PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Ruskin

Publications and source records attributed to P Ruskin.

12 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Religion and end of life treatment preferences among geriatric patients.

The purpose of this study was to determine if religious preference and religiosity influenced choosing end of life treatments in medically ill geriatric patients. The sample consisted of 374 males 60 years of age or older, hospitalized on the acute medical service at the Baltimore Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Choices for end of life treatment preferences were CPR, medical ventilation, tube feeding and IV fluids within six different illness scenarios. Patients indicated how often they attended religious services, how much strength and comfort they got from religion and how religious they would describe themselves. Analyses of variance were performed using as the dependent variables the summation scores across the six scenarios of a willingness to undergo each of the four life saving procedures. The religious preference, race and religiosity scores served as the independent variables. Only tube feeding showed a significant (p<0.05) relationship, with Catholics less willing to undergo this procedure than other Christians. The same trend was found for the other life saving procedures, but was not statistically significant.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Psychiatric assessment of a nursing home population using audiovisual telecommunication.

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that psychiatric assessment of nursing home residents could be reliably carried out remotely via telecommunications. Twenty-seven nursing home residents each had two interviews consisting of the following three rating scales: the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). The interviews were conducted by three trained psychiatrists, each of whom interviewed two-thirds of the subjects. Subjects were sequentially assigned to have either two in-person interviews (in-person group) or one in-person and one remote interview via telecommunication (remote group). Inter-rater reliability was calculated separately for each condition (in-person vs remote group) for each of the three rating scales. Intraclass correlations on the MMSE were .95 for the remote group and .83 for the in-person group. On the GDS, they were .82 for the remote group and .86 for the in-person group. Finally, on the BPRS, they were .81 for the remote group and .49 for the in-person group. There were no statistically significant differences in intraclass correlation on any of the three scales for the remote group compared with the in-person group, indicating that nursing home residents can be reliably assessed remotely via telecommunication.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Predictors of depression in geriatric medically ill inpatients.

OBJECTIVE: Depression in medically ill inpatients has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to identify variables that would successfully predict depression in this population. METHODS: The sample consisted of 314 male, medically ill veterans, age 60 and older, admitted to the acute medical service at Baltimore Veteran Administration Medical Center. Sixty of 314 patients met criteria for Major Depression and scored 11 or higher on the Geriatric Depression Scale. Variables assessing age, race, social support, severity of illness, degree of functional disability, life satisfaction, and hopelessness were included in a logistic regression analysis as predictors of depression. RESULTS: The variables that significantly predicted depression were derived from the Beck Hopelessness Scale, Life Satisfaction Score, and the Cumulative Illness Rating Score. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that medically ill inpatients who feel hopeless about the future, feel the best years of their lives are behind them, and have serious medical problems are likely to be clinically depressed.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Depression, hopelessness, and the desire for life-saving treatments among elderly medically ill veterans.

During a serious medical illness, several factors, including perceived quality of life, social support, functional disability, severity of illness, and presence of depressive symptoms, influence desire for life-saving treatments such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), mechanical ventilation, tube feeding, and intravenous fluids. The authors examined the influence of depression and hopelessness on preferences for life- saving treatment in older, medically ill male patients in the medical service of a Veterans Administration Medical Center. Subjects with high levels of hopelessness desired less life-saving treatment during their current illness; they were at least five times more likely to refuse CPR if required during the current hospitalization. This effect remained statistically significant after removing confounds of race, education, and religiosity. The diagnosis of major depression did not significantly influence the desire for life-saving treatment. Our findings suggest that psychiatrists should assess patients for severity of hopelessness when evaluating decision-making capacity in the context of intervention refusal.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1988

Lithium augmentation for treatment-resistant depression in the elderly.

Lithium has been used successfully to enhance the effectiveness of tricyclic and other antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, and combinations of antipsychotics and antidepressants. The safety and efficacy of adding lithium to the treatment regimen was examined in 14 elderly patients with refractory depression. Seven of the 14 had a complete recovery, and three showed a partial response. Side effects, including peripheral weakness, severe fine tremor, and neurotoxicity, necessitated the discontinuation of lithium in three patients. In two other patients with side effects, lower dosages of lithium relieved their symptoms. Lithium augmentation appears to be a promising treatment for geriatric depressed patients who are unresponsive to or cannot tolerate other standard therapies.

Aged↗