PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Polatin

Publications and source records attributed to P Polatin.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Screening for problematic prescription opioid use.

The proper medicinal use of opioids, in light of their notorious history and current relation to social ills, continues to be debated and remains unclear in several areas of medicine. This article will review several areas and points of controversy related to screening for potential problematic opioid behavior in chronic nonmalignant pain patients. Controversy over the prescription of opioids for chronic nonmalignant pain continues, despite the growing acceptance of this practice. Indeed, past research supports the beneficial use of opioids for noncancer pain. Unfortunately, traditional definitions of abuse and dependence, with their emphasis on tolerance and withdrawal, are inappropriate for chronic pain patients prescribed opioids. The component of traditional definitions of abuse and dependence that appears most applicable to chronic pain patients centers on the criterion that the patient continue to take the drug (in this case, the opioid) despite negative and harmful effects or despite any decrease in pain level. Although clinical observations exist about risk factors for opioid misuse in chronic pain patients, there is limited research. Further, the area of prescreening for problematic drug behavior is in its infancy. However, researchers have begun to delve into this challenging area and the application of rigorous empirical research will bring us closer to identifying those patients at risk so that their pain is managed without destructive outcomes in other areas of their life.

Chronic Disease↗
PubMed2000

Exploration of physicians' recommendations for activities in chronic low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: A mailed survey of 142 practicing physicians (63 orthopedic spine surgeons and 79 family physicians) inquiring about their expertise and experience with chronic low back pain, their pain attitudes and beliefs, and recommendations about the appropriate level of function for chronic back pain patients. OBJECTIVES: To explore physicians' recommendations for activity and work for patients with chronic low back pain and to determine factors that might influence these recommendations. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Physicians continuously are asked to recommend the appropriate level of activities and work for patients with chronic low back pain. Although these recommendations can have a significant impact on patients' lives, little is known about the factors that shape recommendations. METHODS: Mailed surveys included questions inquiring about the physicians' demographics, training, and experience in low back pain, the Health Care Providers' Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale, and three vignettes of work-disabled, chronic low back pain patients. After each vignette, physicians rated their perceptions of severity of symptoms and pathology and recommendations for work and daily activities through five graded responses. Three mailings were done within 4 weeks to maximize the response rate. The association of each variable with work and activity recommendations was statistically explored. To assess the influence of clinical expertise on recommendations, the responses of orthopedic spine surgeons were compared with those of family physicians. Test-retest reliability was assessed with a second mailing of the questionnaire to all initial responders. RESULTS: Sixty-five percent of the orthopedic surgeons and 52% of the family physicians responded to the survey. Thirty-nine percent of the initial responders completed the reliability survey. The survey instrument demonstrated modest reliability, with identical recommendations for activities and work occurring 57% of the time. In general, a wide range of activities and work was recommended, with most physicians recommending avoidance of painful activities or greater restrictions. Orthopedic spine surgeons were slightly less restrictive in their activity recommendations compared with family physicians. Most physicians demonstrated some consistency in their pattern of recommendations when compared with their colleagues. Physicians' pain attitudes and belief influenced their recommendations, as did their perception of the severity of the patients' clinical symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians' recommendations for activity and work to patients with chronic back pain vary widely and frequently are restrictive. These recommendations reflect personal attitudes of the physicians as well as factors related to the patients' clinical symptoms.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1999

The association of the SF-36 health status survey with 1-year socioeconomic outcomes in a chronically disabled spinal disorder population.

STUDY DESIGN: The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) was administered to patients with chronic spinal disorders both before and after tertiary rehabilitation. The association of the SF-36 with various socioeconomic outcomes was then examined. OBJECTIVES: To assess the correlation of scores on SF-36 with treatment program completion and clinically meaningful 1-year socioeconomic outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There has been much interest in identifying variables that can predict which disabled workers with chronic spinal disorders will have good versus poor socioeconomic outcomes after tertiary rehabilitation. Results of previous research have indicated that psychosocial factors are better predictors of such outcomes than physical factors. A more recent trend in research is assessing health-related quality of life from the health care recipient's perspective. METHODS: The SF-36 was administered to a cohort (n = 146) of patients chronically disabled by spinal disorders before entry into a tertiary functional restoration program. Of this cohort, preprogram SF-36 scores and 1-year socioeconomic data were available for 128 program completers and 18 program noncompleters. The pre- and postprogram SF-36 scores of program completers for each of the outcome variables were compared. RESULTS: Better scores on the preprogram SF-36 Social Functioning and Bodily Pain scales were found to be associated with successful completion of the treatment program. Postprogram SF-36 scores were more frequently associated with outcomes than were preprogram scores. Most SF-36 scores, especially the physical domain scales, were associated with the variables of return to work, work retention, and use of health care resources. The overwhelming majority of significant associations were between higher (i.e., better) SF-36 scores and "good" treatment outcomes (e.g., return-to-work). CONCLUSIONS: The large number of associations between SF-36 scores and outcome variables highlights the importance of assessing the health-related quality of life of patients, and supports the use of the SF-36 in accomplishing this task. Among the findings, perhaps the most significant was the value of assessing health-related quality of life, particularly the subjective physical components, after completion of a functional restoration program. Prediction of long-term socioeconomic outcomes is likely to be improved if assessment is conducted at the end of the treatment process. SF-36 is recommended for assessing general health status, and more spine-specific measures are recommended for assessing spinal pain and disability variables.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Spine rehabilitation. Secondary and tertiary nonoperative care.

To achieve desirable behavioral outcomes, physicians treating spinal pain patients should be aware of appropriate algorithms for conservative care. Lower cost secondary rehabilitation can be effective if deconditioning, severity of physical symptoms, surgical equivocation, or psychosocial barriers to recovery are not present. Patients who have extended disability in excess of 6 months, recognized psychosocial barriers (depression, substance abuse, personality disorders, secondary gain), or severe deconditioning have a better prognosis with tertiary care.

Humans↗
PubMed1988

Fluoxetine versus trazodone in the treatment of outpatients with major depression.

Fluoxetine and trazodone were compared in a double-blind, randomized, parallel, 6-week trial in 43 outpatients with major depression after a 1-week single-blind placebo period. Thirty-five patients completed at least 3 weeks of active medication, while 25 patients completed all 6 weeks. Response rates, whether defined by end-of-treatment Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score less than 10 or by a 50% reduction in HAM-D scores, were equivalent for the two medications. For fluoxetine, HAM-D scores were significantly lower at Weeks 1 and 2 compared with those of trazodone. Trazodone improved sleep significantly more than fluoxetine. Fluoxetine was associated more frequently with weight loss (p = .002) and less frequently with dizziness (p = .04) than trazodone.

Ambulatory Care↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Chronic spinal disorders and psychopathology. research findings and theoretical considerations.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Numerous studies have documented a strong association between chronic spinal disorders and psychopathology. However, there have been methodological shortcomings associated with much of this. PURPOSE: This article reviews the relevant research literature, including methodological refinements that have resulted in improved measurement of psychopathology, in order to provide the most updated conclusions concerning the links between spinal disorders and psychopathology. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review of all Medline referenced articles on this subject during the past three decades. METHODS: Previous research has shown that chronic spinal disorders are most often associated with depressive disorders, somatoform disorders, anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, and personality disorders. In addition to reviewing this research, the relationship between chronic spinal disorders and depressive disorders is examined in more detail. RESULTS: Although the relationship between spinal disorders and psychopathology is complex, a diathesis-stress model is emerging as the dominant overarching theoretical model. In this model, diatheses are conceptualized as pre-existing semidormant characteristics of the individual before the onset of chronic spinal disorders, which are then activated by the stress of this chronic condition, eventually resulting in a diagnosable depressive disorder. CONCLUSIONS: In the present review, a diathesis-stress model was applied specifically to the relationship between chronic spinal disorders and depressive disorders. Such a model may also be applicable to the relationship between chronic spinal disorders and other types of psychopathology, such as anxiety and substance use disorders. However, conclusive empirical support will require a prospective research design, given that these diatheses could be validly assessed only before the onset of the chronic pain condition.

Chronic Disease↗