgical incisions to facilitate drainage. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Use of NaOCl must be confined to the root canal system. This report reviews this intracanal medicament's potential toxicity and emphasizes the need for clinicians to remain cognizant of possible problems while using the solution.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Odontogenic sinusitis is a well-recognized condition that usually is responsive to standard medical and surgical treatment. Current antibiotic therapy recommendations are directed against the usual odontogenic and sinus flora. CASE DESCRIPTION: The authors present a case of a patient with acute sinusitis initiated by a complicated tooth extraction that did not yield readily to standard treatment. The case was complicated by orbital extension of the sinusitis. The authors isolated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, or MRSA, species from the affected sinus that usually is not encountered in uncomplicated acute nonnosocomial or odontogenic sinusitis. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Though such forms of resistant microbial flora as MRSA are rare, they may be seen in patients who have a history of intravenous, or i.v., drug use and in immunocompromised patients. Management of patients with orbital extension of sinusitis requires hospitalization and i.v. antibiotic treatment.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.