Biomedical subjects

P Monsivais

Publications and source records attributed to P Monsivais.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

Accommodation enhances depolarizing inhibition in central neurons.

Neurons in the avian cochlear nucleus are depolarized by GABAergic synaptic input. We recorded GABAergic synaptic currents using the gramicidin-perforated-patch method and found their reversal potential (V(rev)) to be depolarized relative to spike threshold, which is surprising given that these inputs are inhibitory. Depolarizing IPSPs (dIPSPs) are kept below spike generation threshold by the activation of a dendrotoxin-I-sensitive, voltage-gated K(+) conductance. We show experimentally that the polarity of IPSPs contributes to their efficacy; dIPSPs induce accommodation, the positive shift in spike threshold, and are therefore more strongly inhibitory than conventional, hyperpolarizing IPSPs in the same neurons. A similar inhibitory mechanism has been described in invertebrate sensory fibers and axons of dorsal root ganglion cells and may be a general means of amplifying the strength of inhibition in cases where the size of excitatory conductances greatly exceeds that of inhibitory conductances.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed2001

Tonotopic map of potassium currents in chick auditory hair cells using an intact basilar papilla.

The avian basilar papilla is tonotopically organized such that hair cells along the sensory epithelium respond best to acoustic stimulation at differing frequencies. This specificity arises due to the mechanics of the cochlea itself and intrinsic electrical properties of the hair cells. Tall hair cells show membrane voltage oscillations in response to step current injection that may allow cells to act as electrical resonators, boosting the response at the resonant frequency. These oscillations and the underlying currents have been studied in enzymatically isolated cells. This study uses a whole chick (Gallus domesticus) basilar papilla preparation where the entire epithelium and its afferent connections are intact. With this preparation, a map of changes in potassium currents of tall hair cells was produced. All cells recorded from expressed two K+ currents, a calcium-activated K+ current, I(K(Ca)), and a voltage-activated K+ current, I(K). Also, apical cells expressed an inward rectifier K+ current, I(IR). The amplitude of total outward current increases in a gradient along the tonotopic axis. Pharmacological blockers were used to separate the outward K+ currents. These experiments showed that both currents individually increase in magnitude along a gradient from apex to base. Finally, measurements of oscillation frequency in response to current steps suggest a discontinuous change in the electrical resonances at about 33% from the apex. This study demonstrates a new preparation to study the electrical properties of hair cells in more detail along the tonotopic axis of the chick basilar papilla.

4-Aminopyridine↗

PubMed2000

GABAergic inhibition in nucleus magnocellularis: implications for phase locking in the avian auditory brainstem.

In the avian auditory brainstem, nucleus magnocellularis (NM) functions to relay phase-locked signals to nucleus laminaris for binaural coincidence detection. Although many studies have revealed that NM neurons exhibit intrinsic physiological and anatomical specializations for this purpose, the role of inhibition has not been fully explored. The present study characterizes the organization of GABAergic feedback to NM. Anterograde and retrograde labeling methods showed that NM receives a prominent projection from the ipsilateral superior olivary nucleus (SON). The functional features of this projection were explored in a brain slice preparation. Stimulating fibers from the SON evoked long-lasting, depolarizing responses in NM neurons that were blockable by bicuculline, a GABA(A) receptor antagonist. The slow time course of these responses allowed them to undergo temporal summation during repetitive stimulation. The summed GABAergic response was capable of blocking spikes generated in NM neurons by suprathreshold current injection. This inhibitory effect was attributable to a large reduction in input resistance caused by a combination of the opening of a GABAergic Cl(-) conductance and the recruitment of a low-voltage activated K(+) conductance. This large reduction of input resistance increased the amount of current necessary to drive NM neurons to threshold. The results lead us to propose that GABAergic inhibition enhances phase-locking fidelity of NM neurons, which is essential to binaural coincidence detection in nucleus laminaris.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed1999

The superior olivary nucleus and its influence on nucleus laminaris: a source of inhibitory feedback for coincidence detection in the avian auditory brainstem.

Located in the ventrolateral region of the avian brainstem, the superior olivary nucleus (SON) receives inputs from nucleus angularis (NA) and nucleus laminaris (NL) and projects back to NA, NL, and nucleus magnocellularis (NM). The reciprocal connections between the SON and NL are of particular interest because they constitute a feedback circuit for coincidence detection. In the present study, the chick SON was investigated. In vivo tracing studies show that the SON projects predominantly to the ipsilateral NM, NL, and NA. In vitro whole-cell recording reveals single-cell morphology, firing properties, and postsynaptic responses. SON neurons are morphologically and physiologically suited for temporal integration; their firing patterns do not reflect the temporal structure of their excitatory inputs. Of most interest, direct stimulation of the SON evokes long-lasting inhibition in NL neurons. The inhibition blocks both intrinsic spike generation and orthodromically evoked activity in NL neurons and can be eliminated by bicuculline methiodide, a potent antagonist for GABAA receptor-mediated neurotransmission. These results strongly suggest that the SON provides GABAergic inhibitory feedback to laminaris neurons. We discuss a mechanism whereby SON-evoked GABAergic inhibition can influence the coding of interaural time differences for sound localization in the avian auditory brainstem.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

Processing of interaural intensity differences in the LSO: role of interaural threshold differences.

Cells in the lateral superior olive (LSO) are known to be sensitive to interaural intensity differences (IIDs) in that they are excited by IIDs that favor the ipsilateral ear and inhibited by IIDs that favor the contralateral ear. For each LSO neuron there is a particular IID that causes a complete inhibition of discharges, and the IID of complete inhibition varies from neuron to neuron. This variability in IID sensitivity among LSO neurons is a key factor that allows for the coding of a variety of IIDs among the population of cells. A fundamental question concerning the coding of IIDs is: how does each cell in the LSO derive its particular IID sensitivity? Although there have been a large number of neurophysiological studies on the LSO, this question has received little attention. Indeed, the only reports that have directly addressed this question are those of Reed and Blum, who modeled the binaural properties of LSO neurons and proposed that the IID at which discharges are completely suppressed should correspond to the difference in threshold between the excitatory, ipsilateral and inhibitory, contralateral inputs that innervate each LSO cell. The main purpose of this study was to test the threshold difference hypothesis proposed by Reed and Blum by recording responses to monaural stimulation and to IIDs from single cells in the LSO of the mustache bat. Our results show that although the IID sensitivities of some LSO cells correspond to the difference in threshold between the excitatory and inhibitory ears, in the majority of cells the difference in thresholds did not correspond to the cell's IID sensitivity. The results lead us to propose two models to account for IID sensitivities. One model is similar to that proposed by Reed and Blum and emphasizes differences in the thresholds of the excitatory and inhibitory inputs. This model accounts for the minority of cells in which the IID of complete inhibition corresponded to the difference in threshold of the inputs from the two ears. The other model, which accounts for the cells in which the IID of complete inhibition did not correspond to the difference in the thresholds of the inputs from the two ears (the majority of cells), places emphasis on differences in latencies of the excitatory and inhibitory inputs. The models incorporate features that are concordant with the known properties of the neurons that project to the LSO and together can account for the diversity of IID sensitivities among the population of LSO neurons.

Animals↗