[Secretory eosinophilia and obstructive rhinitis].
Detecting eosinophilia in the nasal secretions of patients complaining of nasal obstruction makes it possible to identify a group of high risk patients. Hosty use of surgery in these patients carries a high risk of iatrogenic complications and little potential for improvement. The 2 most frequently used methods of obtaining cytologic specimens (swabbing versus washing) were compared in 37 patients with obstructive rhinitis (early stage polyposis and nonallergic rhinitis with eosinophilia syndrome, NARES). Swabbing gave reliable results. Eosinophilia was negligible in a group of 25 control subjects. The mean eosinophil count was 2.5% and only 1 patient had a positive cystogram. The 220 patients which nasal obstruction were classed in 5 groups according to the severity of clinical signs and symptoms. The mean eosinophil count and the percentage of patients with positive cystogram increased with increased severity of the clinical syndrome. 28 patients had uncomplicated obstructive rhinitis, 10 had NARES, 43 had allergic rhinitis, 52 had chronic obstructive rhinitis, and 87 had nasosinal polyposis. The respective mean eosinophil counts were 6.42%, 10.3%, 13.8% 16.8% and 31.4%. The percentage of patients with positive cytograms was respectively, 10.8%, 20%, 23.3%, 28.8% and 54%.