PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P P Garg

Publications and source records attributed to P P Garg.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Reducing racial disparities in transplant activation: whom should we target?

Several studies have documented that blacks with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are less likely than whites to be placed on the waiting list for a renal transplant. We examined trends in access over time to determine whether publication of these reports resulted in a reduction in disparity and identified those blacks who were most affected to focus future interventions. Three nationally representative groups of adult patients with ESRD (first dialysis in 1986 to 1987, 1990, or 1993) were followed up longitudinally to ascertain the date of first placement on the renal transplant waiting list. Cox proportional hazards models were used to characterize the magnitude of racial disparities in access to the waiting list with adjustment for clinical and sociodemographic factors. Lower rates of placement on the waiting list for blacks than whites persisted after adjustment for differences in both sociodemographic characteristics and health status (relative hazard [RH], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.79). The gap between blacks and whites did not narrow over time (blacks versus whites: 1986 to 1987 group, RH, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.86; 1990 group, RH, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.91; 1993 group, RH, 0.57; 0.43 to 0.77) and was greatest for the youngest and healthiest black patients, who were 50% and 40% less likely to be listed than corresponding whites, respectively. Interventions targeted toward young and healthy blacks, who are most likely to benefit from transplantation, are urgently needed to narrow black-white differences in transplant activation.

Black or African American↗

Income-based disparities in outcomes for patients with chronic kidney disease.

The impact of income on outcomes for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), who are largely relieved of structural and financial barriers to care, is poorly understood. We conducted a prospective cohort study of 3,165 patients who developed ESRD in the early 1990s to examine whether low-income patients with ESRD have poorer health outcomes than their socioeconomically advantaged counterparts, and, if so, to determine whether greater health insurance can reduce this disparity. We found that increasing neighborhood income was associated with decreased mortality and an increased likelihood of placement on the renal transplant waiting list. The presence of private insurance coverage in addition to Medicare improved rates of listing for transplantation in a graded manner, with the greatest effect among those living in neighborhoods below the 10th percentile of income, but had no effect on socioeconomic disparities in mortality. Our results suggest that low-income patients with ESRD experience persistent financial barriers to transplantation that can be addressed with greater health benefits. However, they also experience higher mortality that is caused by personal and/or environmental factors that differ by social class. Clinicians, researchers, and policymakers must address these social, cultural, psychologic, and environmental determinants of health to improve the survival of patients with ESRD.

Adult↗

Racial differences in access to the kidney transplant waiting list for children and adolescents with end-stage renal disease.

CONTEXT: Renal transplantation is the treatment of choice for pediatric patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Black patients wait longer for kidney transplants than do white patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the increased time to transplantation for black pediatric patients is attributable not only to a shortage of suitable donor organs, but also to racial differences in the time from a child's first treatment for ESRD until activation on the cadaveric kidney transplant waitlist. DESIGN: National longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: US Medicare-eligible, pediatric ESRD population. PATIENTS: Children and adolescents </=19 years old at the time of their first dialysis for ESRD between 1988 and 1993, followed through 1996. Patients who received living donor renal transplants were excluded from study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time from first dialysis for ESRD until activation on the kidney transplant waiting list, relative hazard of activation on the waiting list for black compared with white pediatric patients. RESULTS: Comparisons of the time from first dialysis for ESRD to waitlisting among the 2162 white (60.7%) and 1122 black (31.5%) patients studied using survival analysis revealed that blacks were less likely to be waitlisted at any given time in follow-up. In multivariate analysis, even after controlling for patient age, gender, socioeconomic status, geographic region, incident year of renal failure, and cause of ESRD, blacks were 12% less likely to be waitlisted than were whites at any point in time (relative hazard:. 88: 95% confidence interval:.79-.97). CONCLUSIONS: Racial disparities in access to the renal transplant waiting list exist in pediatrics. Whether these disparities are attributable to differences in time of presentation to a nephrologist, physician bias in identification of transplant candidates, or patient preferences warrants further study.

Adolescent↗

Effect of the ownership of dialysis facilities on patients' survival and referral for transplantation.

BACKGROUND: More than 200,000 patients with end-stage renal disease undergo dialysis in the United States each year, about two thirds in for-profit centers. Economic pressures, such as the decline in inflation-adjusted Medicare payments for dialysis, may compromise the quality of care. Facilities may also be reluctant to refer patients to be evaluated for transplantation because of the loss of revenues from dialysis after patients receive transplants. It is unknown whether for-profit facilities respond more aggressively than not-for-profit facilities to these financial pressures. Therefore, we examined the effect of for-profit ownership of dialysis facilities on patients' survival and referral for possible transplantation. METHODS: We used data from the U.S. Renal Data System to assemble a nationally representative cohort of patients with end-stage renal disease of recent onset. We followed patients for a minimum of three years and a maximum of six years, until death, placement on the waiting list for a renal transplant, or loss to follow-up, or until May 31, 1996. We used proportional-hazards models to assess the effect of the profit status of the dialysis facility on patients' outcomes and adjusted for differences in sociodemographic, clinical, and facility-level characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 3681 patients who were eligible for inclusion, we included 3569 in the analysis of mortality and 3441 in the analysis of the waiting list. The crude mortality rate per 100 person-years of end-stage renal disease was 21.2 for patients treated in for-profit facilities and 17.1 for patients treated in not-for-profit centers (adjusted relative hazard, 1.20; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.02 to 1.42). The likelihood of being placed on the waiting list for a renal transplant was lower for patients treated at for-profit centers (adjusted relative hazard, 0.74; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.56 to 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: In the United States, for-profit ownership of dialysis facilities, as compared with not-for-profit ownership, is associated with increased mortality and decreased rates of placement on the waiting list for a renal transplant.

Adult↗

Hormone replacement therapy and the risk of epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if use of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) increases the risk of invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma. DATA SOURCES: English-language articles published from January 1966 to June 1997 examining HRT and ovarian cancer were found by using MEDLINE, searching the bibliographies of relevant articles and by consulting experts. STUDY SELECTION: Of 327 articles identified, nine provided data on the risk of invasive cancer among ever-users of HRT and were selected for inclusion by consensus of two independent reviewers. Studies were included if cases were age-matched to controls or results were age-adjusted and if women with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were excluded. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Two independent unblinded reviewers abstracted data regarding risk of developing epithelial ovarian carcinoma and use of HRT. A general variance-based, fixed-effects model was used to calculate summary relative risks. Ever-use of HRT was associated with an increased risk of developing invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma (odds ratio [OR] 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05, 1.27). Use of HRT for more than 10 years was associated with the greatest risk of ovarian cancer (OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.00, 1.61). CONCLUSION: Prolonged use of hormone therapy by postmenopausal women may be associated with an increased risk of developing epithelial carcinoma of the ovary.

Carcinoma↗

Profit-making in the treatment of chronic kidney disease: truth and consequences.

Many have speculated that the quality of dialysis care differs for patients treated in for-profit and not-for-profit facilities. In 1999 we published a study that demonstrated poorer survival and lower rates of listing for renal transplant for patients in for-profit rather than not-for-profit, freestanding centers. While these findings generated substantial discussion, few have commented on their implications. In this article we first discuss potential sources of bias that could impact on the study's results and place the findings in context. We conclude that these disparities are likely to be real, as they are consistent with theorized differences between for-profit and not-for-profit health care organizations and with other evaluations of dialysis facility ownership. We then discuss several policy options for addressing the quality differences we identified. Reducing the outcome discrepancies will not be easy. Upon considering several policy alternatives, we conclude that a widespread effort to link processes of dialysis care to patient outcomes is best suited to reduce the quality differences between for-profit and not-for-profit dialysis units and improve outcomes in both types of facilities.

Ethics, Institutional↗