Analysis of breast cancer survival by clinical response to neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
Biomedical subjects
P Therasse
Publications and source records attributed to P Therasse.
RECIST vs. WHO: prospective comparison of response criteria in an EORTC phase II clinical trial investigating ET-743 in advanced soft tissue sarcoma.
The present study was set up just after the publication of the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) as a prospective validation exercise in soft tissue sarcoma. Forty-nine patients were entered into a phase II clinical trial aiming at determining the activity and safety of ET-743 (Ecteinascidin) in second line advanced soft tissue sarcoma. Response to treatment and progression were monitored following the WHO criteria and RECIST. Discordances between WHO and RECIST criteria for the best response were reported for two cases: one no-change (WHO) reported as partial response (RECIST) and one progression (WHO) reported as no-change (RECIST). In terms of date of progression, 3 patients progressed on WHO criteria while they were still stable with RECIST. Overall the results of the study would not have changed if RECIST had been used instead of WHO criteria. In conclusion, response criteria as defined by RECIST are adequate to measure response and progression in non-GIST soft tissue sarcoma and can be used instead of the modified WHO criteria.
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating↗
Confirmation of response in cancer clinical trials: a meaningless exercise?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic↗
Health related quality of life outcomes in cancer clinical trials.
Over the last decade, health related quality of life (HRQOL) investigations have become an increasingly important part of many cancer clinical trial research programs. This paper presents a review of all HRQOL studies published by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), one of the largest clinical trials organisations in Europe. The findings highlight 24 clinical trials that have been published to date, enrolling over 9000 patients. HRQOL is fully integrated into EORTC phase III trials. In many trials, HRQOL provides a valuable source of additional information useful to both clinician and patient when making treatment decisions. Furthermore, several trials have found that the combined use of clinical information along with HRQOL data has led to the development of new standards of care in several different cancer sites. With more than 40 ongoing HRQOL studies in the EORTC, we expect HRQOL to play an even greater role over the coming decade in helping establish the optimal treatment and care approach for cancer patients.
Clinical Trials as Topic↗
Adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with breast cancer: a survey of the Breast International Group (BIG).
BACKGROUND: To collect oncologists' experience and opinion on adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly breast cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was circulated among the members of the Breast International Group. RESULTS: A total of 277 oncologists from 28 countries participated in the survey. Seventy years is the age cut-off commonly used to define a patient as elderly. Biological age and the biological characteristics of the tumor are the most frequently used criteria to propose adjuvant chemotherapy to an elderly patient. Combination therapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil on days 1 and 8 is the most frequently prescribed regimen. Great interest exists in oral chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: There is interest among those who responded to the survey to validate a comprehensive geriatric assessment for use as a predictive instrument of toxicity and/or activity of anticancer therapy and to evaluate the role of a treatment option that is potentially less toxic and possibly as effective as polychemotherapy.
Aged↗
Medical fellowship programme within the Gynaecological Cancer Group of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer.
In 1962, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) was founded, and in the course of the years it developed into the leading European organisation in cancer research. Currently, the EORTC is organised into (Pre-)Clinical Groups and Task Forces consisting of scientists and/or clinicians. One of these groups with a specific area of interest in cancer research is the Gynaecological Cancer Group (GCG). The EORTC offers fellowship programmes to physicians and scientists from all over the world to create a possibility to be temporarily linked to an EORTC group or a specific research project. Over the past decade, 76 research fellowships have been appointed at the EORTC Data Center. This paper shows an overview of the activities of one EORTC/GCG medical fellow.
Biomedical Research↗
Final results of a randomized phase III trial comparing cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil with a dose-intensified epirubicin and cyclophosphamide + filgrastim as neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced breast cancer: an EORTC-NCIC-SAKK multicenter study.
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of a standard anthracycline-based regimen to a dose-intensified anthracycline regimen in locally advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Locally advanced breast cancer patients were randomly assigned onto a study comparing cyclophosphamide (C; 75 mg/m(2) orally days 1 to 14), epirubicin (E; 60 mg/m(2) intravenously [IV] days 1, 8), and fluorouracil (F; 500 mg/m(2) IV days 1, 8) six cycles every 28 days versus E (120 mg/m(2) IV day 1), C (830 mg/m(2) IV day 1), and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim; 5 micro g/kg/d subcutaneously days 2 to 13) six cycles every 14 days. The study was designed to detect a 15% improvement; that is, from 50% to 65% in median progression-free survival (PFS) in favor of the dose-intensified regimen. RESULTS: A total of 448 patients were enrolled over a period of 3 years. The median dose intensity delivered for C and E reached, respectively, 85% and 87% of that planned in the CEF arm and 96% and 95% of that planned in the EC arm. The dose-intensified arm was slightly more emetogenic and generated more grade 3 to 4 anemia but less febrile neutropenia episodes. After a median follow-up of 5.5 years, 277 events have been reported. The median PFS was 34 and 33.7 months for CEF and EC, respectively (P =.68), and the 5-year survival rate was 53% and 51% for CEF and EC, respectively (P =.94). CONCLUSION: Dose-intensified EC does not provide a measurable therapeutic benefit over CEF as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for unselected locally advanced breast cancer patients.
Adolescent↗
Treatment of operable breast cancer in the elderly: a randomised clinical trial EORTC 10850 comparing modified radical mastectomy with tumorectomy plus tamoxifen.
We have examined the outcome of older patients with operable breast cancer treated in a randomised trial by either standard surgery or less extensive surgery and tamoxifen. There were 236 participants aged >/=70 years, randomised to either modified radical mastectomy MRM (n=120) or wide local excision (WLE) and tamoxifen (T) 20 mg daily (n=116). Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox's proportional hazards model. Endpoints were survival and time to first relapse or progression, loco-regional progression, time to distant progression and progression-free survival. No significant difference was seen in terms of progression-free survival, but there were significantly more loco-regional relapses in the WLE+T group. In contrast, there were more distant metastases in the MRM group, but with a similar overall survival in both groups. The results of this trial give cautious support for the use of WLE+T for selected older women.
Age Factors↗
Treatment of operable breast cancer in the elderly: a randomised clinical trial EORTC 10851 comparing tamoxifen alone with modified radical mastectomy.
For treatment of early breast cancer in older women, little evidence is available from randomised trials. We conducted a randomised trial comparing modified radical mastectomy (MRM) with tamoxifen (TAM) as the sole initial therapy in 164 patients aged >/=70 years with operable breast cancer. 82 were treated by MRM and 82 with TAM. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method: multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox's proportional hazards model. Endpoints included survival, time to first relapse or progression, loco-regional progression, time to distant progression and progression-free survival. After a median follow-up of approximately 10 years, there was a significantly decreased time to progression in the TAM only group (logrank P<0.0001) and significantly shorter time to local progression within the TAM group (logrank P<0.0001). Overall survival of the two groups was similar. The results indicate that tamoxifen alone leads to an unacceptably high rate of local progression or relapse.
Aged↗
The challenges and achievements involved in implementing Quality of Life research in cancer clinical trials.
Over the last decade, Quality of Life (QOL) research has become an important aspect of cancer clinical trials. A dramatically increasing number of published studies, both randomised and non-randomised, report QOL outcomes. There is increasing evidence that QOL results impact on both future research and treatment decisions for clinicians. The rising number of studies with QOL components is mirrored within the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), one of the largest cancer clinical trial organisations in Europe. Clinical trial groups have frequently reported on the difficulties and challenges of implementing QOL research. In the following paper, we therefore examine past experience in EORTC QOL studies, with a focus on the challenges presented and the improved approaches that are being implemented to obtain more meaningful outcomes.
Clinical Trials as Topic↗
Human tissue research: EORTC recommendations on its practical consequences.
Improvement in cancer care is possible by applying new treatment modalities, which are emerging from knowledge and discoveries coming from laboratory research. This is possible through international collaboration and the collection of tumour tissues. Creation of a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Tumor Bank is a natural step in this direction, by offering tumour sample collection from patients entered in EORTC trials. The aim of such a bank is not only to improve the diagnostic review process, but also to facilitate translational research by allowing clinicians and basic scientists to enter into close collaborations. The EORTC Tissue Research Policy is developed to assure, under the EORTC legal framework, an ethical and scientific review of research projects, guarantee adequate information is given to patients, establish procedures on the use of materials, including legal aspects, and publication policies. Being part of the EU TubaFrost project, the EORTC will provide a common international platform for the use of tissues for research purposes, finding a balance between different laws and assuring scientific progress.
Clinical Trials as Topic↗
Impact of locoregional treatment on the early-stage breast cancer patients: a retrospective analysis.
Although adequate locoregional treatment improves local and regional control in early-stage breast cancer, uncertainty still exists about the role of locoregional therapy with respect to survival. To study the impact of surgery and radiotherapy on locoregional control and survival, we combined the data of three European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Breast Cancer Group trials including early-stage breast cancer patients with long-term follow-up. Risk ratios (RR) were estimated for locoregional recurrence and overall survival using Cox regression models. All analyses were adjusted for tumour size, nodal status, age, adjuvant radiotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy and trial. The combined data-set consisted of 3648 patients. The median follow-up period was 11 years. 5.9% of the patients who underwent mastectomy and 10.8% of the patients who underwent breast-conserving therapy had a locoregional recurrence (P<0.0001). The risk of death after breast-conserving therapy was similar compared with mastectomy (RR 1.07, P=0.37). Adjuvant radiotherapy after mastectomy was associated with a lower risk for locoregional recurrence (RR 0.43, P<0.001) and death (RR 0.73, P=0.001). Patients with 1-3 positive nodes benefited the most from radiotherapy after mastectomy. Breast-conserving therapy was associated with an impaired locoregional control. However, breast-conserving therapy was not associated with a worse overall survival. Adjuvant radiotherapy in mastectomised patients was associated with both a significantly superior locoregional control and overall survival. The effect of adjuvant radiotherapy was most profound in patients who had 1-3 positive nodes.
Adult↗
Clinical outcome of breast cancer patients with liver metastases alone in the anthracycline-taxane era: a retrospective analysis of two prospective, randomised metastatic breast cancer trials.
Liver metastases have long been known to indicate an unfavourable disease course in breast cancer (BC). However, a small subset of patients with liver metastases alone who were treated with pre-taxane chemotherapy regimens was reported to have longer survival compared with patients with liver and metastases at other sites. In the present study, we examined the clinical outcome of breast cancer patients with liver metastases alone in the context of two phase III European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trials which compared the efficacy of doxorubicin (A) versus paclitaxel (T) (trial 10923) and of AC (cyclophosphamide) versus AT (trial 10961), given as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic BC patients. The median follow-up for the patients with liver metastases was 90.5 months in trial 10923 and 56.6 months in trial 10961. Patients with liver metastases alone comprised 18% of all patients with liver metastases, in both the 10923 and 10961 trials. The median survival of patients with liver metastases alone and liver plus other sites of metastases were 22.7 and 14.2 months (log rank test, P=0.002) in trial 10923 and 27.1 and 16.8 months (log rank test, P=0.19) in trial 10961. The median TTP (time to progression) for patients with liver metastases alone was also longer compared with the liver plus other sites of metastases group in both trials: 10.2 versus 8.8 months (log rank test, P=0.02) in trial 10923 and 8.3 versus 6.7 months (log rank test, P=0.37) in trial 10961. Most patients with liver metastases alone have progression of their disease in their liver again (96 and 60% of patients in trials 10923 and 10961, respectively). Given the high prevalence of breast cancer, improved detection of liver metastases, encouraging survival achieved with currently available cytotoxic agents and the fact that a significant portion of patients with liver metastases alone have progression of their tumour in the liver again, a more aggressive multimodality treatment approach through prospective clinical trials seems worth exploring in this specific subset of women.
Antineoplastic Agents↗
Quality assurance in clinical trials.
From the literature that was initially searched by electronic databases using the keywords quality, quality control and quality assurance in combination with clinical trials, surgery, pathology, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and data management, a comprehensive review is given on what quality assurance means, the various methods used for quality assurance in different aspects of clinical trials and the impact of this quality assurance on outcome and every day practice.
Clinical Protocols↗
Cancer drug development in Europe: a selection of new agents under development at the European Drug Development Network.
From may 99, three european leaders in anti-cancer drug development (EORTC, Cancer Research UK, SENDO) have got together to form a network of collaborating groups: the European Drug Development Network. The member organisations have all agreed to join their efforts in developing new drugs. They have acquired a great and efficient expertise in anticancer drug development covering all aspects from drug screening to refinement of trial methodology and translational research. In this paper, the most interesting drugs under development in each of the three organisations are being described and discussed.
Angiogenesis Inhibitors↗
Locally advanced/inflammatory breast cancers treated with intensive epirubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy: are there molecular markers in the primary tumour that predict for 5-year clinical outcome?
BACKGROUND: Locally advanced and/or inflammatory breast cancer (LABC) is a heterogeneous disease. Molecular markers may help to understand this heterogeneity. This paper reports the results of a study assessing the potential prognostic or predictive value of HER-2, p53, cyclinD1, MIB1, ER and PgR expression by immunohistochemistry from patients included in an EORTC-NCIC-SAKK trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 448 patients with a cytological or histological diagnosis of LABC were randomised into a trial comparing two anthracycline-based neoadjuvant regimens. Chemotherapy was followed by standard locoregional therapy. Survival was comparable in both arms. We collected and analysed centrally paraffin-embedded tumour specimens from 187 (72.5%) of 258 patients that had a histological diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the patients included in this molecular marker study 114 relapsed and 91 died. In the multivariate analysis p53 positivity was associated with a shorter progression-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.96; 95% CI 1.33-2.91; P = 0.0008) and a shorter overall survival (HR = 1.98; 95% CI 1.28-3.06; P = 0.002). PgR positivity predicted for a longer overall survival (HR = 0.54; 95% CI 0.35-0.83; P = 0.0045). CONCLUSIONS: p53 was an independent factor predicting for survival. In order to clarify whether p53 is a pure prognostic and/or a predictive factor, a phase III trial is being conducted (EORTC 10994/BIG 00-01 study) using functional assay in yeast from frozen tumour samples.
Administration, Oral↗
Quality assurance in medical oncology within the EORTC. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer.
Quality assurance (QA) lately arrived in the medical arena in comparison to other fields. EORTC focused initially its attention on the aspects related to clinical trial data handling. In the late 1980s, the EORTC appointed a Quality Control Committee (QCC) with the remit to expand the QA activities to the main disciplines involved in cancer treatment. From 1990 to 1996, two projects supported by the European Commission enabled the QCC to address, amongst others, specific questions related to medical oncology. Both projects focused on the practices of chemotherapy delivery and the quality of data reporting. Following these projects, the QCC developed standard guidelines to advise on chemotherapy delivery and also a systemic chemotherapy checklist to enable an easy collection of essential data onto the patient's files. More recently, the EORTC QA Committee proposed a minimal set of quality control procedures to be implemented by all EORTC groups.
Europe↗
Quality assurance within EORTC: past, present and future. Introduction. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Europe↗