PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Prandoni

Publications and source records attributed to P Prandoni.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

The metabolic syndrome and the risk of venous thrombosis: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: The results of recent studies have suggested that patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism (VTE) might be at increased risk of asymptomatic atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events. The metabolic syndrome is a cluster of risk factors for atherosclerosis. Its impact on VTE is unknown. METHODS: In a case-control study, consecutive patients with objectively confirmed deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and control subjects with objectively excluded DVT underwent clinical assessment for the presence of the metabolic syndrome according to the National Cholesterol Education Program criteria. The presence of known risk factors for DVT was documented. Patients with DVT secondary to cancer were excluded. The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome was compared between patients with idiopathic DVT and controls. RESULTS: We enrolled 93 patients with a first episode of idiopathic DVT and 107 controls. The mean age was 65.1 and 63.7 years, respectively. The metabolic syndrome was diagnosed in 50.5% of patients with idiopathic DVT and in 34.6% of controls [odds ratio (OR) 1.93; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05, 3.56]. After adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, and smoke, the metabolic syndrome remained independently associated with idiopathic DVT (OR 1.94; 95% CI 1.04, 3.63). In patients with secondary DVT, the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome was 27%. CONCLUSIONS: The metabolic syndrome may play a role in the pathogenesis of idiopathic DVT and may act as link between venous thrombosis and atherosclerosis.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Venous thromboembolism and cancer: guidelines of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM).

Thromboembolic complications represent one of the most important cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. Although several data have been published demonstrating the strong association between cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE), there is poor perception, among oncologists, of the level of risk of thrombosis and of relevance of managing VTE in these patients. The Associazione Italiana di Oncologia Medica (AIOM) has provided some recommendations to direct clinical practice according to evidence-based data concerning cancer and VTE. In fact, we conducted an extensive literature review (1996-2005) to produce evidence-based recommendations to improve perceptions of the magnitude of this risk among Italian medical and surgical oncologists and alert on the new approaches to prophylaxis and treatment of VTE in cancer patients. Levels of evidence are given according to a five-point rating system, and similarly for each key recommendation a five-point rating system suggests if the evidence is strong and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks and burden.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2006

Venous thromboembolism and the risk of subsequent symptomatic atherosclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Recently, we reported an association between asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis and venous thromboembolism (VTE) of unknown origin. We hypothesized that patients with VTE of unknown origin would be at a higher risk of developing symptomatic atherosclerosis than patients with VTE induced by known risk factors. METHODS: To examine this hypothesis, we studied 1,919 consecutive patients followed prospectively after their first VTE episode. The primary outcome was non-fatal and fatal symptomatic atherosclerotic disease in patients with VTE of unknown origin as compared to those with secondary VTE. An independent committee assessed all study outcomes, and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using the Cox's proportional hazards model. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 48 and 51 months, respectively, at least one symptomatic atherosclerotic complication was detected in 160 of the 1,063 patients (15.1%) with VTE of unknown origin, and in 73 of the 856 (8.5%) with secondary VTE. After adjusting for age and other risk factors of atherosclerosis, the HR for symptomatic atherosclerotic complications in patients with VTE of unknown origin compared to those with secondary VTE was 1.6 (95% confidence intervals; CI: 1.2-2.0). When the analysis was restricted to patients without previous symptomatic atherosclerosis, the HR became 1.7 (95% CI: 1.1-2.4). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with VTE of unknown origin have a 60% higher risk of developing symptomatic atherosclerotic disease than do patients with secondary venous thrombosis.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Upper extremity DVT in oncological patients: analysis of risk factors. Data from the RIETE registry.

AIM: The aim of the study is to up date informations on the clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) from the Informatised Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (RIETE). METHODS: RIETE is an ongoing registry of consecutive patients with symptomatic, objectively confirmed, acute venous thromboembolism. In this analysis the clinical characteristics and 3-month outcome of all cancer patients with upper-extremity DVT were evaluated. RESULTS: Up to February 2006, a total of 14,391 patients with symptomatic, objectively confirmed acute venous thromboembolism had been enrolled in RIETE. Of the 2,945 patients with active cancer 196 (6.7%) had arm DVT: 104 had catheter-associated DVT. Most cancer patients with arm DVT were males, younger than 65, and had a low incidence of additional risk factors or underlying diseases. Twenty of them (10%) had symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE). Most patients were treated with low-molecular-weigh heparin, both initially (94%) and after discharge (75%). During the 3-month follow-up period 12 patients (6.1%) developed VTE recurrences (PE 6, DVT 6), 8 (4.1%) had major bleeding (fatal in 3), 43 (22%) died. CONCLUSIONS: Our data from the RIETE registry show that upper limb DVT is a serious complication in patients with cancer, with a high incidence of recurrences and bleeding complications.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Does the type of hormone replacement therapy influence the risk of deep vein thrombosis? A prospective case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Although hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is associated with an increased risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), it is not clear if the risk differs in users of combined estrogen-progestin HRT and estrogen-only HRT. METHODS: We prospectively studied postmenopausal women with suspected DVT in whom HRT use status was ascertained and who subsequently had objective diagnostic testing to confirm or exclude DVT. Cases were patients with idiopathic DVT, in whom there were no DVT risk factors, and controls were patients without DVT, in whom there were also no DVT risk factors. The risk of DVT was determined in users of estrogen-progestin HRT and estrogen-only HRT by comparing the prevalence of current HRT use in cases with idiopathic DVT and controls without DVT (reference group). Multivariable regression analysis was done to adjust for factors that might confound an association between HRT use and the risk of DVT. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred and sixty-eight postmenopausal women with suspected DVT were assessed, from whom 95 cases of idiopathic DVT and 610 controls without DVT and no DVT risk factors were identified. Estrogen-only HRT was associated with an increased risk for DVT that was not statistically significant [odds ratio (OR) = 1.22; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57, 2.61]. Estrogen-progestin HRT was associated with a greater than 2-fold increased risk for DVT (OR = 2.70; 95% CI 1.44, 5.07). CONCLUSION: The risk of developing DVT may be higher in users of combined estrogen-progestin HRT than in users of estrogen-only HRT.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

The incidence of venous thromboembolism in carriers of antithrombin, protein C or protein S deficiency associated with the HR2 haplotype of factor V: a family cohort study.

In order to assess whether the HR2 haplotype of the factor V gene (HR2) increases the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in carriers of antithrombin (AT), protein C (PC) or S (PS) defects, we performed this determination in 336 subjects, who were family members of 66 symptomatic patients with clotting inhibitors defects. We first assessed the presence of previous VTE, and then followed prospectively subjects without prior VTE. VTE episodes had occurred in 26 individuals: 18 in 139 carriers of clotting inhibitors defects alone (annual incidence, 0.55%), four in 33 carriers of clotting inhibitors defects combined with HR2 (0.52%) and four in 151 non-carriers (0.1%), resulting in a relative risk (RR) for VTE of 4.9 (95% CI: 1.7-14.4) and 4.62 (95% CI: 1.2-18.4), respectively. After an overall follow-up of 2557 patient-years, VTE episodes developed in 12 subjects: nine in 121 carriers of clotting inhibitors defects alone (annual incidence, 0.92%), three in 29 carriers of clotting inhibitors defects combined with HR2 (1.0%) and none in 147 non-carriers. In family members of patients with AT, PC or PS defects the coinheritance of HR2 haplotype does not seem to increase the thromboembolic risk.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Relation between quality of anticoagulant treatment and the development of the postthrombotic syndrome.

BACKGROUND: About 30% of patients with an episode of adequately treated deep venous thrombosis (DVT) develop the postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) within 2 years. During treatment with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) patients spend only 60% of time between an International Normalized Ratio (INR) of 2.0 and 3.0. We hypothesized that patients who spend a large amount of their time beneath this range will have an increased risk of the PTS. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relation between the quality of anticoagulant therapy with VKA and the risk of the development of the PTS. METHODS: The time spent beneath the therapeutic range was calculated for patients with a first episode of DVT, who were treated with VKA for at least 3 months. At follow-up assessments for a maximum of 5 years, presence and severity of signs and symptoms of PTS were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 244 patients, with a median duration of follow-up of 4.9 years were included for analysis. Of these, 81 patients (33%) developed the PTS. The multivariate model showed that patients who spend more than 50% of their time beneath an INR level of 2.0 are at higher risk for PTS [odds ratio (OR): 2.71, 95% CI: 1.44-5.10]. CONCLUSIONS: Low quality treatment with VKA, which is a common condition, is related to the occurrence of the PTS in patients with DVT. Strategies aimed at improving the quality of long-term anticoagulation might have the potential to reduce the incidence of this complication.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

High vs. low doses of low-molecular-weight heparin for the treatment of superficial vein thrombosis of the legs: a double-blind, randomized trial.

In contrast with extensive information on the management of deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities, little is known on the most appropriate treatment of the superficial vein thrombosis (SVT). In a multicenter, prospective, controlled, double-blind, double-dummy clinical trial, 164 consecutive patients with acute SVT of the great saphenous vein were randomized to receive the s.c. administration of either fixed prophylactic doses (2850 a-Xa IU) or body-weight adjusted therapeutic doses of nadroparin once daily for 1 month. The main study outcome was to compare the rate of asymptomatic and symptomatic extension of SVT and/or venous thromboembolic (VTE) complications during a 3-month follow-up period. Of the 81 patients randomized to the prophylactic doses, seven [8.6%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.5-17.0] developed SVT progression or VTE complications as compared with six of the 83 (7.2%; 95% CI, 2.8-15.1) allocated to the treatment group (absolute difference, 1.4; 96% CI, -6.9 to 9.7; P = 0.74). No patient in either group developed major bleeding. Our findings suggest that therapeutic doses of low-molecular-weight heparin, administered for 1 month in patients with SVT of the greater saphenous vein do not improve results obtained by prophylactic doses, administered for the same period, over a 3-month follow-up period.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Decision analysis for cancer screening in idiopathic venous thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: The SOMIT trial randomized patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism (IVTE) and without signs of cancer at routine medical examination, to extensive screening for cancer plus 2 years of follow-up or to just 2-year follow-up. METHODS: The data of the SOMIT-trial were used to perform a decision analysis. The screening tests were divided in several possible strategies. The number of detected cancer patients and the number of patients investigated further for an eventually benign condition were calculated for each strategy. The total costs for the screening strategy and for each detected cancer patient were determined. Based on the tumor type, stage, age and gender of the individual cancer patient, the difference in live years gained (LYG) was calculated between the two study groups. RESULTS: Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen combined with sputum cytology and mammography detected 12 of the 14 patients with cancer and had one false-positive result. In general, screening strategies including abdominal/pelvic ultrasonography (US) or tumor markers yielded a higher number of patients needed to screen in comparison with those using abdominal/pelvic CT. Furthermore, the strategies which included colonoscopy, tumor markers, and abdominal/pelvic US were significantly more costly, had inferior LYG and higher costs per LYG, when compared with strategies using abdominal/pelvic CT. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limitations of this analysis, the screening for cancer with a strategy including abdominal/pelvic CT with or without mammography and/or sputum cytology appears potentially useful for cancer screening in patients with IVTE. The cost-effectiveness analysis of this strategy needs confirmation in a large trial.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗
PubMed2005

Thrombophilia and venous thromboembolism. International consensus statement. Guidelines according to scientific evidence.

Thrombophilia is the term now used to describe predisposition to increased risk of venous and occasionally arterial thromboembolism due to hematological abnormalities. It can be a multifactorial disorder where congenital defects of anticoagulant or procoagulant factors may be combined with acquired hematological abnormalities. It should be considered in patients with a documented unexplained thrombotic episode or a positive family history. The aim of this document is to provide guidelines for investigation and management of patients with thrombophilia in the presence or absence of venous thromboembolism (VTE).

Activated Protein C Resistance↗
PubMed2004

Extensive screening for occult malignant disease in idiopathic venous thromboembolism: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Patients with symptomatic idiopathic venous thromboembolism and apparently cancer-free have an approximate 10% incidence of subsequent cancer. Apparently cancer-free patients with acute idiopathic venous thromboembolism were randomized to either the strategy of extensive screening for occult cancer or to no further testing. Patients had a 2-year follow-up period. Of the 201 patients, 99 were allocated to the extensive screening group and 102 to the control group. In 13 (13.1%) patients, the extensive screening identified occult cancer. In the extensive screening group, a single (1.0%) malignancy became apparent during follow-up, whereas in the control group a total of 10 (9.8%) malignancies became symptomatic [relative risk, 9.7 (95% CI, 1.3-36.8; P < 0.01]. Overall, malignancies identified in the extensive screening group were at an earlier stage and the mean delay to diagnosis was reduced from 11.6 to 1.0 months (P < 0.001). Cancer-related mortality during the 2 years follow-up period occurred in two (2.0%) of the 99 patients of the extensive screening group vs. four (3.9%) of the 102 control patients [absolute difference, 1.9% (95% CI, -5.5-10.9)]. Although early detection of occult cancers may be associated with improved treatment possibilities, it is uncertain whether this improves the prognosis.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Screening for occult cancer in patients with acute deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism.

Patients with acute venous thromboembolism have an increased risk for occult malignancy. Limited screening for these malignancies has become common practice but little is known about its usefulness. This is a prospective cohort follow-up study in consecutive patients with acute venous thromboembolism. All patients underwent a routine clinical evaluation for malignancy, if negative, followed by a limited diagnostic work-up consisting of abdominal and pelvic ultrasound and laboratory markers for malignancy. Clinical follow-up was conducted to detect screening failures. The routine clinical evaluation was performed in 864 patients and revealed malignancy in 34 (3.9%) of them. Among the remaining 830 patients the limited diagnostic work-up revealed 13 further malignancies. During follow-up, cancer became symptomatic in 14 patients who were negative for cancer at screening (sensitivity of limited diagnostic work-up, 48.1%). Malignancies that were identified by the limited diagnostic work-up were early stage in 61% of cases vs. 14% in cases occurring during follow-up. Most patients with occult cancer had idiopathic venous thromboembolism and were older than 70 years. A limited diagnostic work-up for occult cancer in patients with venous thromboembolism has the capacity to identify approximately one-half of the malignancies. Identified malignancies were predominantly in an early stage.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2003

Can causes of false-normal D-dimer test [SimpliRED] results be identified?

BACKGROUND: To simplify the diagnostic strategy of patients suspected for venous thromboembolism, the use of D-dimer tests has been advocated. Very important for the safety of such diagnostic strategies would be the capacity to recognise false-normal D-dimer results, in order to prevent inadequately withholding anticoagulant treatment in patients who actually have the disease. Insight in the causes of false-normal D-dimer results would therefore be necessary. We hypothesised that certain patient characteristics are associated with relatively low plasma D-dimer levels and, therefore, could increase the risk of false-normal results. METHODS: Consecutive patients with an objectively confirmed venous thromboembolic event and an independently obtained false-normal SimpliRED D-dimer test result were included in the study. For each patient, two controls with objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism and an adequate abnormal D-dimer result were selected. Baseline patient characteristics, obtained by standardised questionnaires, were compared between the two groups of patients. RESULTS: In total, 686 patients had a venous thromboembolic event and 47 of these patients had a false-normal SimpliRED result. Therefore, the overall sensitivity of the SimpliRED test for venous thromboembolism was 94% (95% CI: 92-95%). Although the prevalence of certain clinical characteristics was significantly higher in patients with a false-normal D-dimer result than in the controls [odds ratios for (LMW)heparin treatment and symptoms lasting more than 10 days: 5.1 (95% CI: 1.5-18.7) and 3.2 (95% CI:1.4-7.4), respectively], the prevalence of these characteristics was also high in the control group with an adequate abnormal D-dimer. Combining two or more of these characteristics had a low prevalence and did not further improve the ability to identify those patients with a false-normal D-dimer test at presentation. CONCLUSIONS: Although these findings clearly indicate an association between certain baseline clinical characteristics and the occurrence of a false-normal SimpliRED test, the clinical utility for these characteristics is limited.

Adult↗