PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Tansley

Publications and source records attributed to P Tansley.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Left ventricular function during support with an asynchronous pulsatile left ventricular assist device.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are frequently used to maintain patients with severe heart failure until heart transplantation becomes possible. Some patients may experience recovery of LV function during such support. Therefore, it is essential to be able to monitor changes in LV function in this setting. METHODS: We studied LV function in 10 patients (median age 34 years, 9 male) who had LVADs implanted because of severe heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy a median of 4 months previously. Median pre-implant ejection fraction was 27% and all patients had been on maximal medical therapy, including intravenous inotropic support, prior to insertion of the LVAD. RESULTS: During LVAD support there were cyclical variations in LV dimensions, fractional shortening (FS) and transmitral flow, related to changes in the phase relationship of the LV and the LVAD. The "best" FS occurred when LV systole coincided with device filling and the "worst" FS when LV systole coincided with device ejection. Median FS with the pump switched off was 18% (10% to 32%). Pump-off FS was significantly greater than the "worst" FS with the pump on (5%, p = 0.002), and similar to the "best" pump-on FS (19%, p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: LV function could be studied echocardiographically during LV support and brief periods of interruption in support. Function varied according to the phase relationship of the LV and LVAD. The "best" FS measured during LVAD support was more closely related to the FS with the device switched off than the "worst" pump on FS. The "best" pump-on LV function is therefore most representative of intrinsic LV performance and can be used as a guide to recovery and the potential need for pump-off studies.

Adult↗

Improved reliability of post-operative ventricular pacing by use of bipolar temporary pacing leads.

The study compared the clinical reliability of using a bipolar epicardial wire (6495, Medtronic) over a unipolar type (FEP15, Ethicon) for post-operative pacing in coronary artery surgery. Atrial and ventricular wires of both types were implanted in 18 patients. Sensitivities and pacing thresholds were tested for 5 consecutive days. Results show that pacing thresholds were better maintained with the bipolar wire in both atria and ventricles. However, sensing failures were frequent in the atrial position (34% vs 9.3% compared with unipolar). By contrast, in the ventricle, no sensing failures occurred (0% vs 17.6% compared with unipolar). Furthermore, sensing magnitude was significantly better (11.13+/-1.32 vs 5.65+/-0.53 mV, P<0.001). We conclude that a single 6495 bipolar wire is effective for temporary ventricular pacing, whilst double unipolar wires remain a useful strategy for securing atrial sensing and pacing.

Cardiac Pacing, Artificial↗