P Messina — Page 4 | PubMed Health

It is a matter of discussion if bladder augmentation should or should not utilize in the treatment of exstrophy-epispadias complex. When staged functional bladder reconstruction is adopted in the most difficult cases, or when one desires to avoid early and/or subsequent urinary diversions, sometimes a bladder enhancement could be necessary. The indications should be: a progressive damage to the upper urinary tract, after bladder closure at birth, due to a very small, no compliant detrusor plate (this is a rare condition: only one case in our series); a bladder capacity < or = 80 mls at the time of bladder neck reconstruction (this is a frequent but questionable condition: three cases in our series); a progressive damage of the upper urinary tract after bladder neck reconstruction (this is an unexpected, but not rare condition: 3 cases in our series); during every undiversion procedure (bladder augmentation is nearly mandatory during undiversion in cloacal or bladder exstrophies previously diverted: 4 cases in our series). In our experience, 12 bladder augmentations (in 11 patients, over 85 cases we observed) were done at median age of 8 years and 5 months. Different intestinal segments have been used: the sigmoid colon, the ileo-cecal portion, an ileal tract and the stomach. Follow-up ranges from 11 years to 12 months; until now, we observed few surgical complications: a bowel obstruction in one patient, a left ureteral partial stenosis at level of the anastomosis with the gastric patch wall in another patient and bladder lithiasis in 5 patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗