PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Pouliquen

Publications and source records attributed to P Pouliquen.

12 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

[Improvement of dry eye symptoms with polyunsaturated fatty acids].

INTRODUCTION: Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) are involved in inflammatory pathways via prostaglandins. Conjunctival inflammation is a hallmark of all dry eye syndromes. We investigated the role of dietary n-6 and n-3 fatty acids in patients suffering from ocular dryness. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-one patients presenting with mild to moderate dry eye syndromes were randomly assigned to Nutrilarm or placebo capsules, twice a day for 6 months. The Schirmer test, BUT, fluorescein staining, and lissamin green stainings were performed at inclusion and after 1, 3, and 6 months. Furthermore, a questionnaire related to the dry eye symptoms and global discomfort was provided at every visit. RESULTS: The Schirmer test, BUT, fluorescein staining, and lissamin green stainings were improved with treatment when compared to placebo but the difference was not statistically significant. The efficacy evaluated by the patients and the investigator were nearly significant (p=0.052 and p=0.054, respectively). For some signs, such as reflex tearing and conjunctival hyperemia, the improvement reached the threshold of significance (p=0.047 and p=0.045, respectively). The same results were found with skin quality and emotional condition, which were improved (61% with treatment versus 36% with placebo). CONCLUSION: This double-masked pilot study shows that PUFAs seem to be an interesting tool to alleviate the symptoms related to dry eye syndrome. These results should be confirmed using a larger study population.

Double-Blind Method↗
PubMed2006

Comparison of a non-preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (single dose unit) with a preserved 0.1% T-Gel eye gel (multidose) in ocular hypertension and glaucomatous patients.

AIM: This comparative, open design, phase III study was to assess the non-inferiority of the non-preserved T-Gel 0.1% single dose unit (SDU) versus its preserved multidose (MD) reference. METHODS: 175 patients with bilateral POAG or OHT were randomised: 87 patients were to receive one drop daily of T-Gel 0.1% MD and 88 patients were to receive one drop daily of T-Gel 0.1% SDU, for a treatment period of 12 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the change in intraocular pressure (IOP) in the worse eye between the baseline and the last assessment. Subjective and objective ocular signs as well as adverse events were recorded for safety. Global tolerance was assessed by the investigator and by the patient. RESULTS: The mean percentage reduction from baseline IOP was 24% for both treatments groups, which was consistent with previous studies. The safety results were comparable in both treatment groups. Because of gel formulation, mild short lasting episodes of blurred vision occurred for about 20% of patients. The global tolerance assessment reported that both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The overall study results demonstrated that T-Gel 0.1% SDU is not inferior to T-Gel 0.1% MD.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2004

[Efficacy and safety of a fluid carbomer gel versus a conventional carbomer gel in dry eye treatment].

AIM: To compare the risk/benefit for C974P (a 0.25% fluid carbomer gel in a vial allowing dropwise instillation) versus a conventional carbomer gel. MATERIAL AND METHODS: During this multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked trial, patients with dry eye syndrome were treated with C974P or C940. Control visits were planned on day 7, day 28 (efficacy evaluation) and day 56 (tolerance evaluation). The main criterion was dry eye symptoms globally assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS). The non-inferiority limit for the between-group difference of VAS changes was 10 mm. RESULTS: In the population of 169 patients (87 patients for C974P, 82 for C940), C974P was at least as effective as C940 on symptoms (non-inferiority hypothesis confirmed). The mean VAS value fell by one third in the two groups. The objective signs improved identically in the two groups: corneal staining by fluorescein (p=0.96), rose Bengal score (p=0.73), and lacrimal break-up time (p=0.73). The dosage adaptation was slightly lower than three instillations per day (p=0.16). The adverse events were mild or moderate. CONCLUSION: C974P galenic changes are able to reach the same level of efficacy on dry eye symptoms and ocular surface damages as the conventional tube carbomer gels.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed2004

[Ocular tolerance of a new formulation of nonpreserved diclofenac].

AIM: To compare the ocular tolerance of nonpreserved diclofenac versus thiomersal-preserved diclofenac in healthy volunteers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty healthy volunteers instilled Dicloabak in the randomised eye and thiomersal-preserved diclofenac in the other eye, according to a strictly identical dosing regimen, for 28 days. Each volunteer thus served as his or her own control. The dose regimen was five drops/day for 7 days followed by three drops/day for 20 days. Ocular tolerance was assessed by the discomfort upon instillation (measured on a visual analogue scale [VAS]), subjective ocular symptoms following instillation (irritation/burning/stinging, eye dryness and foreign body sensation) and finally by an objective examination of the ocular surface. These criteria were evaluated on days 0, 14, 21 and 28. RESULTS: The subjective ocular symptoms following instillation were significantly lower in the nonpreserved group at Day 7 and nearly significantly lower until the end of the study. The biomicroscopy exam confirmed that there was better tolerance without thiomersal. There was less follicular-papillary conjunctivitis and a significantly better lissamine green score in the Dicloabak group. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that the nonpreserved formulation of diclofenac is better tolerated by the ocular surface and thus constitutes a therapeutic benefit.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

[Comparison of once-daily nonpreserved timolol and timolol maleate gel-forming solution associated with latanoprost].

AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of a single daily instillation of nonpreserved timolol to a timolol maleate gel-forming solution in patients with chronic glaucoma or ocular hypertension already treated with latanoprost. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized, prospective, multicenter, open, parallel-group clinical trial was undertaken with 73 patients with chronic glaucoma treated with latanoprost and a timolol maleate gel-forming solution. In 36 patients, the previous regimen was substituted by nonpreserved timolol given instead of timolol maleate gel for 3 months. The changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) were recorded as well as local and systemic tolerance and patient compliance. RESULTS: At 3 months, both regimens were found equivalent in maintaining IOP control between D0 and D84. The difference with baseline was -0.08 +/- 2.22 mmHg and -0.38 +/- 2.41 mmHg in the nonpreserved timolol group and in the timolol maleate gel-forming solution group, respectively (CI 95% [-0.79; 1.38]). After 84 days of treatment, blurred vision (5.9%) and eyelid deposits (5.9%) were reduced in the preservative-free timolol group compared to the other group (respectively, 33.3% and 24.2%). These differences were statistically significant for both signs (blurred vision: p < 0.0001 and for eyelid deposits: p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: This short-term study has demonstrated the equivalence of nonpreserved timolol to timolol maleate gel-forming solution in terms of IOP control. Moreover, the local tolerance of nonpreserved timolol was better.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

[Efficacy and safety of substituting a twice-daily regimen of timolol with a single daily instillation of nonpreserved beta-blocker in patients with chronic glaucoma or ocular hypertension].

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single daily instillation of nonpreserved timolol in patients with chronic glaucoma or ocular hypertension previously treated with a twice-daily regimen of timolol 0.25% or 0.50%. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective open clinical trial was undertaken by 220 ophthalmologists in 435 patients with chronic glaucoma or ocular hypertension controlled with twice-daily instillations of timolol 0.25% or 0.50%. In this population, the previous regimen was substituted with a single daily instillation of preservative-free timolol 0.25% or 0.50% for 3 months. The changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) were recorded as well as local and systemic tolerance and patient compliance. RESULTS: It was found that 398 patients (93.6%) maintained stable IOP: in 92%, IOP increased no more than 2 mmHg. The mean IOP was 17.0 +/- 2.2 mmHg at D0, 16.5 +/- 2.4 mmHg at D28/42 and 16.6 +/- 2.4 mmHg at D84. The proportion of patients with at least one ocular symptom upon instillation or at another time decreased (p<0.0001 and p=0.03, respectively). The proportion of conjunctival hyperemia reduced from 24.4% to 14.6% (p=0.0002). The rate of folliculopapillar reactions and superficial punctate keratitis was halved (p=0.005 and p=0.02, respectively). CONCLUSION: During this study in daily practice, the switch from a twice-daily regimen of timolol to a once-daily application maintained stable intraocular pressure with a notable improvement in tolerance.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2002

Prevalence of ocular symptoms and signs with preserved and preservative free glaucoma medication.

AIM: To determine the incidence of ocular toxicity of preservatives with glaucoma medications. METHODS: A prospective epidemiological survey was carried out in 1999 by 249 ophthalmologists on 4107 patients. Ocular symptoms, conjunctiva, cornea, and eyelids were assessed. A chi(2) test was used for differences between preserved eye drops (P) and preservative free eye drops (PF). RESULTS: 84% patients used P, 13% received PF, and 3% a combination of P and PF eye drops. All symptoms were more prevalent with P than with PF drops (p<0.001): discomfort upon instillation (43% versus 17%), and symptoms between instillations such as burning-stinging (40% versus 22%), foreign body sensation (31% versus 14%), dry eye sensation (23% versus 14%), tearing (21% versus 14%), and eyelid itching (18% versus 10%). An increased incidence (>2 times) of ocular signs was seen with P eye drops. The prevalence of signs and symptoms was dose dependent, increasing with the number of P drops. A reduction in the symptoms and signs was observed when patients changed from P to PF eye drops (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms and signs are less prevalent when PF drops are used. Moreover, most of the adverse reactions induced by P glaucoma medication are reversible after removing preservatives.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

[Allergy and preservatives. Apropos of 3 cases of allergy to benzalkonium chloride].

BACKGROUND: Ophthalmologists are not always aware of the hypersensitising potential of benzalkonium chloride (preservative widely used in ophthalmology). OBSERVATIONS: Hypersensitivity to benzalkonium chloride was asserted by allergologic exploration in the three cases reported. Contact allergy, a frequent phenomenon, was diagnosed in two cases. The third case represents one of the few cases described in ophthalmology of immediate hypersensitivity associated to vital risk: chemosis and angioneurotic edema is reported in a woman who had been already presented an anaphylactic shock to a quaternary ammonium family anaesthetic. DISCUSSION: The ocular allergologic evaluation is specified. Risk to benzalkonium chloride sensitisation factors (ophthalmology, presence of benzalkonium chloride in numerous daily used products) are reviewed. The risk of severe immediate allergy is increased due to the relationship of benzalkonium chloride to other quaternary ammonium compounds. CONCLUSION: Best risk prevention remains allergen eviction.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

[Exfoliative syndrome and cataract surgery].

In the present prospective study, we compared the results of cataract surgery in two groups with or without exfoliation syndrome; 210 eyes were studied. The preoperative pupillary dilatation was smaller in the group with exfoliation syndrome (SE). We noticed a higher incidence of complications during planned extracapsular cataract extraction in patients with SE. A pupillary diameter smaller than 6 mm increases the incidence of capsulozonular rupture (22.5%) in these patients. After surgery, an inflammatory reaction and a transient increase in intraocular pressure were more frequent and the visual results were less favourable in the group with SE. The exfoliation syndrome is a major risk factor for cataract surgery. We recommend extracapsular extraction associated with a sector iridectomy when the pupillary diameter measures less than 6 mm.

Aged↗