PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Vennin

Publications and source records attributed to P Vennin.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Clinical evidence for topotecan-paclitaxel non--cross-resistance in ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: A large, randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of topotecan versus paclitaxel in patients with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer showed that these two compounds have similar activity. In this study, a number of patients crossed over to the alternative drug as third-line therapy, ie, from paclitaxel to topotecan and vice versa. We therefore were able to assess the degree of non-cross-resistance between these two compounds. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who had progressed after one platinum-based regimen were randomized to either topotecan (1.5 mg/m(2)/d) x 5 every 21 days (n = 112) or paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) over 3 hours) every 21 days (n = 114). A total of 110 patients received cross-over therapy with the alternative drug (61 topotecan, 49 paclitaxel) as third-line therapy. RESULTS: Response rates to third-line cross-over therapy were 13.1% (8 of 61 topotecan) and 10.2% (5 of 49 paclitaxel; P =.638). Seven patients who responded to third-line topotecan and four patients who responded to paclitaxel had failed to respond to their second-line treatment. Median time to progression (from the start of third-line therapy) was 9 weeks in both groups, and median survival was 40 and 48 weeks for patients who were receiving topotecan or paclitaxel, respectively. The principal toxicity was myelosuppression; grade 4 neutropenia was more frequent with topotecan (81.4% of patients) than with paclitaxel (22.9% of patients). CONCLUSION: Topotecan and paclitaxel have similar activity as second-line therapies with regard to response rates and progression-free and overall survival. We demonstrated that the two drugs have a degree of non-cross-resistance. Thus, there is a good rationale for incorporating these drugs into future first-line regimens.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Multicenter phase II-III study of oxaliplatin plus cyclophosphamide vs. cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide in chemonaive advanced ovarian cancer patients.

PURPOSE: A phase II-III randomised study to compare safety and efficacy of an oxaliplatin/cyclophosphamide (OXAC) combination, vs. the reference combination of cisplatin/cyclophosphamide (CPC), in untreated advanced ovarian cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 182 patients were enrolled, of whom 177 were treated: 86 with OXAC (130 mg/m2 oxaliplatin two-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion, 1,000 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide two-hour i.v. infusion), and 91 with CPC (100 mg/m2 cisplatin one-hour i.v. infusion. 1,000 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide two-hour i.v. infusion). Treatment cycles were repeated every three weeks (maximum of six cycles). RESULTS: The main toxicities, which were significantly less severe in the OXAC arm, were myelosuppression and vomiting, including (OXAC vs CPC, % patients): grade 3-4 leukopenia (37% vs. 56%), and anaemia (7% vs. 32%), with blood transfusions in 8% vs. 21%. In the OXAC arm, 64% of surgically assessable patients and 33% of clinically assessable patients achieved an objective response. In the CPC arm, 67% patients achieved a surgical response and 42% achieved an objective clinical response. In the OXAC and CPC arms, median progression free-survival was 13.0 and 13.3 months, and overall survival was 36.0 and 25.1 months respectively, without statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: The activity and time-related parameters of the OXAC and CPC combinations in advanced ovarian cancer patients, are comparable. Combined with the better safety profile of the oxaliplatin-containing regimen, this confirms the interest of oxaliplatin combined with active new agents in this indication.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Comparison of physicians' and cancer prone women's attitudes about breast/ovarian prophylactic surgery. Results from two national surveys.

Prophylactic surgery is a major issue for breast/ovarian cancer prone women. Bio-clinical data to help in the decision-making are not sufficient. In this context of uncertainty, physicians' and women's attitudes to prophylactic surgery is information of great value. The physicians' attitudes were assessed by a randomised national sample of practitioners involved in breast and ovarian cancer management. The patients' attitudes were appraised with a pre-consultation self- administered questionnaire presented during a one-year period to all women in five cancer genetic clinics chosen, for their representative geographical locations and their activity level. Consent to prophylactic surgery is higher among physicians than among patients (p < 0.0001). Acceptability of mastectomy is lower than that of oophorectomy in both patients and physicians (p < 0.0001 in both groups). In addition, age at which the intervention is proposed to be performed is a key determinant for both mastectomy and oophorectomy acceptability, in both physicians and patients (p < 0.001 for each comparison). Particularly, the age of 40 years seems to be a critical threshold for the acceptability of prophylactic oophorectomy. In contrast, respondents' age at the time of the survey has no significant effect on the acceptability rate. The higher acceptability rate of prophylactic oophorectomy compared to that of mastectomy observed in the physicians' survey is paradoxical because a more substantial medical impact on life expectancy was expected from the latter. Our results indicate that assumed reduced mortality is not the main criterion steering acceptability. It was anticipated that prophylactic mastectomy should be rarely performed in France.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

[Patient choice for cancer treatment: towards a shared-decision model?].

The process of medical decision implies the elaboration of a choice between alternatives. Who has the choice? The doctor? The patient? Both? That depends on the particular characteristics of the patient and of the tumour, but also of the characteristics of the doctor and of his approach of medical discipline. For that reason, we planned first to remind some principles. In our analysis, the patient-doctor's relationship ties with environment, culture and habits. Philosophical principles, moral, and models of the relation between patient and doctor concern first part. In the second part, these ideas are compared with our routine practice: surveys about patients' needs, the obstacles for complete information and participation, studies on patients' preferences. The authors' analysis is that we are going inescapably towards shared decision-making taking into account the patients preferences. This evolution is not only tied with ethical principles, but with medical reason, i.e. the variability of patients' preferences led to tailor the treatment to the individual patient especially when benefit is limited. Of course, the applicability of a shared model depends on the particular situation of the patient and of his demand. It is all the easier as the consequences of the treatment are well known the riks tiny and distant. In the classical paternalistic model, there is no choice for the patient because the doctor(s) give the treatment. In the ideal model of the shared decision, doctor and patient progress together towards medical decision, in this case, the patient is not alone facing a choice, and in all cases, he is never alone.

Choice Behavior↗
PubMed2001

[Evidence-based medicine: towards evidence-based radiology].

PURPOSE: To present evidence-based medicine (EBM), a concept that has been emerging over the decade, and to propose a reflexion about the role of radiologists in this new paradigm of medical practice. Clinical decision making. This new paradigm proposes the use of the best evidence and patient's participation in making medical decisions with de-emphasizing of intuition and empirical medicine. Application to a practice policy. EBM imposes new skills for physicians: clinical practice guideline is a witness of its importance. The main objective of EBM is to assist practitioners in their decision making process, but limits of this new concept must be known when it is used to control health-care resources or practice policies. Towards evidence-based radiology. What is the place for radiologists (diagnosis or interventional) in this new very popular paradigm?

Evidence-Based Medicine↗
PubMed2000

Tamoxifen adjuvant treatment duration in early breast cancer: initial results of a randomized study comparing short-term treatment with long-term treatment. Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer Breast Group.

PURPOSE: In 1986, The Fédération Nationale desCentres de Lutte Contre le Cancer Breast Group initiated a multicenter randomized trial to assess the usefulness of long-term adjuvant tamoxifen treatment. Short-term adjuvant tamoxifen treatment was to be compared with life long adjuvant tamoxifen treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who were disease-free after 2 to 3 years of adjuvant tamoxifen treatment were eligible for the trial. From September 1986 to May 1995, 3,793 patients were randomized from France, Belgium, and Argentina. A total of 1,882 patients stopped tamoxifen (short-term group), and 1,911 patients were to continue tamoxifen for life (long-term group) at the same dose as previously prescribed. The protocol was modified in February 1997, limiting tamoxifen treatment to 10 years after randomization, thus giving a comparison between a 2- to 3-year treatment and a 12- to 13-year treatment. To date, the median duration of tamoxifen treatment is 30 months in the short-term group, and 70 months in the long-term group. RESULTS: Overall, longer tamoxifen treatment induced a 23% reduction in relapse rates, leading to a 7-year disease-free survival rate of 78%, compared with 72% in the shorter-treatment group. In contrast, overall survival did not differ between the two groups, with a 79% overall survival rate in both groups. This improvement in disease-free survival could be observed in node-positive patients (P: =.001); however, it was not found in node-negative patients. Prolonged tamoxifen treatment corresponded to a significant increase in disease-free survival in estrogen receptor-positive patients (P: =.03) as well as in estrogen receptor-negative patients (P: =.05). Furthermore, longer treatment reduced contralateral breast cancers and did not increase the number of endometrial cancers. CONCLUSION: Although no survival advantage was noted, patients did benefit from longer tamoxifen treatment over 3 years and had significantly better disease-free survival compared with patients who stopped hormonal treatment. Long-term follow-up is needed to assess these results. Most patients in the long-term group are still receiving treatment. Comparison of results as time passes will enable conclusions to be made on the value of long-term treatment over 5 years compared with 2 to 3 years.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
PubMed2000

Disclosure to the family of breast/ovarian cancer genetic test results: patient's willingness and associated factors.

Informed probands are key actors for disclosing genetic information to their relatives when a mutation has been identified in the family. The objectives were to study women's attitudes towards the family disclosure of positive breast cancer genetic testing results and to determine the predictive factors of the diffusion patterns observed. A national multi-center cross-sectional survey was carried out at five French cancer genetic clinics during a 1-year period. Self-administered questionnaires were completed after the consultation by 84.5% (398/471) of women attending breast cancer genetic clinics for the first time. Among the 383 respondents who had at least one living first-degree relative to inform, 8.6% would inform none, 33.2% would inform at least one of them, and 58.2% would inform all of them. The sibship would be the most frequently informed blood relatives, sisters in 86.9% and brothers in 79% compared with mother in 71.4%, children in 70.4%, and father in 64.9%. Women of the family would be more frequently informed than men (P < 0.05). After multivariate adjustment, age, the fact to be affected by cancer, the number of daughters, and the emotional disturbance due to cancer in a close relationship were the main determinants (P < 0.05) of the diffusion patterns observed. The first step of the relatives' attendance to genetic counseling and the proband's willingness to disclose breast cancer genetic tests results was high in this study and was clearly dependent on the women's personal and emotional characteristics.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

[Predictive value of preoperative abdominopelvic CT for optimal cytoreduction surgery in ovarian carcinoma].

Some patients underwent laparoscopy without optimal debulking surgery as initial treatment for advanced ovarian carcinoma. The amount of residual tumor following primary surgery was an important prognosis factor. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a new therapeutic approach. Secondary, optimal surgery could be done in better conditions. The purpose was to access the ability of preoperative abdominopelvic CT to predict success of debulking surgery for ovarian carcinoma: less than 1 cm of residual tumor size after initial surgery. We reviewed 39 patients (2 stages Ic, 1 stage IIc, 22 stages III and 14 stages IV) operated on for ovarian carcinoma between January 1992 and December 1997. Surgical criteria of inability to perform optimal surgical cytoreduction were compared with abdominopelvic CT done the month before. CT scans were prospectively assessed by radiologist A and retrospectively (3 months to 6 years delay) rewiewed separately by radiologists A and B without surgical data. Nineteen patients underwent optimal debulking surgery: 13 no residual tumor and 6 with residual lesions under 1 cm. The interreader (0.73) and intrareader (0.9) agreement, worked out by Kappa coefficient, was juged good to very good. The sensitivity of CT was 91% with a specificity of 95%. These results allowed us to determine wich CT criteria were accurate and reproducible to be a helpfull for therapeutic choice and to avoid laparotomy without optimal surgery.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Evaluation of toxicity and efficacy of 186Re-hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate in patients with painful bone metastases of prostate or breast cancer.

UNLABELLED: Twenty-eight patients (12 men with prostate cancer, 16 women with breast cancer) were included in a phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of 186Re-hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate (HEDP) on pain from bone metastasis and the toxicity of this agent. METHODS: After intravenous administration of 1295 MBq 186Re-HEDP, the efficacy was evaluated by means of a daily log. RESULTS: We observed an objective response in 67% of prostate cancer patients and in 36% of breast cancer patients. The mean duration of response was 45 d for prostate cancer patients and 24 d for breast cancer patients. No major adverse effects were observed. Marrow toxicity did not exceed grade 2 for white blood cells and grade 3 for platelets using National Cancer Institute criteria. CONCLUSION: 186Re-HEDP provides safe symptomatic relief of pain in prostate cancer patients. The benefit of this treatment is less clear in breast cancer patients. Further studies should be conducted to evaluate treatment by 186Re-HEDP at an earlier stage of the disease.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2000

[Predictive value of abdominopelvic scan for optimal surgery of ovarian carcinoma].

BACKGROUND: Some patients undergo laparoscopy without optimal debulking surgery as initial treatment for advanced ovarian carcinoma. The amount of residual tumor following primary surgery is an important prognosis factor. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a new therapeutic approach. Secondary, optimal surgery could be done in better conditions. PURPOSE: To access the ability of preoperative abdominopelvic CT to predict success of debulking surgery for ovarian carcinoma: less than 1cm of residual tumor size after initial surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 39 patients (two stage Ic, 1 stage IIc, 22 stage III and 14 stage IV) operated on for ovarian carcinoma between January 1992 and December 1997. Surgical criteria of inability to perform optimal surgical cytoreduction were compared with abdominopelvic CT done the month before. CT scans were prospectively assessed by radiologist A and retrospectively (3 months to 6 years delay) reviewed separately by radiologists A and B without surgical data. RESULTS: Nineteen patients underwent optimal debulking surgery: 13 no residual tumor and 6 with residual lesions under 1cm. The interreader (0.73) and intrareader (0.9) agreement, worked out by Kappa coefficient, was judged good to very good. The sensitivity of CT was 91% with a specificity of 95%. CONCLUSION: These results allowed us to determine which CT criteria were accurate and reproducible to be a helpful for therapeutic choice and to avoid laparotomy without optimal surgery.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1999

Novel indications for BRCA1 screening using individual clinical and morphological features.

Since there is a lack of common family profile among BRCA1-gene carriers, and since the risk of being a mutation carrier is not limited to women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer, multivariate statistical analysis using the logistic-regression model was carried out, to discriminate between sporadic cases and BRCA1-breast cancers (BRCA1-BCs), especially when information about the family history of breast/ovarian cancer and ethnicity are irrelevant or unavailable, in order to offer specific medical treatment to this population. We examined 32 BRCA1-BCs selected at cancer genetic clinics and 200 consecutive controls without family history of breast cancer for age at onset and current morphological parameters. Following the multivariate analysis, 3 parameters only, namely, early age at cancer onset [odds ratio (OR) for each year = 1.16; p < 0.0001], estrogen-receptor negativity (OR = 5.7; p = 0.01) and poor differentiation (OR = 5; p = 0.03) were found significant factors for predicting BRCA1-carrier status. The expected impact in BRCA1 screening of our model was estimated using data on 5700 breast-cancer cases from a hospital-based registry. Only 50 and 15% of tumours with early age at onset below 35 years present one or the other 2 discriminant parameters respectively. Consequently, whereas the probability of finding a BRCA1 mutation is rated low (6.2%) when the sole criterion of early onset up to the age of 35 years is used, based on our model, in the sub-group of women with a tumor that is both estrogen-receptor-negative and poorly differentiated the mutation-detection rate is predicted to be above the 10% chance level recommended by the ASCO guidelines. This sub-group of women, representing about 1% of all breast-cancer cases in Western countries, consequently deserves to be tested.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

A multicenter phase II study with triptorelin (sustained-release LHRH agonist) in advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a French anticancer federation study.

The objective of this phase II multicenter study was to assess the efficacy and tolerance of triptorelin (a sustained-release LHRH agonist) in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. A total of 101 monthly intramuscular injections were administered to 24 eligible patients (median number/patient = 3; range 1-12). Mainly due to progression, only 16 patients received 3 or more injections. Among the 23 evaluable patients, 1 complete and 1 partial response (response rate of 8.7%) and 5 disease stabilizations were observed, often of long duration, but never in an irradiated area or after progestogens treatment failure. Median survival for eligible patients was 7.2 months (range: 1-36 months). Only grade 1 toxicities possibly related to the treatment were observed in 4 patients. In conclusion, triptorelin was safe, well tolerated, and easily manageable, and the very low toxicity did not impair the quality of life in these patients with a very poor prognosis. Although the response rate was disappointing, several patients showed early evidence of efficacy which may be of long duration. Response rates range between 0 and 45% in different published studies. Additional studies with stricter inclusion criteria and a larger sample size are necessary to better evaluate the role of LHRH agonists in endometrial adenocarcinomas.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Results of a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Early Clinical Studies Group phase II trial of first-line irinotecan in patients with advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and tolerability of irinotecan (CPT-11) in advanced or recurrent cervical carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had histologically confirmed, inoperable, progressive, metastatic or recurrent squamous cell cervical carcinoma and had received no radiotherapy in the preceding 3 months and had never received chemotherapy. The initial irinotecan dosage of 350 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks was modifiable according to toxicity. Treatment continued for six cycles after complete response, or until disease progression or excessive toxicity after partial response, or for three additional cycles in the case of stable disease. Patients were stratified into group A (>/= one measurable lesion in a previously unirradiated area, with or without progressive disease in irradiated fields) or group B (measurable new lesion[s] in an irradiated field). RESULTS: Fifty-one of 55 enrolled patients were eligible for inclusion (median age, 47 years; range, 30 to 71 years). The response rate was 15.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.0% to 28.6%) overall, 23.5% (95% CI, 10.7% to 41.2%) for group A (complete response, 2.9%), and zero for group B. The median time to progression and median survival were 4.0 and 8.2 months for group A and 2.5 and 4.2 months for group B, respectively. The major grade 3/4 toxicities for groups A and B were diarrhea (24.3% and 55.5%, respectively) and neutropenia (24.3% and 33.3%, respectively). There were four toxicity-related deaths, three in group B. Patients with no prior external pelvic irradiation experienced fewer grade 3 and 4 adverse events. CONCLUSION: Irinotecan is effective in treating cervical squamous cell carcinoma if disease is located in an unirradiated area. Because of toxicity, a reduced dose is advised for patients previously treated with external pelvic irradiation.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Cancer genetic clinics: why do women who already have cancer attend?

Cancer patients attend oncogenetic clinics so that the existence of a genetic risk can be checked and the relatives informed. The aim of this study was to describe the expectations of cancer patients about genetic counselling and their beliefs about the aetiology of their disease. A survey based on self-administered questionnaires before and after the consultation was carried out on 115 women with breast/ovarian cancer who attended one of the six French participating clinics. In 59 cases (51%), the consultees' expectations focused on the preventive options available and in 86 cases (75%) on their offspring; 87 (76%) found the consultation informative. On average, the women rated heredity and diet as lower risk factors (P < 0.05) after the consultation than before. Heredity, stress and the environment were thought to be more decisive than diet, smoking and alcohol. 34 patients who seemed unlikely to have a genetic risk in the consultant's opinion thought heredity to be less relevant (P < 0.05) after the consultation than before. At the time of the survey, cancer patients accounted for at least half of the consultees attending oncogenetic clinics in France. They need to have the clinical specificities of their disease and its medical management explained. They attend mainly for their offspring's sake, whereas healthy clients attend for their own sake.

Attitude to Health↗