PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Siegenthaler

Publications and source records attributed to P Siegenthaler.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1995

Phase II trial of CPT-11 in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, an EORTC early clinical trials group study.

BACKGROUND: CPT-11 (irinotecan) is a semi-synthetic derivative of camptothecin and exerts its activity by inhibiting DNA topoisomerase I. A phase II study of this drug was performed in patients with pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility criteria included advanced non-chemotherapy-pretreated pancreatic cancer. CPT-11 was administered as a 30-minute i.v. infusion at a dose of 350 mg/m2 diluted in 250 ml normal saline every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-four eligible patients were enrolled in the study, thirty-two of them were evaluated, and three achieved partial responses (9%; 95% C.I. = 3%-25%). The duration of response was 7.2, 7.5 and 7.8 months, respectively. Thirteen patients had no change, fourteen patients had progressive disease and two had early progressive disease. The median duration of survival for all patients treated was 5.2 months. The main toxicities (CTC grade > or = 3) were diarrhea, leukocytopenia, asthenia, nausea and vomiting in, respectively, 7%, 16%, 8%, 6%, 4% of the courses. These toxicities were reversible and manageable with anti-emetics and prophylactic or curative antidiarrheal agents. CONCLUSION: CPT-11 is an interesting moderately effective drug in pancreatic cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Early versus late alternating chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK).

BACKGROUND: From 1984 to 1989, the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) performed a randomized phase III trial comparing early versus late alternating chemotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 406 eligible patients were entered into the trial. Regimen A consisted of PAV (cisPlatin, Adriamycin, VP 16-213, and Regimen B of CyMOC (Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, Oncovin, CCNU). Cycles were repeated as rapidly as possible. patients were randomized to receive either ABABAB (early alternating chemotherapy) or AAABBB (late alternating chemotherapy). After six cycles patients with limited disease in complete or partial remission and those with extensive disease in complete remission received irradiation to the primary (45 Gy) and the CNS (36 Gy). RESULTS: The overall remission rate was 87% with 31% complete remissions. The median survival of all 406 eligible patients was 346 days with 15% of the patients alive at two years. The overall remission rate, the rate of complete remission, the median survival and the rate of long-term survival were not significantly different in the two treatment arms. In limited disease the estimated percentages of survival at 2 years were 33% in the early and 24% in the late alternating chemotherapy arms. Patients with extensive disease survived significantly longer with late alternating chemotherapy than on the early alternation regimen (median survival 336 days versus 301 days, p = 0.01). In the latter patients the received dose intensities (RDI) of cisplatin, adriamycin and etoposide were significantly higher in the late-alternation arm. Patients treated with early alternating chemotherapy rated their tumor symptoms, functional states, fatigue/malaise and restriction of social activity significantly better, reflecting an improved subjective adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Alternating chemotherapy with PAV-CyMOC plus consolidating radiotherapy is a feasible and effective treatment for small-cell lung cancer, with acceptable toxicity. Whereas patients with early alternating chemotherapy achieve a better subjective adjustment, late alternating chemotherapy allows for a higher RDI of cisplatin, adriamycin and etoposide, which results in a significantly longer median survival of patients with extensive disease.

Actuarial Analysis↗
PubMed1994

Phase II trial of anaxirone (TGU) in advanced colorectal cancer: an EORTC Early Clinical Trials Group (ECTG) study.

Anaxirone, a rationally synthesised triepoxide derivative, was given to 46 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Good risk patients received 800 mg/m2 as a rapid intravenous injection every 4 weeks, whereas poor risk patients received 650 mg/m2. Of 46 patients, 45 were evaluable for toxicity and 42 for efficacy analysis. There were 37/45 patients with poor risk, showing no difference in toxicity as compared to good risk patients. The major toxic effect was myelosuppression with 34% of all patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 leucopenia; thrombocytopenia was less frequent. Locoregional phlebitis occurred in 66% of the patients. There was no objective tumour response to anaxirone in 42 evaluable patients. Only 4 patients achieved stabilisation of the disease lasting maximally up to 248 days. Anaxirone is inactive in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Combined-modality treatment of small-cell lung cancer: randomized comparison of three induction chemotherapies followed by maintenance chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy to the chest. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK).

BACKGROUND: From 1980 to 1983 the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) performed a randomised phase III trial in patients with small-cell lung cancer with the objective of improving the results of induction chemotherapy and defining the role of consolidating chest irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were initially randomised to induction arms AVP (adriamycin, etoposide and cisplatin given every four weeks for four cycles), EVA (cyclophosphamide, etoposide and adriamycin given every four weeks for four cycles) or MOC/AVP (methotrexate, vincristine, cyclophosphamide alternating with adriamycin, etoposide and cisplatin given for two cycles). All patients received prophylactic cranial irradiation with 30 Gy, and after four months of induction chemotherapy were randomized to maintenance chemotherapy with or without consolidating chest irradiation. The patients in the combined-modality maintenance arm first received radiation therapy to the chest (45 Gy) followed by MOC/EVA chemotherapy. RESULTS: 266 patients were eligible and evaluable. An overall response rate of 70% with 21% of complete remissions, a median survival of 9.3 months and survival of 8% of the patients at two years were observed. The highest objective response rate was achieved with the AVP-induction chemotherapy with an 80% response rate and 32% complete remissions. Similar results were achieved with the alternating regimen of MOC/AVP. In contrast, patients treated with the EVA induction regimen had significantly lower overall remission (56%) and complete remission rates (7%). The role of consolidating chest irradiation could not be clarified in limited-disease patients due to the small number of them who were randomised to the maintenance part of the study. However, in patients with extensive disease in partial remission after induction treatment, combined maintenance therapy had a more significant adverse effect on survival than maintenance chemotherapy alone (median survival in the maintenance phase of 148 days versus 239 days, p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: We conclude that the combination of adriamycin, etoposide and cisplatin is an active induction treatment. Consolidating chest irradiation is contraindicated in patients with extensive disease in partial remission after induction when given in a sequential manner, as in our trial.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1990

Combination chemotherapy with mitomycin, vindesine, and cisplatin for non-small cell lung cancer. Association of antitumor activity with initial tumor burden and treatment center.

From 1984 through 1986, 205 patients with non-small cell lung cancer were entered into a group-wide trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK). This trial evaluated the combination of mitomycin (8 mg/m2 intravenously [IV] on day 1), vindesine (3 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8), and cisplatin (60 mg/m2 IV on day 1) with forced diuresis, repeated every 4 weeks (MiViP regimen). One hundred eighty-three patients were evaluable. Six complete and 69 partial responses were documented for an overall response rate of 41% (95% confidence interval, 34% to 50%). In the multivariate analysis the strongest predictors for response were the participating institution and the number of initially involved organ sites. The estimated median time to progression for patients with a complete response, partial response, or stable disease was 155 days (estimated inter-quartile range, 99 to 258 days). In the multivariate analysis the time to progression was significantly associated with the number of involved organ sites (P = 0.041). The estimated median survival time for the 183 evaluable patients was 239 days (estimated inter-quartile range, 137 to 436 days). In univariate and multivariate analyses performance status, number of involved organ sites, pretreatment status with radiation therapy, and participating institution were all significantly associated with survival. The principal toxicities were myelosuppression and nausea and vomiting with 16% of the patients refusing further treatment after a median of four cycles of chemotherapy. In conclusion, the MiViP regimen was an active combination chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer in a large trial performed by the SAKK. The prognostic value of the participating institution and the number of organ sites involved by metastatic deposits in non-small cell lung cancer needs further investigation.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

Phase II study of iproplatin (CHIP, JM-9) in advanced testicular cancers progressing after prior chemotherapy.

Twenty-two patients with advanced testicular cancer received iproplatin at a dose of 180-240 mg/m2 every 4 weeks. All the patients progressed or recurred after chemotherapy including cisplatin. The most severe toxicity was thrombocytopenia with two toxic deaths after a first cycle of 240 and 180 mg/m2 respectively. Nausea and vomiting were almost universal but mild in intensity. One renal failure occurred 6 weeks after the first cycle while the tumor was progressing. No antitumor activity was observed in this heavily pretreated population of patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Phase II trial of nimustine (ACNU; 3-[4-amino-2-methyl-5-pyrimidinyl) methyl]-1-(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea hydrochloride) in patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung after failure on combination chemotherapy.

Thirty-nine previously treated patients received Nimustine in a phase II trial to test the therapeutic activity in refractory small cell lung cancer. Nimustine was given as a direct i.v. injection of 100 mg/m2 with treatments repeated every six weeks. Three partial remissions of 56, 123 and 355 days duration were noted among 34 evaluable patients. Thrombocytopenia was prominent with a median platelet nadir of 47,000/microliter. We conclude that Nimustine has minor antitumor-activity in heavily pretreated patients with small cell lung cancer. The definitive value of Nimustine in the treatment of small cell lung cancer, as well as its superiority over its parent compounds remains to be established.

Aged↗
PubMed1986

Phase II study of 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (doxifluridine) in advanced malignant melanoma.

Forty-two patients with malignant melanoma were treated with doxifluridine, 4000 mg/m2 daily X 5, repeated every 3 weeks. The daily dose was reduced to 3000 mg/m2 in patients who had experienced severe myelosuppression with prior chemotherapy. A total of 35 patients were evaluable for response, and 25 of these received two or more courses. Two responses were observed. Toxicity mainly took the form of nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, dizziness, ataxia, and fatigue. Mild leukopenia was frequent (43%). Nadir counts less than 1.5 X 10(9)/l leukocytes or 50 X 10(9)/l platelets were seen in 7% and 2% of the courses respectively. Doxifluridine has no useful activity against malignant melanoma.

Drug Evaluation↗
PubMed1984

Phase II study of 9-hydroxy-2N-methylellipticinium acetate.

A broad phase II trial of elliptinium was conducted in 105 evaluable patients with advanced solid tumors. The drug was given as a 60-90-min i.v. infusion at a weekly dose of 100 mg/m2. Of 36 breast cancer patients, one achieved complete and six achieved partial response for an overall response rate of 19%. Responses lasted for 12-56 weeks from initiation of therapy. There was also one partial response among 21 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. No response could be obtained in 17 patients with colon cancer, 13 patients with head and neck cancer and 18 patients with a wide variety of other malignancies. Myelosuppression was minimal. Nausea and vomiting were the most frequent toxic effects. The drug also produced serious xerostomia and acute intravascular hemolysis. Asthenia was common. Other adverse reactions included fever and chills, transient neurologic and cardiovascular manifestations and renal function impairment. Additional work is needed to define optimal modes of drug administration.

Adult↗
PubMed1984

Phase II study of amsacrine in refractory lymphomas. A report of the EORTC Early Clinical Trials Group.

Forty-three patients with advanced measurable lymphoma, progressive after conventional therapy, were entered into a phase II study of m-AMSA 90-120 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Five patients were ineligible and response could not be evaluated in four patients. For HD there were two partial responses (14%), lasting 6 and 41 weeks, in 14 evaluable patients. Among 20 evaluable patients with NHDL three (15%) achieved partial remission, but duration of response could not be evaluated. One patient with diffuse histiocytic lymphoma died of infection at 4 weeks, a second with lymphoblastic lymphoma was given high-dose steroids commencing at 6 weeks, and the third patient with nodular poorly differentiated lymphocytic lymphoma refused further treatment after one course. Leucopenia was more marked in patients with NHDL (WBC nadir X 10(9)/l, median 2.2, range 0.2-4.3) than in HD (WBC nadir X 10(9)/l, median 2.8, range 0.85-7.2), as was thrombocytopenia. There was one toxic death and one life-threatening infection, both secondary to myelosuppression. Non-haematological toxicity was mild. m-AMSA has marginal activity in previously treated lymphomas and causes considerable myelosuppression.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1984

Combination chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer with doxorubicin and mitomycin or cisplatin and etoposide.

The combinations of doxorubicin (40 mg/m2 iv every 3 weeks) and mitomycin (12 mg/m2 iv every 6 weeks) or cisplatin (80 mg/m2 iv every 3 weeks X 3, then every 6 weeks) and etoposide (80 mg/m2 iv on Days 1-3 every 3 weeks X 3, then every 6 weeks) were evaluated in a randomized phase II trial in 77 patients with measurable or evaluable non-small cell lung cancer. No patient had been pretreated with prior chemotherapy. The overall response rate for the doxorubicin and mitomycin regimen was 11% and for the cisplatin and etoposide regimen was 23%. Responses lasted a median of 5.5 months. Median survival was 7.0 months for the doxorubicin and mitomycin regimen and 8.0 months for the cisplatin and etoposide regimen. One treatment-related death was observed after doxorubicin and mitomycin in a patient who had received radiation therapy immediately prior to study entry. Otherwise, the hematologic toxicity of both chemotherapy regimens was moderate, with only six patients (10%) having World Health Organization grade 3 toxicity and no patients having World Health Organization grade 4 toxicity. However, subjective tolerance gastrointestinal upset) of the cisplatin and etoposide combination was poor.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1983

Phase II study of amsacrine in solid tumors: a report of the EORTC Early Clinical Trial-Group.

A total of 239 patients with advanced solid tumors were treated in this phase II trial. Amsacrine was administered as a single i.v. dose of 120 mg/m2 repeated at 21-day intervals. The initial dose was reduced to 90 mg/m2 in the case of extensive prior therapy. Some antitumor activity was detected in head and neck cancer but the drug appears to lack significant efficacy in epidermoid lung cancer as well as in carcinoma of the breast, melanoma, renal cell cancer, colorectal cancer and non-seminomatous testicular cancer. Leukopenia was the major toxic effect encountered in this trial and was similar at 90 and 120 mg/m2.

Adult↗